If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Is DOMA doomed? It's your big f'ing hubbub over something that will seem silly in 50 years thread, Day 2   (cnn.com) divider line 20
    More: Obvious, DOMA, supreme courts, same-sex marriages, Theodore B. Olson, Paul Clement, American Law, Tammy Hollingsworth, United States Code  
•       •       •

4112 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 Mar 2013 at 8:27 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-03-27 08:41:03 AM  
6 votes:
img7.imageshack.us
2013-03-27 08:34:25 AM  
6 votes:

ginandbacon: Kyro: I see nothing wrong with keeping marriage to the Biblical definition: one man and 700 wives.  Or one man and a prisoner of war.  Or one man and his rape victim.

Don't forget the pillar of salt.


Nice Job.
2013-03-27 08:30:18 AM  
4 votes:
I see nothing wrong with keeping marriage to the Biblical definition: one man and 700 wives.  Or one man and a prisoner of war.  Or one man and his rape victim.
2013-03-27 09:55:43 AM  
3 votes:
i2.photobucket.com
2013-03-27 09:59:00 AM  
2 votes:
Yes, DOMA is indeed doomed.

i.imgur.com
2013-03-27 09:00:18 AM  
2 votes:

dinch: I find it equally humorous and sad when somebody wearing clothes made up of blended fibers is quoting Liviticus to put down gay marriage.


Or someone with a tattoo:
3.bp.blogspot.com
2013-03-28 12:45:17 AM  
1 votes:

MrBallou: "Marriage", as opposed to "civil union", is fundamentally a religion-based concept.


Wrong.

Mock26: It is time to get the government out of the marriage business.


Wrong.

VoodooTaco: Marriage is a religious sacrament.


Wrong.

cattmandont: let's remove all marriage rules from gummint.


Wrong.

VoodooTaco: I guess the Seven Sacrements are a largely a Roman Catholic thing, but here they are:


By that logic, crackers are also a fundamentally religious institution.  Won't someone think of the crackers?

ShonenBat: why not polygamy?


Because it's a fundamentally different question and its implementation carries numerous challenges that allowing gays to marry does not.

nekom: So much THIS. Let the church decide what "marriage" is and leave the government out of it.


Why should we let "the church" (as if there's only one, right?) decide the nature of something it has no valid claim upon?

The Muthaship: I've been saying this for a long time. Eliminate marriage as a legal construct.


If so, you've been an ignorant fool for doing so the entire time.  This argument is historically inaccurate nonsense.  Marriage has always been a civil matter as long as it has existed, and it sure as shiat predates Christianity or whatever other modern religion you might practice.  All of you idiots need to find a new angle if you want to argue against marriage equality.  This willfully ignorant pseudo-libertarian crap is for the birds.

The government has the power to marry people.  Churches do not.  Get the fark over it.
2013-03-27 10:49:02 AM  
1 votes:

friday13: I find it funny that they eat cheeseburgers and have tattoos.


To be fair, the original authors of the hebrew scriptures would probably not have had a problem with a cheeseburger, unless it was a goat veal burger with goat cheese and the cheese happened to be from the milk of the mother of the kid that supplied the goat veal.  The whole "no meat and dairy AT ALL" thing is much more modern.

Hmmm, now I want to open a restaurant called "Chez Tref" where the house special is goat veal burgers with cheese made from their mother's milk.
2013-03-27 10:22:00 AM  
1 votes:

special20: ginandbacon: Kyro: I see nothing wrong with keeping marriage to the Biblical definition: one man and 700 wives.  Or one man and a prisoner of war.  Or one man and his rape victim.

Don't forget the pillar of salt.

Nice Job.


I think you have mistaken a Lot.
2013-03-27 10:01:44 AM  
1 votes:

Kyro: I see nothing wrong with keeping marriage to the Biblical definition: one man and 700 wives.  Or one man and a prisoner of war.  Or one man and his rape victim.


As long as she's not a LEGITIMATE RAPE victim, 'cause that would shut the whole thing down.
2013-03-27 09:59:23 AM  
1 votes:
Ah yes, gay marriage, so important it could be said to be the most important topic Jesus ever spoke about, 2nd only to abortion.
2013-03-27 09:37:09 AM  
1 votes:
Hahahahahaha ... I've got one ...

The only incest laws in Ohio deal with the parent/child relationship over the age of consent (16).

Which means, in no parsed words, that IN OHIO, you can marry your sister, your brother, or your cousin and have that marriage be recognized in ALL 50 STATES.

Take that GAY MARRIAGE!

media.tumblr.com
2013-03-27 09:01:54 AM  
1 votes:

propasaurus: dinch: I find it equally humorous and sad when somebody wearing clothes made up of blended fibers is quoting Liviticus to put down gay marriage.

Or someone with a tattoo:
[3.bp.blogspot.com image 700x446]


I wonder if anyone has ever gotten a tattoo of Ezekiel 23:20...
2013-03-27 08:48:07 AM  
1 votes:
Remember, kids: Federal Government is ALWAYS incompetent, ALWAYS malevolent, and ALWAYS YOUR MORTAL ENEMY - except when it comes to keeping the gays down.
2013-03-27 08:39:28 AM  
1 votes:
Did everyone change their profile picture to the DOMA oral argument one? Because if you didn't the Justices won't know which way they should rule on this case.
2013-03-27 08:37:54 AM  
1 votes:
I find it equally humorous and sad when somebody wearing clothes made up of blended fibers is quoting Liviticus to put down gay marriage.
2013-03-27 08:34:46 AM  
1 votes:

festoon: Obligatory: Supreme Court On Gay Marriage: 'Sure, Who Cares' - WASHINGTON-Ten minutes into oral arguments over whether or not homosexuals should be allowed to marry one another, a visibly confounded Supreme Court stopped legal proceedings Tuesday and ruled that gay marriage was "perfectly fine" and that the court could "care less who marries whom."

"Yeah, of course gay men and women can get married. Who gives a shiat?" said Chief Justice John Roberts, who interrupted attorney Charles Cooper's opening statement defending Proposition 8, which rescinded same-sex couples' right to marry in California. "Why are we even seriously discussing this?"


I love the Onion oh so much
2013-03-27 08:34:39 AM  
1 votes:
They will punt on Prop 8 and strike down DOMA. The dude who authored the bill has changed his mind, the pres who signed it too. The executive branch wont defend it. But more importantly, arent there like 250 major corporations that have signed an amicus brief saying its bad business?

Idunno, coffee tiemz!
2013-03-27 08:32:16 AM  
1 votes:

alywa: /discuss


You called?
1.bp.blogspot.com
2013-03-27 08:05:35 AM  
1 votes:
It already seems silly.

alywa: nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


If only it were just that easy. It should be, but apparently it isn't.
 
Displayed 20 of 20 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report