Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post)   Special Ops were told not to respond to Benghazi attacks. It might actually be a scandal now   (washingtonpost.com) divider line 681
    More: Interesting, Benghazi, U.S., Benghazi attacks, Jason Chaffetz, diplomats  
•       •       •

6501 clicks; posted to Politics » on 06 May 2013 at 7:24 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



681 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-05-06 10:45:25 PM  

tenpoundsofcheese: GTATL: Whodat: Biological Ali: Whodat: I think that this will pan out like Watergate. It wasn't the actual event that was the problem but rather the obfuscation and cover up that will be the real issue. Obvious difference being that nobody died in Watergate.

The administration has had a long time to get out in front of this issue and they have done nothing but fuel the flames.

So, you think that this is somehow worse than Watergate, and will result in Obama being impeached and resigning from office?

I just want to get a sense of the full extent of the crazy before deciding how hard to laugh.

Yes, I would say that this could be worse than Watergate in that if it is found that they are covering up, (Which I think that they are or at least delaying and attempting to shift blame.) Our diplomatic mission was attacked and people died. That would make it much worse of a cover up than Watergate. No, I don't think that Obama will be impeached for this. I do think that this will severely undermine Hillary's attempt to run in 2016.

What are they covering up? You still haven't answered. Nothing could have saved the ambassador except hindsight.

that or giving Stevens the added security he asked for.

no, instead we spend extra money on the embassies in Switzerland, Norway and the UK.
It isn't as if Benghazi had either weak security or was in a threatening area.


So, the Republicans cut Embassy security and it's Obama's fault that something bad came of it.

Well, naturally.
 
2013-05-06 10:47:16 PM  

GTATL: So where is the coverup or scandal?


www.stewwebb.com
 
2013-05-06 10:47:22 PM  

GTATL: So any time someone dies in an embassy or consulate attack the administration is at fault? Why aren't we investigating all the attacks of the last 10 years where someone died?

Clearly the reduced security funding also contributed to this mess, became there would be more guards to around.

So where is the coverup or scandal? A mistake in prioritizing security was made, nothing more. You can't protect everyone to the extent that you would like when your budget was cut.


See, Bush didn't LIE about all those deaths during his time in office.  So that mean's it not a scandal!
 
2013-05-06 10:48:35 PM  
Explain. The Muslims who attacked the other embassies weren't extremists? Can you say without a doubt the video didn't contribute in any way to the attack? Can you prove the video didn't cause anyone in Libya to form a protest?

Preplanned or not, the video could have been a contributing factor. At the end of the day, does it matter? No, because Muslim extremists attacked the consulate.
 
2013-05-06 10:51:26 PM  

dr_blasto: GTATL: So where is the coverup or scandal?

[www.stewwebb.com image 280x334]


Why hasn't Obama weighed in on the rampaging chimp? What did he know and when did he know it?
 
2013-05-06 10:52:29 PM  

BSABSVR: dr_blasto: GTATL: So where is the coverup or scandal?

[www.stewwebb.com image 280x334]

Why hasn't Obama weighed in on the rampaging chimp? What did he know and when did he know it?


It's the same story, just a subheadline
 
2013-05-06 10:52:59 PM  
You all have convinced me. Benghazi was simply an unplanned protest about an random anti-muslim video and the administration did everything exactly right. Apparently there is nothing to see here and I will be moving along.
 
2013-05-06 10:54:23 PM  

BSABSVR: dr_blasto: GTATL: So where is the coverup or scandal?

[www.stewwebb.com image 280x334]

Why hasn't Obama weighed in on the rampaging chimp? What did he know and when did he know it?


And were those secret love letters from Paul Newman addressed to 0bongo?  Is that the gay scandal??
 
2013-05-06 10:54:49 PM  

Whodat: You all have convinced me. Benghazi was simply an unplanned protest about an random anti-muslim video and the administration did everything exactly right. Apparently there is nothing to see here and I will be moving along.


You have me convinced. There's some sort of massive coverup involving something. It's a big scandal. Bigger than Watergate and the Hindenburg combined
 
2013-05-06 10:54:52 PM  
Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.
 
2013-05-06 10:56:32 PM  

Whodat: You all have convinced me. Benghazi was simply an unplanned protest about an random anti-muslim video and the administration did everything exactly right. Apparently there is nothing to see here and I will be moving along.


Clearly security could have been better prioritized. That's the only mistake, other than cutting security funding.
 
2013-05-06 10:59:18 PM  

GTATL: Whodat: You all have convinced me. Benghazi was simply an unplanned protest about an random anti-muslim video and the administration did everything exactly right. Apparently there is nothing to see here and I will be moving along.

Clearly security could have been better prioritized. That's the only mistake, other than cutting security funding.


Thanks 0bama!
 
2013-05-06 11:00:13 PM  

Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: Satanic_Hamster: Waldo Pepper: Satanic_Hamster: Waldo Pepper: I have no clue if or if not anything could have been done before, during or after the attack, What I do know is I watched Obama lay all the blame on some video and I would bet my paycheck that he knew the video had nothing to do with it.

Don't you ever feel bad about lying/trolling on the internet?  I mean really, is that all you have going in your life?

what do you care

Wouldn't it be nice if SOMEONE cared, somewhere?

It's just kind of sad and pathetic.  Some of us would actually like to have real discussions about things.

so put me on ignore

Ok

See how easy that is to do. problem solved


It will solve the problem for me, when i get round to it, but everyone else will still have to read your embarrassing contribution. Perhaps it would be better if you learned to substantiate your opinions, though
 
2013-05-06 11:01:13 PM  

GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.


It's CLEAR AS DAY!

www.bitlogic.com
 
2013-05-06 11:05:09 PM  

tenpoundsofcheese: Wrong.
Don't you think they are trained to go into situations without a lot of notice?
You watch too many movies.


Wow. Thanks for the clarification Sergeant Major. Didn't know you were all over this. Please enlighten us. How do those deployments work?
 
2013-05-06 11:07:24 PM  

Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.


So in other words you have nothing other than it seems fishy to you. Until you have some proof of something fishy, you're going to get mocked. Since this is the 100th story with nothing other than unfounded suspicion with nothing proven it seems as though you are being partisan.
 
2013-05-06 11:07:44 PM  

Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.


Oh for god's sake, shut up
 
2013-05-06 11:08:52 PM  

Whodat: You all have convinced me. Benghazi was simply an unplanned protest about an random anti-muslim video and the administration did everything exactly right. Apparently there is nothing to see here and I will be moving along.


Ah, I see what's happening - you and Waldo Pepper are having a contest to see who can come across as more pathetic.

/not sure what the winner gets, though
 
2013-05-06 11:11:37 PM  

NewportBarGuy: tenpoundsofcheese: Wrong.
Don't you think they are trained to go into situations without a lot of notice?
You watch too many movies.

Wow. Thanks for the clarification Sergeant Major. Didn't know you were all over this. Please enlighten us. How do those deployments work?


sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net
 
2013-05-06 11:17:34 PM  

Whodat: You all have convinced me. Benghazi was simply an unplanned protest about an random anti-muslim video and the administration did everything exactly right. Apparently there is nothing to see here and I will be moving along.


I'm always open to new evidence. What is being covered up? What blame is being shifted?

Drop the passive-aggressive whining, give me something NEW that's been uncovered, and I'll give it the attention it deserves. What has been discovered that shows this was not a planned attack using the protests as cover, taking advantage of the weaker security at the consulate due to ongoing budget cuts which required the use of supplemental Libyan security personnel as adjuncts to US troops?

All this is already known. What more do you have?
 
2013-05-06 11:17:58 PM  
If it's okay with the ridiculously touchy moderator of this thread, I would like to point out that I find it highly unlikely that the President, Barack Obama, would go out of his way to make sure that American diplomats in Libya were viciously murdered by his true compatriots - radical, fundalmentalist, Islamists.

I humbly submit this to the Fark thought minders.
 
2013-05-06 11:18:54 PM  

tenpoundsofcheese: NewportBarGuy: 4 Special Operators? They already killed two ex-SEALs. Did you want a higher body count?

Jesus. And the reason they couldn't get a team from Europe was time. It was over before they could even write the OPORD. They don't just throw people into the fire. They need at least SOME time to prep before they get dropped.

Wrong.
Don't you think they are trained to go into situations without a lot of notice?
You watch too many movies.


Well, when I need accurate information about military deployments, you are the first woman I call.

\god, I hope it isn't female
 
2013-05-06 11:18:55 PM  

Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

Oh for god's sake, shut up

No I won't shut up, I have the right to my opinion and the right to annoy everyone here with it. so deal with it.


1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-05-06 11:19:14 PM  

tenpoundsofcheese: GTATL: Whodat: Biological Ali: Whodat: I think that this will pan out like Watergate. It wasn't the actual event that was the problem but rather the obfuscation and cover up that will be the real issue. Obvious difference being that nobody died in Watergate.

The administration has had a long time to get out in front of this issue and they have done nothing but fuel the flames.

So, you think that this is somehow worse than Watergate, and will result in Obama being impeached and resigning from office?

I just want to get a sense of the full extent of the crazy before deciding how hard to laugh.

Yes, I would say that this could be worse than Watergate in that if it is found that they are covering up, (Which I think that they are or at least delaying and attempting to shift blame.) Our diplomatic mission was attacked and people died. That would make it much worse of a cover up than Watergate. No, I don't think that Obama will be impeached for this. I do think that this will severely undermine Hillary's attempt to run in 2016.

What are they covering up? You still haven't answered. Nothing could have saved the ambassador except hindsight.

that or giving Stevens the added security he asked for.

no, instead we spend extra money on the embassies in Switzerland, Norway and the UK.
It isn't as if Benghazi had either weak security or was in a threatening area.


Why did the GOP directly block sending money that would of given the Ambassador what he requested?

:A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested. "

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/12/politics/fact-check-benghazi-security
 
2013-05-06 11:20:11 PM  
All these posts and no mention of the fact that the talking points that the Obama Administration got from the FBI and CIA had any references to AQ or terrorism omitted.

So why aren't we focusing on this part of the "scandal"?
 
2013-05-06 11:20:40 PM  
The problem is that you keep asserting that something is wrong, but you don't provide the something. We can all sit here and predict, but when all you bring is vague accusations and disproven talking points, people get mad. Not to mention the fact that all your points of view tend to be right-wing, which would be annoying, but the hypocrticality of it makes it worse when you are quite clearly partisan.

A partisan tends to be some repeating disproven talking points and always attacking 1 side...aka you.
 
2013-05-06 11:20:52 PM  

Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America.

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

So in other words you have nothing other than it seems fishy to you. Until you have some proof of something fishy, you're going to get mocked. Since this is the 100th story with nothing other than unfounded suspicion with nothing proven it seems as though you are being partisan.

Please how can anyone on here prove anything that deals with this issue? I doubt any farker is involved in this situation and even if they are, I doubt the would be allowed to give us the details.

so of course I can't freaking prove anything but I can feel that something is fishy from what I have gathered from the news and talking heads.


i1.minus.com
 
2013-05-06 11:23:42 PM  

Waldo Pepper: dr_blasto: Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

Oh for god's sake, shut up

No I won't shut up, I have the right to my opinion and the right to annoy everyone here with it. so deal with it.

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 500x375]

I expect better from you


No you don't.
 
2013-05-06 11:23:59 PM  
To add, most of the defense comes the complete lack of motive to receive. The president gains nothing. The attack still happened, people still died. There was no effort to hide this.
 
2013-05-06 11:24:52 PM  
To decieve*
 
2013-05-06 11:25:06 PM  

Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

So in other words you have nothing other than it seems fishy to you. Until you have some proof of something fishy, you're going to get mocked. Since this is the 100th story with nothing other than unfounded suspicion with nothing proven it seems as though you are being partisan.

Please how can anyone on here prove anything that deals with this issue? I doubt any farker is involved in this situation and even if they are, I doubt the would be allowed to give us the details. 

so of course I can't freaking prove anything but I can feel that something is fishy from what I have gathered from the news and talking heads.


Your "facts" come from your "fishy feelings" and not from actual facts.
 
2013-05-06 11:26:36 PM  

Mrtraveler01: All these posts and no mention of the fact that the talking points that the Obama Administration got from the FBI and CIA had any references to AQ or terrorism omitted.

So why aren't we focusing on this part of the "scandal"?


Clearly, Obama is evil for doing that.
 
2013-05-06 11:27:14 PM  

NewportBarGuy: MyRandomName: He spent more time preparing for fundraisers than finding out what was going on during a terrorist attack against one of his diplomats.

Wow. You're on the White House Staff? I'm impressed!


seriously.  it's not like the President can do more than one thing at a time.
 
2013-05-06 11:27:25 PM  

GTATL: To add, most of the defense comes the complete lack of motive to receive. The president gains nothing. The attack still happened, people still died. There was no effort to hide this.


A conspiracy theory makes no goddamn sense? I am shocked.
 
2013-05-06 11:29:00 PM  

Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

Oh for god's sake, shut up

No I won't shut up, I have the right to my opinion and the right to annoy everyone here with it. so deal with it.


Substantiate your opinion or shut up. That's how it works. Some people are slower than others and don't get it, but that is how it is
 
2013-05-06 11:32:36 PM  

Waldo Pepper: so of course I can't freaking prove anything but I can feel that something is fishy from what I have gathered from the news and talking heads.


userserve-ak.last.fm

Wake up Sheeple!
 
2013-05-06 11:37:07 PM  

Mugato: Would someone please for the love of Christ tell me how this is a scandal?

I'm not averse to accepting that Obama is capable of being a duplicitous prick but at least explain it to me.


OK, get this, O & the H Bomb (my new name for hilary) were orchestrating a false flag, where their OWN faux terrorists took the consulate hostage. In a reverse October surprise O liberates them thus assuring a sweep of elections on the heels of AMERICA FARK YEAHism. But oh crap! SNAFU, the plan goes south and the arms dealers and black ops guys in the consulate get taken straight up murdered by for reals terrorists who were at teh right place at the wrong time. To cover all this up, anti-american anti-first amendment excuses are ginned up, a patsy is found, and general wave of lies is instituted to cover up the SCANDALOUS partisan de facto orchestrated murder of americans by the administration.

Or something like that.

/Through
//The
///Looking Glass
 
2013-05-06 11:43:25 PM  

Waldo Pepper: Fart_Machine: Waldo Pepper: so of course I can't freaking prove anything but I can feel that something is fishy from what I have gathered from the news and talking heads.

[userserve-ak.last.fm image 415x335]

Wake up Sheeple!

who's that?


Alex Jones. He's difficult to recognize when not weeping.
 
2013-05-06 11:44:25 PM  
Has Lindsey Graham managed to fend off that right-wing primary threat yet? Nope?

Then obviously this is still a scandal.

Clutch those pearls, Lindsey, clutch 'em and look for the faintin' couch...that dapper Mr Issa is watching, girl.

/Going to hell, I know.
 
2013-05-06 11:44:49 PM  

Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America.

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

Oh for god's sake, shut up

No I won't shut up, I have the right to my opinion and the right to annoy everyone here with it. so deal with it.

Substantiate your opinion or shut up. That's how it works. Some people are slower than others and don't get it, but that is how it is

is that written somewhere?  I will never shut up.  I have not seen a single person here who can 100% substantiate with fact an opinion on this subject as the all the facts have yet to be presented and the truth has been screwed up by both sides. so all that is left is our opinions.

here is what Obama said on the 12th of Sept.
"We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others. "

This is a foreshadow of blaming it on the video. Do i know his motives for Hillary and Him talking about the video as much as they did, No but my gut tells me there is something fishy. And for all you science geeks on here, there appears to be research that proves "gut feelings" are often right

http://www.livepsyche.com/blog/experts-articles/your-gut-feeling-is- al most-always-right/

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/09/12/us/politics/libya-stat em ents.html?_r=2&;



You realize that, by your link, that was the embasy in Cairo that said that and they said that before the attack, right? Or are you trying to begin another scandal?
 
2013-05-06 11:53:44 PM  
For eighty-nine cents a day, less than a cup of coffee, you can help prevent the farking of that poor chicken.

Please, won't you give?
 
2013-05-06 11:54:10 PM  

Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America.
sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.


You should stick to posting Heather Graham pics.
 
2013-05-06 11:58:37 PM  
imageshack.us
 
2013-05-07 12:00:30 AM  
Waldo Pepper:

here is what Obama said on the 12th of Sept.
"We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others. "

This is a foreshadow of blaming it on the video. Do i know his motives for Hillary and Him talking about the video as much as they did, No but my gut tells me there is something fishy. And for all you science geeks on here, there appears to be research that proves "gut feelings" are often right

http://www.livepsyche.com/blog/experts-articles/your-gut-feeling-is- al most-always-right/

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/09/12/us/politics/libya-stat em ents.html?_r=2&;


You realize that, by your link, that was the embasy in Cairo that said that and they said that before the attack, right? Or are you trying to begin another ...

wait, I believe this is from Obama's press conference on Sept 12th, 2012


Apparently, you're close. He stated:
"While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, we must all unequivocally oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants. "
 
2013-05-07 12:02:07 AM  

Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: 21-7-b: Waldo Pepper: GTATL: Ah, it seems even the trolls have a limit. No word on what the scandal is, how shocking.

not sure if there is a scandal or not but something is fishy with the way it all was handled and being that it happened before the election. it is worth checking into either to clear up or uncover whichever is the truth.

I for one do get tired of every freaking little thing being a right or left issue instead of what is best for America. 

sure it is fine to argue, troll, discuss on fark but these idiots that we all pay are screwing with our lives and our kids future.

Oh for god's sake, shut up

No I won't shut up, I have the right to my opinion and the right to annoy everyone here with it. so deal with it.

Substantiate your opinion or shut up. That's how it works. Some people are slower than others and don't get it, but that is how it is

is that written somewhere?  I will never shut up.  I have not seen a single person here who can 100% substantiate with fact an opinion on this subject as the all the facts have yet to be presented and the truth has been screwed up by both sides. so all that is left is our opinions. 

here is what Obama said on the 12th of Sept. 
"We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others. "

This is a foreshadow of blaming it on the video. Do i know his motives for Hillary and Him talking about the video as much as they did, No but my gut tells me there is something fishy. And for all you science geeks on here, there appears to be research that proves "gut feelings" are often right 

http://www.livepsyche.com/blog/experts-articles/your-gut-feeling-is- al most-always-right/

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/09/12/us/politics/libya-stat em ents.html?_r=2&;


If you're going to come in and spout talking points as if they are gospel truth, and insist that "something is fishy" because "your gut" tells you so, then you need to provide more than that if you want to be taken for more than some fool spouting Glenn Beckian talking points because you can. This is a discussion thread, but it's not a Freeper vomit-fest. Or, if you insist on treating it as such, you'll be treated as such, and you can't whine when you are.

If you're going to go with your gut, you better realize that your gut is wrong as often as it is right; remember George W. Bush and his gut feeling that there were WMDs in Iraq (wrong). Also realize that people around here are very intolerant of conspiracy theories and chicken-f*cking for the sake of chicken-f*cking; so if you wish to have an opinion, that's fine; but people WILL call you on it, and if you can't put up, be prepared to be told to shut up, and by better debaters than you.
 
2013-05-07 12:02:33 AM  
There is some weapons grade stupid in this thread...

and it's entirely from the folks wanting this to be a scandal... still.

---

I wonder if there is a strong correlation between people who believe in "Chem-Trails" and people who believe the attack on the Benghazi embassy is a scandal...
 
2013-05-07 12:04:56 AM  

jjorsett: You know how I know it's a scandal? All the left winger's voices going up four octaves and 100 dB shrieking that it isn't.


You're hearing voices?  Uh-oh.
 
2013-05-07 12:05:27 AM  

Waldo Pepper: No I won't shut up, I have the right to my opinion and the right to annoy everyone here with it. so deal with it.


Right? No, you really don't. You should understand what words mean before you use them.
 
2013-05-07 12:05:42 AM  
It's not a scandal until the American Enterprise Institute figures out a way to make it sound like a real threat to the proles.

You people are as top down authoritarian communist as a democracy could ever be.
 
2013-05-07 12:06:29 AM  
Can't we just give Limbaugh, Savage, Beck, etc. a Benghazi Channel and call it good?
 
Displayed 50 of 681 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report