Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Boobies Nice genes. Not safe for work   (themosteroticteens.com) divider line 58
    More: Boobies  
•       •       •

127121 clicks; posted to Main » on 30 Dec 2003 at 3:53 AM (11 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



58 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2003-12-29 11:54:03 PM  
Too bad they leave them on.
 
2003-12-30 12:40:10 AM  
Aww, c'mon now doccm with a little effort you coulda found them with NO genes (jeans) on.

Heh.

Here and here and finally, here


However, I personally prefer this hottie on the balcony

None of those links are Safe for work.
 
2003-12-30 02:08:09 AM  
Denim? Hell, yea I done em.
 
2003-12-30 02:43:30 AM  
That site uses preteen girls in some of their 'erotic' banners. It's a legit site as far as I can tell so I can't imagine why they would do that. It was disturbing to see though.
 
2003-12-30 03:56:12 AM  
Well, are you two just gonna farkin' stand there?
 
2003-12-30 03:58:55 AM  
Ditto on the banners. preteen porn is not cool.
 
2003-12-30 04:02:44 AM  
...And would it kill these naked-posing-on-the-internet girls to SMILE?? I hate that pouty zombie thing they all seen to do.
 
2003-12-30 04:02:45 AM  
im tired of girl with small boobs, bring on the boobs!
 
2003-12-30 04:10:17 AM  
Mmm, ribs. Tasty.

/anorexic girls suck... and not in the good Las Vegas way
 
2003-12-30 04:36:10 AM  
I'm convinced JohnDX is the most clever farker of them all. Either that or everyone else is too busy fapping to look for others.
 
2003-12-30 04:57:43 AM  
Dayum. I want the redhead naked, though.
 
2003-12-30 05:09:42 AM  
Cute. Dodgy site though. One of the girls in JOHNDX's link did not look quite legal. Still, she had muff and boobies so that's enough for me.

/Is this the platform for Hell Express?
 
2003-12-30 05:27:14 AM  
Actually, as a straight female, I can actually respect the photography in these pictures. Ignoring the preteen porn aspect, there is some nice art there.
 
2003-12-30 05:27:32 AM  
Why's that one wearing a shirt?
 
2003-12-30 05:29:39 AM  
redbo - I was guessing some sort of juxtaposition between the male, dominant girl and the female, submissive girl? o_O
 
2003-12-30 05:45:56 AM  
And, unless I missed some joke, uhm, why did the headline writer spell "jeans" wrong? >.>
 
2003-12-30 05:54:29 AM  
It's a joke, they are fraternal twins......

Get it?
 
2003-12-30 05:56:03 AM  
....supposedly.
 
2003-12-30 05:59:50 AM  
As for the legal aspect of the pics, I have no idea. I don't work for these people, it's not my site and I didn't take the pictures. They look old enough to me. *shrugs*
 
2003-12-30 06:22:00 AM  
I like it when girls like to touch one another.

/drool
 
2003-12-30 06:41:07 AM  
Beh to all this faux lesbian porn out there. This is almost as bad as that wimpy porn where the guy and girl pretend to have sex and the dick doesn't get inside ANY bit of her! Arrrrggggggggghhhhhhh, I hate faux porn!
 
2003-12-30 06:42:12 AM  
No sir. I don't like it. Not one bit.

[image from mediaservice.photoisland.com too old to be available]

WHY DON'T THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF????
 
2003-12-30 07:00:00 AM  
I must be looking at the wrong pictures because to me non of the girls look pre-teen to be honest they may even not be teenagers.

They look in their early to mid twenties. I also don't think they look aneorexic and look like what healthy young women should look like.

Good weight ie not fat. Not too toned as to look slightly masculine and boobs that are natural not implants or breast augmentation.

I would say they are normal and to be honest and this is nothing sexual but that is and I do take this from how I was but that's normal.
 
2003-12-30 07:16:48 AM  
I saw I think one's virginia!

/dyslexic
 
2003-12-30 07:54:23 AM  
They look like Hegre to me. Nice, natural, slavic girls, wonky pictures, autofocus, bits of the set at the edges of the frames.

Perfect for kitten killing.
 
2003-12-30 08:18:18 AM  
Sorry JOHNDX I wasn't getting at you or anything. I reckon they're legal, one just looked borderline.

And thanks for always posting extra boobie links:)
 
2003-12-30 08:28:48 AM  
JOHNDX,
You didnt miss these did ya?
NSFW Clicky linky

Hoorah for lazy pr0n webmasters.
 
2003-12-30 08:39:33 AM  
Where can I get one of those? Seriously. I just want ONE. That shouldn't be too much to ask.
 
2003-12-30 09:03:51 AM  
nytyper: i hear you can order them from the internet, just like everything else.
 
2003-12-30 09:09:31 AM  
tempathy,
I only have the world wide web on my computer, not the internet, damn. How do I get to the internet?
 
2003-12-30 09:13:25 AM  
tempathy, thanks for the tip. Too bad Amazon.com is temporarily out of stock.
 
2003-12-30 09:35:42 AM  
JohnDX, my bad, I was tired last night when I posted.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2003-12-30 09:44:34 AM  
Look, girls wearing clothes pretending to almost touch each other sexually!

Actually, I have to admit this is better than average. There's a hand touching a nipple in #20 so it's not the usual "girls sticking their tongues out at each other", and like Keelin said the photography is good.
 
2003-12-30 09:50:30 AM  
Hoorah for lazy pr0n webmasters.


I'll drink to that!

No problem doccm just trying to help. :-)
 
2003-12-30 10:39:13 AM  
sumodan- I don't think JOHNDX was being lazy, just allowing us to find those links on our own. I think the appropriate phrase deals with teaching a man to fish....

JOHNDX - Thanks for the links!
 
2003-12-30 11:02:33 AM  
Is it just me, or does JOHNDX sound like the Hugh of Fark? He knows 'bout all the pretty ladies. Wonder if he has 6 girlfriends too...
 
2003-12-30 11:07:04 AM  
7
 
2003-12-30 11:09:54 AM  
No, I wasn't being lazy. The reason I didn't post the index was because there is one particular set of pics on them that I don't approve of. Yes, I have standards too.

NSFW
 
2003-12-30 11:50:44 AM  
Um...which set didnt you approve of? Have something against clay?
 
2003-12-30 11:56:31 AM  
Erm....
I mean, she's hot but it's kind of wierd...and what's going on with the metallic pubes?

Not asking what they are John, but why don't you approve of them?
 
2003-12-30 12:05:44 PM  
One day the real lesbians will come, and there will be much rejoicing.

Unless it's Rosie O'Dildo and k.d. lang. Then there will be much eye-gouging.

Sorry to ruin your afternoon.
 
2003-12-30 12:12:15 PM  
I agree with Gavino.
Hegre twins are better
 
2003-12-30 12:37:43 PM  
I like them. I like women. I like pretty women. I like pretty naked women.

My jeans are mutating.
 
2003-12-30 12:42:22 PM  
future truckstop short order cooks unite (literaly)
 
2003-12-30 01:55:50 PM  
I wanna see the red head without the shirt
 
2003-12-30 03:09:00 PM  
[image from people.delphiforums.com too old to be available]
 
2003-12-30 03:57:44 PM  
I've seen several instances of JOHNDX kicking ass with some awesome links here. Three cheers for JOHNDX!


----

JOHNDX for Prez
 
2003-12-30 08:35:36 PM  
ChadM89:

You make a terribly unconvincing argument when you use a woman as attractive and well photographed as her.
 
2003-12-30 08:43:29 PM  
Uh, yeah, you guys might wanna check this one out...

NSFW btw
 
2003-12-30 08:54:30 PM  
/standing up in the bleachers with my "JOHNDX 3:16" sign
 
Displayed 50 of 58 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report