If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Buzzfeed)   Girl raped at 15 and then bullied for 2 years over photos rapists took & shared online commits suicide   (buzzfeed.com) divider line 549
    More: Sick  
•       •       •

19367 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Apr 2013 at 3:30 AM   |  Favorite   |  Watch    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



549 Comments   (+0 »)
   
Log in (at the top of the page) to enable voting.
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all
 
  2013-04-10 06:13:18 AM
Nidiot: I'd like to know what some people would regard as sufficient evidence before you'd accept a girl's claim of being raped?

In general there is not going to be a room full of witnesses, video recordings or the like. It mostly only ever comes down to her word vs his. Judging by some of the responses here, her word carries less value than that of the alleged rapist/s.


Lady Justice is most often depicted with a set of scales typically suspended from her right hand, upon which she measures the strengths of a case's support and opposition. She is also often seen carrying a double-edged sword in her left hand, symbolizing the power of Reason and Justice, which may be wielded either for or against any party.

It's an imperfect system, for sure. But it beats every alternative I can think of, short of unfalsifiable mind-reading.
 
  2013-04-10 06:15:18 AM
100 Watt Walrus: Look, there's a lot of this going on in this thread. You have no clue what the police did or did not do. It's possible they dropped the ball. It's also possible that there wasn't enough evidence to arrest anyone.

The pictures should be evidence enough because: She's underage, and drunk. Two different ways she can't legally consent. Plus, distributing the photos is also a crime.
 
  2013-04-10 06:17:52 AM
sxacho: Nidiot: I'd like to know what some people would regard as sufficient evidence before you'd accept a girl's claim of being raped?

In general there is not going to be a room full of witnesses, video recordings or the like. It mostly only ever comes down to her word vs his. Judging by some of the responses here, her word carries less value than that of the alleged rapist/s.

Lady Justice is most often depicted with a set of scales typically suspended from her right hand, upon which she measures the strengths of a case's support and opposition. She is also often seen carrying a double-edged sword in her left hand, symbolizing the power of Reason and Justice, which may be wielded either for or against any party.

It's an imperfect system, for sure. But it beats every alternative I can think of, short of unfalsifiable mind-reading.


The Japanese used to call a special breed of unicorn to court.  It could divine the guilty party and would run him through with its horn.  I forget the exact name of that species... not kirin.
 
  2013-04-10 06:18:37 AM
Well, shiat. There are no words.

/stop this effing planet, I want to get off
 
  2013-04-10 06:19:57 AM
MooseUpNorth: Nidiot: It mostly only ever comes down to her word vs his.

I accuse you of raping a goat. How much evidence should I have to present before someone takes my word over yours over your alleged guilt?


Pictures would be good evidence.
 
  2013-04-10 06:21:15 AM
Abacus9: 100 Watt Walrus: Look, there's a lot of this going on in this thread. You have no clue what the police did or did not do. It's possible they dropped the ball. It's also possible that there wasn't enough evidence to arrest anyone.

The pictures should be evidence enough because: She's underage, and drunk. Two different ways she can't legally consent. Plus, distributing the photos is also a crime.


Great.  Crimes were committed.

By whom?  Whoever she says?  That's not how it works.
 
  2013-04-10 06:22:35 AM
Lsherm: [img42.imageshack.us image 620x348]

Still can't look at that picture without tearing up.


Is that her??
 
  2013-04-10 06:23:44 AM
Is her name Rita or Reytayah?
 
  2013-04-10 06:23:46 AM
BarkingUnicorn: 
So it's no different from U. S. incapacitated-consent jurisprudence.

Possibly not? I don't have much knowledge of the US legal system. I was just quoting some stuff from a Canadian site talking about it.

/Aussie
 
  2013-04-10 06:23:51 AM
BarkingUnicorn: Abacus9: 100 Watt Walrus: Look, there's a lot of this going on in this thread. You have no clue what the police did or did not do. It's possible they dropped the ball. It's also possible that there wasn't enough evidence to arrest anyone.

The pictures should be evidence enough because: She's underage, and drunk. Two different ways she can't legally consent. Plus, distributing the photos is also a crime.

Great.  Crimes were committed.

By whom?  Whoever she says?  That's not how it works.


Is that what I said? No. And perhaps you missed the part in bold. Are you saying that the police don't have the authority to check their cell phones for these pictures, or they don't have the ability to find out which device the pictures originate from?
 
  2013-04-10 06:25:23 AM
Rehtaeh?

She never stood a chance.
 
  2013-04-10 06:36:56 AM
This kind of thing definitely happened in the late 90s when I was this age. I knew a girl who had gotten drunk and taken advantage of while another guy put it on VHS. The girl's brother and a friend went and kicked some ass, took the tape and destroyed it. Nothing was reported, to save the girl from shame. No one went to jail. No one besides her family found out until later. By senior year the girl was sharing the story with her friends. Point of the story is that if we all had Facebook back then, what happened to her would have been shared immediately, before she could recover emotionally. So I don't think this generation of kids is raping or taking advantage more frequently, they're just getting found out faster. If anything, the light shining on the situation may discourage future perps. In the meantime the glare of the social media light makes a small fraction of the girls kill themselves. If the girl in my story had killed herself, no one at school would have known why.
 
  2013-04-10 06:42:35 AM
Legios: BarkingUnicorn: 
So it's no different from U. S. incapacitated-consent jurisprudence.

Possibly not? I don't have much knowledge of the US legal system. I was just quoting some stuff from a Canadian site talking about it.

/Aussie


Here, a person who is so incapacitated as to be incapable of making a conscious, rational decision cannot give consent.  Incapacitation may result from intoxication, physical damage, mental illness, or just being a deep sleeper. A judge or jury determines the degree of incapacitation based on evidence.
 
  2013-04-10 06:42:42 AM
NicoFinn: Lsherm: [img42.imageshack.us image 620x348]

Still can't look at that picture without tearing up.

Is that her??



If I recall correctly, that was a different girl from last year. Don't know if she was raped, but she was bullied pretty mercilessly. She wrote different messages on signs and put them on her Facebook or whatever. She was literally begging for help. She also hanged herself.
 
  2013-04-10 06:47:15 AM
Something about the tattoos makes me wonder if there isn't something more going on here. The life span of girls with large tattoos of stars on their arms has always been pretty low.
 
  2013-04-10 06:47:56 AM
Jim_Callahan: Pictures taken of the rape of an underage girl and redistributed by the accusers but the police found there was insufficient evidence to lay charges?

I suspect there's a lot to this story that's not being shared by the article, there.  My money is on "the pictures didn't actually depict the crime and the parent is just trying to mitigate their own guilt over not responding to bullying by making shiat up" at minimum.


Apparently the photo shows one of the boys having sex with her while she was vomiting. The police said they could not proceed with charges on child porn because the boys could have denied knowing she was 15. I did not know knowledge as to age was relevant.

I listened to Rehtaeh's mother yesterday speak about what has happened. It made me cry. I don't cry.
 
  2013-04-10 06:50:24 AM
Why does the drunk means you can't give consent only apply to women?

We're the guys also drunk? If they were wouldn't that mean thy also couldn't give consent?
 
  2013-04-10 06:52:10 AM
Abacus9: BarkingUnicorn: Abacus9: 100 Watt Walrus: Look, there's a lot of this going on in this thread. You have no clue what the police did or did not do. It's possible they dropped the ball. It's also possible that there wasn't enough evidence to arrest anyone.

The pictures should be evidence enough because: She's underage, and drunk. Two different ways she can't legally consent. Plus, distributing the photos is also a crime.

Great.  Crimes were committed.

By whom?  Whoever she says?  That's not how it works.

Is that what I said? No. And perhaps you missed the part in bold. Are you saying that the police don't have the authority to check their cell phones for these pictures, or they don't have the ability to find out which device the pictures originate from?


"The family said they were told the photographs were not a criminal issue even though Rehtaeh was underage."

I guess Canadian law needs to be changed.  But don't blame law enforcement.
 
  2013-04-10 06:55:35 AM
Almost Everybody Poops: BarkingUnicorn: Almost Everybody Poops: BarkingUnicorn: Almost Everybody Poops: miss diminutive: "An investigation into an earlier sexual assault was completed, and in consultation with the Crown, there was insufficient evidence to lay charges," MacRae said.

So there's apparently picture evidence of the crime being distributed by the offenders and the Crown doesn't have enough evidence to charge them?

Also, maybe I'm already out of touch with today's youth, but who bullies a girl who's been a victim of rape? Seriously? I know I did some pretty hurtful things in my biatchy teenage days, but something like this would have never crossed my mind. I honestly don't understand.

Anyway, my heart breaks for this girl.

Seriously, this.

It appears to be a lack of empathy and stigma on part of law enforcement.  But this shiat should not stand.

I wish a thousand butt-hole surfers to penetrate the rapists asses while covered in knives and arugula.

WTF did LE do wrong?  Do you seriously expect them to waterboard confessions out of four boys just because a girl accused them?  WTF is wrong with you people?

I would assume the PHOTOS THEY TOOK WHILE RAPING HER would be enough evidence, but that's just me.

Well, apparently something was insufficient about those photos (another article says one was circulated, showing her "having sex with one of the boys").  Boy unidentifiable in pic.  Nobody would talk.  So we're back to waterboarding, right?

So because the boy was unidentifiable she wasn't raped?


The boy was identified. According to Rehtaeh's mother he was looking at the camera giving a thumbs up in the photo I referenced above. The police also know who owned the phone that took the picture.
 
  2013-04-10 06:57:52 AM
Barfmaker: Holy shiat...that's outrageously sad.

And yeah, here we are where Anonymous is now our real-life Batman equivalent.


except that "anonymous" has a feavy overlap with thw /b fplks who CAUSE shiat like this
 
  2013-04-10 07:01:03 AM
Warlordtrooper: Why does the drunk means you can't give consent only apply to women?

We're the guys also drunk? If they were wouldn't that mean thy also couldn't give consent?


Not to being penetrated.  Rape laws (a subset of "sexual assault" laws) involve penetration of the sexual, oral, or "elimination" orifices, "however slight."

Also, "drunk" is insufficient; you must be so drunk that an ordinary (including "sober") observer would reasonably conclude that you are incapable of making rational decisions.
 
  2013-04-10 07:06:33 AM
BarkingUnicorn: Warlordtrooper: Why does the drunk means you can't give consent only apply to women?

We're the guys also drunk? If they were wouldn't that mean thy also couldn't give consent?

Not to being penetrated.  Rape laws (a subset of "sexual assault" laws) involve penetration of the sexual, oral, or "elimination" orifices, "however slight."

Also, "drunk" is insufficient; you must be so drunk that an ordinary (including "sober") observer would reasonably conclude that you are incapable of making rational decisions.


Ah ok. So basically pissed drunk.

Its sad that the rapists aren't being charged but it's better then convicting somebody without a level of evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt
 
  2013-04-10 07:06:34 AM
This case is tragic, and if the perpetrators can be prosecuted in some way still, I hope they are.

However, a lot of people have posted that they are outraged that she is underage and yet nothing was done.  As I understand Canadian (which is to say, very little) she was not underage if there was consent.  I don't know anything about this case beyond the article, and in no way am I saying she did consent.
 
  2013-04-10 07:11:12 AM
I have no idea what happened and of course it's a horrible story.  HOWEVER, I have yet to meet a 17 year old (did she have them at 15) with so many tattoos that was all sweet and innocent.  Regret can be a hard pill for a kid to swallow and I'm guessing parents who let their kid run around with all that ink (fake or not) were probably not clued into how she was feeling until too late.
 
  2013-04-10 07:12:56 AM
msupf: so, if presented with the picture of a girl obviously inebriated or impaired, possibly displaying pain, being sexually violated, and testimony from that girl that it was not consensual, you'd immediately call bullshiat on her?

So now we're just going to make shiat up?
 
  2013-04-10 07:16:12 AM
If there was not sufficient evidence to prosecute rape how about prosecuting the people who were sending this trash around the net? Surely there are some laws that were broken?
 
  2013-04-10 07:18:25 AM
Lorelle: When you're so drunk that you're throwing up, it's clear that you are NOT in any condition to give consent to having sex, or to make any rational decision, for that matter.

So you've seen the picture? It's of a drunk girl passed out in a pile of her own vomit, being banged by a dude?

Oh wait, of course you haven't seen the picture, you have no farking idea what really happened. Since you're a chick, you automatically believe a girl when they say they were raped. Lets just ignore evidence and stuff and start convicting guys of rape whenever a woman says so. Women would never lie, right?
 
  2013-04-10 07:19:47 AM
Lsherm: [img42.imageshack.us image 620x348]

Still can't look at that picture without tearing up.


Neither can I, it appears.

Jesus Christ, we really have failed this generation of kids. Not sure what specific thing came unglued. Perhaps it's a laundry list of things.

Horribly sad.
 
  2013-04-10 07:22:06 AM
A lot of people here seem to be wondering how there was 'insufficient evidence...'

I can answer that question pretty easily, actually.

Let's assume for a second that there was a rape- it did happen, no consent.
That's easy enough- not just underage, but drunk... the entirety of the western world has laws preventing someone from being held to a contract signed while visibly intoxicated or under duress precisely because they're incapable of consenting... I see that as precedent for the same limitations on consent here.
If I sign a contract drunk, I can later get out of the contract by saying I didn't understand what was going on. If the photos (and any personal account or witness statement) confirm she was as far gone as I'd suspect here... even if she gave something that got taken as consent... she has a legal right to retract that consent once sober, in theory. [Word of warning to guys here- if she's buzzed, you're probably ok... wasted... even a yes is shaky, so just... don't.]

If the photo didn't include the boy's face, we very quickly have a problem.
She was drunk- she may not be able to identify the boys accurately (or accurately enough).
Even if the photo has identifying features (distinguishing birthmark or summat), they'd at least need a specific accusation against the correct individual to compel him to show it for comparison.
If it doesn't... well. We have a problem because we have a victim, but no way to identify the suspect beyond the hazy memories of a drunken, traumatic event.

As for the photo(s?)... they went viral- at a certain point, well before viral, it becomes impossible to trace them back to a source.
And bloody difficult to charge everyone who ever shared it with a count of child pornography, simply because there aren't enough handcuffs to go around.

Evidence may abound, but it's also all useless evidence unless a suspect comes forward and confesses, or someone close to the event is able to identify him/them.

Police have to let crimes they KNOW happened slide all the time because they are literally unable to pursue them... they lack a victim willing to prosecute, or legally usable evidence, or even a good suspect... or once in a while, they have all of the above, but lack the resources to do anything about it.
 
  2013-04-10 07:31:33 AM
At least the boys involved came to the realization that what they did was wrong.

//sarcasm mode off
 
  2013-04-10 07:33:59 AM
I'm sure being named "Rehtaeh" didn't help matters much, either. Seriously, parents...STAHP!!

In other news, sounds like some dude(s) need a killin'. But in the meantime, I'm OK with this: Multiple Anonymous-affiliated OP accounts are already trying to find and publish the identities of the four men involved with Rehtaeh's rape.
 
  2013-04-10 07:35:09 AM
phenn: Lsherm: [img42.imageshack.us image 620x348]

Still can't look at that picture without tearing up.

Neither can I, it appears.

Jesus Christ, we really have failed this generation of kids. Not sure what specific thing came unglued. Perhaps it's a laundry list of things.

Horribly sad.


I don't think stuff like this is really more common.  We just have more kids (look at the population size) with more means to broadcast/share their depression, teen angst, etc. and those same means make it more widey reported when they opt out.

Bullying is not anything new, most older folks remember it back in the day.
 
  2013-04-10 07:36:14 AM
doglover: Back in the day, the initial RCMP investigation would have been 4 homicides of teenage boys and no one would have seen anything.

I know if I were that girl's dad, I'd be facing the Crown on multiple homicide charges.  This shiat is sickening.
 
  2013-04-10 07:36:48 AM
Hope karma farks them in the ass with a nail-studded broom handle
 
  2013-04-10 07:37:36 AM
SpikeStrip: Nezorf: Great, another ape thread...

got something against apes?


Stop monkeying around with people's posts.
 
  2013-04-10 07:39:12 AM
Obviously he was just trying to advance in the main storyline.

i.imgur.com

STAY CLASSY ADFLY.
 
  2013-04-10 07:39:56 AM
gibbon1: NewportBarGuy: I hope the assholes die of ass cancer, slowly.

Passing pictures of her being raped around is a felony, her suicide should invoke the felony murder rule.


This.
 
  2013-04-10 07:41:46 AM
All I know is...I am NOT looking forward to when my son becomes a hormone-riddled teenager. I can preach and teach good behavior so much, but the other party has to listen.  And this kid has a hard time listening.
 
  2013-04-10 07:43:39 AM
Well I fully welcome the nuclear holocaust.
 
  2013-04-10 07:45:21 AM
farkmedown: gibbon1: NewportBarGuy: I hope the assholes die of ass cancer, slowly.

Passing pictures of her being raped around is a felony, her suicide should invoke the felony murder rule.

This.


At the very least, it's child porn.  Can't get these assholes on rape charges?  Child porn charges.  That includes the farktards that were passing the pictures around.
 
  2013-04-10 07:45:49 AM
rattchett: The boy was identified. According to Rehtaeh's mother he was looking at the camera giving a thumbs up in the photo I referenced above. The police also know who owned the phone that took the picture.

OK.  Thanks.  Slowly, details get filled in.

So we have this news, and let's add someone else's comment that she was puking while being railed.  So it's safe to assume she wasn't enjoying herself when the pic was taken.

Unfortunately, that still doesn't prove she did not consent or was not capable of consenting.  My ex told me a perfectly disgusting story about puking during a bj, and swore she was sober at the time

This girl drank a lot, but she puked out a window as well as during sex. How can anyone credibly estimate how much alcohol remained in her and how much it impaired her decision-making ability?  When I was a teen and first getting started, the first shot of liquor would try to come back up and sometimes succeeded.  Then I'd try again, and again, frustrated that I wasn't getting drunk.

It was quite some time after the party that she told her parents and they called the cops.  So the only other evidence of incapacitation is her testimony and the testimony of others at the party.  Apparently, the cops got all of that testimony.

The family was told that the photograph was not a criminal matter despite the girl's age.  That really surprises me, if it's true.  No one has cited a source that says it isn't true, so I'll be surprised for now.

The prosecutor decided there was too much doubt about her impairment or consent for a reasonable likelihood of conviction. Wouldn't you like a prosecutor to feel there's a reasonable likelihood of conviction before he charges you?

Now, it appears that the state has opened a new investigation into the girl's death.  Perhaps that will lead to charges against those who harassed the girl.  Or maybe not; it's been a long time since she moved away from them.

The case was incredibly messy.  The cops and prosecutors made the best of it they could, and came up short.  Until someone shows me evidence that they ignored evidence, I'm not going to blame them.
 
  2013-04-10 07:51:27 AM
She was underaged, how is that not child porn?
 
jxc
  2013-04-10 07:53:25 AM
Photos with tongue ring, tattoos, bongs and booze = sweet innocent teenage girl
One photo no one has seen = horrible teenage boys who must be put down in the most horrible way
Strange days....
 
  2013-04-10 07:53:42 AM
xanadian: All I know is...I am NOT looking forward to when my son becomes a hormone-riddled teenager. I can preach and teach good behavior so much, but the other party has to listen.  And this kid has a hard time listening.

sack of oranges... they'll listen and there won't be bruises... win-win
 
  2013-04-10 07:55:30 AM
This is very sad. My home town of Halifax is a shameful place sometimes. The school, the RCMP (Canadian nation police), the kids involved, their parents, and the justice system have all failed this girl and her family. Here are a whole bunch of things I don't get:

- According to a gut wrenching interview on CBC radio's As It Happens last night, the mother of this girl said they supplied the police with the names of many of the people at the party. They know who committed the crime and who witnessed it, yet the RCMP have done nothing to arrest these little monsters.

- The mother also said the school did not contact the family at all during this whole ordeal. Shame on them. In this area we hear an enormous amount of talk about bullying in the schools and all the good the schools do to curve its pursuit. Evidently talk is a cheap commodity used as a tool to make their public image perception all shiny and nice. They must get involved in such things to intervene early before it's too late. Someone at both schools must have known something here; I can't believe they were that naive. Do the right thing.

- The "adults" who own the home where the rape took place should be held accountable. The RCMP and the courts have completely failed in their responsibility to make these irresponsible people accountable for what goes on in their home. Teaching our kids to be good people takes an enormous amount effort; laziness and neglect is not an option.

- Shockingly, the mother said there is a boy in the photo having sex with the minor giving the thumps up. Look, RCMP! There he is! Get off your lazy asses, go to his home and arrest the little bastard! He's a rapist! Do your farking job!

- Online bulling is easy to track. It's online! The terrible kids who harassed this poor girl, and their parents need to be held accountable for just being horrible people if nothing else.

We like to proclaim ourselves as evolved beings here in 2013, but I'm not so sure sometimes. Rape should find no tolerance anywhere at any time period.
 
  2013-04-10 07:56:15 AM
jxc: Photos with tongue ring, tattoos, bongs and booze = sweet innocent teenage girl
One photo no one has seen = horrible teenage boys who must be put down in the most horrible way
Strange days....


You're right, how have I not seen this before? If a girl as a tattoo, then she is incapable of NOT being raped right? Only sweet innocent girls can be raped, so she has to have sex with anyone who wants it. Oh f*ck, how have I not seen this before?
 
  2013-04-10 07:58:50 AM
jxc: Photos with tongue ring, tattoos, bongs and booze = sweet innocent teenage girl
One photo no one has seen = horrible teenage boys who must be put down in the most horrible way
Strange days....


So a rape isn't actually a rape if the victim's appearance doesn't meet with your approval.

Gotcha.
 
  2013-04-10 08:01:38 AM
I don't usually support Anonymous and their antics, but go get em guys.  This is sick.  Barring any kind of crazy info we don't have, the whole town should be ashamed of itself and mostly the rcmp.  Let's hope these goons learn their lesson in prison on how much fun it is to get raped.  Heck maybe we can call in a favor with the AB and get them to gang rape these lil fun boys and publish the pics.  Anyhoo, at the very least I hope her family can find peace someday as this is a tragedy that gets played out way too often.  If it was a teacher, farkers would be bro fisting.  Let's hope they think of this the next time one of those threads comes up.

My only CSB:  A friend in college decided to bed this disgusting douche that myself and her girlfriends warned her about.  She goes over there and they hook up one night and he videos the whole thing.  Shows it around to his friends and it gets back to us.  Myself and this douche actually came from the same hometown before college so I knew him and his ilk.  Dropped a dime to some friends that were still at home and when he went back for spring break they found him on a boardwalk one night.  He returned to college with a broken arm, nose, and two black eyes.  His arm had been broken over the rail of the boardwalk.  Another day we went and retrieved the tape and smashed it.  L as we'll call her, dropped out of college after another semester and just started working at home.  Probably waits at a Chili's or some such these days.  The douche-who knows.  Hopefully he didn't do anything like that again.
 
  2013-04-10 08:02:48 AM
Lorelle: doglover: Teenage girls are the least compassionate creatures on the planet. Even honey badger steers clear. Teenage boys are right behind them. I think it's some kind of mixture of ignorance and hormones.

Some are. I was bullied a lot in junior high and high school, mostly by other girls. In jr. high it was female gang members, in h.s. it was stuck-up, biatchy female socs.

/eventually got revenge on the latter
//enjoyed it immensely



I remember that.  You got covered in pigs' blood or something at the prom, then everything started on fire and shiat.  Freaked me the hell out.
 
  2013-04-10 08:03:20 AM
Warlordtrooper: BarkingUnicorn: Warlordtrooper: Why does the drunk means you can't give consent only apply to women?

We're the guys also drunk? If they were wouldn't that mean thy also couldn't give consent?

Not to being penetrated.  Rape laws (a subset of "sexual assault" laws) involve penetration of the sexual, oral, or "elimination" orifices, "however slight."

Also, "drunk" is insufficient; you must be so drunk that an ordinary (including "sober") observer would reasonably conclude that you are incapable of making rational decisions.

Ah ok. So basically pissed drunk.

Its sad that the rapists aren't being charged but it's better then convicting somebody without a level of evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt


If "pissed drunk" means "can't find your car," then the standard is not that high. More like DUI, I would say.  They do call it "driving while impaired" in some States.

I'm not going to call anyone a rapist until he's been convicted by a jury.
 
Displayed 50 of 549 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all

Log in (at the top of the page) to enable voting.
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

 
   Forgot password? Create an account to make comments
  Remember me Use HTML Buttons
If you can see this, something's wrong with your browser's CSS support.
 
Before posting, please take a minute to review our posting rules and our legal/privacy policy.
By posting, you agree to these terms.
Got questions about Fark? See our FAQ.
Notify moderators about this thread
(comment-related issues: posting rule violations, etc.)
...or Notify admins about this link
(link/headline related issues: bad link, bad headline, repeats, etc.)
If you are about to post a question that requires an answer from us, use Farkback instead.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report