If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Drone kills 4 people in Pakistan. But it's okay because a Democrat is in the White House   (cnn.com) divider line 334
    More: Stupid, Pakistani, Pakistan, U.S., U.S. drone, North Waziristan  
•       •       •

1502 clicks; posted to Politics » on 15 Apr 2013 at 12:33 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



334 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-04-15 11:03:31 AM
I assume the Stupid tag is for subby for linking an article with little facts to support their butthurt.
 
2013-04-15 11:09:04 AM

dennysgod: I assume the Stupid tag is for subby for linking an article with little facts to support their butthurt.


Since when do we need facts to condemn the murder of 4 people by the US military?


tho I do have to admit there is one thing I like about a Democrat in the White House, the media assumes that the intelligence was right and they people who got killed deserved it.
 
2013-04-15 11:09:17 AM

dennysgod: I assume the Stupid tag is for subby for linking an article with little facts to support their butthurt.


I was assuming it was for the blatant troll headline.
 
2013-04-15 11:16:15 AM
Obama hates brown people!
 
2013-04-15 11:17:20 AM
Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-04-15 11:20:03 AM

vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.


It's the same with any other type of air-strike or other attack.

We've been dropping laser guided bombs on terrorists for decades, so I don't see the difference.
 
2013-04-15 11:22:59 AM
Not enough information to decide whether I'm OK with this.
 
2013-04-15 11:25:15 AM
i583.photobucket.com
 
2013-04-15 11:36:09 AM

vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.


We never really bother determining which is which.
 
2013-04-15 11:37:32 AM

vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.


So it's OK to kill innocent men?

WHAT ABOUT MEN'S RIGHTS!!1??!
 
2013-04-15 11:39:31 AM

vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

 
2013-04-15 11:41:13 AM

GAT_00: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

We never really bother determining which is which.


Pretty much.
 
2013-04-15 11:50:28 AM

Lionel Mandrake: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

So it's OK to kill innocent men?

WHAT ABOUT MEN'S RIGHTS!!1??!


Having a penis and being between the ages of 16 and 60 makes them enemy combatants.

/apparently
 
2013-04-15 11:50:47 AM

Aarontology: GAT_00: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

We never really bother determining which is which.

Pretty much.


No no no: remember they hate us for our freedom.

Our freedom to arbitrarily rain death from above on their villages.
 
2013-04-15 11:53:24 AM
media.tumblr.com
The Unites States is at war in Afghanistan with military targets near the border in Pakistan.
 
2013-04-15 11:56:09 AM

gilgigamesh: Aarontology: GAT_00: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

We never really bother determining which is which.

Pretty much.

No no no: remember they hate us for our freedom.

Our freedom to arbitrarily rain death from above on their villages.


As we've all found out as of late, America is at it's most free when its the most heavily armed and when it kills kids.
 
2013-04-15 12:04:38 PM
Wait till subbs finds out how well we bombed counties in WW2. You don't win wars by decimating the military, you win it by killing civilians.
 
2013-04-15 12:08:52 PM

PreMortem: Wait till subbs finds out how well we bombed counties in WW2. You don't win wars by decimating the military, you win it by killing civilians.


What nation are we at war with that justifies bombing civilians? Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.

And speaking of winning, what is our military objective that justifies killing civilians?
 
2013-04-15 12:09:06 PM

Aarontology: GAT_00: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

We never really bother determining which is which.

Pretty much.


But at least our XBox remote operators can now get medals for doing it.
 
2013-04-15 12:14:43 PM
Forget this targeted drone strike nonsense.

We need to go back to million dollar-a-pop cruise missiles fired in packs.

Or indiscriminate carpet bombing.

Or naval blockades bombarding the shore.

Or sieges surrounding the city walls with trebuchets.

Yeah, trebuchets. That's the ticket.

Damn you, Obama!
 
2013-04-15 12:15:30 PM

gilgigamesh: PreMortem: Wait till subbs finds out how well we bombed counties in WW2. You don't win wars by decimating the military, you win it by killing civilians.

What nation are we at war with that justifies bombing civilians? Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.

And speaking of winning, what is our military objective that justifies killing civilians?


As I recall, our objective in Afghanistan and Pakistan was to get Osama bin Laden.  I think we did that.  Let's go home.
 
2013-04-15 12:22:37 PM

GAT_00: gilgigamesh: Aarontology: GAT_00: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

We never really bother determining which is which.

Pretty much.

No no no: remember they hate us for our freedom.

Our freedom to arbitrarily rain death from above on their villages.

As we've all found out as of late, America is at it's most free when its the most heavily armed and when it kills kids.


And at its most fascistic when feeding hungry people and expanding health care coverage.
 
2013-04-15 12:23:17 PM

I_C_Weener: gilgigamesh: PreMortem: Wait till subbs finds out how well we bombed counties in WW2. You don't win wars by decimating the military, you win it by killing civilians.

What nation are we at war with that justifies bombing civilians? Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.

And speaking of winning, what is our military objective that justifies killing civilians?

As I recall, our objective in Afghanistan and Pakistan was to get Osama bin Laden.  I think we did that.  Let's go home.


Newsflash:  We are!
 
2013-04-15 12:24:44 PM

Lionel Mandrake: I_C_Weener: gilgigamesh: PreMortem: Wait till subbs finds out how well we bombed counties in WW2. You don't win wars by decimating the military, you win it by killing civilians.

What nation are we at war with that justifies bombing civilians? Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.

And speaking of winning, what is our military objective that justifies killing civilians?

As I recall, our objective in Afghanistan and Pakistan was to get Osama bin Laden.  I think we did that.  Let's go home.

Newsflash:  We are!


When did we kill bin Laden and when did we just have a drone strike in Pakistan last?

Newsflash indeed.
 
2013-04-15 12:25:59 PM
You know, if even the Pakistani military officials are saying that it's a militant compound that the drones hit (and they have been more than happy to cry over any instance of civilian drone bombings by the US in that region of the world in the last two years), then maybe we actually hit militants this time.

FTA: (CNN) -- At least four people were killed when missiles thought to be from a U.S. drone struck a militant compound in tribal North Waziristan on Sunday, Pakistani military sources told CNN.
 
2013-04-15 12:36:06 PM
Drone kills 4 people in Pakistan. But it's okay because a Democrat is in the White House it didn't cost over 1 Trillion dollars or 4000 soldiers' lives.
 
2013-04-15 12:36:39 PM

RexTalionis: You know, if even the Pakistani military officials are saying that it's a militant compound that the drones hit (and they have been more than happy to cry over any instance of civilian drone bombings by the US in that region of the world in the last two years), then maybe we actually hit militants this time.

FTA: (CNN) -- At least four people were killed when missiles thought to be from a U.S. drone struck a militant compound in tribal North Waziristan on Sunday, Pakistani military sources told CNN.


Shhhhh, you're ruining the outrage.
 
2013-04-15 12:37:11 PM

gilgigamesh: What nation are we at war with that justifies bombing civilians? Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.


Pakistan, like many countries in that region, does not have full sovereignty over all it's territories. Effectively, Gangs which operate outside of and independently from the Pakistani government control the western region of the country. So while Pakistan is an ally, that does not mean we, and they, are not "at war" with part of their territory.
 
2013-04-15 12:37:43 PM
Remember those people during the Bush years that said Democrats were softies?  All I'm saying is I would NOT want to be on Obama's shiatlist.  That man gets things done.
 
2013-04-15 12:38:05 PM
I am appalled that of the same group of people that condemed a huge military invasion (that I supported and accused you of loving terrorist penis if you opposed) that resulted in thousands upon thousands of deaths and cost the US tax payer 2-6 trillion dollars, only half of them are against using targeted drone strikes that kill handfuls of people at a time.


Those dumo-craps are soft on terror! They love them some muslims!

Those dumo-craps are using drones to kill terrorists, am outrage!
 
2013-04-15 12:38:10 PM

gilgigamesh: Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.


I guess that must've been before we found out they were harboring Bin Laden.
 
2013-04-15 12:38:52 PM
What's your take on this, subby?

Okay or not okay because of who's in the Whitehouse?
Cause I didn't see a whole lot of outrage when it was happening.
 
2013-04-15 12:41:18 PM

Lionel Mandrake: vernonFL: Drone strikes are good when they kill militants.

Drone strikes are bad when they kill innocent women and children.

So it's OK to kill innocent men?

WHAT ABOUT MEN'S RIGHTS!!1??!


i.imgur.com
 
2013-04-15 12:41:20 PM
no, it's ok because they're brown. Get your mems straight subs
 
2013-04-15 12:42:14 PM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: dennysgod: I assume the Stupid tag is for subby for linking an article with little facts to support their butthurt.

Since when do we need facts to condemn the murder of 4 people by the US military?

tho I do have to admit there is one thing I like about a Democrat in the White House, the media assumes that the intelligence was right and they people who got killed deserved it.


Are you saying there's 'good' media bias? Assuming somebody is right just because they're a member of a particular party is just as dumb as assuming somebody is wrong because they're a member of the other one.
 
2013-04-15 12:42:17 PM

I_C_Weener: Lionel Mandrake: I_C_Weener: gilgigamesh: PreMortem: Wait till subbs finds out how well we bombed counties in WW2. You don't win wars by decimating the military, you win it by killing civilians.

What nation are we at war with that justifies bombing civilians? Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.

And speaking of winning, what is our military objective that justifies killing civilians?

As I recall, our objective in Afghanistan and Pakistan was to get Osama bin Laden.  I think we did that.  Let's go home.

Newsflash:  We are!

When did we kill bin Laden and when did we just have a drone strike in Pakistan last?

Newsflash indeed.


So you're opposed to a military presence of any kind outside of the USA?  Or just Pakistan?  Or just while Obama's President?
 
2013-04-15 12:42:33 PM
i13.photobucket.com
 
2013-04-15 12:45:43 PM

gilgigamesh: No no no: remember they hate us for our freedom.

Our freedom to arbitrarily rain death from above on their villages.


It's true. Watching someone close to you get exploded from the sky has no effect on the witness joining a group dedicated to fighting the people who bombed them.

I_C_Weener: But at least our XBox remote operators can now get medals for doing it.


For all the sacrifice of blood, sweat, and Mountain Dew they really deserve it.
 
2013-04-15 12:45:59 PM
Afghan opium production increases for 3rd year in a row, nearing record

The boom in poppy cultivation is at its most pronounced in the Taliban's heartland in the south, the report showed, especially in regions where troops of the U.S.-led coalition have been withdrawn or are in the process of departing. The report suggests that whatever international efforts have been made to wean local farmers off the crop, they are having little success.

Yeah, right, sure, lie all you want we know what's really going on.
 
2013-04-15 12:46:53 PM
2001-2009 you must support the president no matter what or you're not a real american patriot
2009-present HOLY shiat HE'S BLACK
too bad libs
 
2013-04-15 12:47:28 PM
It ate my picture! Anyway GIS: usa soldiers guarding poppy fields and you'll see it.
 
2013-04-15 12:47:35 PM
"But it's okay because a Democrat is in the White House "

oooo.....good one....did you ever hear the joke about the president who was responsible for over 100k Iraqi deaths? But that it was ok because he had daddy issues and a Mr Burns style VP actually pulling the strings in the WH?

good times. good times.


Iraq - documented civilian deaths from violence 2003-2013
www.iraqbodycount.org
 
2013-04-15 12:48:29 PM

gilgigamesh: Last time I checked, Pakistan was an ally.


[bender laughing at leela's pain.gif goes here]
 
2013-04-15 12:49:06 PM
There's no indication that the people who were killed were noncombatants. Big ol meh.
 
2013-04-15 12:49:25 PM
If you don't oppose Obama's murder of people with drones you have no right to call yourself a liberal.  It's just that simple.
 
2013-04-15 12:49:26 PM
No matter what Obama does, he will be criticized by those on the right for being either a warmonger killing kids, or a Muslim terrorist sympathizer putting America at risk for another 9/11 X 1000.  It is what it is.

Also, there's now a lot of information about the people operating the drones and what and how they do their jobs.  Supporter or detractor, you should get informed.  start here. http://video.pbs.org/video/2326108547
 
2013-04-15 12:50:53 PM
No, it's OK because it's in Pakistan.
 
2013-04-15 12:53:10 PM

Outrageous Muff: If you don't oppose Obama's murder of people with drones you have no right to call yourself a liberal.  It's just that simple.


"liberal" does not mean opposition to all war. Whether it is troops storming the compound and killing the enemy or a glider firing hellfires from afar, it doesn't matter.
 
2013-04-15 12:53:22 PM

ReverendJasen: No, it's OK because it's in Pakistan, and the Pakistani government supports our actions as we are targeting people that are on their terror lists, too.

 
2013-04-15 12:53:29 PM

Outrageous Muff: If you don't oppose Obama's murder of people with drones you have no right to call yourself a liberal.  It's just that simple.


Your concern is noted.
 
Displayed 50 of 334 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report