Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Ottawa Citizen)   Stigma still attached to male bulimics and anorexics, researchers say. "Men would rather go to war than experience the shame of eating disorders"   (ottawacitizen.com ) divider line
    More: Weird, body images, sexual anorexia, eating disorders, academic conference, outpatient clinics  
•       •       •

738 clicks; posted to Geek » on 05 May 2013 at 8:38 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-05-06 12:30:38 AM  
1 vote:

hasty ambush: ZeroCorpse: If the choice were offered for me to vomit after every meal, or pick up a gun and shoot foreign people for some vague political reason, I'd have my finger down my throat in a heartbeat.

Call me a coward if you like, but I'd rather risk my life and not take other people with me than risk my life and kill strangers because some politician told me to.

Your problems is that you see Islamic facists and commies as "people".  You are really doing the world a service by putting down rabid dogs or even fighting for womens' rights:

Taliban shoots a little girl in the head in Pakistan


I'd also be doing the world a service by not being fat. Believe me: If my upstairs neighbor lost a few pounds it would be a big favor to me. She stomps around up there too much.

Also, it's not always Taliban or terrorists we're fighting against, and the enemies of the past become the allies of the future. What makes a Russian a valued ally during World War II, a hated enemy during the Cold War, and an ally after the fall of the Soviet Union? Politics.

Japanese people were our mortal enemies in 1942. They're our best buddies, now.

Most wars come down to politicians having a pissing match with other peoples' lives. I'll be more in support of wars when we go back to the old standards, when the kings and leaders of the people were all expected to be in the battlefield with their troops.

If the President, Senate, and Congress had to personally fight in every war, you can bet we'd have fewer wars.
 
Displayed 1 of 1 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report