fozziewazzi: Summercat: While I agree that taxis ought to be regulated in general, as per the base arguements presented in the article for said regulation, I do not see why it has to be a flat fee that low.In short, the practice is okay, but the specifics might need tweaking. A lot. The Taxicab companies do have a point about them not being profitable. If the city wants to use them as a public transportation company, perhaps they should considering hiring the cabs themselves, and charging fees that keep the business break-even.Allow cabs to set some rates themselves, but they have to be fixed once the cab starts. No gouging rich looking people (Nobody deserved to be gouged.). Perhaps a flat fee plus a distance and gas surcharge that covers a predetermined estimate (Generated weekly, or even monthly, to adjust for price fluxuations) of the cost of wear and tear and gas for said distance.I dunno. *shrug*The article doesn't mention that the cab business is typically very restricted. Unlike most businesses you can't just submit a license and get started. In NYC the Taxi and Limousine Commission jealousy guards their monopoly and fights hard whenever someone tries to get into the business, especially in the lucrative tourist areas. In exchange for that protection the companies agree to be held to certain restrictions regarding pricing and service.
If you like these links, you'll love
Total accessTotal knowledgeTotal Fark
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Nov 22 2017 06:58:20
Runtime: 0.328 sec (328 ms)