If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Christian Science Monitor)   Republicans pursue probe of Benghazi attacks. In related news, Fark contemplates introduction of a "Not This Shiat Again" tag   (csmonitor.com) divider line 288
    More: Asinine, Benghazi, deputy assistant, terrorist threat  
•       •       •

1048 clicks; posted to Politics » on 05 May 2013 at 9:46 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



288 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-05-05 11:11:15 AM

Mrbogey: Hobodeluxe: [p.twimg.com image 850x593]

I believe this has been retread several times. But hey, if you want to keep peddling inaccurate talking points go ahead.


I rely on you for that, thanks.
 
2013-05-05 11:11:47 AM

CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Funny how the right doesn't give a shiat about terrorists killing Americans unless there's a Democrat in office

did you miss the reaction to 9/11?

(check your old newspapers, a lot of things happened back then).

Oh, we remember.

[www.mrmediatraining.com image 640x360]

\We also remember it being used as an excuse for Dick to get the Police State he always wanted


Maybe he meant the pointless war in Iraq in which a bit more than four Americans died.

And many thousands of non-Americans, but they don't count.
 
2013-05-05 11:12:28 AM

Hobodeluxe: Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: GOP: "Why did Obama fail to protect an embassy where 4 Americans died in a prolonged attack?"

This is actually a valid question.

Instead all I've heard on TV today is a bunch of retards derping about some conspiracy as to how this whole thing is a coverup.

why did HE fail to protect them?

He's not farking clairvoyant that's why.

You act as though they intentionally left them unprotected in the face of some huge imminent attack that they knew was coming.


I didn't mean to word it like that.

I meant to ask the question was the threat in Libya taken as seriously as it should've.

Outside of that, I don't buy the whole coverup derp that seems to be the center focus of this investigation.
 
2013-05-05 11:14:34 AM

Hobodeluxe: I think you are just letting your bias taint the facts. you see what you wish to see


I think it's clear that it's you in this case as I have a solid grasp on the timeline of events and am not being jerked around from one inaccurate talking point to another. We still had farkers like you saying it was a protest that turned violent well into this year. Luckily, tat talking point has quietly melted away as it's trickled through the lefty blogs what the "new truth" has always been.
 
2013-05-05 11:15:32 AM

Marcus Aurelius: So they have a witness with important information.  You don't suppose it would occur to them to turn this witness over to the people actually investigating the attacks, do you?


No if you had  read an earlier article its an investigation of the investigation. People have some information on problems they believe happened regarding the first investigation.
 
2013-05-05 11:17:11 AM

CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Funny how the right doesn't give a shiat about terrorists killing Americans unless there's a Democrat in office

did you miss the reaction to 9/11?

(check your old newspapers, a lot of things happened back then).

Oh, we remember.

[www.mrmediatraining.com image 640x360]

\We also remember it being used as an excuse for Dick to get the Police State he always wanted


Yea, Bush didn't run out of a room full of kids screaming his head off and instead sat there for a few minutes. Truly histories greatest monster.

Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours. Hey, the guy's not psychic!

BTW... how did that police state turn out?
 
MFK
2013-05-05 11:17:26 AM

NIXON YOU DOLT!!!!!: MFK: Ok, So correct me if I'm wrong here, but I'm seriously trying to understand why the Republicans are so butthurt.

This is how I understand it:

* Attack on embassy
* Administration initially says it was because of riots over youtube video because that was happening in 2 or 3 other counties at the exact same time
* More info emerges over the next few days and administration says "this looks like it was actually a terrorist attack"
* Republicans: "Why didn't you say it was terrorism on day 1? OMGIMPEACH!!!1!11"

Am I missing anything?

this is an attack on Hillary. she said she didn't know about the requests for increased security. They are trying to claim she knew and personally denied tthem and that Obama is complicit in helping her cover up the truth.


I had heard that the "increased security" request was for an airplane.  Is this not the case?
 
2013-05-05 11:18:39 AM

Mrtraveler01: Hobodeluxe: Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: GOP: "Why did Obama fail to protect an embassy where 4 Americans died in a prolonged attack?"

This is actually a valid question.

Instead all I've heard on TV today is a bunch of retards derping about some conspiracy as to how this whole thing is a coverup.

why did HE fail to protect them?

He's not farking clairvoyant that's why.

You act as though they intentionally left them unprotected in the face of some huge imminent attack that they knew was coming.

I didn't mean to word it like that.

I meant to ask the question was the threat in Libya taken as seriously as it should've.

Outside of that, I don't buy the whole coverup derp that seems to be the center focus of this investigation.


Oh, come on...you know Fartb0ng0 could have scrambled jets from Italy to instantly appear on the scene and rain down bad-guy-only killing missiles if he wasn't busy smoking crack and having gay sex with Eric Holder.

You libbies are so gullible.
 
2013-05-05 11:19:02 AM

Mrbogey: Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours.


Citation please?
 
2013-05-05 11:19:03 AM

CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Funny how the right doesn't give a shiat about terrorists killing Americans unless there's a Democrat in office

did you miss the reaction to 9/11?

(check your old newspapers, a lot of things happened back then).

Oh, we remember.

[www.mrmediatraining.com image 640x360]

\We also remember it being used as an excuse for Dick to get the Police State he always wanted


That expression on W's face is taught in business school, I think. It's the same expression you see when any of those MBA's realize that they aren't just going to coast by pretending to be competent once they are faced with a real world situation that means they will actually have to do some leading and some real work. It's why so many of them work for a place only a couple years. They hope to get out of town with their golden parachute before all of their short sighted management decisions come home to roost. They love the prestige and the titles, but hate the work.
 
2013-05-05 11:20:12 AM

Mrbogey: Yea, Bush didn't run out of a room full of kids screaming his head off ...


Because that was the only option other than staring blankly into space.
 
2013-05-05 11:20:30 AM
EVERY RECIPE IS THE SAME
imageshack.us
fark THAT CHICKEN
 
2013-05-05 11:20:48 AM

Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours.

Citation please?


It's true.  I saw it on Breitbart.
 
2013-05-05 11:24:34 AM

Mrtraveler01: Citation please?


media.townhall.com
 
2013-05-05 11:24:45 AM

Lionel Mandrake: Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours.

Citation please?

It's true.  I saw it on Breitbart.


I heard he was golfing on his record breaking vacation when he got the call too, and he wouldn't do anything until the game was over.
 
2013-05-05 11:24:54 AM

Apocalyptic Inferno: The other thing about 'did Obama say this was a terrorist attack fast enough' is that I don't think this was a "terrorist" attack, at least in the sense that I would use the word.  This was an act of war on a military and political target, not an attack against civilians or an attack otherwise intended to "terrify" a populace.


The rules are pretty cut-and-dry from the GOP perspective:

If a brown-skinned person kills someone, it's terrorism, and immediate steps need to be taken to invade the privacy of American citizens in the name of security.  Preferably legislating who can marry who.

If a white-skinned person kills someone, it's a tragedy, and it's too soon after the horror of the event to start making rushed decisions about gun control.
 
2013-05-05 11:26:19 AM

Mrtraveler01: I meant to ask the question was the threat in Libya taken as seriously as it should've.


hard to say. in hindsight you have to say no,that it wasn't adequate to the attack that was leveled on the embassy. but they had no idea that there would be that level of an attack I don't think or they would have done something about it. I mean they had a CIA operation running out of that complex too. if anyone would know it would be them right?
 
2013-05-05 11:27:04 AM

kronicfeld: Mrtraveler01: Citation please?

[media.townhall.com image 462x359]


Glenn McCoy's cartoon is showing what a partisan dumbass he is?

Must be a day that ends in 'y'.
 
2013-05-05 11:27:56 AM

Mrbogey: CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Funny how the right doesn't give a shiat about terrorists killing Americans unless there's a Democrat in office

did you miss the reaction to 9/11?

(check your old newspapers, a lot of things happened back then).

Oh, we remember.

[www.mrmediatraining.com image 640x360]

\We also remember it being used as an excuse for Dick to get the Police State he always wanted

Yea, Bush didn't run out of a room full of kids screaming his head off and instead sat there for a few minutes. Truly histories greatest monster.

Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours. Hey, the guy's not psychic!

BTW... how did that police state turn out?


Well, it's done a great job of making Robo Cheney and his pals damn rich. Wasn't that the intent?

While you're picking apart each hour and minute of Obama's response to that embassy attack, how about someone digging into the GW Bush Presidential library archives and getting a nice timeline for who did what and when for the *several* times this happened to his administration? You know, for a fair comparison? I mean, if he was such a leader (and foreign policy genius) it should be elementary to lay out the timeline of how G-Dub whomped the decisionating on similar events! Teach that Chicago Liberal a thing or two 'bout bein the Decider, amirite?

Surely you'd have no problem, after all this time for the public to look over the previous administration with the same magnifying glass you insist on using today.

\$5 says at least half of 'em Cheney didn't tell him about till later in the week
\\if he told him at all
\\\which would explain that blank look on his face when the public raised hell over "his policies"
 
2013-05-05 11:27:59 AM

Hobodeluxe: Mrtraveler01: I meant to ask the question was the threat in Libya taken as seriously as it should've.

hard to say. in hindsight you have to say no,that it wasn't adequate to the attack that was leveled on the embassy. but they had no idea that there would be that level of an attack I don't think or they would have done something about it. I mean they had a CIA operation running out of that complex too. if anyone would know it would be them right?


I agree.

That's why I think that the GOP has no clue what they're talking about when it comes to Benghazi.
 
2013-05-05 11:29:17 AM

Hobodeluxe: [p.twimg.com image 850x593]


I posted the other Benghazi graphic on a conservative gun board.  I was told that the attacks under Bush didn't count because they were suicide bombings.

I'm sure everyone who's died in a suicide bombing is happy that it wasn't "terrorism".
 
2013-05-05 11:29:18 AM
I apologize. When I submitted this link I had no idea that it would be such effective troll bait. My bad.
 
2013-05-05 11:29:48 AM

Smoking GNU: Mugato: Stranded On The Planet Dumbass: This is all about running against Clinton in 2016. They are trying to swift boat up a Willie Horton issue.

They're going to keep this shiat up for another 2-3 years? Because it's already played out.

Kinda like the Birther issue, you mean?


Well, yeah. No one but the lunatic fringe takes birthers seriously anymore.
 
2013-05-05 11:29:48 AM

Hobodeluxe: edmo: She said she's not running and she's not running.

want to put some money on that?


i would. mostly because as a recent convert to D (2004, 2008, 2012) i see a lot of faults with her as the nominee. bill may have burnished his image but they have a lot of baggage. she herself has some and then there is both the female and age issue.

sure it's the wet dream of the (far) left but if i were a betting man i'd bet against her being president. and i doubt the democrat party wants to throw away an election just to give hillary a feel good moment.
 
2013-05-05 11:30:34 AM

LouDobbsAwaaaay: Apocalyptic Inferno: The other thing about 'did Obama say this was a terrorist attack fast enough' is that I don't think this was a "terrorist" attack, at least in the sense that I would use the word.  This was an act of war on a military and political target, not an attack against civilians or an attack otherwise intended to "terrify" a populace.

The rules are pretty cut-and-dry from the GOP perspective:

If a brown-skinned person kills someone, it's terrorism, and immediate steps need to be taken to invade the privacy of American citizens in the name of security.  Preferably legislating who can marry who.

If a white-skinned person kills someone, it's a tragedy, and it's too soon after the horror of the event to start making rushed decisions about gun control.


What if its a white skinned person with a brown skin persons religion. what happens then?
 
2013-05-05 11:31:35 AM
Lets take a look as see what conservatives think about this.

http://hopenchangecartoons.blogspot.com/2013/05/friday-double-header .h tml
4.bp.blogspot.com
When asked about the American deaths in Benghazi and the Administration's ongoing refusal to give answers, Whitehouse Spokesweasel Jay Carney brushed off the question as unimportant because
"Benghazi happened a long time ago" Which might be true if you're the brain-damaged star of the film "Memento," but for the rest of the thinking world, remembering all the way back to a successful terror attack just last September 11th isn't really that hard.

And speaking of people with memory impairment, it's worth mentioning that at Barack Hussein Obama's press conference this week, he asserted that putting prisoners in Guantanamo Bay had been an "emotional reaction" to those goshdarn 9/11 attacks but it needs to be closed because, "we are now over a decade out. We should be wiser."

ure, Barry. Ten years is a long time ago, right? Even though they're still finding pieces of aircraft wreckage in New York, near the desired site of the (presidentially praised) Ground Zero Mosque.
 
2013-05-05 11:31:48 AM

Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours.

Citation please?


That it happened in the middle of the day? Well the attack started just after 9PM local time. That means it started mid day here. It ended just before 4AM local time which is late evening here.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/04/benghazi_n_3215048.html
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/04/benghazi-whistleblowe r- latest-from-fnc-chad-pergram/

As always, feel free to try and debunk it.
 
2013-05-05 11:34:07 AM

CheapEngineer: Well, it's done a great job of making Robo Cheney and his pals damn rich. Wasn't that the intent?

While you're picking apart each hour and minute of Obama's response to that embassy attack, how about someone digging into the GW Bush Presidential library archives and getting a nice timeline for who did what and when for the *several* times this happened to his administration? You know, for a fair comparison? I mean, if he was such a leader (and foreign policy genius) it should be elementary to lay out the timeline of how G-Dub whomped the decisionating on similar events! Teach that Chicago Liberal a thing or two 'bout bein the Decider, amirite?

Surely you'd have no problem, after all this time for the public to look over the previous administration with the same magnifying glass you insist on using today.

\$5 says at least half of 'em Cheney didn't tell him about till later in the week
\\if he told him at all
\\\which would explain that blank look on his face when the public raised hell over "his policies"


You're such a caricature of a paranoid Democrat that I'd venture this is an attempt at a Poe's Law.
 
2013-05-05 11:34:07 AM

Apocalyptic Inferno: The other thing about 'did Obama say this was a terrorist attack fast enough' is that I don't think this was a "terrorist" attack, at least in the sense that I would use the word.  This was an act of war on a military and political target, not an attack against civilians or an attack otherwise intended to "terrify" a populace.


The media calls every act of violence a "terrorist" attack. The Batman theater shooting was called a terrorist attack. The word has no meaning anymore.
 
2013-05-05 11:35:10 AM

Mrbogey: Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours.

Citation please?

That it happened in the middle of the day? Well the attack started just after 9PM local time. That means it started mid day here. It ended just before 4AM local time which is late evening here.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/04/benghazi_n_3215048.html
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/04/benghazi-whistleblowe r- latest-from-fnc-chad-pergram/

As always, feel free to try and debunk it.


I think he was talking about the "nothing done about it" part of your statement.
what in your opinion should have been "done about it" that wasn't?
 
2013-05-05 11:36:36 AM

Mrbogey: CheapEngineer: Well, it's done a great job of making Robo Cheney and his pals damn rich. Wasn't that the intent?

While you're picking apart each hour and minute of Obama's response to that embassy attack, how about someone digging into the GW Bush Presidential library archives and getting a nice timeline for who did what and when for the *several* times this happened to his administration? You know, for a fair comparison? I mean, if he was such a leader (and foreign policy genius) it should be elementary to lay out the timeline of how G-Dub whomped the decisionating on similar events! Teach that Chicago Liberal a thing or two 'bout bein the Decider, amirite?

Surely you'd have no problem, after all this time for the public to look over the previous administration with the same magnifying glass you insist on using today.

\$5 says at least half of 'em Cheney didn't tell him about till later in the week
\\if he told him at all
\\\which would explain that blank look on his face when the public raised hell over "his policies"

You're such a caricature of a paranoid Democrat that I'd venture this is an attempt at a Poe's Law.


says the Republican who thinks Obama could have stopped the attack, but chose to let Americans die instead...lol.  You are precious.
 
2013-05-05 11:36:46 AM
ghare:Obama has BLACK CHILDREN!

Obama lives in government housing with his mother-in-law.
 
2013-05-05 11:38:20 AM

Mugato: Apocalyptic Inferno: The other thing about 'did Obama say this was a terrorist attack fast enough' is that I don't think this was a "terrorist" attack, at least in the sense that I would use the word.  This was an act of war on a military and political target, not an attack against civilians or an attack otherwise intended to "terrify" a populace.

The media calls every act of violence a "terrorist" attack. The Batman theater shooting was called a terrorist attack. The word has no meaning anymore.


an act of war? so these attackers represent a state? a governing body of a territory?
 
2013-05-05 11:39:03 AM

Curious: sure it's the wet dream of the (far) left


Only the old guard, and not even all of them.  The younger folks by and large were happy with her as Secretary of State but wouldn't be a fan of her as the nominee.  I could see her getting it by default a la Romney's second try, but that seems less likely with the Dems than the GOP these days.
 
2013-05-05 11:39:22 AM

Erebus1954: ghare:Obama has BLACK CHILDREN!

Obama lives in government housing with his mother-in-law.


Obama has a chaffeured limo and private jet and draws a govt check.
 
2013-05-05 11:39:36 AM

Mrbogey: Mrtraveler01: Mrbogey: Obama gets a call in the middle of the day about an attack on an embassy and nothing is done about it for hours.

Citation please?

That it happened in the middle of the day? Well the attack started just after 9PM local time. That means it started mid day here. It ended just before 4AM local time which is late evening here.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/04/benghazi_n_3215048.html
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/04/benghazi-whistleblowe r- latest-from-fnc-chad-pergram/

As always, feel free to try and debunk it.


I found a good timeline of the events here (even though it's on the CNN website):

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/world/africa/libya-benghazi-timeline
 
2013-05-05 11:40:03 AM

EvilEgg: 99% of the American public have forgotten everything about Benghazi, except maybe the name.

It is virtually impossible to get people to care at this point.


Yeah, so what an administration lied to the people.  Who gives a shiat.  Why does it matter what happened.  It was so long ago.

When even democrat senators are finally admitting the administration/state lied, it's time to realize that maybe, just maybe, the administration is lying to you.

"It was scrubbed. It was totally inaccurate. There's no excuse for that," House oversight committee member Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) told Fox News. "What they tried to do was harmonize what happened in Benghazi with what happened everywhere across the Middle East."

But who cares the people were lied to. 

Sickening that liberals love being lied to.
 
2013-05-05 11:41:12 AM

Curious: Hobodeluxe: edmo: She said she's not running and she's not running.

want to put some money on that?

i would. mostly because as a recent convert to D (2004, 2008, 2012) i see a lot of faults with her as the nominee. bill may have burnished his image but they have a lot of baggage. she herself has some and then there is both the female and age issue.

sure it's the wet dream of the (far) left but if i were a betting man i'd bet against her being president. and i doubt the democrat party wants to throw away an election just to give hillary a feel good moment.


I'm not sure in what world would Hillary Clinton running be a wet dream of the far left.
 
2013-05-05 11:41:21 AM

Hobodeluxe: Erebus1954: ghare:Obama has BLACK CHILDREN!

Obama lives in government housing with his mother-in-law.

Obama has a chaffeured limo and private jet and draws a govt check.


And eats lobster and caviar on our dime!!
 
2013-05-05 11:43:01 AM

MFK: I had heard that the "increased security" request was for an airplane. Is this not the case?


Doesn't matter if it was for an attack guard goat.   Their talking point right now, judging by my teatard friends on Facebook, is Hillary personally knew, personally refused it, has denied it, so the blood is on her hands, and Obama helped her cover it up.  So he's the worst president ever for playing politics with American lives (because THAT never happened before) and the American people shouldn't trust her to run a soup kitchen.

And then I think they are also using as a backup that when the attack occurred, help didn't get sent right away, so we let them die rather than dealing with awkward questions...I thought that particular talking point got thoroughly debunked the last time around but I guess not...I even saw the whole "Obama ordered them to stand down" bull shiat again.
 
2013-05-05 11:43:18 AM

MyRandomName: EvilEgg: 99% of the American public have forgotten everything about Benghazi, except maybe the name.

It is virtually impossible to get people to care at this point.

Yeah, so what an administration lied to the people.  Who gives a shiat.  Why does it matter what happened.  It was so long ago.

When even democrat senators are finally admitting the administration/state lied, it's time to realize that maybe, just maybe, the administration is lying to you.

"It was scrubbed. It was totally inaccurate. There's no excuse for that," House oversight committee member Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) told Fox News. "What they tried to do was harmonize what happened in Benghazi with what happened everywhere across the Middle East."

But who cares the people were lied to.

Sickening that liberals love being lied to.


So I guess the real question to ask is why did the CIA scrub the talking points in the first place?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57550337/cia-talking-points-f or -susan-rice-called-benghazi-attack-spontaneously-inspired-by-protests/
 
2013-05-05 11:45:08 AM

Mrtraveler01: So I guess the real question to ask is why did the CIA scrub the talking points in the first place?


Because Obama.  And liberals.  Study it out.
 
2013-05-05 11:54:56 AM
Cuts both ways, if the American people can so quickly forget 20 dead elementary school kids in Sandy Hook, the damn well are capable of forgetting 4 dead diplomats who agreed to work in an unstable third-world country.
 
2013-05-05 11:58:01 AM

Mugato: Smoking GNU: Mugato: Stranded On The Planet Dumbass: This is all about running against Clinton in 2016. They are trying to swift boat up a Willie Horton issue.

They're going to keep this shiat up for another 2-3 years? Because it's already played out.

Kinda like the Birther issue, you mean?

Well, yeah. No one but the lunatic fringe takes birthers seriously anymore.


In other words, All Republicans.
 
2013-05-05 11:59:16 AM

Mrbogey: BTW... how did that police state turn out?


do you mean jack booted thugs patrolling my street? if that's the criteria everything is fine.

do you mean the government at all levels treating us as guilty first, spying on us by every means possible, spending money we don't have to militarize the police all in the name of the "war on terror"tm then it turned out terribly.

worse the tools of the police state are being legislated for use by private companies. see SOPA. oh wait it failed (thank god) but then there's CISPA which passed the house. will it become law? one hopes not but it won't be for lack of trying by the jackbooted thug mentality that prevails in the house.

beginning with the "patriot act" ( man what a great name) we have been going downhill ever since. no it's not just one party it's a mind set. in any event i'm not encouraged by the trend.
 
2013-05-05 12:09:56 PM
Benghazi MIGHT have become a relevant topic, IF the right wing wasn't being so fanatical in trying to use it as an excuse to create another Clintionian era witch hunt/impeachment/waste of taxpayer money.

The gop played that harassment card back in 1996. The American People can see what a bunch of buttholes the gop was to waste millions of taxpayer dollars and everyone's time, just because Bil was a man who didn't want his wife to know that he played on the side.

Dear gop: You lost. get.over.it.
 
2013-05-05 12:11:03 PM

Curious: Mrbogey: BTW... how did that police state turn out?

do you mean jack booted thugs patrolling my street? if that's the criteria everything is fine.


Oh, that's happening, all right...didn't you see the Nazi thugs roaming the streets of Boston crashing down doors without warrants after the "terrorist" bombings?  The ones set off by the Dictator 0bama to seize our guns and obliterate the Constitution once and for all??11!?

/this is what a shocking number of (mostly) Republicans actually believe.*

*Oh, and Sandy Hook was a Government job
 
2013-05-05 12:14:41 PM
How's that republican led investigation going  on lax regulations at the fertilizer plant in Texas that has ultimately destroyed more Real American lives?
 
2013-05-05 12:15:59 PM
TV's Vinnie: just because Bil was a man who didn't want his wife to know that he played on the side.

that Bill was able to frame it as that is what saved him. the man lied under oath. worse he was a sitting president. presidents shouldn't get a pass for lying under oath, period.
 
2013-05-05 12:19:28 PM
Democrats sure hate it when you bring up something they did wrong. Especially Hillary. Dang, she gets angry. She would make a very poor president.
 
Displayed 50 of 288 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report