If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTAE)   Western PA Man charged with drinking $102,000 worth of pre-Prohibition whiskey   (wtae.com) divider line 78
    More: Ironic, Westmoreland County, Andrew Carnegie, DNA matching, South Broadway, basement apartment  
•       •       •

11215 clicks; posted to Main » on 22 Mar 2013 at 7:32 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



78 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-03-22 05:46:02 PM
images1.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2013-03-22 05:53:43 PM
i.qkme.me
 
2013-03-22 05:56:07 PM
In a criminal complaint, Chief Barry Pritts wrote Saunders denied drinking the whiskey or removing labels from the bottles. Saunders reportedly told police he moved the cases to clean them several times but never opened any of the bottles.

"Saunders said that the whiskey probably evaporated and being that old, it was probably no good," Pritts wrote.


48 bottles? Unlikely.

God, I hope he did it proper justice and didn't just dump it in a Big Gulp with some Dr. Pepper and chug it down with a straw. That  would be a crime.
 
2013-03-22 06:17:46 PM
So, what's his fark handle??
 
2013-03-22 06:41:37 PM
Saunders is now charged by Scottdale police with consuming 48 bottles of the historic whiskey.

media.tumblr.com
 
2013-03-22 07:07:20 PM
That's not too far from here.  I'm totes jelly.
 
2013-03-22 07:25:39 PM
Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?
 
2013-03-22 07:30:29 PM

GAT_00: Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?


0/10.

I expect better trolls from someone of your caliber.
 
2013-03-22 07:36:09 PM
GAT_00: Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?

I'm guessing novelty, because Whiskey doesn't age in the bottle, only in the barrel.

Or they are just retarded and think it ages in the bottle like wine
 
2013-03-22 07:37:40 PM
Ummmm... Is he single? Is that wrong to ask? That's wrong to ask.

Dude, you're obviously on Fark. EIP. WIE?
 
2013-03-22 07:39:41 PM
Seriously, this guy may be the biggest dick/idiot in the world.

It's not about drinking the booze under the stairs, because contractors are douchebags and do shiat like that. It's the fact that one should have been able to at least assume that the bottles were not run-of-the-mill bottles of JD from a couple of years ago.
 
2013-03-22 07:40:45 PM
What is he being charged with? It would be nice to have more detail.
 
2013-03-22 07:42:07 PM

Oldiron_79: GAT_00: Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?

I'm guessing novelty, because Whiskey doesn't age in the bottle, only in the barrel.

Or they are just retarded and think it ages in the bottle like wine


I bet some farkers will show up and think the latter as well... oh wait.
 
2013-03-22 07:42:18 PM
If it were me, I'd make sure they'd put that fact on my tombstone.
 
2013-03-22 07:44:01 PM

Oldiron_79: GAT_00: Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?

I'm guessing novelty, because Whiskey doesn't age in the bottle, only in the barrel.

Or they are just retarded and think it ages in the bottle like wine


In the thread about the hundred year old whisky found in Antarctica, someone pointed out that it is interesting not because it ages in the bottle, but because it is preserved and has historical value. The whisky can show what alcohol was like in the day and, according to this one poster, its recipe could be reverse engineered in order to duplicate 1800s or early 1900s whisky or whatever year it was
 
2013-03-22 07:46:55 PM
In a row?  If that was even close to true he would have been so wasted while on the job they he couldn't have even walked out of the house.
 
2013-03-22 07:47:26 PM
There really needs to be a FARK thread of all the stupid shait renters do.
 
2013-03-22 07:47:58 PM
You know how you rent an apartment out to some random dude, right? And you leave $102,000 lying around in the place, you know? In one of those big, you know ... boxes, right? And you know how the dude takes it and just spends it? Yeah?

I hate when that happens.
 
2013-03-22 07:51:09 PM
This guy drank $102,000 worth of whiskey. What have YOU accomplished in your pathetic little life?
 
2013-03-22 07:52:05 PM

megarian: Ummmm... Is he single? Is that wrong to ask? That's wrong to ask.

Dude, you're obviously on Fark. EIP. WIE?


You are seriously going to regret asking for WEI.

/No, I won't do that to you.
 
2013-03-22 07:52:10 PM
I'm lost, did they leave the bottles in the basement apartment when they rented it to the guy or were they stored somewhere else and the guy just helped himself?
 
2013-03-22 07:55:01 PM

FreetardoRivera: Oldiron_79: GAT_00: Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?

I'm guessing novelty, because Whiskey doesn't age in the bottle, only in the barrel.

Or they are just retarded and think it ages in the bottle like wine

I bet some farkers will show up and think the latter as well... oh wait.


You don't know collectors very well.

Napkin: $0.0001 USD

Napkin touched by celebrity: $10-$100 USD

Napkin touched by dead celebrity or historical figure you personally care about: Priceless.


There's people out there with lots of money who would buy pre-prohibition era whiskey not to drink but just to have. It's historical, or was.

But really who would leave $100,000 worth of potable artifacts in a house with a renter? That's kinda a big boner on their part.
 
2013-03-22 07:55:54 PM
WhippingBoy: This guy drank $102,000 worth of whiskey. What have YOU accomplished in your pathetic little life?

I've probably drank that much worth of whisky, I just did it with many more bottles of less expensive stuff
 
2013-03-22 07:56:18 PM

Pointy Tail of Satan: What is he being charged with? It would be nice to have more detail.


Stealing is my guess.  I'm not a law-talking guy, or a real estate type, but I imagine the lady who bought the mansion bought the contents as well.  Kind of a dick move to press charges or sue, though.

If I'd found it, I sure as shiat wouldn't have told.
 
2013-03-22 07:57:01 PM

Oldiron_79: WhippingBoy: This guy drank $102,000 worth of whiskey. What have YOU accomplished in your pathetic little life?

I've probably drank that much worth of whisky, I just did it with many more bottles of less expensive stuff


Impressive. Most impressive.
 
2013-03-22 07:57:09 PM

doglover: There's people out there with lots of money who would buy pre-prohibition era whiskey not to drink but just to have. It's historical, or was.


A premium has also been thrown on top of old booze after the Shackelton find, IMO. If something's good and had a following, there's now a slight chance that someone will attempt to replicate it with the technology that exists today.
 
2013-03-22 07:58:49 PM

Lionel Mandrake: Kind of a dick move to press charges or sue, though.


The charges shouldn't be that hefty, because even if this guy knew that these booze weren't your typical JD, he probably never knew they had that kind of value.

A civil lawsuit, though? Yeah, I'd have no problem with that.
 
2013-03-22 08:05:19 PM

puffy999: Lionel Mandrake: Kind of a dick move to press charges or sue, though.

The charges shouldn't be that hefty, because even if this guy knew that these booze weren't your typical JD, he probably never knew they had that kind of value.

A civil lawsuit, though? Yeah, I'd have no problem with that.


Yeah, he should pony up some dough, but not six figures.

The guy who took it must be dumb as hell. There's probably a date on the bottle or case, and even if there isn't it had look old...and it was hidden.  I like booze, but I think I would do some research before guzzling 48 bottles of the shiat.
 
2013-03-22 08:06:51 PM
Hell, I've drank that much sh*tty whisky.
 
2013-03-22 08:07:16 PM

Lionel Mandrake: Yeah, he should pony up some dough, but not six figures.


He'll never PAY that, regardless of any judgment.
 
2013-03-22 08:08:39 PM
On a related subject, I'm in a bit of a quandary right now. I've consumed one bottle of Apfelwein. I'm feeling pretty good, but quite there, if you know what I mean. If I have another bottle, I'll likely incur the wrath of my wife, and spend the night sleeping on the couch with the dog. What should I do?
 
2013-03-22 08:13:29 PM

WhippingBoy: On a related subject, I'm in a bit of a quandary right now. I've consumed one bottle of Apfelwein. I'm feeling pretty good, but quite there, if you know what I mean. If I have another bottle, I'll likely incur the wrath of my wife, and spend the night sleeping on the couch with the dog. What should I do?


kick the dog off the couch
 
2013-03-22 08:16:53 PM

chitownmike: WhippingBoy: On a related subject, I'm in a bit of a quandary right now. I've consumed one bottle of Apfelwein. I'm feeling pretty good, but quite there, if you know what I mean. If I have another bottle, I'll likely incur the wrath of my wife, and spend the night sleeping on the couch with the dog. What should I do?

kick the dog off the couch


You're the boss!

/to oblivion... and beyond!
 
2013-03-22 08:21:51 PM

WhippingBoy: On a related subject, I'm in a bit of a quandary right now. I've consumed one bottle of Apfelwein. I'm feeling pretty good, but quite there, if you know what I mean. If I have another bottle, I'll likely incur the wrath of my wife, and spend the night sleeping on the couch with the dog. What should I do?


Huh...Bembel...strangely enough I now the the proper name for that old pitcher I have sitting in the closet. Maybe if you tell her that you were educating fellow farkers on antiques that will help your cause ;)
 
2013-03-22 08:23:07 PM

WhippingBoy: On a related subject, I'm in a bit of a quandary right now. I've consumed one bottle of Apfelwein. I'm feeling pretty good, but quite there, if you know what I mean. If I have another bottle, I'll likely incur the wrath of my wife, and spend the night sleeping on the couch with the dog. What should I do?


Come over with the other bottle and you can have my couch!
 
2013-03-22 08:25:21 PM

ReapTheChaos: I'm lost, did they leave the bottles in the basement apartment when they rented it to the guy or were they stored somewhere else and the guy just helped himself?


I found another news article that describes the guy as the live-in caretaker of the mansion.
 
2013-03-22 08:25:56 PM

OgreMagi: megarian: Ummmm... Is he single? Is that wrong to ask? That's wrong to ask.

Dude, you're obviously on Fark. EIP. WIE?

You are seriously going to regret asking for WEI.

/No, I won't do that to you.


Why?
 
2013-03-22 08:28:18 PM

puffy999: Lionel Mandrake: Kind of a dick move to press charges or sue, though.

The charges shouldn't be that hefty, because even if this guy knew that these booze weren't your typical JD, he probably never knew they had that kind of value.

A civil lawsuit, though? Yeah, I'd have no problem with that.


I'm OK with the charges.  Don't take stuff from other people.  If it seems run-of-the-mill, but turns out to be really valuable to someone else, you may end up in a lot more trouble then you thought.
 
2013-03-22 08:34:18 PM
You'd think someone able to afford a mansion would be able to afford at least a couple of locks.
 
2013-03-22 08:34:29 PM

kim jong-un: OgreMagi: megarian: Ummmm... Is he single? Is that wrong to ask? That's wrong to ask.

Dude, you're obviously on Fark. EIP. WIE?

You are seriously going to regret asking for WEI.

/No, I won't do that to you.

Why?


Because I have enough class that I don't email photos of my junk to random strangers.
 
2013-03-22 08:40:42 PM

Oldiron_79: GAT_00: Why the fark would a bottle of whiskey be worth $2100?

I'm guessing novelty, because Whiskey doesn't age in the bottle, only in the barrel.

Or they are just retarded and think it ages in the bottle like wine


I have no idea.  I'd hope it's novelty, but even then I question that value.

I guess it must not have been bad since the guy drank that much of it.
 
2013-03-22 08:41:55 PM
  I think I'll start with 2 gallons of Jack Daniels...and a coke machine on the side.
 
2013-03-22 08:45:54 PM

OgreMagi: kim jong-un: OgreMagi: megarian: Ummmm... Is he single? Is that wrong to ask? That's wrong to ask.

Dude, you're obviously on Fark. EIP. WIE?

You are seriously going to regret asking for WEI.

/No, I won't do that to you.

Why?

Because I have enough class that I don't email photos of my junk to random strangers.


Oh come on, you're on fark. How much class can you have?
 
2013-03-22 08:49:21 PM
I have an unopened bottle of pre-war Canadian Club. Is it actually worth anything?
i.imgur.com

A a later 1945 version sold on eBay for US$72
 
2013-03-22 09:00:40 PM

puffy999: doglover: There's people out there with lots of money who would buy pre-prohibition era whiskey not to drink but just to have. It's historical, or was.

A premium has also been thrown on top of old booze after the Shackelton find, IMO. If something's good and had a following, there's now a slight chance that someone will attempt to replicate it with the technology that exists today.


It's not the same as 50 year old barrel aged stuff. That's expensive because it's a unique flavor that can be replicated with good chemistry.

Really old stuff is really old. There's only one way to replicate that, and technology to replicate that doesn't work yet. It's all down to physics: t=t
The Shackleford whiskey, for example, is unique because there was only one Shackleford and he only owned so many bottles of whiskey.
 
2013-03-22 09:01:15 PM
just curious, if the whiskey was as rare as it was, wouldn't it become more valuable the more he drank? I could see the value being almost triple by the time he polished off the last bottle
 
2013-03-22 09:13:01 PM
Consumed 48 bottles of another man's rye? Hangin's too good for him I tells ya!

1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-03-22 09:15:04 PM

dogfarker: You don't know collectors very well.

Napkin: $0.0001 USD

Napkin touched by celebrity: $10-$100 USD

Napkin touched by dead celebrity or historical figure you personally care about: Priceless.


There's people out there with lots of money who would buy pre-prohibition era whiskey not to drink but just to have. It's historical, or was.

But really who would leave $100,000 worth of potable artifacts in a house with a renter? That's kinda a big boner on their part.


If you bothered to read the article, you'd know the answer to that question.
 
2013-03-22 09:15:06 PM
Maybe I'm not getting it, but it sounds like they found the whiskey while rehabbing the place into a B&B, and the renter was the guy that drank 48 bottles of it. Did they just leave the whiskey there after they finished the rehab and rented the place out?
 
2013-03-22 09:15:12 PM
I had some Old Mark, distilled 1919 (pre-prohibition), bottled 1933 (after).

$70/dram, I believe

Smelled like heaven.  The taste, I had better.
 
Displayed 50 of 78 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report