swingerofbirches: I think most of the opposition has to do with the aesthetics of the male bulge more than the underwear itself. That's why dancers wear dance belts. Makes everything symmetrical and less human. But why are humans so human? To me the penis and balls on a man (and I say this as a man) just look so appendage like. Like they were stuck on as an afterthought. There's not even a great place for them between the legs. They're just sort of there, always a bit in the way. The human body somehow looks less "organic" and natural than other animals when both are in the nude. With a nice pair of slacks I think we compare nicely to bears though, for example. I'm not a prude, but I generally can't think of a time where I find a man more attractive without clothes than with clothes, even a bathing suit.
GWSuperfan: [media.tumblr.com image 248x200]
miss diminutive: [sfcitizen.com image 600x358]
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Mar 29 2017 03:36:06
Runtime: 0.293 sec (293 ms)