If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   U.S. Employers have more job openings than at any other time in nearly five years, they are in no hurry to fill them. We're living in a fear-based environment right now, thanks Obama   (finance.yahoo.com) divider line 26
    More: Sad, United States, job opening, staffing firm, environmentalisms, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago  
•       •       •

3167 clicks; posted to Business » on 10 Apr 2013 at 4:11 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-04-10 12:58:22 AM  
13 votes:
Why would I hire more workers at a time when Taxbongo has already collected two of the relics and only needs the Ivory Jackal to achieve global domination?
2013-04-10 12:24:51 AM  
5 votes:
If we're spending so much on our military, why do we have to pay our debts?
2013-04-09 09:02:26 PM  
4 votes:

NewportBarGuy: Tax and spend seems to have worked and we've never incurred as much debt as with tax CUT policies. Why don't we go back to what worked before?


Because black and brown poor people have gay marriages and abortions.
2013-04-10 05:04:40 AM  
3 votes:
If we shift more taxes from employers to employees, shift more taxes from the 1% to the 47%, eliminate more regulations and oversight, and throw in some more million dollar ceo bonuses, perhaps they'll consider ending our current wage deflation program and returning to the more stable wage stagnation policy we've enjoyed for nearly half a century. But we'd better not ask for clean air or affordable healthcare, because that would introduce uncertainty and require more wage deflation.
2013-04-10 07:41:11 AM  
2 votes:

Mike_LowELL: Why would I hire more workers at a time when Taxbongo has already collected two of the relics and only needs the Ivory Jackal to achieve global domination?


If you were a chocolate bunny I would eat your ears
2013-04-10 07:22:53 AM  
2 votes:
Clearly we need to get rid of unions, pensions, minimum wage laws, OSHA and DEP, *then* those skittish corporations will finally feel safe.
2013-04-10 06:45:37 AM  
2 votes:

randomjsa: vygramul: What were we doing in 2000?

Watching the tech bubble burst.

But the job losses that resulted from that along with the 9/11 attack in 2001 should be no excuse... All the job losses from 2001-2005 were Bush's fault. The DNC campaign ads in 2004 told me this so it must be true.

But nothing is ever Obama's fault, particularly not the economy since he took office so you can't blame him for the record high number of people on welfare or the 20-30+ year record for lowest labor participation rate. You certainly can't blame Obama for insisting come hell or high water on a tax increase at the start of the year, nor can you blame him for proposing another 700 billion in tax increases in his budget, nor can you blame him for the boondoggle known as ObamaCare which is making companies less willing to hire.


I agree - Obama is way too conservative. This country needs a real progressive, like FDR.
We need to start by raping the GOP in 2014.
2013-04-10 05:43:58 AM  
2 votes:

Albino Squid: The good news is that a sudden upswing in the economy and concurrent downswing in the unemployment rate would probably convince employers that hiring someone qualified, rather than waiting for a Nobel laureate to apply for that position, isn't such a bad thing, because soon you might have a whole bunch of competition for skilled workers.

The bad news is that austerity fever is busy kneecapping the economy such that it won't happen.


My employer has enjoyed hiring Nobel laureates for a few years now. The mid-level managers who make the hiring decisions walk around with their chests puffed out, bragging about how they hired someone with a Master's degree for a job that doesn't even require a Bachelor's degree. On the one hand, that new hire leaves quickly and my employer wastes a lot of time and money on turnover, recruitment and training, and lost productivity. But on the other hand, a few mid-level managers get to walk around with their chests puffed out. You've got to have priorities.
2013-04-10 05:41:36 AM  
2 votes:

NewportBarGuy: fake lobster meet?


3.bp.blogspot.comfarm3.static.flickr.comwww.ireviewcostumes.comfarm9.staticflickr.com
www.reactionface.info
2013-04-10 05:11:59 AM  
2 votes:

WhyteRaven74: Nothing says people have to just accept how things are, Americans have in the past moved to change things. Plenty of things that could be done now to move things along. Like get rid of all exemptions to overtime pay and mandate all hours over 40 come with overtime. Oh sure Goldman and Sachs will cry like a spoiled brat but that's hardly a downside.


Class warfare!

Corporations have a right to bilk their workers out of fair pay for their labor.
2013-04-10 04:49:49 AM  
2 votes:

Mike_LowELL: Why would I hire more workers at a time when Taxbongo has already collected two of the relics and only needs the Ivory Jackal to achieve global domination?


This thread was over some time ago.

Why are people still typing and not running for their lives?
2013-04-10 01:31:12 AM  
2 votes:

Mike_LowELL: Why would I hire more workers at a time when Taxbongo has already collected two of the relics and only needs the Ivory Jackal to achieve global domination?


Well it's a good thing the Society of Pissed Off Old White People is keeping the Ivory Jackal safe in the garden shed.
2013-04-10 10:45:45 AM  
1 votes:

Lawyers With Nukes: I swear, it's like you farksters live in a cartoon or something.

"Evil rich...(slurp)...gimme jerb...(herp)...I'll kill you and take your stuff...please hire me...(derp)"

Want to understand what's going on? Go out and start a small business. Small business owners are hurting bad and dont know what the future will bring. Meanwhile the applicants either suck, or have a sucky attitude.


Pretend small business owner detected.
2013-04-10 10:02:46 AM  
1 votes:

Bucky Katt: BunkyBrewman: NewportBarGuy: Tax and spend seems to have worked and we've never incurred as much debt as with tax CUT policies. Why don't we go back to what worked before?

Spend on credit seems to have worked as well, hasn't it?

Please enlighten us... WHAT exactly worked before?

austerity has a brilliant track record, then?



Austerity has a perfect record.

It's never worked.
2013-04-10 08:58:23 AM  
1 votes:

o5iiawah: Obama's policies are almost identical to FDR.  To suggest he's a conservative means you should probably ask for your money back from whatever institution provided you with an education.


i.imgur.com
How, in the name of Cthulu, are Obama's policies similar in ANY way, shape, or form to FDR's New Deal?

Please explain this one to me. Because of Obama tried to do what FDR tried to do before World War II, he would have been thrown out onto the white house lawn with torches and pitchforks.
2013-04-10 07:24:08 AM  
1 votes:

Mr. Coffee Nerves: Clearly we need to get rid of unions, pensions, minimum wage laws, OSHA and DEP, *then* those skittish corporations will finally feel safe.


Sorry, EPA, not DEP. DEP is Pennsylvania only. But get rid of them, too, just to be safe. The gas drillers will just police themselves like those noted environmentalists that ran the coal industry 100 years ago did.
2013-04-10 05:56:18 AM  
1 votes:

Old enough to know better: Well of course they're keeping the labor market tight. Business owners are probably scared shiatless of what employee's are likely to do to them should workers ever gain the upper hand again in this economy.

Payback is a biatch.


Everybody is waiting for the other guy to make the first move. Employees have been overworked for the better part of a decade and they're getting worn out. What's going to happen is a few companies are going to decide that it's a good time to get a permanent increase in market share at the expense of their frightened competitors. To do that, they're going to have to hire. Those who do will be able to expand while the rest will have to play catch up.

Once the hiring frenzy gets started, things are going to get really crappy for employers as employees bitter about the way they've been treated jump ship. The company they go to probably will be just as guilty as the company they left of mistreating employees but they won't know that or won't care since it didn't happen to them (no bad mental associations everyday going to the same office). This will be really bad for employers because a huge amount of institutional knowledge will be walking out the door. If a few people leave, new people can be hired and they can learn from those still around. Large numbers of people leave and that knowledge is gone forever and will have to be rediscovered at a high cost.

Productivity numbers are likely to take a nose dive and there will be nothing employers will be able to do to get it back since employees will be able to leave if the employer tries to whip them into higher productivity. It's not a situation where you want to be the employer trying to keep up with a competitor who is taking your market share and racing away. It's unlikely these trailing companies are going to understand why this happened to them. I foresee lots of middle managers who have spent the last half a decade crapping on employees getting the boot as they're not mentally able to adjust to not having the power in the employee relationship anymore. It's also going to be funny to watch HR departments get overworked trying to replace the people they spent much of their time telling "shut up and get back to work, you're lucky to have a job" when employees complained about poor management behavior.

I opted out of the labor market a little over a year ago. It's interesting to see my former employers reaching out to try to hire me even though I haven't so much as posted a resume. The dumbest is my last employer who I left because of poor treatment. After six months of searching they hired someone to replace me and three months later ran the guy off. According to my former co-workers, the guy was a good worker, he just wasn't willing to put up with the department manager treating him like dirt. They simply can't figure out why they can't keep people around, blaming the labor market instead of their own stupidity. The next five years is going to be fun to watch as companies have to tear themselves apart to remake themselves or die when their competitors grab market share that use to belong to the dysfunctional company. Maybe they'll try staffing up with "do the needful" visa holders.
2013-04-10 05:55:24 AM  
1 votes:
We need to go back to the tax rates of Reagan.  It pays companies too much to just sit on cash right now.
2013-04-10 05:04:28 AM  
1 votes:
Well of course they're keeping the labor market tight. Business owners are probably scared shiatless of what employee's are likely to do to them should workers ever gain the upper hand again in this economy.

Payback is a biatch.
2013-04-10 01:26:20 AM  
1 votes:

Lando Lincoln: Therion: Isn't it wonderful that fear will make full-time engineer-level employees accept part-time technician pay and be glad to work fifty hours a week with no benefits?

THAT'S CLASS WARFARE.


No it isn't. That's the wonderful capitalist system working.

Questioning why such employees are working for lower level wages and no benefits...THAT'S class warfare
2013-04-10 01:19:30 AM  
1 votes:
Obama should wave his magic wand and fix everything.
2013-04-10 12:38:18 AM  
1 votes:

jaylectricity: If we're spending so much on our military, why do we have to pay our debts?


We don't. It's mostly a courtesy.
2013-04-10 12:02:14 AM  
1 votes:

vygramul: BunkyBrewman: NewportBarGuy: Tax and spend seems to have worked and we've never incurred as much debt as with tax CUT policies. Why don't we go back to what worked before?

Spend on credit seems to have worked as well, hasn't it?

Please enlighten us... WHAT exactly worked before?

What were we doing in 2000?


About to make a terrible decision in Presidential politics. Why do you ask?
2013-04-09 09:36:54 PM  
1 votes:
Well, the government isn't threatening to shut down anything for a few more months, at least, and once the sequester does its damage and works its way through the system it looks like were poised for some real recovery once businesses aren't afraid of Congress's incompetence. We just need Congress not to do anything monumentally stupid for about 10 months. In other words: we're boned.
2013-04-09 09:04:22 PM  
1 votes:

clancifer: Because black and brown poor people have gay marriages and abortions.


I hear tell that they also abscond with live lobsters on the first of the month with their food stamps. How the f*ck am I supposed to host a proper luncheon with fake lobster meet? Or, lubetser, as they term it.

These people need to be liquidated.
2013-04-09 09:02:16 PM  
1 votes:
4.bp.blogspot.com
 
Displayed 26 of 26 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report