Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CBC)   Canadian police bust $500k a week bootleg DVD operation. In other news, people are still buying DVDs   (cbc.ca) divider line 91
    More: Spiffy, DVD, Canadians, Canadian History, consumer complaint, luxury cars  
•       •       •

3711 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 May 2013 at 4:18 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



91 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-05-01 12:04:17 AM  
.Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.
 
2013-05-01 12:45:59 AM  
Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.
 
2013-05-01 12:57:40 AM  
mediastudies.blog.ryerson.ca
 
2013-05-01 04:27:03 AM  
What's wrong with buying DVDs?  I watch movies at home, so I'm not concerned with portability.
 
2013-05-01 04:39:08 AM  
I don't understand the headline. Is Subby so shallow and meaninglessly competitive that he/she has to immediately jump on the newest way of doing something and shun all others?
 
2013-05-01 04:46:47 AM  
Check location- yep, Oakville. Highest average income, highest home prices, and more white-collar crooks per capita than any other location in Southern Ontario, if not Canada.
 
2013-05-01 04:48:40 AM  

Bucky Katt: Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.


Recently saw an old college friend from the mid-90s. We got high and over the weekend watched what might be the most epic Simpsons VHS collection known to exist in the wild. Many of them taped from original broadcast, which means original commercials. For two stoned guys eating Fritos scoops with whatever sauce/dressing was in the house and drinking warm Budweiser. it was a great weekend.

/yes, I know you were kidding, but still
 
2013-05-01 04:52:23 AM  

FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.


Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.
 
2013-05-01 04:53:19 AM  
Crime doesn't pay? What?
 
2013-05-01 05:00:15 AM  

Fallout Boy: FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.

Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.


America needs glasses.

Or they need to hook up the blu-ray to the flatscreen with HDMI rather than composite video.
 
2013-05-01 05:03:58 AM  

Fallout Boy: FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.

Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.


I have a 36" SD CRT with a Blu-ray player and plenty of regular and 3D Blu-rays waiting on that next infusion of expendable cash.....
 
2013-05-01 05:10:51 AM  
images3.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2013-05-01 05:11:45 AM  

pecosdave: 3D Blu-rays


How do you fit them in the slot?
 
2013-05-01 05:16:32 AM  
Ooh, i'll take the Director's Cut of Blade Runner, and... Robocop 2.
 
2013-05-01 05:33:32 AM  
Works in Indonesia so is getting a kick... I don't know how many VCDs I have I go by the Kilo now.
 
2013-05-01 05:40:54 AM  
Why wouldn't people be buying DVD's? If you actually want to own and control a product, buying it seems to be the way to go.
 
2013-05-01 05:41:45 AM  
Investigators say consumers had ordered DVD television series box sets from a seemingly legitimate manufacturer's website but received counterfeit merchandise of inferior quality.

I thought one of the biggest talking points about piracy was how the pirate's products were superior to the MPAA's ones?
 
2013-05-01 05:46:47 AM  
That's almost as impressive as the largest police bust in Canada...

bp1.blogger.com
 
2013-05-01 05:48:30 AM  
The carriers here in Canada are basically three monopolies..they charge exorbitant bandwidth fees for Internet over a paltry 25 MB/month, so you either use their (expensive) entertainment options  or use DVD because it costs way to much to watch over the net.  And they give the government campaign contributions bribes and have high-powered lobbyists to keep it that way.

Greedy bastards.
 
2013-05-01 05:49:59 AM  
I quite often flip between HD and non-HD versions of the same broadcast and I've got to say - HD is no more immersive than non-HD. You can see the extra detail but who needs to see the weave of someone's clothes to be immersed in a drama? On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.

HD fetishists are the new audiophiles.
 
2013-05-01 05:50:16 AM  

Day_Old_Dutchie: The carriers here in Canada are basically three monopolies..they charge exorbitant bandwidth fees for Internet over a paltry 25 MB/month, so you either use their (expensive) entertainment options  or use DVD because it costs way to much to watch over the net.  And they give the government campaign contributions bribes and have high-powered lobbyists to keep it that way.

Greedy bastards.


Teksavvy.
 
2013-05-01 06:15:49 AM  
They have DVDs in Canada?
 
2013-05-01 06:16:22 AM  
Sure, Blu-Ray quality is great. But have you ripped one to storage lately? DVD MPG quality is plenty good enough on smaller screens  and when ripped to storage in mp4 format becomes highly portable. I have gobs of legally purchased DVDs ripped to MP4 format on the home NAS. I don't access them over the web, my ISP is a joke...I move em back and forth between storage and tablet as I choose. The denser data on the Blue-Ray format means longer rip times, greater storage requirements, and no real benefit in portability as they need to be MP4 for the tablet anyways.

/I'll be 54 this year.
//Get the fark off my lawn
///meh, purists
 
2013-05-01 06:16:42 AM  
Sigh.  The bootleggers were stupid in that they were selling clearly burned dvds and pawning them off as legitimate.  They were NOT making $500,000 a week.  And their $500,000 in "inventory" was likely highly inflated.  This bust is an absolute joke in that eBay is totally rife with near perfect cd and dvd box set counterfeits from China. 

Look up "The Sopranos" dvd box set.  Mostly all of the Sopranos sets are counterfeit.  How can you tell?  If the price is lower than Amazon/Walmart and the seller is selling multiple sets that's the catch.  Also, check the seller's feedback and specifically click on the negative/neutral feedback to see if anyone's recently left negative feedback stating that they purchased bootlegs from the seller.  I just looked up a seller with 13,000 feedback that sells truck parts or something like that, but just now started selling dvd box sets.

There's sites online where you can buy these near perfect counterfeit sets for cheap in bulk and then resell them on eBay or at a flea market.  It's almost impossible to spot the difference in these pirated versions.  Some even perfectly duplicate all of the materials in the set, like Seinfeld's coffee table book for the Seinfeld box set.

It's cheap, easy, and fast money.  However, it's generally a Felony since the threshold for a Felony count is so low, and the prosecutors go off of the full retail value when calculating charges.

And everyone eventually gets caught because there's no way to sell online without a money trail. 

It's not the Feds either cracking down, the states are trying to get some of the money from the Feds and have setup IP taskforces locally.  MS just sentenced some poor dude to 15 years for selling bootlegs.  15 years, man!  Bank robbers, murderers, and Jon Corzines get off with less time.

http://rt.com/usa/king-couinterfeit-selling-ip-630/
 
2013-05-01 06:16:45 AM  

BumpInTheNight: I thought one of the biggest talking points about piracy was how the pirate's products were superior to the MPAA's ones?


I think those "talking points" would be referring to free downloads, not fraudulent commercial duplication for a profit.
 
2013-05-01 06:29:12 AM  

Bucky Katt: Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.


I just don't get why I should use up all the badwidth on my computer when I have a hard copy of the movies and shows i like that don't take up much space and are readily available whenever there's a disruption in net service.

The "People still buy DVDs?" crowd are only a few rungs higher than the "I don't own a TV" crowd.
 
2013-05-01 06:36:25 AM  

MadAzza: I don't understand the headline. Is Subby so shallow and meaninglessly competitive that he/she has to immediately jump on the newest way of doing something and shun all others?


is to appease the people still use cash? / people still write checks? / people still read newpapers? shiatheads
 
2013-05-01 06:46:26 AM  

Bucky Katt: Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.


I like my VCR. It automatically skips commercials.
 
2013-05-01 06:48:26 AM  

gwowen: I quite often flip between HD and non-HD versions of the same broadcast and I've got to say - HD is no more immersive than non-HD. You can see the extra detail but who needs to see the weave of someone's clothes to be immersed in a drama? On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.


i won't choose what to watch based on if its HD or not, but HD is definitely nice, especially for sports where you can really see what the hell is happening on a nice wide shot of the field/action.
Whether the screen size matters depends on how far you are from it.  People complain about SD in 4" youtube videos.

HD fetishists are the new audiophiles.

Ah, come on.  You admit you can see a difference, and I should hope you characterize HD as 'better' even if you consider it irrelevant.  Audiophiles either (1) think distorted sound is 'better', like the vinyl or tube lovers, or (2) convince themselves that utterly impossible things make a difference, like rocks holding up their speaker cables.

Just wait until 2160p content is widely available for the home if you want to see the rise of the true videophile.
 
2013-05-01 06:51:03 AM  

evil saltine: pecosdave: 3D Blu-rays

How do you fit them in the slot?


You let the Blu-ray make it's own slot.

media.tumblr.com
 
2013-05-01 07:06:48 AM  

Fallout Boy: FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.

Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.


i love my netflix and blu rays, but ill buy *cheap* DVDs sometimes. usually stuff for the kids since they dont care, and since its faster to rip/convert so i can put it on a tablet for the car trips. tablets are the best kid travel invention ever.
 
2013-05-01 07:11:19 AM  

Bacontastesgood: gwowen: I quite often flip between HD and non-HD versions of the same broadcast and I've got to say - HD is no more immersive than non-HD. You can see the extra detail but who needs to see the weave of someone's clothes to be immersed in a drama? On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.

i won't choose what to watch based on if its HD or not, but HD is definitely nice, especially for sports where you can really see what the hell is happening on a nice wide shot of the field/action.
Whether the screen size matters depends on how far you are from it.  People complain about SD in 4" youtube videos.

HD fetishists are the new audiophiles.

Ah, come on.  You admit you can see a difference, and I should hope you characterize HD as 'better' even if you consider it irrelevant.  Audiophiles either (1) think distorted sound is 'better', like the vinyl or tube lovers, or (2) convince themselves that utterly impossible things make a difference, like rocks holding up their speaker cables.

Just wait until 2160p content is widely available for the home if you want to see the rise of the true videophile.


If something is irrelevant, I think it's hard to justify calling it better.  Why pay $10 more for a disc I can't watch if my network is down (a friends router died when we wanted to watch the new Spiderman on Blueray) for an increase in detail I truly don't care about?  A crappy book on nice paper is still a crappy book.   The only value I personally see to Blueray discs is having more episodes of a show on a single disc but that's a moot point when talking about movies.  Not to mention that Blueray players, while cheaper now, are still more expensive than the now ubiquitous DVD players.
 
2013-05-01 07:22:41 AM  
DVDs are nice and cheap, and that's the format most Korean dramas come in, so that's what I buy when I don't want to stream something.

Even DVDs look gorgeous on my nice television.  Also, it's nice not to be interrupted by commercials or by buffering.
 
2013-05-01 07:29:54 AM  
Those estimates are based on MPAA calculations, they actually just sold 5 copies.
 
2013-05-01 07:32:19 AM  
and sorry but some of us have really nice systems and despise two channel stereo when 5.1 or higher is available. The "HD" quality for most streaming is below SD quality for DVD.
 
2013-05-01 07:32:41 AM  
When I was in Kuwait and Iraq, they pirated the hell out of movies there. Hell, we occasionaly even got movies as they were in the theaters or even before they hit. Often times the new stuff was from some guy in the theater with a camcorder (which heads in the way and people talking) Sometimes the older ones where really shiatty quality and sometimes started late or cut off the end. Most where average quality but with eveything but the movie stripped from the disc so they could cram two or more movies on it. But a large portion of them were straight copies with special features and full quality. All for 5 bucks each.

Sure the money was probably going to the same guys who were trying to kill us, but our entertainment options were very limited.
 
2013-05-01 07:36:45 AM  
put me in the group that still buys dvds as well.  i don't own a bluray player and i don't see any reason to buy one, since they still sell dvds of every single movie release.  i usually torrent movies first to see if i like them, and then i'll buy the dvd if the movie is good.  once they stop selling dvds at all and switch solely to bluray, i'll probably stop buying physical media altogether and stick with downloading my movies and burning them to dvd.
 
2013-05-01 07:45:44 AM  
*reads TFA to make sure it's not my sister-in-law's creepy boyfriend who is constantly trying to sell us bootleg DVD's of really shiatty movies at family gatherings*

Nope, not this time!
 
2013-05-01 07:46:06 AM  

illannoyin: That's almost as impressive as the largest police bust in Canada...

[bp1.blogger.com image 281x400]


static.guim.co.uk
"Well... it's very impressive, yes, but we need to ask you a few questions. "
 
2013-05-01 08:00:42 AM  
Uhhh... is subby from some future time when you can see any movie anytime you want on the internet? As far as I know we only get a few, rather crappy, movies available at any time. If you are stupid enough to use Apple you STILL have to pay to see it AND wait hours for the stupid thing to download. Seriously, WTF is wrong with Apple users?
 
2013-05-01 08:03:09 AM  

Fallout Boy: FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.

Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.


I plan on buying a blue ray player... as soon as my dvd player breaks down... unless some other dumbass thing is cool by then.
 
2013-05-01 08:04:52 AM  

MythDragon: When I was in Kuwait and Iraq, they pirated the hell out of movies there. Hell, we occasionaly even got movies as they were in the theaters or even before they hit. Often times the new stuff was from some guy in the theater with a camcorder (which heads in the way and people talking) Sometimes the older ones where really shiatty quality and sometimes started late or cut off the end. Most where average quality but with eveything but the movie stripped from the disc so they could cram two or more movies on it. But a large portion of them were straight copies with special features and full quality. All for 5 bucks each.

Sure the money was probably going to the same guys who were trying to kill us, but our entertainment options were very limited.


That was all deployments. The Afghan market sold buckts of that stuff, and we had a hard time explaining to the boys that this stuff had to stay in-country because importing it was a crime and in the off chance you got a customs guy who was in the mood to search a returning soldier (I've heard they exist but I've never seen one) the fines would really suck.
 
2013-05-01 08:16:00 AM  

pecosdave: Fallout Boy: FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.

Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.

I have a 36" SD CRT with a Blu-ray player and plenty of regular and 3D Blu-rays waiting on that next infusion of expendable cash.....


honestly, bros, 720p is good enough for me!

/55" 1080 LCD less than 4 ft from the couch.

dickfreckle: /yes, I know you were kidding, but still


I hope y'all were vaping, but aside from that critique, sounds like a blast.
 
2013-05-01 08:17:07 AM  
Though I'm pretty sure Subby was trollin' in the headline. . .

There are plenty of reasons to still buy DVD's.

Yeah, I stream some things.  I've got a Netflix subscription.  It's nice, but far from perfect.  There are massive gaps in what you can find in any streaming service, thanks to licensing issues, even if you subscribed to Hulu, Netflix, Amazon Prime and who knows what else.

Also, streaming is reliant on having a working net connection.  Just like anything else "in the cloud".  If you're travelling to a place where you can't be assured of a good broadband internet connection, streaming is a waste.

Furthermore, streaming is all subscription based.  Don't keep paying that money each month?  The show goes away.  Should the service ever go out of business, it all vanishes.

Yet more, even if the show/movie you like is on a streaming service, it might go away at any time thanks to the vagaries of licensing.  My kid has discovered this, when his favorite show on Netflix went away because the license ran out.

As opposed to DVD. . .where you buy the disc once, and never have to worry about a bad internet connection, or paying a monthly subscription, and far more movies are available.

Netflix et al. is nice for what it is, but there is no way I'll give up my DVD collection for some streaming video service.
 
2013-05-01 08:25:11 AM  

gwowen:HD is no more immersive than non-HD. On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.

X-boxershorts: DVD MPG quality is plenty good enough on smaller screens....


Some people have larger screens because
a) they're cheap nowadays
b) the shows worth watching are available in HD if you just wait until they're released on Netflix (bonus:  no commercials)
c) "streaming quality sucks" is not a reason to justify your crappy TV
d) your crappy TV is not a reason to justify crappy quality of what you're watching

If you're content watching low def on your 32" tv or your damn phone, more power to you.  Just stay off my bandwidth, I need that for work.
 
2013-05-01 08:26:19 AM  
I still buy....although not as much as I use to. May be buying a new Hiromi (jazz pianist) concert DVD in a matter of days.

Also I am tired of where its all gone. Even with some games you don;t get a disc...actual disc anymore. I still pay the same price though and then have tpo take hours downloading it. Hate it.
 
2013-05-01 08:40:18 AM  

Fallout Boy: FirstNationalBastard: .Yeah... idiots.

They should be watching shiatty quality streaming shows that eat up bandwidth like a civilized person.

Consumers have already accepted that blu-ray is far superior and that it is highly affordable. That being said, it is really laughable how almost every household owns a flat screen HD TV these days yet most of them watch nothing but cable television and DVDs.


Far superior maybe (depends on the movie), but it took a couple of years to get the Blu-Ray down in price, and even then 9/10 computers still don't have a native drive for it. I'm like this: Why buy Blu-Ray for $30+ if it doesn't have 3D, when I can buy DVD for $15? All I gain is a little quality on newer releases, while losing some portability.

/now if Blu-Ray was cheaper...
 
2013-05-01 08:43:30 AM  

Silverstaff: Though I'm pretty sure Subby was trollin' in the headline. . .

There are plenty of reasons to still buy DVD's.

Yeah, I stream some things.  I've got a Netflix subscription.  It's nice, but far from perfect.  There are massive gaps in what you can find in any streaming service, thanks to licensing issues, even if you subscribed to Hulu, Netflix, Amazon Prime and who knows what else.

Also, streaming is reliant on having a working net connection.  Just like anything else "in the cloud".  If you're travelling to a place where you can't be assured of a good broadband internet connection, streaming is a waste.

Furthermore, streaming is all subscription based.  Don't keep paying that money each month?  The show goes away.  Should the service ever go out of business, it all vanishes.

Yet more, even if the show/movie you like is on a streaming service, it might go away at any time thanks to the vagaries of licensing.  My kid has discovered this, when his favorite show on Netflix went away because the license ran out.

As opposed to DVD. . .where you buy the disc once, and never have to worry about a bad internet connection, or paying a monthly subscription, and far more movies are available.

Netflix et al. is nice for what it is, but there is no way I'll give up my DVD collection for some streaming video service.


You ought to do like me, rip the movie to another format after you buy it. That way if the company dies, your collection doesn't ;)

/save for Netflix, but they're working on it.
//most of my video collection is from Netflix queue.
 
2013-05-01 08:57:47 AM  
I always tell people who don't have Blu-ray not to worry about having or needing to upgrade. I recently switched to BRs myself and am loving it. I have about 70 BRs already in a span of 2 months. My avg spending for each BR came out to $5 per disc. I keep looking out for deals, buy used 'like new' copies from ebay, amazon, best buy etc... My bluray player itself is an older Samsung D5900 I bought refurb for $30.

Heck Best Buy has a great DVD trade in program running right now where you hand in your old DVD (It can be ANY non XXX rated DVD) and they give you a $5 off coupon towards any BR in the store. The kicker is they have tons of BRs on sale right that are $10. so you can essentially buy BRs for $5 right now. I love picking up the triple or double BR editions for around $10 or so, they are the best value for money.

Also bought the Tarantino XX set for $30 from amazon warehouse, the Nolan set for $20 on ebay. They all look just like new maybe were used once. They dont come in a shrinkwrap, other than that there is no way of telling if they're used.

I typically rip my BRs (15-20 mins) on to my hard drive. Then transcode them using Handbrake to smaller files (60 mins usually) I stream those smaller files using Plex on my Roku 2 XS and I'm all set. My wife was very weary of getting a Roku or a BR player etc.. but now she loves it and is a big fan. It's not really that hard to do and the price is almost the same in terms of buying DVDs for me.

I can understand that it looks like a lot of work for some but believe me it's only the initial setup and tweaking that takes a while, otherwise its smooth sailing.
 
2013-05-01 09:14:07 AM  

enderthexenocide: put me in the group that still buys dvds as well.  i don't own a bluray player and i don't see any reason to buy one, since they still sell dvds of every single movie release.  i usually torrent movies first to see if i like them, and then i'll buy the dvd if the movie is good.  once they stop selling dvds at all and switch solely to bluray, i'll probably stop buying physical media altogether and stick with downloading my movies and burning them to dvd.


Same here.  I'm often an early adopter of technology and I don't have a Blu-Ray player.  I bought my first DVD player in 1997 and have around 550 DVDs.  While the improvement in image quality was certainly important transitioning from VHS to DVD, the biggest attractions to me were seeing the movies in the correct aspect ratios and the CD quality multi-channel audio.  (I never got into laserdisc due to movies needing multiple discs.)   Going from VHS to DVD corrected fundamental flaws for proper home theater viewing whereas going from DVD to Blu-Ray was and still is just a refinement of what is already a perfectly acceptable product on all but the largest screens.   Plus, backing up a collection onto the computer for safekeeping or streaming over the home network or portable viewing is obviously quicker when you are starting out with a DVD than a Blu-Ray and requires less storage space.
 
2013-05-01 09:14:49 AM  
probably smokin that Humboldt Gold incense shiat too
 
2013-05-01 09:34:19 AM  

BumpInTheNight: Day_Old_Dutchie: The carriers here in Canada are basically three monopolies..they charge exorbitant bandwidth fees for Internet over a paltry 25 MB/month, so you either use their (expensive) entertainment options  or use DVD because it costs way to much to watch over the net.  And they give the government campaign contributions bribes and have high-powered lobbyists to keep it that way.

Greedy bastards.

Teksavvy.


They're just a reseller, no? Like VIF and some others. Whatever happened to Look? Ah yes, Videotron strong-armed their way into their turf and no more Look.
 
2013-05-01 09:38:03 AM  

DrBrownCow: I'm often an early adopter of technology and I don't have a Blu-Ray player.


I don't have a Blu-ray player either.
I've also never watched Seinfeld, and my hobby is not collecting stamps.

/10 HDD NAS
 
2013-05-01 09:48:57 AM  

roflmaonow: I typically rip my BRs (15-20 mins) on to my hard drive. Then transcode them using Handbrake to smaller files (60 mins usually) I stream those smaller files using Plex on my Roku 2 XS and I'm all set. My wife was very weary of getting a Roku or a BR player etc.. but now she loves it and is a big fan. It's not really that hard to do and the price is almost the same in terms of buying DVDs for me.


+1 for Plex. I have over a hundred movies on my HTPC in full HD, love never having to mess with the discs after ripping. Also nice to be able to stream my collection to any android device.
 
2013-05-01 09:55:19 AM  

Flakeloaf: MythDragon: When I was in Kuwait and Iraq, they pirated the hell out of movies there. Hell, we occasionaly even got movies as they were in the theaters or even before they hit. Often times the new stuff was from some guy in the theater with a camcorder (which heads in the way and people talking) Sometimes the older ones where really shiatty quality and sometimes started late or cut off the end. Most where average quality but with eveything but the movie stripped from the disc so they could cram two or more movies on it. But a large portion of them were straight copies with special features and full quality. All for 5 bucks each.

Sure the money was probably going to the same guys who were trying to kill us, but our entertainment options were very limited.

That was all deployments. The Afghan market sold buckts of that stuff, and we had a hard time explaining to the boys that this stuff had to stay in-country because importing it was a crime and in the off chance you got a customs guy who was in the mood to search a returning soldier (I've heard they exist but I've never seen one) the fines would really suck.


When I came back, customs didn't care as long as we didn't have more than 1 copy of each movie. They only were looking for people who were bringing back like 20 of the same thing.
 
2013-05-01 09:59:15 AM  
What did they do, shut down Pacific Mall?

/dnrtfa
//I buy DVDs for the sake of convience(sp), since I'm too impatient to download movies and my workplace doesn't hsve an internet connection
 
2013-05-01 10:06:31 AM  

hitlersbrain: Uhhh... is subby from some future time when you can see any movie anytime you want on the internet? As far as I know we only get a few, rather crappy, movies available at any time. If you are stupid enough to use Apple you STILL have to pay to see it AND wait hours for the stupid thing to download. Seriously, WTF is wrong with Apple users?


That future is now, as long as you have a respectable, high cap/uncapped broadband connection, and a home theater pc.

piratebay and other trackers have everything you could possibly want and you choose 720 or 1080 quality and you choose stereo or digital surround sound. Popular stuff downloads in ~20 minutes, older stuff might take a day or two

once you have the files its trivial to transfer them to any device you own, and you can keep the stuff you want to watch over and over again without downloading again

If netflix allowed local storage where I could download for offline viewing later they would get my money.
 
2013-05-01 10:22:39 AM  
Wait, you can make 500,000 a week just selling crappy DVD's?  I think I'm in the wrong business.
 
2013-05-01 10:33:53 AM  

Day_Old_Dutchie: The carriers here in Canada are basically three monopolies..they charge exorbitant bandwidth fees for Internet over a paltry 25 MB/month, so you either use their (expensive) entertainment options  or use DVD because it costs way to much to watch over the net.  And they give the government campaign contributions bribes and have high-powered lobbyists to keep it that way.

Greedy bastards.


Try living in the South in the USA. More place than not, there's only one provider to choose from and most of them charge over $50 a month for 5Mbps. I work for most of these companies; here's REAL pricing:

Plan: Tier 1 Cable
Speed (Mbps): 5 down/1 up
Price: $85.99 per month (if the year is paid for upfront)
 
2013-05-01 10:49:17 AM  

cynicalbastard: Check location- yep, Oakville. Highest average income, highest home prices, and more white-collar crooks per capita than any other location in Southern Ontario, if not Canada.


And the worst people to deal with if you work in any sort of customer service environment.
 
2013-05-01 11:00:57 AM  

Flakeloaf: MythDragon: When I was in Kuwait and Iraq, they pirated the hell out of movies there. Hell, we occasionaly even got movies as they were in the theaters or even before they hit. Often times the new stuff was from some guy in the theater with a camcorder (which heads in the way and people talking) Sometimes the older ones where really shiatty quality and sometimes started late or cut off the end. Most where average quality but with eveything but the movie stripped from the disc so they could cram two or more movies on it. But a large portion of them were straight copies with special features and full quality. All for 5 bucks each.

Sure the money was probably going to the same guys who were trying to kill us, but our entertainment options were very limited.

That was all deployments. The Afghan market sold buckts of that stuff, and we had a hard time explaining to the boys that this stuff had to stay in-country because importing it was a crime and in the off chance you got a customs guy who was in the mood to search a returning soldier (I've heard they exist but I've never seen one) the fines would really suck.


this was far before dvd, but back when I was in the navy in 1991 and stationed overseas, bootleg cassette tapes were the big thing.  the tapes generally came in these plastic clamshell cases (kinda like miniature VHS clamshells) and had nice art and booklets.  They were called "thompson originals" and the tapes themselves were obviously dubbed from cds.  the track listings would be out of order, sometimes omitting songs from albums or inserting different songs from other albums, but they were dirt cheap and no one on our ship ever had any problems getting them back to the states.  I still have several.

/my favorite one is a Doors greatest hits.  heh.
 
2013-05-01 11:22:39 AM  

dickfreckle: Bucky Katt: Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.

Recently saw an old college friend from the mid-90s. We got high and over the weekend watched what might be the most epic Simpsons VHS collection known to exist in the wild. Many of them taped from original broadcast, which means original commercials. For two stoned guys eating Fritos scoops with whatever sauce/dressing was in the house and drinking warm Budweiser. it was a great weekend.

/yes, I know you were kidding, but still


Second most epic Simpsons VHS collection etc.

We didn't have cable growing up, and also ate dinner with Grandma every Sunday night.  So my dad taped the Simpsons, with commercials unless dinner ended early enough to pause them, for about 10 years.  There may have been one or two missed episodes, but on the off chance we did he'd just get it on the rerun.

That said, oh yes, fun times were had in college with those tapes.

/gotta find a cheap VHS player somewhere
 
2013-05-01 11:23:20 AM  

pippi longstocking: Those estimates are based on MPAA calculations, they actually just sold 5 copies.


Probably. I remember a few years ago when the RIAA had a CD piracy ring raided. They claimed they confiscated 400 CD burners to play up the ability to produce lots of counterfeit copies. The actual count was more like 150, but they were, and I'm paraphrasing, "faster than average burners so it was like having 400."
 
2013-05-01 12:08:47 PM  

StreetlightInTheGhetto: We didn't have cable growing up, and also ate dinner with Grandma every Sunday night.  So my dad taped the Simpsons, with commercials unless dinner ended early enough to pause them, for about 10 years.  There may have been one or two missed episodes, but on the off chance we did he'd just get it on the rerun.

That said, oh yes, fun times were had in college with those tapes.

/gotta find a cheap VHS player somewhere


I think the reason so many of us dish out and recognize Simpsons references, no matter how obscure, is that we had them recorded on VHS and watched the same episodes 17 times. Possibly while high. Cypress Hill, I'm looking in your general direction.

Since your dad "taped" the show for 10 years, I presume you got the really good years.
 
2013-05-01 12:08:52 PM  

Day_Old_Dutchie: The carriers here in Canada are basically three monopolies..they charge exorbitant bandwidth fees for Internet over a paltry 25 MB/month, so you either use their (expensive) entertainment options  or use DVD because it costs way to much to watch over the net.  And they give the government campaign contributions bribes and have high-powered lobbyists to keep it that way.

Greedy bastards.


Where do you live?

I get unlimited dl/ul at 20Mbps for 50 bucks.

25 megs a month...pffft.
 
2013-05-01 12:10:30 PM  
Canadian cops better not see what's in the trade stalls in any Third World bazaar
 
2013-05-01 12:17:10 PM  

cynicalbastard: Check location- yep, Oakville. Highest average income, highest home prices, and more white-collar crooks per capita than any other location in Southern Ontario, if not Canada.


There are honest people in Oakville! At least 3 or 4 anyway! Well 5 actually, but 2 are homeless and the third lives in his van...................... But the other two own Loblaws! Oh wait.... does that qualify them as being honest..................

Nevermind. I retract my previous statement,......
 
2013-05-01 12:19:17 PM  

squibbits: They have DVDs in Canada?


A couple of them...... If we're lucky we can get the occasional blue-ray too.
 
2013-05-01 12:21:03 PM  

Kairaishi: Bacontastesgood: gwowen: I quite often flip between HD and non-HD versions of the same broadcast and I've got to say - HD is no more immersive than non-HD. You can see the extra detail but who needs to see the weave of someone's clothes to be immersed in a drama? On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.

i won't choose what to watch based on if its HD or not, but HD is definitely nice, especially for sports where you can really see what the hell is happening on a nice wide shot of the field/action.
Whether the screen size matters depends on how far you are from it.  People complain about SD in 4" youtube videos.

HD fetishists are the new audiophiles.

Ah, come on.  You admit you can see a difference, and I should hope you characterize HD as 'better' even if you consider it irrelevant.  Audiophiles either (1) think distorted sound is 'better', like the vinyl or tube lovers, or (2) convince themselves that utterly impossible things make a difference, like rocks holding up their speaker cables.

Just wait until 2160p content is widely available for the home if you want to see the rise of the true videophile.



Meh. I want 14400p for my porn, or nothing.
 
2013-05-01 12:31:43 PM  
Can't find the exact quote from Strange Brew

"No wonder they've got all those cameras they're cutting bootlegs."

"This is one of those square records that plays in a turntable thats on its side"

"Probably one of those British new wave bands"

[ floppy disc is placed on a turntable and "played", high pitched screeching noises are heard]

"sounds like a British new wave band"
 
2013-05-01 12:32:54 PM  
http://dvdorderonline.com/

Looks like this was the site.  Wonder what a Canadian sentence will entail?  The US court's 15 years referenced above is outrageous.
 
2013-05-01 12:36:11 PM  

shifter_: Kairaishi: Bacontastesgood: gwowen: I quite often flip between HD and non-HD versions of the same broadcast and I've got to say - HD is no more immersive than non-HD. You can see the extra detail but who needs to see the weave of someone's clothes to be immersed in a drama? On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.

i won't choose what to watch based on if its HD or not, but HD is definitely nice, especially for sports where you can really see what the hell is happening on a nice wide shot of the field/action.
Whether the screen size matters depends on how far you are from it.  People complain about SD in 4" youtube videos.

HD fetishists are the new audiophiles.

Ah, come on.  You admit you can see a difference, and I should hope you characterize HD as 'better' even if you consider it irrelevant.  Audiophiles either (1) think distorted sound is 'better', like the vinyl or tube lovers, or (2) convince themselves that utterly impossible things make a difference, like rocks holding up their speaker cables.

Just wait until 2160p content is widely available for the home if you want to see the rise of the true videophile.


Meh. I want 14400p for my porn, or nothing.


HD porn is a revelation.

I honestly didn't think there was any real reason to have HD porn.

I was wrong.
 
2013-05-01 12:45:44 PM  

dickfreckle: I think the reason so many of us dish out and recognize Simpsons references, no matter how obscure, is that we had them recorded on VHS and watched the same episodes 17 times. Possibly while high. Cypress Hill, I'm looking in your general direction.

Since your dad "taped" the show for 10 years, I presume you got the really good years.


I was never high while doing it, but I had an 8 hour tape and a 6 hour tape of The Simpsons, recorded between 1992 and 1994, so some of the peak years.

When I was in High School, that was some of my go-to watching.  Yeah, I'd say that's why a lot of my Simpsons quotes coming from.  I must have seen the "That's the Joke" clip a hundred times before it was an Internet meme, probably the same with much of my generation.

I also had big collections of Married: With Children, and all the Star Trek series that were out at the time.
 
2013-05-01 01:09:52 PM  
I've NEVER bought a DVD.

I've also NEVER paid for a download.

Folks, The Pirate Bay exists for a reason.
 
2013-05-01 01:32:40 PM  

Kairaishi: If something is irrelevant, I think it's hard to justify calling it better.  Why pay $10 more for a disc I can't watch if my network is down (a friends router died when we wanted to watch the new Spiderman on Blueray) for an increase in detail I truly don't care about?


So long as you perceive an increase in detail, we're in agreement.   The rest is semantics* and stuff I won't argue about.  If you don't see the value in Blu-rays or HD downloads don't buy them.  My whole point was that audiophiles are basically insane and 'perceive' differences where there simply aren't any, and with SD/HD video basically everyone without cataracts can see the difference.

I think there's a whole subculture of audiophiles some of you are blissfully unaware of.  People will spend $100k on a farking stereo that looks like a prop from Dr Who and rant on endlessly about the 'layers of transparency' it gives the music.


*how do we define "better" or "irrelevant"?  Ugh, who cares?
 
2013-05-01 01:37:14 PM  

frepnog: shifter_: Kairaishi: Bacontastesgood: gwowen: I quite often flip between HD and non-HD versions of the same broadcast and I've got to say - HD is no more immersive than non-HD. You can see the extra detail but who needs to see the weave of someone's clothes to be immersed in a drama? On a 72" screen it'll make a difference, but at 38" it's irrelevant.

i won't choose what to watch based on if its HD or not, but HD is definitely nice, especially for sports where you can really see what the hell is happening on a nice wide shot of the field/action.
Whether the screen size matters depends on how far you are from it.  People complain about SD in 4" youtube videos.

HD fetishists are the new audiophiles.

Ah, come on.  You admit you can see a difference, and I should hope you characterize HD as 'better' even if you consider it irrelevant.  Audiophiles either (1) think distorted sound is 'better', like the vinyl or tube lovers, or (2) convince themselves that utterly impossible things make a difference, like rocks holding up their speaker cables.

Just wait until 2160p content is widely available for the home if you want to see the rise of the true videophile.


Meh. I want 14400p for my porn, or nothing.

HD porn is a revelation.

I honestly didn't think there was any real reason to have HD porn.

I was wrong.


...because it turns out that anal warts and being able to count the individual sperm in every facial does it for you?


Anyway, yeah, I have a blu-ray player. The only use it gets is when a new Star Trek: TNG set comes out, because the DVDs looked so shiatty, and the new remastered episodes look so good.

Other than that, I'm happy with regular DVD. Hell, even streaming stuff like Netflix looks good on the TV.

Also, Blu-ray has almost no selection, especially in the way of TV shows.
 
2013-05-01 01:51:53 PM  
Meh. I want 14400p for my porn, or nothing.

HD porn is a revelation.

I honestly didn't think there was any real reason to have HD porn.

I was wrong.



I want some of the classics re-done in 3D with some decent surround sound......
 
2013-05-01 02:14:49 PM  

shifter_: cynicalbastard: Check location- yep, Oakville. Highest average income, highest home prices, and more white-collar crooks per capita than any other location in Southern Ontario, if not Canada.

There are honest people in Oakville! At least 3 or 4 anyway! Well 5 actually, but 2 are homeless and the third lives in his van...................... But the other two own Loblaws! Oh wait.... does that qualify them as being honest..................

Nevermind. I retract my previous statement,......


A homeless person in Oakville? Call the Halton Regional Police. They'll "relocate" the individual quickly enough.
 
2013-05-01 02:23:43 PM  

FirstNationalBastard: ...because it turns out that anal warts and being able to count the individual sperm in every facial does it for you?


because HD puts you in the room.  for all the claims about herpes sores and warts, what I have discovered is that it simply... puts you in the room.  Instead of watching a video, you are looking thru a window.  It brings an immediacy to the work.
 
2013-05-01 03:40:56 PM  

FirstNationalBastard: I have a blu-ray player. The only use it gets is when a new Star Trek: TNG set comes out, because the DVDs looked so shiatty, and the new remastered episodes look so good.


Hmm.  I will have to check those out.  I thought they were kinda screwed because TNG was shot on video so would always be kinda SD, unlike even the originals, which were shot on film that could be re-scanned at higher res.  So even though the props suck and every time an actress is in close up there is an absurd starlight filter in place, it does look pretty amazing for a 40 year old show.

Anyway, maybe they found a way to de-blur TNG.  When they show it on TV the image still blows, that's for sure.
 
2013-05-01 03:47:29 PM  

Bacontastesgood: FirstNationalBastard: I have a blu-ray player. The only use it gets is when a new Star Trek: TNG set comes out, because the DVDs looked so shiatty, and the new remastered episodes look so good.

Hmm.  I will have to check those out.  I thought they were kinda screwed because TNG was shot on video so would always be kinda SD, unlike even the originals, which were shot on film that could be re-scanned at higher res.  So even though the props suck and every time an actress is in close up there is an absurd starlight filter in place, it does look pretty amazing for a 40 year old show.

Anyway, maybe they found a way to de-blur TNG.  When they show it on TV the image still blows, that's for sure.


Yes, they found a way to de-blur... Since TNG was only edited on videotape, but shot on film, they went back to the original 35mm film elements, recompiled the episodes according to the original editing notes, and made true HD versions of them.

And no, there was no Lucasization... the majority of the effects were also shot on film, so the ships are ILM-filmed models, not CGI.

www.darkhorizons.com

/it's pretty. And, HD makes the first season almost watchable!
 
2013-05-01 03:57:44 PM  

FirstNationalBastard: /it's pretty. And, HD makes the first season almost watchable!


it makes it pretty.

nothing can make STTNG season one watchable.

/love me some TNG, and the only dvd set i own is season one, but dear god.  to this day it amazes me that the show got a second season.
 
2013-05-01 04:01:15 PM  

caddisfly: http://dvdorderonline.com/

Looks like this was the site.  Wonder what a Canadian sentence will entail?  The US court's 15 years referenced above is outrageous.


Malware blocked
 
2013-05-01 04:05:05 PM  

frepnog: FirstNationalBastard: /it's pretty. And, HD makes the first season almost watchable!

it makes it pretty.

nothing can make STTNG season one watchable.

/love me some TNG, and the only dvd set i own is season one, but dear god.  to this day it amazes me that the show got a second season.


Well, I did say "almost".

The first half of season 1 had some of the most horrible episodes of all Treks...  Fear of a Black Planet, Let's fark and/or kill Wesley, Wesley and the Space Pedophile, Remake of a TOS Episode, but Wesley saves the day... But the second half of the season had some decent episodes, and Contagion was so good it should have been in season 4.

But anyway, it was the fact that it was ZOMG NEW STAR TREK that saved the show in season 1.

/but the Blu-rays look so damn good, you sit there going SQUEEEEEEEEE until the decent episodes kick in.
 
2013-05-01 04:42:30 PM  

dickfreckle: Bucky Katt: Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.

Recently saw an old college friend from the mid-90s. We got high and over the weekend watched what might be the most epic Simpsons VHS collection known to exist in the wild. Many of them taped from original broadcast, which means original commercials. For two stoned guys eating Fritos scoops with whatever sauce/dressing was in the house and drinking warm Budweiser. it was a great weekend.

/yes, I know you were kidding, but still


This, yes!

Old commercials will be lost to the mists of time if not for tapes.
 
2013-05-01 04:45:56 PM  

Haoie: dickfreckle: Bucky Katt: Meh!  I'm still happily using my VCR.  I prefer to stick with tried and true technologies.  New innovations are unreliable.

Recently saw an old college friend from the mid-90s. We got high and over the weekend watched what might be the most epic Simpsons VHS collection known to exist in the wild. Many of them taped from original broadcast, which means original commercials. For two stoned guys eating Fritos scoops with whatever sauce/dressing was in the house and drinking warm Budweiser. it was a great weekend.

/yes, I know you were kidding, but still

This, yes!

Old commercials will be lost to the mists of time if not for tapes.


Old commercials are fun to watch, as are local promos and idents for TV stations from before every independent channel became a Fox, WB/CW, or UPN/My Network affiliate.

/and BBC/ITV Continuities is interesting, too.
 
2013-05-01 05:04:40 PM  

FirstNationalBastard: The first half of season 1 had some of the most horrible episodes of all Treks... Fear of a Black Planet, Let's fark and/or kill Wesley, Wesley and the Space Pedophile, Remake of a TOS Episode, but Wesley saves the day... But the second half of the season had some decent episodes, and Contagion was so good it should have been in season 4.


Contagion wasn't season 1.  That was Season 2.

Conspiracy maybe is what you were thinking of, that was an episode that had glimmers of what TNG could become.  Apparently that was meant to lead into a much larger plotline, that got dropped for two reasons: The writers strike and complaints that the episode was too graphic.

If anybody didn't know, those parasites were supposed to lead into an insectoid-race invasion of the Federation, but the insectoid hive got rewritten for budgetary reasons and ended up becoming the Borg.  Yeah, they knew the Ferengi were basically a dud as far as a "new Klingon" threat race was, so they were trying to come up with something better, especially since Roddenberry was EXTREMELY gun-shy about using old races at all for anything (getting Worf into the cast was an uphill fight against him).

They wouldn't create the Cardassians until the 4th season (the real "new Klingons" of the TNG era), but they fit just so well into the Star Trek setting they seemed like they had been there a lot longer.
 
2013-05-01 07:23:18 PM  

Salmon: http://dvdorderonline.com/


It's just a Dept. of Justice/US Customs/Homeland Security take-down notice.
 
2013-05-01 10:06:42 PM  

FirstNationalBastard: Yes, they found a way to de-blur... Since TNG was only edited on videotape, but shot on film, they went back to the original 35mm film elements, recompiled the episodes according to the original editing notes, and made true HD versions of them.

And no, there was no Lucasization... the majority of the effects were also shot on film, so the ships are ILM-filmed models, not CGI.

/it's pretty. And, HD makes the first season almost watchable!


Thanks for the info, apparently I'd been misled!  That is really spectacular.  Why the fark are they still showing the crappy versions in reruns when there are so many HD channels hurting for content?
 
2013-05-01 11:58:11 PM  
wow. The remastered TNG sounds like a blu-ray actually worth buying. I've only ever rented or borrowed them since I happen to have a PS3. Yes it's on HDMI :)
 
2013-05-02 04:56:03 AM  

Bacontastesgood: FirstNationalBastard: Yes, they found a way to de-blur... Since TNG was only edited on videotape, but shot on film, they went back to the original 35mm film elements, recompiled the episodes according to the original editing notes, and made true HD versions of them.

And no, there was no Lucasization... the majority of the effects were also shot on film, so the ships are ILM-filmed models, not CGI.

/it's pretty. And, HD makes the first season almost watchable!

Thanks for the info, apparently I'd been misled!  That is really spectacular.  Why the fark are they still showing the crappy versions in reruns when there are so many HD channels hurting for content?


Because they're only up through season 3 as far as remastering goes. with S3 just coming out this past Tuesday. The final set will probably be released late next year. Unlike TOS, for TNG they're doing the DVDs first, then they'll get around to putting them in syndication.
 
Displayed 91 of 91 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report