If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Beast)   Bill Ayers speaks: "Obama's not a radical. I wish he were, but he's not"   (thedailybeast.com) divider line 85
    More: Interesting, Bill Ayers, President Obama, Weather Underground, Bernardine Dohrn, antiwar movement, SDS, Weathermen, Madeleine Albright  
•       •       •

1229 clicks; posted to Politics » on 03 Apr 2013 at 2:40 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



85 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-04-03 10:11:22 AM
no shiat. same goes for his alleged socialism. if you want to know if obama is a socialist - ask a socialist!
 
2013-04-03 10:16:43 AM

FlashHarry: no shiat. same goes for his alleged socialism. if you want to know if obama is a socialist - ask a socialist!


Obama is the worst socialist in history!
 
2013-04-03 10:17:49 AM
Obvious tag met its quota for the day?
 
2013-04-03 10:40:22 AM
I read that as "Bill Ayers squeaks:...".
Still worked.
 
2013-04-03 10:42:36 AM
Well that settles that. If a honest stand-up guy like Bill Ayers says so then it must be true!
 
2013-04-03 01:44:22 PM

chiett: Well that settles that. If a honest stand-up guy like Bill Ayers says so then it must be true!


That thing you just missed completely was the point.
 
2013-04-03 01:47:40 PM
Good job, Bill.  I know it sounds absurd, but for a while now they've been calling him calling a radical, a liberal, fanatical, criminal.  Now you're trying to sign up your name hoping we will find you  acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable?  That's just not logical.
 
2013-04-03 01:50:27 PM
This is key. The wording he uses is classic radical wording. Conservatives need to read and memorize that wording.Then they need to look at Obama's wording and they will note that it does not match. Not even slightly. Then they will shut up about Obama being a radical.

Of course the false assumption is that Conservatives are literate.
 
2013-04-03 01:52:17 PM
Breaking on Fox News "Obama is ... a radical." says Islmo-Commie-Atheist Bill Ayers!
 
2013-04-03 01:53:44 PM

chiett: Well that settles that. If a honest stand-up guy like Bill Ayers says so then it must be true!


how is he not honest? he admits to all the things the weather underground is accused of doing.
 
2013-04-03 01:55:40 PM

PC LOAD LETTER: This is key. The wording he uses is classic radical wording. Conservatives need to read and memorize that wording.Then they need to look at Obama's wording and they will note that it does not match. Not even slightly. Then they will shut up about Obama being a radical.

Of course the false assumption is that Conservatives are literate.


Or that they care about what actually would make Obama radical.  It doesn't matter what his positions are.  In 2004 Kerry was the most liberal Senator ever.  In 2008, it was suddenly Obama.  The GOP is always going to call the Democrats extreme radicals.  Their actual positions are irrelevant.
 
2013-04-03 02:19:15 PM
Saul Alinsky has never said that Obama isn't a socialist.
 
2013-04-03 02:26:32 PM

JerseyTim: Saul Alinsky has never said that Obama isn't a socialist.


He has also not never failed to occupy my kitchen.
 
2013-04-03 02:33:31 PM
Obama is a man of institutions. It can't be more obvious.
 
2013-04-03 02:42:43 PM
Alinsky!
 
2013-04-03 02:43:06 PM
Obama is so socialist/Marxist/Kenyan even his closest socialist/Marxist/Kenyan friends don't know it.
 
2013-04-03 02:44:53 PM
I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

Also, he's definitely a horrible socialist, fascist on the other hand...decent.
 
2013-04-03 02:48:05 PM

Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.


So farking what?

Your hero Reagan went into business with terrorists, more than once.
 
2013-04-03 02:52:48 PM

Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

Also, he's definitely a horrible socialist, fascist on the other hand...decent.


Please define "fascist"
 
2013-04-03 02:52:49 PM

Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

Also, he's definitely a horrible socialist, fascist on the other hand...decent.


www.legitgov.org
 
2013-04-03 02:53:33 PM

Jake Havechek: terrorist's living room.


Worse than bringing the terrorists to the goddamn oval office?
 
2013-04-03 02:53:51 PM

I_Am_Weasel: Good job, Bill.  I know it sounds absurd, but for a while now they've been calling him calling a radical, a liberal, fanatical, criminal.  Now you're trying to sign up your name hoping we will find you  acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable?  That's just not logical.


I will never forgive you for lodging that song in my head for the rest of the day.

/it's actually a good song, tho
 
2013-04-03 02:54:27 PM
fark me, I suck at this.
 
2013-04-03 02:55:01 PM

GAT_00: PC LOAD LETTER: This is key. The wording he uses is classic radical wording. Conservatives need to read and memorize that wording.Then they need to look at Obama's wording and they will note that it does not match. Not even slightly. Then they will shut up about Obama being a radical.

Of course the false assumption is that Conservatives are literate.

Or that they care about what actually would make Obama radical.  It doesn't matter what his positions are.  In 2004 Kerry was the most liberal Senator ever.  In 2008, it was suddenly Obama.  The GOP is always going to call the Democrats extreme radicals.  Their actual positions are irrelevant.


Actually, they are relevant. That's why the GOP is now made up of folks who were fringe lunatics 20 years ago.
 
2013-04-03 02:55:17 PM

Jake Havechek: Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

So farking what?

Your hero Reagan went into business with terrorists, more than once.


Our country was founded by what the British would have called terrorists.  Of course a terrorist that wins becomes a freedom fighter.  Nuclear weapons are effectively state terrorism given how much they scare a civilian population, how likely they are to be targeted upon a civilian population, and the only two used in war were targeted on cities with little military value and so were mostly intact.

Perspective is everything.
 
2013-04-03 02:55:38 PM
For the last time, subby, his name is "The Terrorist Bill Ayers".

JerseyTim: Saul Alinsky has never said that Obama isn't a socialist.


You'd have to dig him and ask him, I suppose.....
 
2013-04-03 02:57:14 PM

Pants full of macaroni!!: You'd have to dig him up and ask him, I suppose.....


Now with missing word restored.
 
2013-04-03 03:00:53 PM

Jake Havechek: Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

So farking what?

Your hero Reagan went into business with terrorists, more than once.


One, you're talking to a blatant troll.

Two, you're falling into his trap.  You're responding to his stupid allegation instead of either ignoring it or pointing out the entire premise of his assumption is a long debunked lie.
 
2013-04-03 03:03:29 PM
The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.
 
2013-04-03 03:07:48 PM

I_Am_Weasel: Good job, Bill.  I know it sounds absurd, but for a while now they've been calling him calling a radical, a liberal, fanatical, criminal.  Now you're trying to sign up your name hoping we will find you  acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable?  That's just not logical.


Super work, ya tramp
 
2013-04-03 03:08:22 PM

JerseyTim: Saul Alinsky has never said that Obama isn't a socialist.


You know who else didn't say something about Obama?
 
2013-04-03 03:09:28 PM
Man, even Obama's best friend doesn't support him anymore.
 
2013-04-03 03:09:37 PM

HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.


"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?
 
2013-04-03 03:10:36 PM
This is so stupid. The whole case against Weather Underground was manufactured by government officials payed off by the Weather Channel. Never underestimate what lengths the meteorological-industrial complex will go to in order to protect its territory. The powers that be can't allow the power of weather prediction to wind up in the hands of the populous. That is how they control us.

Wake up, sheeple!!!!
 
2013-04-03 03:12:52 PM

skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.

"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?


I think the sentiment was ok, but continuing to sink lives, money and prestige in to that particular project while terribly managing domestic unrest over it put them at the shiat end.

Er wait, are you talking about the North Vietnamese or the Weather Underground?
 
2013-04-03 03:14:36 PM

HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.

"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?

I think the sentiment was ok, but continuing to sink lives, money and prestige in to that particular project while terribly managing domestic unrest over it put them at the shiat end.

Er wait, are you talking about the North Vietnamese or the Weather Underground?


so the only people who weren't fond of revolutionary communist terrorists were supporters of the Vietnam War?
 
2013-04-03 03:16:32 PM
This is a secret code, he's actually saying Obama is totally radical.

/not to mention bodacious
 
2013-04-03 03:18:23 PM

skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.

"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?

I think the sentiment was ok, but continuing to sink lives, money and prestige in to that particular project while terribly managing domestic unrest over it put them at the shiat end.

Er wait, are you talking about the North Vietnamese or the Weather Underground?

so the only people who weren't fond of revolutionary communist terrorists were supporters of the Vietnam War?


No. There are other options.
 
2013-04-03 03:20:01 PM

HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.

"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?

I think the sentiment was ok, but continuing to sink lives, money and prestige in to that particular project while terribly managing domestic unrest over it put them at the shiat end.

Er wait, are you talking about the North Vietnamese or the Weather Underground?

so the only people who weren't fond of revolutionary communist terrorists were supporters of the Vietnam War?

No. There are other options.


ok good. So there are a number of people on the right side of history who think that Ayers and his friends are scumbags. Agreed.
 
2013-04-03 03:21:57 PM

I_Am_Weasel: Good job, Bill.  I know it sounds absurd, but for a while now they've been calling him calling a radical, a liberal, fanatical, criminal.  Now you're trying to sign up your name hoping we will find you  acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable?  That's just not logical.


:Favorite:
 
2013-04-03 03:23:24 PM

skullkrusher: ok good. So there are a number of people on the right side of history who think that Ayers and his friends are scumbags. Agreed.


"are" or "were"?
 
2013-04-03 03:23:37 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Jake Havechek: Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

So farking what?

Your hero Reagan went into business with terrorists, more than once.

One, you're talking to a blatant troll.

Two, you're falling into his trap.  You're responding to his stupid allegation instead of either ignoring it or pointing out the entire premise of his assumption is a long debunked lie.


Three, you can see his comments in the first place.

Fark gives us tools to avoid that problem.
 
2013-04-03 03:25:22 PM

skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.

"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?

I think the sentiment was ok, but continuing to sink lives, money and prestige in to that particular project while terribly managing domestic unrest over it put them at the shiat end.

Er wait, are you talking about the North Vietnamese or the Weather Underground?

so the only people who weren't fond of revolutionary communist terrorists were supporters of the Vietnam War?

No. There are other options.

ok good. So there are a number of people on the right side of history who think that Ayers and his friends are scumbags. Agreed.


But does Ayers matter to those people at all? Because that's what I said. It may have played a role in the voting decisions of the people that were on the wrong side of history, but I doubt it did for anyone else.
 
2013-04-03 03:28:13 PM

HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: skullkrusher: HotWingConspiracy: The entire Bill Ayers thing only matters to nearly dead people who were on the wrong side of history anyway.

"wrong side of history" means finding a communist revolutionary terrorist organization a tad unsavory?

I think the sentiment was ok, but continuing to sink lives, money and prestige in to that particular project while terribly managing domestic unrest over it put them at the shiat end.

Er wait, are you talking about the North Vietnamese or the Weather Underground?

so the only people who weren't fond of revolutionary communist terrorists were supporters of the Vietnam War?

No. There are other options.

ok good. So there are a number of people on the right side of history who think that Ayers and his friends are scumbags. Agreed.

But does Ayers matter to those people at all? Because that's what I said. It may have played a role in the voting decisions of the people that were on the wrong side of history, but I doubt it did for anyone else.


ahh Bill Ayers in connection to Obama. Gotcha
 
2013-04-03 03:34:45 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: ok good. So there are a number of people on the right side of history who think that Ayers and his friends are scumbags. Agreed.

"are" or "were"?


"I've thought about this a lot. Being almost 60, it's impossible to not have lots and lots of regrets about lots and lots of things, but the question of did we do something that was horrendous, awful? ... I don't think so." - Ayers in 2004

both?
 
2013-04-03 03:36:01 PM

Eshman: Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

Also, he's definitely a horrible socialist, fascist on the other hand...decent.

[www.legitgov.org image 485x237]


this never gets old or less stupid
 
2013-04-03 03:39:06 PM
Why should I listen to an uprepentent murdering terrorist?
 
2013-04-03 03:40:20 PM

OgreMagi: Why should I listen to an uprepentent murdering incompetent terrorist?

 
2013-04-03 03:41:54 PM

Jake Havechek: Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

So farking what?

Your hero Reagan went into business with terrorists, more than once.


My hero is Reagan?  Weird.  Never knew that.
 
2013-04-03 03:42:52 PM

Eshman: Silly Jesus: I'd be curious what liberals would say if a republican candidate got his start in a terrorist's living room.

Also, he's definitely a horrible socialist, fascist on the other hand...decent.

[www.legitgov.org image 485x237]


Newsflash:  Not everyone opposed to Obama is a Republican and/or loves Reagan.
 
Displayed 50 of 85 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report