threadjackistan: Pinko_Commie: threadjackistan: Man On Pink Corner: threadjackistan: Man On Pink Corner: (Shrug) To those who understand, no explanation is necessary. To those who don't, no explanation is possible.This wasnt a farking original Model-T.Correct, it was one hell of a lot rarer and more influential.More influential, because this car mechanized America, right? This Lamborghini was the first car that the average person could afford to buy? I'm sorry, how can a Lamborghini ever be influential as far as anyone is concerned. It's a tiny little niche thing. It will never influence the world. Lamborghini isnt Saab, Saab influences the with their fighter aircraft and light attack munition manufacturing. Saab doesnt even make cars anymore.Lamborghini makes cars for the super rich. That is about it. If they make IFVs of any-sort I'll withdrawal my argument of their insignificance. But what worth does a sports car have?[upload.wikimedia.org image 640x427]So they also make shiat tractors as well as overpriced cars?
Thunderboy: threadjackistan: Man On Pink Corner: (Shrug) To those who understand, no explanation is necessary. To those who don't, no explanation is possible.This wasnt a farking original Model-T.Number of Model Ts currently in existence - @100,000Number of Lamborghini Miuras produced (all variants) - @750 749
threadjackistan: Wow, you all think I;m some car fan that thinks this thing was a piece of shiat. I dont know the first thing about this car except but what I;ve been told by you all about it.No, you guys are right. We should bow down and worship this museum worthy car. I could go faster than other cars like it. And it looks pretty too. Not a waste of materiel at all.
ZackDanger: EraserDH: OH NOES a 1%ermobile went up in smoke!In other news, a bunch of darkies died in African civil strife today but who the fark gives a shiat about that because WHITE PEOPLE.Why do you assume that to own this car the the person had to be white?thatsracist.gif
Vienna: Subby: saddest thing you'll see todayI'm gonna guess that a vast majority of Farkers would disagree.
threadjackistan: Lsherm: threadjackistan: Awww, a rich person had their easily replaceable automobile catch on fire?I should care because?Well, for one, it isn't easily replaceable.Please explain to me how it isnt easly replaceable. Did it get exceptional gas mileage? Did it have a unique cargo capacity? It what sense is this automobile difficult to replace? Perhapse if had a specialized medical suite in the trunk I might be able to understand.But I suspect that this was just a rare pokemon car for the super rich. And that it is about as difficult to replace as my old Desert Storm trading cards? What irreplaceable economic function does it provide? Or am I right? Is this just a poor little super rich man lost his toy?
super_grass: As a non-1%er without penile insecurity, why should I give a single morsel of crap again?
orbister: All these Italian sports cars look the same to me. Why should I car, particularly, if one of them catches fire?
threadjackistan: Awww, a rich person had their easily replaceable automobile catch on fire?I should care because?
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Apr 27 2017 00:36:23
Runtime: 0.341 sec (341 ms)