Sin_City_Superhero: Bravo Two: And from the article, it sounds like this asshat dealer was in and out of the jointSo what? Are you saying that ex-cons don't deserve any civil liberties, or protection under the law? Look, I'm not pro-heroine, or anything, and I'll agree that the guy is scum, but that doesn't mean that he doesn't get to enjoy the same rights as you and I. For that matter, what gives YOU the right to determine what crimes should be punished by a baseball bat beating? What if someone decides that YOU'RE doing something that warrants a beating?
Sin_City_Superhero: Bravo Two: i love how there're people on Fark and elsewhere that would convict her.Me too. She assaulted the guy with a bat. She gets a trial to determine if she is guilty. That is a courtesy she did not extend to her victim. Regardless of your feelings, we do NOT condone vigilantee justice in this country. She is not the police, judge, jury, and enforcer. We pay taxes to pay for a comprehensive justice system...cops, attorneys, judges, jailers, etc. She should've let them do their job.
belome: Sure makes you wonder why they greenlight this, yet let so many others go by the wayside.Maybe one of the mods is dyslexic too?
jtown: What DA was stupid enough to go forward with the case, anyway?
KangTheMad: Innocent. Case done, next!
If you like these links, you'll love
More Fark for your buck
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Sep 23 2017 16:36:17
Runtime: 0.314 sec (313 ms)