Tom_Slick: PsyLord: WTF people. First of all, kale sucks so whoever wants to eat more of it, go right ahead. Second, how is this even infringing on Chick-fil-A ? Unlike Chick-fil-A, the guy uses the correct spelling of "more" and follows it with something totally unrelated to chicken. So does the patent/trademark office now restricts the usage of all "eat more <insert food/non-food item>" since it might be confused with Chick-fil-A? The stupidity hurts...[kwinofnothing.files.wordpress.com image 500x282]The problem is, if they don't at least try to defend the Trademark they lose it all together, so if they didn't go after this guy, then they couldn't go after Burger King if they used Chickens to say Eat More Beef. Trademark Law leaves it to the Trademark owner to enforce the Trademark, if a Trademark is not enforced they lose it.
If you like these links, you'll love
$5 a month since 19 aught diddly.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 16 2017 10:16:43
Runtime: 0.261 sec (260 ms)