If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Google)   Best Leader has final approval to launch nukes   (google.com) divider line 639
    More: News, United States, National Defense University, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Ministry of Unification, nuclear detonation, weapons-grade plutonium, North Korean military, interceptors  
•       •       •

20872 clicks; posted to Main » on 03 Apr 2013 at 8:07 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



639 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-04-03 08:11:14 PM  
Put me down for Okinawa in the NK nuke pool.
 
2013-04-03 08:11:21 PM  
encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com
 
2013-04-03 08:11:24 PM  
Rodman infected him with the crazy......
 
2013-04-03 08:12:03 PM  
shiat or get off the pot. You'll get hemorrhoids.
 
2013-04-03 08:12:31 PM  
Yongbyon reactor
yeah, about that...
 
2013-04-03 08:13:09 PM  

MaliFinn:


Does he have enough generals points to unlock the nuclear helix?
 
2013-04-03 08:13:31 PM  
i50.tinypic.com
 
2013-04-03 08:14:01 PM  
So when is Israel going to launch their nukes and protect North America from the nuclear menace???????


/Wake me up when the nuke fallout is. Then I'll start looting whatever government office is breakable.
//Next up is which neighbors taste the best?
 
2013-04-03 08:14:02 PM  
www.supplementinnercircle.com
 
2013-04-03 08:14:09 PM  

Bontesla: The more he moves toward war - the more I'm thinking that he had something up his sleeve.


His sleevies are where he keeps his armies
 
2013-04-03 08:15:29 PM  
I actually wouldn't mind seeing them try. Heck, the US should even give them a 3 day advance warning of their attack, so that every man, woman and child has the chance to flee the country before it's razed to the ground.
 
2013-04-03 08:16:46 PM  
 
2013-04-03 08:17:03 PM  
I'm gonna keep posting this. Stratfor's take on Best Korea. Ferocious, Weak, and Crazy: The North Korean Strategy
 
2013-04-03 08:17:44 PM  
i0.kym-cdn.com
 
2013-04-03 08:17:52 PM  
I'm hoping this will be like an old Road Runner / Wile E. Coyote skit, where Dear Leader pushes the launch button and a little flag in the shape of a mushroom cloud pops up.
 
2013-04-03 08:18:48 PM  

Ow! That was my feelings!: I'm gonna keep posting this. Stratfor's take on Best Korea. Ferocious, Weak, and Crazy: The North Korean Strategy


The past 72 hours have ramped up well beyond Stratofr's expectations when that was written.
 
2013-04-03 08:19:10 PM  
ITS HAPPENING
 
2013-04-03 08:19:33 PM  
This is such bullshiat, they're not going to do anything. The North Koreans are in bed with the Obama administration and are only doing this to distract us from Benghazi. Study it out.
 
2013-04-03 08:20:16 PM  
Kim Jong-Un is a world master troll.
 
2013-04-03 08:20:23 PM  
They couldn't launch a water balloon.

/China will just kill him soon if he becomes too much of a problem.
 
2013-04-03 08:20:33 PM  

ultraholland: This is such bullshiat, they're not going to do anything. The North Koreans are in bed with the Obama administration and are only doing this to distract us from Benghazi. Study it out.


lol you a funny person
 
2013-04-03 08:21:06 PM  
 upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-04-03 08:21:31 PM  
The one worry I have is this little shiat manages to get one missile in the air and it explodes some crappy low kiloton yield somewhere harmless like the ocean or the wilderness of Alaska or Canada.
 
2013-04-03 08:21:40 PM  
 
2013-04-03 08:21:53 PM  
fc05.deviantart.net
 
2013-04-03 08:22:09 PM  

ultraholland: This is such bullshiat, they're not going to do anything. The North Koreans are in bed with the Obama administration and are only doing this to distract us from Benghazi.


Is it working?
 
2013-04-03 08:22:50 PM  
 
2013-04-03 08:22:55 PM  

dameron: My fear is that he'll float a nuke into the port of Long Beach.  I have no doubt they could do this.  This is exactly the scenario Oppenheimer presented to Congress back in 1945.

<i>Sen. Millikin: We... have mine-detecting devices, which are rather effective... I was wondering if anything of that kind might be available to use as a defense against that particular type of use of atomic bombs.

Dr. Oppenheimer: If you hired me to walk through the cellars of Washington to see whether there were atomic bombs, I think my most important tool would be a screwdriver to open the crates and look. I think that just walking by, swinging a little gadget would not give me the information </i>

It'd be REALLY hard to find a well hidden atomic bomb.   Even given 1940's technology, the radioactive plutonium core of an implosion type bomb would weight less than 20 pounds.


This is an extremely important point that nearly everyone overlooks. Best Korea doesn't need missiles to deliver a nuke to take out a US city.

It would be very easy to conceal a nuke in a shipping cargo container and set it off when it gets into SF Bay. Send it part by part to Pakistan as innocent looking bits and pieces (baseball sized chuck of plutonium goes in a tractor engine block), assemble it, put it in a lead box; and into a container headed to the US. You wouldn't even have to bribe people to look the other way. Shielding a nuke so that radiation detectors can't find it is completely trivial, six inches of lead will do the job just fine.

Pakistan got alot of their nuke parts from NK (or was it the other way around?) so, it can be done.

Or, put it on a submarine and send it on a one way trip. You don't have to go all the way to California, Tokyo, US bases in South Korea, or Pearl Harbor are all alot closer.

Probably NK is just running at the mouth, but since they *can* deliver a nuke already, I think this needs to be taken seriously. I'd suggest a nuclear air burst to take out the electronics of the entire country, and then conventionally bomb every military-related installation into complete dust. It's a bad scenario, but I see no particular reason to think that NK is batshiat insane and means business this time.
 
2013-04-03 08:23:06 PM  

YouPeopleAreCrazy: Come at me, bro

[24.media.tumblr.com image 500x333]


Dude, my brother is on one of those. STFU unless it's your butt on that ship.

/not interested in having him come home in a body bag
 
2013-04-03 08:23:11 PM  

dameron: My fear is that he'll float a nuke into the port of Long Beach.  I have no doubt they could do this.  This is exactly the scenario Oppenheimer presented to Congress back in 1945.

<i>Sen. Millikin: We... have mine-detecting devices, which are rather effective... I was wondering if anything of that kind might be available to use as a defense against that particular type of use of atomic bombs.

Dr. Oppenheimer: If you hired me to walk through the cellars of Washington to see whether there were atomic bombs, I think my most important tool would be a screwdriver to open the crates and look. I think that just walking by, swinging a little gadget would not give me the information </i>

It'd be REALLY hard to find a well hidden atomic bomb.   Even given 1940's technology, the radioactive plutonium core of an implosion type bomb would weight less than 20 pounds.


This, this is the only thing that has me concerned.

They can't get a missle over here, but a warhead in the cargo hold of some shiatball oil fired freighter?

No problem.
 
2013-04-03 08:23:36 PM  
i.dailymail.co.uk

considering their maps have  straight lines on a plant thats round, even if they do launch they'll probably hit Antarctica.
 
2013-04-03 08:23:36 PM  

cretinbob: [www.gonemovies.com image 468x357]


How many times have I told you I don't want no horsin' around on the plane?
 
2013-04-03 08:23:47 PM  

Mr.Poops: I actually wouldn't mind seeing them try. Heck, the US should even give them a 3 day advance warning of their attack, so that every man, woman and child has the chance to flee the country before it's razed to the ground.


They won't raze the whole country, just the capital. There really isn't anything else of significance besides empty farms and starving peasants.
 
2013-04-03 08:23:47 PM  
cdn.avsforum.com
 
2013-04-03 08:23:48 PM  
No worries until he gets double secret approval.
 
2013-04-03 08:24:09 PM  

The Bestest: Ow! That was my feelings!: I'm gonna keep posting this. Stratfor's take on Best Korea. Ferocious, Weak, and Crazy: The North Korean Strategy

The past 72 hours have ramped up well beyond Stratofr's expectations when that was written.


Nope. It's all still the same bullshiat, different day. Nothing has changed except the attention paid. Best Korea is not gonna start a war they have no chance to 'win'.
 
2013-04-03 08:24:53 PM  
i.imgur.com
 
2013-04-03 08:25:38 PM  

oldfarthenry: This is like recess with the special-needs kid in his wheelchair ramming the sports jock in the ankles.
If the jock punches Timmy in the face he's deemed a bully. If he does nothing Timmy will pinch his nuts with his reaching stick.

There's no easy way out of this.


LOL'D SO HARD

\because its true
 
2013-04-03 08:25:51 PM  

GAT_00: SnakeLee: "Never has the whole Korean peninsula been exposed to such danger of a nuclear war as today," it added.

[c481901.r1.cf2.rackcdn.com image 364x370]

You sure about that?

Eisenhower openly considered ending the Korean war with nukes.  He thought it was a cheap way to wage war.


I think you're thinking of MacArthur. None of the biographies of Ike that I've read claim that he considered at all.

It is true that the military in the US at that time viewed nukes as a very good bang for the buck bargain without much thought about what a nuclear war would really mean...
 
2013-04-03 08:26:08 PM  
Come on USA, let's just liberate North Korea! They might not have oil, but think of all the kimchi and rice plus barbeque pork that we can "develop"! Better to take their kimchi, rice, and pork now than get blasted by nuclear bombs!
 
2013-04-03 08:26:09 PM  
At this point it would be safe to conclude that not only does NK not have a way out of this situation, it wants this to happen.

I guess after 50 years NK is in "let's end this war, one way or another" mode.
 
2013-04-03 08:26:34 PM  
Assuming Best Korea's Troll-In-Chief actually *has* nukes to spare to throw at someone, and assuming he actually has a missile to attach them to that can fly further than 1,000km, and assuming he has a guidance system that can actually allow a warhead to come within 5km of his intended target, he *might* actually be able to cause some damage... right before we turn Best Korea into the World's Biggest Glass-Covered Self-Lighting Parking Lot.
 
2013-04-03 08:27:19 PM  

Spanky_McFarksalot: [i.dailymail.co.uk image 638x448]


4 servers?  Apparently one of them fancy restaurants.
 
2013-04-03 08:28:07 PM  

ultraholland: This is such bullshiat, they're not going to do anything. The North Koreans are in bed with the Obama administration and are only doing this to distract us from Benghazi. Study it out.


Oh, I like the cut of your kimchi!
 
2013-04-03 08:28:35 PM  
Spanky_McFarksalot: i.dailymail.co.uk 

MY GOD, we misunderestimated  them, they have enough food to make at least 2 people fat!
 
2013-04-03 08:28:57 PM  

GAT_00: CaptSacto: That's what makes me wonder if Un is really calling the shots.

I saw some article speculating this is all trying to stop a coup from happening, but I don't understand how this would stop a coup either.


Right now, Kim is not personally responsible for any of the atrocities and human rights violations going on in Best Korea (in that he didn't order them, he's just perpetuating them). His generals and advisors, however, are. If Kim wants to make things better and normalize relations with the West, everyone else gets to stand in front of the Hague, and they know it--so if Kim HAS been making such noises, the generals have likewise been making noises to the effect of "Nice lifestyle you got here, 'Dear Leader', shame if anything happened to it."

OTOH, if Kim starts a war he knows he has to lose, he can surrender to the US on his own terms, which would include throwing his loyal generals under an Abrams tank (literally or figuratively, doesn't much matter) while he keeps his pudgy head intact. It's a win-win for him at this point.
 
2013-04-03 08:28:59 PM  

ClavellBCMI: Assuming Best Korea's Troll-In-Chief actually *has* nukes to spare to throw at someone, and assuming he actually has a missile to attach them to that can fly further than 1,000km, and assuming he has a guidance system that can actually allow a warhead to come within 5km of his intended target, he *might* actually be able to cause some damage... right before we turn Best Korea into the World's Biggest Glass-Covered Self-Lighting Parking Lot.


We lost face on the world stage when Bush invaded Iraq.

Do we get another peace prize when we incinerate millions of Nork civillians?

Is it a different because Obama is black?
 
2013-04-03 08:29:51 PM  
Your funeral.  Really.
 
2013-04-03 08:29:56 PM  
Well this is a good propaganda move to show the people that he is strong like his ironfisted daddy and granddaddy.  The people don't know any better.
 
2013-04-03 08:30:03 PM  

Ow! That was my feelings!: The Bestest: Ow! That was my feelings!: I'm gonna keep posting this. Stratfor's take on Best Korea. Ferocious, Weak, and Crazy: The North Korean Strategy

The past 72 hours have ramped up well beyond Stratofr's expectations when that was written.

Nope. It's all still the same bullshiat, different day. Nothing has changed except the attention paid. Best Korea is not gonna start a war they have no chance to 'win'.


That's where the "crazy" part comes in!
 
Displayed 50 of 639 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report