If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   Congressman notes that five jihadists have reached their targets under Obama, quickly glosses over the fact he still 14 points behind Bush   (nation.foxnews.com) divider line 127
    More: Dumbass, Fourteen Points, United States, underwear bomber, Times Square bomber, congressman, jihadists  
•       •       •

1855 clicks; posted to Politics » on 25 Apr 2013 at 10:43 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



127 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-04-25 11:10:23 AM

Granny_Panties: My voting record:

Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan

George Bush
Bob Dole Clinton
George Bush
John Kerry
Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Getting a pattern here Republicans? There are lots of people like me. There is no freaking way I'll ever vote GOP again in my lifetime. No way. Not after what they did and how many Americans died because of George Bush's failed oil wars. The loser didn't even get the oil. What a failure. Now Republicans think we are so dumb they can rewrite history and make this war criminal some sort of hero. Sick.


I wasn't old enough to vote for Reagan, but yeah.  Count me in that group somewhat.  I wasn't thrilled with Kerry, but wasn't going to vote for Bush.
 
2013-04-25 11:11:00 AM
I see 10lbsofderp can't stand by his Clinton comment, just moves on to get ridiculed by someone else. That never happens.
 
2013-04-25 11:12:51 AM

Satanic_Hamster: hugram: Oh, I don't know... maybe the hate you have derped for years about Democratic candidates (both presidential and congress level) might be a hint to me that you have not voted for the Democratic choice in 2000 and 2004. But if you did not vote for Bush in 2000 and in 2004 (assuming you voted for the Democratic option), then why all of the sudden the hatred you have towards the current Democratic president?

He's black?


NO... that could not be it. I'm sure tenp0unds0fderp loved the Bush economy... you know, when we were losing 800K jobs a month during his last few months.
 
2013-04-25 11:16:25 AM

hugram: NO... that could not be it. I'm sure tenp0unds0fderp loved the Bush economy... you know, when we were losing 800K jobs a month during his last few months.


I've been assured that the economy was perfect and only started to crash when Obama won the election.
 
2013-04-25 11:16:55 AM

JusticeandIndependence: In the over seven years after 9/11 under George W. Bush, how many terrorists reached their target in the United States? Zero! We need to ask, 'Why is the Obama Administration failing in its mission to stop terrorism before it reaches its targets in the United States?


Seems legit.


If you discount the most devastating terrorist attack in American history, it REALLY makes President Obama look bad!
 
2013-04-25 11:17:21 AM

FlashHarry: do these assholes seriously think that we'll forget about 9/11?


We will never forget about the 9/11 Benghazi attack
 
2013-04-25 11:17:28 AM
Trust me, in 20 years they will tell you 9/11 happened under Obama and people will defend that statement.

I mean, he does have a time machine so he probably did that too.  Once he got in office he caused a swath of damage that was felt for 1000s of years.
 
2013-04-25 11:18:15 AM

highbrow45: Satanic_Hamster: Fort Hood Shooter really count as terrorism?

Mass shootings count as terrorism if the shooter is a Muslim.

/I guess


img1-cdn.newser.com

Not when a Republican is president.
 
2013-04-25 11:18:27 AM

Satanic_Hamster: hugram: NO... that could not be it. I'm sure tenp0unds0fderp loved the Bush economy... you know, when we were losing 800K jobs a month during his last few months.

I've been assured that the economy was perfect and only started to crash when Obama won the election.


I need to study it out. OMG, it is true. IMPEACH THAT ATHEIST-MUSLIN, FASCIST-COMMIE
 
2013-04-25 11:19:43 AM

Satanic_Hamster: hugram: NO... that could not be it. I'm sure tenp0unds0fderp loved the Bush economy... you know, when we were losing 800K jobs a month during his last few months.

I've been assured that the economy was perfect and only started to crash when Obama won the election.


Don't forget that for the entire campaign McCain/Palin were going to trounce the empty suit, no contest.  And also remember that by July 2008 everyone knew Obama was going to win for sure, so that is why the economy starting going sour around August.
 
2013-04-25 11:19:45 AM

Lord_Baull: Your mistake is in thinking I'm keeping score.


Keeping score is a mistake in itself, but that was more addressed to the room than to you specifically.
 
2013-04-25 11:22:09 AM
next up: "apart from the holocaust, hardly any jews died under hitler!"
 
2013-04-25 11:23:20 AM

Dr Dreidel: Lord_Baull: Your mistake is in thinking I'm keeping score.

Keeping score is a mistake in itself, but that was more addressed to the room than to you specifically.



Okay.
 
2013-04-25 11:31:42 AM
Just to point out how much of a fatasy land Republicans live in, let me point out the reality...

2001 September 11: . The attacks killed nearly 3,000 civilians.

2002 July 4: 2002 Los Angeles Airport shooting Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, a 41-year-old Egyptian national, kills two Israelis and wounds four others at the El Al ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport.

October 2002 Beltway sniper attacks: During three weeks in October 2002, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo killed 10 people and critically injured 3 others in Washington D.C., Baltimore, and Virginia. The pair were also suspected of earlier shootings in Maryland, Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, and Washington state.No motivation was given at the trial, but evidence presented showed an affinity to the cause of the Islamic jihad.

2006 March 5: Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar injured 6 when he drove an SUV into a group of pedestrians at UNC-Chapel Hill to "avenge the deaths or murders of Muslims around the world".

2006 July 28: Seattle Jewish Federation shooting, Naveed Afzal Haq, an American citizen of Pakistani descent, kills one woman and shoots five others at the Jewish Federation building in Seattle. During the shooting, Haq told a 911 dispatcher that he was angry with American foreign policy in the Middle East.

/these are only the ones in Bush's watch that were solved, some bombings have not been solved and could have also been done by "jihadists" (not listed).
// the Fox news article even listed the "underwear bomber" as successfully making his target, that is a lie,he was stopped before the bomb exploded.
 
2013-04-25 11:37:34 AM
Freshman Republican congressman from Arkansas can't count or remember recent history. Film at 11.

encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com
 
2013-04-25 11:38:45 AM

Aldon: Just to point out how much of a fatasy land Republicans live in, let me point out the reality...

2001 September 11: . The attacks killed nearly 3,000 civilians.

2002 July 4: 2002 Los Angeles Airport shooting Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, a 41-year-old Egyptian national, kills two Israelis and wounds four others at the El Al ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport.

October 2002 Beltway sniper attacks: During three weeks in October 2002, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo killed 10 people and critically injured 3 others in Washington D.C., Baltimore, and Virginia. The pair were also suspected of earlier shootings in Maryland, Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, and Washington state.No motivation was given at the trial, but evidence presented showed an affinity to the cause of the Islamic jihad.

2006 March 5: Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar injured 6 when he drove an SUV into a group of pedestrians at UNC-Chapel Hill to "avenge the deaths or murders of Muslims around the world".

2006 July 28: Seattle Jewish Federation shooting, Naveed Afzal Haq, an American citizen of Pakistani descent, kills one woman and shoots five others at the Jewish Federation building in Seattle. During the shooting, Haq told a 911 dispatcher that he was angry with American foreign policy in the Middle East.

/these are only the ones in Bush's watch that were solved, some bombings have not been solved and could have also been done by "jihadists" (not listed).
// the Fox news article even listed the "underwear bomber" as successfully making his target, that is a lie,he was stopped before the bomb exploded.



Those aren't terrorist activities. We had a republican president then.
 
2013-04-25 11:45:08 AM

Makh: I mean, he does have a time machine so he probably did that too.


John Titor and Barack Obama have never been seen in the same room together. Think about it!
 
2013-04-25 11:45:30 AM
Hey, looks like some farkers are bringing reality to a derpfest.
 
2013-04-25 11:48:01 AM
He cites the underwear bomber as a terrorist who 'reached his target', and that after 9/11 there was no terrorism on US soil under Bush.

I suppose he forgot the shoe bomber and the two DC snipers.  For starters.
 
2013-04-25 11:56:56 AM
Paging Ten Pounds of Cheese. Please return to the thread to back up your "Clinton did nothing after 1993 WTC" statement.
 
2013-04-25 11:57:56 AM

WizardofToast: 9/11 was Clinton, wasn't it?


No, Al Gore had been elected by then.
 
2013-04-25 12:01:27 PM
Bush kept us safe!


HURRRRRR
 
2013-04-25 12:01:30 PM

Karac: I suppose he forgot the shoe bomber and the two DC snipers.  For starters.


Yeah, but those don't count because...  um...  because he doesn't WANT them to count!
 
2013-04-25 12:04:21 PM
Also, countless American soldiers that died from IEDs don't count.
 
2013-04-25 12:12:11 PM
It's funny how they always seem to start their counting the day after 9/11.
 
2013-04-25 12:14:17 PM

Pincy: It's funny how they always seem to start their counting the day after 9/11.


They seem to come from the same stock that blame Clinton for the 1992 Ruby Ridge shootings.
 
2013-04-25 12:15:37 PM

Pincy: It's funny how they always seem to start their counting the day after 9/11.


And that their math skills are so poor that even with that advantage they still can't count correctly.
 
2013-04-25 12:18:39 PM

Sgt Otter: Pincy: It's funny how they always seem to start their counting the day after 9/11.

They seem to come from the same stock that blame Clinton for the 1992 Ruby Ridge shootings.


I've had someone tell me with absolute certainty that the Berlin Wall came down on Reagan's watch.  Absolutely refused to believe otherwise.
 
2013-04-25 12:21:07 PM

Sgt Otter: They seem to come from the same stock that blame Clinton for the 1992 Ruby Ridge shootings.


Heh.  Actually had that conversation last year.  Same guy also claimed that Obama had killed the oil, gas, and coal industries, Obama was responsible for Medicare part-D, Clinton was responsible for Challenger, etc etc.
 
2013-04-25 12:26:33 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Heh.  Actually had that conversation last year.  Same guy also claimed that Obama had killed the oil, gas, and coal industries, Obama was responsible for Medicare part-D, Clinton was responsible for Challenger, etc etc.


I've often wondered what goes on in someone's head when they're presented with actual dates showing that X person was in the White House when Y event happened.  I mean, I know that right then and there they tend to dodge or change the subject, but afterward do they actually stop using the argument or do they wilfully say to themselves "well, I'm wrong but I'm going to keep arguing it anyway because if it were true (though it's not), it'd be to my benefit"?
 
2013-04-25 12:28:29 PM

flondrix: WizardofToast: 9/11 was Clinton, wasn't it?

No, Al Gore had been elected by then.


This is actually true.
 
2013-04-25 12:32:39 PM
If you ever want to compare the collective character of American liberals vs. American conservatives, all you have to do is look at what was said about Bush in the days after 9/11, and what was said about Obama in the days after Benghazi.

Bush's approval rating soared to 92% after 9/11.  Why do you think that is?  He hadn't yet taken any concrete actions, and he hadn't done anything extraordinary.  That number is the simple result of liberals, as a block, placing their country ahead of their party.  Compare that to republicans tripping over themselves to try and take political advantage of Benghazi, including Romney spouting off against the president based on incorrect information THE SAME DAY, while American service men and women were still being shot at.
 
2013-04-25 12:33:58 PM
freshman congressman from Arkansas

Strike 1 and 2 your Tea Tarded Twat
 
2013-04-25 12:36:42 PM

tenpoundsofcheese: we weren't at war with the terrorists before 9/11.


We were at war. Most Americans just didn't realize it.
Cruise missile strikes on Afghanistan and Sudan (August 1998)
 
2013-04-25 12:39:43 PM

Vodka Zombie: tenpoundsofcheese: well, they were fighting us, but after they bombed the WTC the first time, the President at the time thought it was not worth doing much about

I guess launching a shiatload of missiles into Afghanistan instead of getting into a land war in Asia falls under the category of "not doing much."


I seem to remember Republicans going batshiat insane whenever Clinton attacked the Middle East.

Also:

This beguiling piece of fiction ["Wag the Dog"], which was nominated for numerous awards, assumes a topical dimension with the headlining of the Clinton-Monica Lewinsky sex scandal. At the height of Zippergate, President Clinton announced the U. S. attacks on "terrorist-related facilities in Afghanistan and Sudan." Editorials and cartoonists had a field day in linking Wag the Dog to the Clinton-Lewinsky affair.
Some cartoon captions included:
    A White House reporter asking Clinton "How do we know these attacks aren't meant to distract us from distracting the country?"
    Clinton, with his pants down and draped in an American flag, saying "Rally Round the Flag."
    Clinton looking at a "Monica Tells All" headline, while a general tells him "The best form of defense is attack."
    A husband and wife watching CNN. When she asks "Do you want to watch Wag the Dog, he responds "I thought this was Wag the Dog."

 http://www.filmandhistory.org/documentary/politicalthought/wag-dog. php
 
2013-04-25 12:41:19 PM

THX 1138: I've often wondered what goes on in someone's head when they're presented with actual dates showing that X person was in the White House when Y event happened. I mean, I know that right then and there they tend to dodge or change the subject, but afterward do they actually stop using the argument or do they wilfully say to themselves "well, I'm wrong but I'm going to keep arguing it anyway because if it were true (though it's not), it'd be to my benefit"?


In my experience, they respond with hostility and accusations of liberalism.  All they know is that anything bad it HAD to be a Democrat's/liberal's fault.  They treat political discussions like telling fishing/sports stories.  Just a contest to one-up the next person.

"Obama has destroyed the economy."
"Wish he was only that.  He's also a secret muslim who is planning to let the UN bomb Nascar events."
"Going to be a moot point on Nascar when the department of homo security under Obamas orders starts shooting people."

All they know is that liberals bad, bad things mean it was liberals fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all liberals fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a LIBERAL.
 
2013-04-25 12:45:49 PM

Satanic_Hamster: THX 1138: I've often wondered what goes on in someone's head when they're presented with actual dates showing that X person was in the White House when Y event happened. I mean, I know that right then and there they tend to dodge or change the subject, but afterward do they actually stop using the argument or do they wilfully say to themselves "well, I'm wrong but I'm going to keep arguing it anyway because if it were true (though it's not), it'd be to my benefit"?

In my experience, they respond with hostility and accusations of liberalism.  All they know is that anything bad it HAD to be a Democrat's/liberal's fault.  They treat political discussions like telling fishing/sports stories.  Just a contest to one-up the next person.

"Obama has destroyed the economy."
"Wish he was only that.  He's also a secret muslim who is planning to let the UN bomb Nascar events."
"Going to be a moot point on Nascar when the department of homo security under Obamas orders starts shooting people."

All they know is that liberals bad, bad things mean it was liberals fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all liberals fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a LIBERAL.


Know a guy that blames the current situation on Clinton's handling of Mogadishu because since we didn't respond to the dragging of the body of the pilot around with carpet bombing, it showed the world we were a paper tiger.  He doesn't have much of response beyond a glare when I ask how our response to the Islamic Jihad bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon didn't do the same thing.
 
2013-04-25 12:46:43 PM
GOP PRO TIP:

i.imgur.com
 
2013-04-25 12:47:29 PM

Sgt Otter: Pincy: It's funny how they always seem to start their counting the day after 9/11.

They seem to come from the same stock that blame Clinton for the 1992 Ruby Ridge shootings.


Who could possibly be that dumb?  Oh, wait:

"Let me ask you a question. What was a more likely cause of the Oklahoma City bombing: talk radio or Bill Clinton and Janet Reno's hands-on management of Waco, the Branch Davidian compound, and maybe to a lesser extent Ruby Ridge."

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2010/04/19/clinton_rewrites_histor y_ shifts_blame_for_oklahoma_city_bombing
 
2013-04-25 12:49:59 PM
Religious
Rightwing
Doesn't like America
Will commit terrorist acts

Perfectly describes the TeaParty


i.imgur.com
 
2013-04-25 12:55:01 PM

Satanic_Hamster: All they know is that liberals bad, bad things mean it was liberals fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all liberals fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a LIBERAL.


Um..Check this out:

All they know is that  liberals Communists bad, bad things mean it was  liberals Communists fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all  liberals Communists fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a  LIBERAL COMMUNIST.

All they know is that liberals Jews bad, bad things mean it was liberals Jews fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all  liberals Jews' fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a  LIBERAL JEW.

All they know is that liberals Ni****s bad, bad things mean it was liberals Ni****s fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all liberals Ni****s fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a LIBERAL NI****.

All they know is that liberals Irish bad, bad things mean it was liberals Irish fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all  liberals Irish' fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a  LIBERAL IRISHMAN.

All they know is that liberals Gaijin bad, bad things mean it was liberals Gaijins' fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all  liberals Gaijins' fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a  LIBERAL GAIJIN.


encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com

They're just people who love liberty....
 
2013-04-25 12:56:40 PM

tenpoundsofcheese: FlashHarry: do these assholes seriously think that we'll forget about 9/11?

Do you think that Bush is still President?

The point is how is the current President doing.  But okay, 0bama is only the second worse President.


I suppose anybody who has to spend their entire administration cleaning up Bush's mess is going to look 2nd worst.
 
2013-04-25 12:57:44 PM
It seems that the esteemed congressman from the great state of Arkansas suffers from a mental malady known as CRSWIC (pronounced "CHRIS-WICK").  CRSWIC stands for: Can't Remember Sh*t When It's Convenient.

This affliction tends to become widespread among members of the American political profession, particularly around the congressional mid-terms.
 
2013-04-25 12:58:21 PM

Lord_Baull: tenpoundsofcheese: we weren't at war with the terrorists before 9/11.
(well, they were fighting us, but after they bombed the WTC the first time, the President at the time thought it was not worth doing much about).

or did subby miss that?

oh, and when the guy killed those people at Fort Hood it was just a little bit of "workplace violence"

Wow, you're so very misinfromed. Keep watching FOX! You're doing great!

Link
I won't ask you what exactly Bush did about a certain memo that sat on his desk for a month.


As you'll recall, when President Clinton bombed the shiat out of chemical weapons facilities in Sudan and in parts of Afghanistan, the GOP was determined to say that we were not at war with terrorists, that he was just doing it to take their minds off of his penis.
 
2013-04-25 01:05:48 PM

wingnut396: Satanic_Hamster: THX 1138: I've often wondered what goes on in someone's head when they're presented with actual dates showing that X person was in the White House when Y event happened. I mean, I know that right then and there they tend to dodge or change the subject, but afterward do they actually stop using the argument or do they wilfully say to themselves "well, I'm wrong but I'm going to keep arguing it anyway because if it were true (though it's not), it'd be to my benefit"?

In my experience, they respond with hostility and accusations of liberalism.  All they know is that anything bad it HAD to be a Democrat's/liberal's fault.  They treat political discussions like telling fishing/sports stories.  Just a contest to one-up the next person.

"Obama has destroyed the economy."
"Wish he was only that.  He's also a secret muslim who is planning to let the UN bomb Nascar events."
"Going to be a moot point on Nascar when the department of homo security under Obamas orders starts shooting people."

All they know is that liberals bad, bad things mean it was liberals fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all liberals fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a LIBERAL.

Know a guy that blames the current situation on Clinton's handling of Mogadishu because since we didn't respond to the dragging of the body of the pilot around with carpet bombing, it showed the world we were a paper tiger.  He doesn't have much of response beyond a glare when I ask how our response to the Islamic Jihad bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon didn't do the same thing.


What Marine barracks?  The United States has never even BEEN in Lebanon.  And it's not like Osama Bin Laden (ever notice how close Osama and Obama are?) ever directly listed that as one of the main reasons he decided that America can be beaten.
 
2013-04-25 01:07:28 PM

The Lone Gunman: tenpoundsofcheese: FlashHarry: do these assholes seriously think that we'll forget about 9/11?

Do you think that Bush is still President?

The point is how is the current President doing.  But okay, 0bama is only the second worse President.

I suppose anybody who has to spend their entire administration cleaning up Bush's mess is going to look 2nd worst.


You might say that Bush's legacy is trickling-down on Obama.

I prefer to say that he took a huge dump on the country and we are still trying to unclog the plumbing.
 
2013-04-25 01:07:52 PM

firefly212: Lord_Baull: tenpoundsofcheese: we weren't at war with the terrorists before 9/11.
(well, they were fighting us, but after they bombed the WTC the first time, the President at the time thought it was not worth doing much about).

or did subby miss that?

oh, and when the guy killed those people at Fort Hood it was just a little bit of "workplace violence"

Wow, you're so very misinfromed. Keep watching FOX! You're doing great!

Link
I won't ask you what exactly Bush did about a certain memo that sat on his desk for a month.

As you'll recall, when President Clinton bombed the shiat out of chemical weapons facilities in Sudan and in parts of Afghanistan, the GOP was determined to say that we were not at war with terrorists, that he was just doing it to take their minds off of his penis.


The important take-away from all of this is the fact that the GOP's fascination with other men's penises dates back to at least August 1998.
 
2013-04-25 01:13:18 PM

wingnut396: Satanic_Hamster: THX 1138: I've often wondered what goes on in someone's head when they're presented with actual dates showing that X person was in the White House when Y event happened. I mean, I know that right then and there they tend to dodge or change the subject, but afterward do they actually stop using the argument or do they wilfully say to themselves "well, I'm wrong but I'm going to keep arguing it anyway because if it were true (though it's not), it'd be to my benefit"?

In my experience, they respond with hostility and accusations of liberalism.  All they know is that anything bad it HAD to be a Democrat's/liberal's fault.  They treat political discussions like telling fishing/sports stories.  Just a contest to one-up the next person.

"Obama has destroyed the economy."
"Wish he was only that.  He's also a secret muslim who is planning to let the UN bomb Nascar events."
"Going to be a moot point on Nascar when the department of homo security under Obamas orders starts shooting people."

All they know is that liberals bad, bad things mean it was liberals fault, and that it makes them feel better to bullshiat about how bad things are and how it's all liberals fault and that anyone questioning/correcting them is a LIBERAL.

Know a guy that blames the current situation on Clinton's handling of Mogadishu because since we didn't respond to the dragging of the body of the pilot around with carpet bombing, it showed the world we were a paper tiger.  He doesn't have much of response beyond a glare when I ask how our response to the Islamic Jihad bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon didn't do the same thing.


Whadaya mean the U.S. didn't respond to the Marine Barracks bombing in Lebanon? We invaded Grenada two days later!
 
2013-04-25 01:14:24 PM

Epoch_Zero: Check this out:


In other words, LIBERALS = ANYONE WHO'S NOT ONE OF US.
 
2013-04-25 01:15:59 PM
"... reached their targets" and were often apprehended before they were able to harm anyone.
 
Displayed 50 of 127 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report