Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

I'd imagine he'll pay, but a lot less.  Unless this guy has significant assets can be shown to truly be trolling the courts. The important thing though is making him pay at least court costs for this incident to show you can't troll the courts as a retirement hobby.

cman: One cannot be deemed an "idiot" in a court of law.

They certainly can. But it's more of a defense than a charge.

Frivolous lawsuits contribute to a larger government.  Dick.

so, he's a conservatard? Retardlican? spoiled brat throwing a fit because the black man got elected?

ha-ha-guy: can be shown to truly be trolling the courts

FTFA:

Apparently Strunk had written 20 previous lawsuits. Most have been dismissed

Somehow I doubt those prior lawsuits had any more merit than this one.

Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

Yeah. Cutting his balls off sounds about right.

Rush and Fox will make him a martyr by the end of next week.

Pud: "I'm going to have this thing overturned and I'm not going to pay a dime," vowed Strunk .

Yea, thumbing your nose at the judge. Let me know how that one works out for ya'

It gets him more attention, so it will work out for him just fine.

Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

This post makes me want to drop my Libertarian card for a Republican card, just to spite you.

The public ends up paying for frivolous lawsuits.

Pud: "I'm going to have this thing overturned and I'm not going to pay a dime," vowed Strunk .

Yea, thumbing your nose at the judge. Let me know how that one works out for ya'

Any legal expert care to chime in?  I mean, how hard is it to overturn fines like this that are imposed by a judge?  I'd imagine not easy...

The conspiracy spreads!

"If the complaint in this action was a movie script, it would be entitled 'The Manchurian Candidate Meets The Da Vinci Code.'"

Hell, I'd see that movie.

I'm not versed in photoshop, but this guy is begging for the Hee-Haw treatment with bale of hay and banjo.

Charlie Chingas: so, he's a conservatard? Retardlican? spoiled brat throwing a fit because the black man got elected?

Now now, both sides have their share of nutters. Just that right-wing nutters burden society in extra special ways.

Mr. Coffee Nerves: Yet another activist judge in on the conspiracy! The Hoverrounds ride at dawn!

This.

Arkanaut: The conspiracy spreads!

Exactly...now even lower court judges are in on it!!!

/off to wash my hands

GAT_00: Can you get cited for contempt outside of the courtroom?

For failing to obey a court order / judges order.

Change that blue suit to a pair of bib overalls, put a straw hat on him, and he'd feel right at home here in Texas. We have a large supply of nutters just like him.

GAT_00: Pud: "I'm going to have this thing overturned and I'm not going to pay a dime," vowed Strunk .

Yea, thumbing your nose at the judge. Let me know how that one works out for ya'

Can you get cited for contempt outside of the courtroom?

Most contempt happens outside of court. Ignoring the court and not showing up often results in contempt rulings.

Here's a strategy: buy the judgment against him and plague him with legal action until he pays.  It works in the credit card business.

Wook: Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

This post makes me want to drop my Libertarian card for a Republican card, just to spite you.

The public ends up paying for frivolous lawsuits.

Mmm, I think I misdirected my snark.  Yes, frivolous lawsuits are bad.  Yes, Republicans say they are against them.  Unless, you know, it involves pointing out the derp of a large number of their supports.

But you carry whatever card you like ;)

Had it been the guys first lawsuit on the issue than I may have been irked by the Judge's fine. But 20 previous ones? Come on your time would be more productive arguing with trolls.

Seriously though what do people honestly hope to accomplish with this? Making sure Biden gets to be president.

A few days maybe weeks of news coverage would occure before people went back to their normal business and by the next election they will have virtually forgotten about it.

Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

Only the lawsuits against corporations that "donate" to massive "campaign contributions".

Carn: Wook: Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

This post makes me want to drop my Libertarian card for a Republican card, just to spite you.

The public ends up paying for frivolous lawsuits.

Mmm, I think I misdirected my snark.  Yes, frivolous lawsuits are bad.  Yes, Republicans say they are against them.  Unless, you know, it involves pointing out the derp of a large number of their supports.

But you carry whatever card you like ;)

Supporters.  Derp.

cman: One cannot be deemed an "idiot" in a court of law.

That's what Fark is for.

Mithiwithi: Can this guy still file new lawsuits with 177 unpaid big ones hanging over his head? That would seem to be a very sensible way to shut him down, if not. Even if they never actually get any significant amount of that money out of him, it'll be worth it in the long run if nonpayment is sufficient grounds to bar him from filing any more bullshiat lawsuits.

I am not a lawyer but I seriously doubt that having (what I assume to be) a civil judgement against you in one court legally bars you from pursuing litigation, even in that same court. Now, how the presiding judge will view that litigation is another matter entirely.  Just from my experiences with district and federal judges outside of a courtroom setting I can say that they are typicallypretty goddamn impressed with themselves and it is best not to poke at them.

Danger Avoid Death: Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

Yeah. Cutting his balls off sounds about right.

He looks pretty old. I doubt they work very well.

How much is Obaamma being fined for being an idiot?

I'm almost 100% positive you can't be punished for being an idiot in America. At least I have to assume so, given the idiot to punishment ratio.

Deep Contact: How much is Obaamma being fined for being an idiot?

You're supposed to say Fartbongo or King Obambo von Socialista.

Deep Contact: How much is Obaamma being fined for being an idiot?

You don't get fined for being an idiot. You get promoted.

Chuck Wagon: Danger Avoid Death: Carn: Republicans are all about getting rid of frivolous lawsuits so they're going to castigate this guy, right?  Right?

Yeah. Cutting his balls off sounds about right.

He looks pretty old. I doubt they work very well.

I don't think the berries ever go bad, I think the twig just wilts.

Charlie Chingas: "so, he's a conservatard? Retardlican? spoiled brat throwing a fit because the black man got elected?"

Yes.


semiotix: "If the complaint in this action was a movie script, it would be entitled 'The Manchurian Candidate Meets The Da Vinci Code.'"

Hell, I'd see that movie."


So would I. Plot might be kinda hard to follow, though.

roddack: Had it been the guys first lawsuit on the issue than I may have been irked by the Judge's fine. But 20 previous ones? Come on your time would be more productive arguing with trolls.

Seriously though what do people honestly hope to accomplish with this? Making sure Biden gets to be president.

A few days maybe weeks of news coverage would occure before people went back to their normal business and by the next election they will have virtually forgotten about it.


Before long you will start seeing the claims that Biden is not eligible to run for President in 2016. This is because the Muslin Usurper was never really eligible to be President and so for the past 5 years Biden was really President.

Deep Contact: How much is Obaamma being fined for being an idiot?

You are not competent at trolling.

Deep Contact: How much is Obaamma being fined for being an idiot?

He's being fined at a rate of $10,000 for each major idiotic thing he's done, and $1,000 for each lesser idiotic thing. Trivial idiotic things he gets a pass on.

So far the fines have added up to $0.

/wonder what that means...