NephilimNexus: General #1: "So they want us to use environmentally friendly fuel or something..."General #2: "What kind of commie hippie crap is this?"General #1: "We don't have a choice."General #2: "Sure we do. Watch... we'll just order the most over-priced crap there is and let the media find out about it."General #1: "What good does that do us?"General #2: "When they find out how much we're spending on that stupid commie hippie gas then they'll do a complete about-face on the whole thing and insist we go back to using good old fashioned, God-given he-man black death smog gas to save money."General #1: "Brilliant!"
hasty ambush: How to Cut the Military Budget Without Touching Defense"Office of Naval Research's recent effort to track how babies interact with robots, which concluded after much observation that "if you want to build a companion robot, it is not sufficient to make it look human ... the robot must be able to interact socially.""disease victims and medical specialists have pressured the Pentagon into spending more than a billion dollars annually for research that is often not related to injuries experienced on the battlefield, such as breast and prostate cancer. The Government Accountability Office concluded last February that these programs are often poorly coordinated with civilian health agencies, and their administration by the Pentagon eats up around $45 million in overhead and management.Overall Pentagon spending for research and development now totals $73 billion, Coburn's report states, an amount that exceeds the total spent for that purpose by all other federal agencies and includes much research that does not "enhance the technological superiority of our soldiers or improve the defense of our nation.""military ranks are now top-heavy with generals and admirals, pushing up defense costs by hundreds of thousands of dollars because each has a large retinue of aides. The current proportion is seven general officers for every 10,000 troops, two more than during the Cold War. "We almost now have an admiral for every ship in the Navy,""the military is needlessly operating 64 schools on 16 military installations around the country, at a cost averaging $50,000 per student. The national average for other schools is $11,000 per student. According to the report, the Pentagon picks up the tab mostly out of inertia, continuing a practice begun when public schools were not as integrated as military families were.""$1.5 million the military is spending to create more palatable beef jerky -- on top of more than $600,000 being spent by others in the government. "
ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha: NephilimNexus: General #1: "So they want us to use environmentally friendly fuel or something..."General #2: "What kind of commie hippie crap is this?"General #1: "We don't have a choice."General #2: "Sure we do. Watch... we'll just order the most over-priced crap there is and let the media find out about it."General #1: "What good does that do us?"General #2: "When they find out how much we're spending on that stupid commie hippie gas then they'll do a complete about-face on the whole thing and insist we go back to using good old fashioned, God-given he-man black death smog gas to save money."General #1: "Brilliant!"Actually, the military tends to be very interested in alternative energy.
k_46r_a: Here at Ft. Bliss, the base is attempting to go completely net-zero for electricity, water and trash by 2015. They have built solar panels everywhere, are tapping into geothermal pockets, have no-flush toilets, etc.
cman: thamike: It's renewable.Renewable does not automatically mean sustainable
k_46r_a: While I agree with most of the items listed in your linked article (I didn't read the attachment), this one misses the mark completely. Those schools are not operated because of lingering segregation issues. They are operated because the local school systems often cannot support the amount of students the military brings into predominantly rural areas.For the bases where students use civilian schools, the school is refunded the cost of their military kids. By and large, service members don't own the houses they live in while stationed in town, and therefore don't contribute to the taxes used to fund the school systems. Either way the government is paying more for military student's education.I grew up attending these schools, and I can tell you that they are very nice schools. I never had to provide my own pencils, paper, art supplies, etc. We had large computer labs, new equipment, and great labs. They may be able to cut some of the budget, but given the godforsaken, middle-of-nowhere location of many of our military installations (Grand Forks, Yakima, Fort Irwin, Fort Polk - just to name a few) there is no way they can shutter them all.Plus, those totals probably include the DoD dependent schools in Germany, Italy, Korea, Japan, etc.
If you like these links, you'll love
Come for the Total, stay for the Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 18 2017 17:21:06
Runtime: 0.232 sec (231 ms)