Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(   It turns out that the Fourth Amendment is only MOSTLY dead   ( divider line
    More: Hero, visual routine, supreme courts, search warrants, Missouri Supreme Court, lower courts, supreme court ruling  
•       •       •

7986 clicks; posted to Politics » on 18 Apr 2013 at 11:49 AM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

102 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

2013-04-19 08:47:43 AM  

colithian: Except the whole "failing the roadside AND breathalyzer tests" is probable cause, so you wouldn't need a warrant to do a blood test.
Sounds like subby likes getting "one for the road".

Sounds like you can't read.
2013-04-19 09:14:43 PM  
"Only Justice Clarence Thomas would have held that a warrantless blood test does not violate a suspect's constitutional rights."

It's obvious this man doesn't have any respect for the Constitution or BoRights, if there was just some legal precedence to remove a crooked judge, he deserves it.
Displayed 2 of 102 comments

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.