If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Haaretz)   Apparently, Palestinians really want to play World of Warcraft and Everquest. Debate on the difference between RPGs and MMORPGs on the right   (haaretz.com) divider line 148
    More: Interesting, U.S. President Barack Obama, RPGs, World of Warcraft, Palestinians, Everquest, rocket propelled grenades, CIA, MMORPG  
•       •       •

4126 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Mar 2013 at 11:38 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



148 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-03-21 05:58:15 PM  

Insatiable Jesus: You're goddamned right I am a hater, of middle easterners interfering in my Govt.


They are not doing anything without the consent of elected leaders. And those leaders did not vote themselves into office.
 
2013-03-21 06:01:13 PM  
You people are  gamers ???

SWEET JESUS hide the children in bulletproof rooms, call the National Guard and bunker down. Gamers in the house. Gamers in the house.

/Congress believes gamers kill
 
2013-03-21 06:02:04 PM  

JeffDenver: NostroZ: Why don't you ask around your glass house before you throw stones at others...

I know who I voted for and why, and I don't regret my decisions.

There is no evil conspiracy forcing you to vote for people you do not agree with or want to be in power. the same holds true for everyone in America. You are a victim and you are not special. You just got overruled by the majority.


You're either a liar or a psychopath to have no regrets or remorse for what has been perpetrated in our name:
images.tcj.com
www.andyworthington.co.uk
cdn.buzznet.com
(Do you smile like the psychopath above when you say you have no regrets?)
 
2013-03-21 06:05:48 PM  

NostroZ: You're either a liar or a psychopath to have no regrets or remorse for what has been perpetrated in our name.


Oh no, someone on the internet disagrees with me and thinks I am bad. That has never happened before.
 
2013-03-21 06:12:11 PM  

JeffDenver: NostroZ: You're either a liar or a psychopath to have no regrets or remorse for what has been perpetrated in our name.

Oh no, someone on the internet disagrees with me and thinks I am bad. That has never happened before.


So you are a psychopath!  Glad I'm not the first person to tell you this.

Here's the definition of the word, Psychopath (as per Dictionary.com)
"a person with a psychopathic personality, which manifests as amoral and antisocial behavior, lack of ability to love or establish meaningful personal relationships, extreme egocentricity, failure to learn from experience, etc."
"a person afflicted with a personality disorder characterized by a tendency to commit antisocial and sometimes violent acts and a failure to feel guilt for such acts"

The fact that you experience no guilt at the photos above, continue on this anti-social crusade to paint all Jews as warmongers, and an inability to learn from your previous experience of being called a psychopath fits the definition perfectly.

Please seek help.
For yourself sake and EVERYONE AROUND YOU.
 
2013-03-21 06:12:49 PM  

ronaprhys: liam76: ronaprhys: FARK rebel soldier: liam76: Can you point me to some mainstream zionist groups that denies Palestenians are a people?

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Golda_Meir

You just quoted someone that's been dead for how long now?

And didn't actually say what he implied.

Yeah - I know it didn't.  However, it was funny to see him quote "mainstream that deny", which by the verb tense implies a current group, and use someone that's been tits up since, what, 1978?  It's fail all around and that just happened to be the part that amused me the most.


She was Prime Minister when she gave that interview, and no Israeli government has reversed that policy. Also she was PM for a relatively moderate party (a socialist labor party predecessor of Labor) that refused to work with the predecessor of the current governing party, feeling (correctly) that they were crazy fascists.

IOW they're not current because they're not crazy enough.
 
2013-03-21 06:14:26 PM  

NostroZ: So you are a psychopath!


Everyone you have ever met on the internet that does not agree with you is. It's the only possible explanation.
 
2013-03-21 06:23:36 PM  

JeffDenver: NostroZ: So you are a psychopath!

Everyone you have ever met on the internet that does not agree with you is. It's the only possible explanation.


Oh no, Jeff from Denver... you are the first and ONLY person that I have called that name online.  Honestly.

I can see no other explanation to your lack of remorse at the photos of torture that have been committed in your name that you showed.  Only a psychopath would proudly say they have 'no regrets' to voting and supporting outright torture and murder of an innocent country's people.

You're what mental hospitals were built for Jeff from Denver... your inability to feel empathy is the hall mark of a psychopath.
I'm being serious when I say you should seek help for yourself sake and those around you...  I'm sadder today for knowing that people like you are out there without help.
 
2013-03-21 06:25:33 PM  

NostroZ: Oh no, Jeff from Denver... you are the first and ONLY person that I have called that name online.


LOL
 
2013-03-21 06:30:14 PM  

FARK rebel soldier: ronaprhys: liam76: ronaprhys: FARK rebel soldier: liam76: Can you point me to some mainstream zionist groups that denies Palestenians are a people?

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Golda_Meir

You just quoted someone that's been dead for how long now?

And didn't actually say what he implied.

Yeah - I know it didn't.  However, it was funny to see him quote "mainstream that deny", which by the verb tense implies a current group, and use someone that's been tits up since, what, 1978?  It's fail all around and that just happened to be the part that amused me the most.

She was Prime Minister when she gave that interview, and no Israeli government has reversed that policy. Also she was PM for a relatively moderate party (a socialist labor party predecessor of Labor) that refused to work with the predecessor of the current governing party, feeling (correctly) that they were crazy fascists.

IOW they're not current because they're not crazy enough.


Get a modern quote, sparky.  You look foolish.

Kind of like the twit who's saying someone's a psychopath because they've no regrets on their voting record - when they don't even know who the alleged psychopath voted for.
 
2013-03-21 06:40:02 PM  

ronaprhys: Get a modern quote, sparky. You look foolish.

No, you look foolish for discounting anything that does not fit your narrative of Palestinian = Victim, when the truth is that they've been manipulating the world community.

If you'd like a modern quote, here's the Hamas Charter (you know, their constitution to govern):

"The Day of Judgement will not come until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, 'O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews"(related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).


Kind of like the twit who's saying someone's a psychopath because they've no regrets on their voting record - when they don't even know who the alleged psychopath voted for.

Let Jeff from Denver speak for himself.He said  "I know who I voted for and why, and I don't regret my decisions."
It's obviously Bush... as was assumed when he said the above comment in response to the posted picture of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld... He has no regrets.  Let the man speak for himself, instead of pulling him into your derpfest.
 
2013-03-21 06:41:33 PM  

ronaprhys: Get a modern quote, sparky. You look foolish.


I see we're into the sticks and stones, fingers in your ears phase of this thread. This is why we don't let the Pol tab crawl out of your hole very often.
 
2013-03-21 06:43:39 PM  

give me doughnuts: TheBigJerk: Palestinians do not exist

Until the late '60s, Arab "Palestinians" didn't exist. Before that, the term had been applied almost exclusively to Jews living in what is now Israel.

The Palestine Liberation Organization took it's name from the region, not a people. And their definition of "liberation" was the same one Hamas used: Drive all the Jews into the sea.


It never ceases to amaze me how many people gleefully ignore the fact that Palestine is exactly as real as Symbia.

/which is to say, real enough to kill and die for in the minds of the members of the Symbian Liberation Army
//but not real enough to be an actual government, because beyond the uniting ideology no thought at all was given to the actual task of governing
 
2013-03-21 06:43:40 PM  

NostroZ: ronaprhys: Get a modern quote, sparky. You look foolish.
No, you look foolish for discounting anything that does not fit your narrative of Palestinian = Victim, when the truth is that they've been manipulating the world community.

If you'd like a modern quote, here's the Hamas Charter (you know, their constitution to govern):
"The Day of Judgement will not come until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, 'O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews"(related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).


Kind of like the twit who's saying someone's a psychopath because they've no regrets on their voting record - when they don't even know who the alleged psychopath voted for.

Let Jeff from Denver speak for himself.He said  "I know who I voted for and why, and I don't regret my decisions."
It's obviously Bush... as was assumed when he said the above comment in response to the posted picture of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld... He has no regrets.  Let the man speak for himself, instead of pulling him into your derpfest.


You aren't particularly bright, are you?  I've not espoused a view one way or the other, and now you've attempted to assign one to me.

That's either being pants on the head retarded or a particularly stupid troll attempt.  I'm not sure which yet, but I'm leaning towards particularly stupid troll based on the use of the bold tag when it's not necessary.  Enjoy your extra chromosome.
 
2013-03-21 06:46:47 PM  

Clemkadidlefark: You people are  gamers ???

SWEET JESUS hide the children in bulletproof rooms, call the National Guard and bunker down. Gamers in the house. Gamers in the house.

/Congress believes gamers kill


Hell yes we're gamers!
i208.photobucket.com
 
2013-03-21 06:50:19 PM  

FARK rebel soldier: ronaprhys: Get a modern quote, sparky. You look foolish.

I see we're into the sticks and stones, fingers in your ears phase of this thread. This is why we don't let the Pol tab crawl out of your hole very often.


If, in fact, we're actually trying to have a decent debate you'd have a modern quote.  You don't.  You quoted someone who died roughly 35 years ago.  Fail is yours and then you defended it.  That's why you've earned your mockery.

Pony up with a modern quote.  That's all you've got to do in order to try and establish your point.  A quote that's recent and from someone who's in actual authority.
 
2013-03-21 06:50:35 PM  

ronaprhys: You aren't particularly bright, are you?  I've not espoused a view one way or the other, and now you've attempted to assign one to me.

That's either being pants on the head retarded or a particularly stupid troll attempt.  I'm not sure which yet, but I'm leaning towards particularly stupid troll based on the use of the bold tag when it's not necessary.  Enjoy your extra chromosome.


Coward... you espouse a view, but don't have the balls to stand behind your words.

Now you're just getting obnoxious with your insults.  You tried to knock down a quote from 1978 with insults, that's a loud cowards way of arguing... so now, I give you another quote and you personally attack again!

What a coward you are!
Instead of arguing the facts you just sit back and insult the people you disagree with.

Why don't you crawl back under the rock you came out from, you cowardly scum.
 
2013-03-21 06:51:03 PM  

ronaprhys: NostroZ: ronaprhys: Get a modern quote, sparky. You look foolish.
No, you look foolish for discounting anything that does not fit your narrative of Palestinian = Victim, when the truth is that they've been manipulating the world community.

If you'd like a modern quote, here's the Hamas Charter (you know, their constitution to govern):
"The Day of Judgement will not come until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, 'O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews"(related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).


Kind of like the twit who's saying someone's a psychopath because they've no regrets on their voting record - when they don't even know who the alleged psychopath voted for.

Let Jeff from Denver speak for himself.He said  "I know who I voted for and why, and I don't regret my decisions."
It's obviously Bush... as was assumed when he said the above comment in response to the posted picture of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld... He has no regrets.  Let the man speak for himself, instead of pulling him into your derpfest.

You aren't particularly bright, are you?  I've not espoused a view one way or the other, and now you've attempted to assign one to me.

That's either being pants on the head retarded or a particularly stupid troll attempt.  I'm not sure which yet, but I'm leaning towards particularly stupid troll based on the use of the bold tag when it's not necessary.  Enjoy your extra chromosome.


I'm leaning toward "alt of Amos Quito pretending to be a Zionist, only to screw it up in record time by trying to act how he thinks a Zionist is supposed to act."
 
2013-03-21 06:54:42 PM  
" said Mohammed Mohammed,"

I know the name is used a lot, but cmon...
 
2013-03-21 06:54:51 PM  

NostroZ: ronaprhys: You aren't particularly bright, are you?  I've not espoused a view one way or the other, and now you've attempted to assign one to me.

That's either being pants on the head retarded or a particularly stupid troll attempt.  I'm not sure which yet, but I'm leaning towards particularly stupid troll based on the use of the bold tag when it's not necessary.  Enjoy your extra chromosome.

Coward... you espouse a view, but don't have the balls to stand behind your words.

Now you're just getting obnoxious with your insults.  You tried to knock down a quote from 1978 with insults, that's a loud cowards way of arguing... so now, I give you another quote and you personally attack again!

What a coward you are!
Instead of arguing the facts you just sit back and insult the people you disagree with.

Why don't you crawl back under the rock you came out from, you cowardly scum.


Pants on the head retarded troll.

Woohooo.  It's been awhile since one of you've shown up in a thread I've been in.  Are you more of a LIHOP or MIHOP kind of guy?  Or do you support the view that the entire structure was loaded with explosives?
 
2013-03-21 07:00:57 PM  

ronaprhys: Woohooo. It's been awhile since one of you've shown up in a thread I've been in. Are you more of a LIHOP or MIHOP kind of guy? Or do you support the view that the entire structure was loaded with explosives?


Are you trying to insult me personally again?

Because 9/11 is nothing to joke about or use as leverage in a flame war.
Unless of-course you have no sense of dignity and are a coward.
 
2013-03-21 07:02:19 PM  

NostroZ: ronaprhys: Woohooo. It's been awhile since one of you've shown up in a thread I've been in. Are you more of a LIHOP or MIHOP kind of guy? Or do you support the view that the entire structure was loaded with explosives?

Are you trying to insult me personally again?

Because 9/11 is nothing to joke about or use as leverage in a flame war.
Unless of-course you have no sense of dignity and are a coward.


Of course 9/11 is something to joke about.  At the very least, our national hysteria was something straight out of a bad 70's disaster film.
 
2013-03-21 07:03:26 PM  

NostroZ: 9/11 is nothing to joke about or use as leverage in a flame war.


Totally disagree. That is it's two primary uses nowadays.
 
2013-03-21 07:11:51 PM  

JeffDenver: NostroZ: 9/11 is nothing to joke about or use as leverage in a flame war.

Totally disagree. That is it's two primary uses nowadays.


Okay, glad you agree on the part where you're a coward.
Your daddy would be proud of the service you provide this country with your loud insults.

You obviously have no shame or decency.

Go hide behind your "primary uses" of whatever disgusting cowardly practice you have told yourself is normal.
 
2013-03-21 07:17:44 PM  

NostroZ: ronaprhys: Woohooo. It's been awhile since one of you've shown up in a thread I've been in. Are you more of a LIHOP or MIHOP kind of guy? Or do you support the view that the entire structure was loaded with explosives?

Are you trying to insult me personally again?

Because 9/11 is nothing to joke about or use as leverage in a flame war.
Unless of-course you have no sense of dignity and are a coward.


Welcome to Fark.

Now, moving on to bigger issues:  What's your current prescribed dose of clozapine and how many doses have you missed?
 
2013-03-21 08:06:24 PM  

JeffDenver: NostroZ: 9/11 is nothing to joke about or use as leverage in a flame war.

Totally disagree. That is it's two primary uses nowadays.



...lol.
 
2013-03-21 09:01:24 PM  
www.haaretz.com

At first I thought these were teabaggers, but the signs are spelled correctly.
 
2013-03-21 09:07:09 PM  

Torrent of Rubbish: ronaprhys: Torrent of Rubbish: srschatzer: Is EQ even around anymore?  I thought they shut the servers off a few years ago?

It looks like the 19th expansion was released about 5 months ago. I'm shocked...I don't know anyone that plays EQ anymore, and I know a lotta nerds.

Back in the day I used to play.  I think I was on Vishan?  Can't remember as I let the subscription expire over a decade ago.  It was slightly amusing and a decent game at the time and I had joined one of the guilds, mostly to have other folks to team up with.  Damn if that didn't turn into a constant butthurt festival of he said she said nonsense.

All I wanted to do was spend a night or so playing, have some wine with it, and be silly while killing shiat.

I understand the appeal of MMORPGs, but the idea of having to mediate real human conflict while trying to do wizard shiat is nerve-wracking to me. Skyrim makes more sense to me because I like my wizard games as I like my women: heavily glitched and unable to acknowledge quests I've completed.


I have to admit I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
 
2013-03-21 10:35:36 PM  

Tatterdemalian: I'm leaning toward "alt of Amos Quito pretending to be a Zionist, only to screw it up in record time by trying to act how he thinks a Zionist is supposed to act."



Well, that was cute.


Now, of you don't mind, please revisit the questions that I posed to you upthread:

QUOTE:

Tatterdemalian: Amos Quito: "Obama is spending three days in Israel and the West Bank, with the vast majority of his appointments taking place in Israel, including plans to lay a wreath on the grave of Zionist leader Theodor Herzl."


That is disgusting.

Because someone who noticed the Jew-hate before the Nazi party emerged must obviously have caused it.



So, what did "cause it", then?

And on the whole, would you say that Political Zionism has been a "good thing"?

Good for the Jews of Israel?

Good for the Jews as a whole?

Good for the Palestinians?

Good for the world at large?

Why or why not?

END QUOTE


Quite simply, Tatterdemalian, I'm asking you (and your fellows) to justify Zionism by its fruits.

Do you find it worthy or wanting? And why?


/So, what's it going to be then, eh?
 
2013-03-21 11:58:33 PM  
static6.depositphotos.com

Anyone?
 
2013-03-22 06:54:40 AM  

FARK rebel soldier: ronaprhys: liam76: ronaprhys: FARK rebel soldier: liam76: Can you point me to some mainstream zionist groups that denies Palestenians are a people?

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Golda_Meir

You just quoted someone that's been dead for how long now?

And didn't actually say what he implied.
Yeah - I know it didn't.  However, it was funny to see him quote "mainstream that deny", which by the verb tense implies a current group, and use someone that's been tits up since, what, 1978?  It's fail all around and that just happened to be the part that amused me the most.

She was Prime Minister when she gave that interview, and no Israeli government has reversed that policy. Also she was PM for a relatively moderate party (a socialist labor party predecessor of Labor) that refused to work with the predecessor of the current governing party, feeling (correctly) that they were crazy fascists.

IOW they're not current because they're not crazy enough.



What policy?

As I pointed

out earlier she didn't say what you implied, and for the record PLO leader of the time was very forthright in saying the palestenian people were invented as a tool to fight the jews.

Amos Quito: [static6.depositphotos.com image 850x719]

Anyone?


we already did this dance, in this very thread.

But keep up with your moronic logic of since there is anti semetism after the rise of zionism, it must be because of zionism.
 
2013-03-22 07:45:08 AM  

NostroZ: give me doughnuts: Until the late '60s, Arab "Palestinians" didn't exist. Before that, the term had been applied almost exclusively to Jews living in what is now Israel.

The Palestine Liberation Organization took it's name from the region, not a people. And their definition of "liberation" was the same one Hamas used: Drive all the Jews into the sea.

Come now... the Palestinians or neighboring Arabs, whatever you call them, only want PEACE.

They teach their kids to LOVE their neighbor Jews from an early age...
[newsbusters.org image 384x289]

Why everyone knows that it's the evil Jews that spread hate, not the peaceloving Palestinians as shown in their KIDS SHOW above & below.

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x263]


Whenever someone points out Israel's humanitarian abuses the only defense that come back "bbbbut the Palestinians are worse!!!11q"

Way to take the moral high ground. Do you ever read that scroll you treasure so much?
 
2013-03-22 07:56:51 AM  

nmemkha: Whenever someone points out Israel's humanitarian abuses the only defense that come back "bbbbut the Palestinians are worse!!!11q"

Way to take the moral high ground. Do you ever read that scroll you treasure so much


If the other guys are worse, you do have the moral high ground.

Doesn't make you right, doesn't make you perfect, and I certainly don;t agree with a lot of what they do, but they do have the moral high ground.
 
2013-03-22 10:26:20 AM  

nmemkha: NostroZ: give me doughnuts: Until the late '60s, Arab "Palestinians" didn't exist. Before that, the term had been applied almost exclusively to Jews living in what is now Israel.

The Palestine Liberation Organization took it's name from the region, not a people. And their definition of "liberation" was the same one Hamas used: Drive all the Jews into the sea.

Come now... the Palestinians or neighboring Arabs, whatever you call them, only want PEACE.

They teach their kids to LOVE their neighbor Jews from an early age...
[newsbusters.org image 384x289]

Why everyone knows that it's the evil Jews that spread hate, not the peaceloving Palestinians as shown in their KIDS SHOW above & below.

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x263]

Whenever someone points out Israel's humanitarian abuses the only defense that come back "bbbbut the Palestinians are worse!!!11q"

Way to take the moral high ground. Do you ever read that scroll you treasure so much?


Israelis defend themselves. Thay absolutely have the moral high ground. They have never done anything non-humane. They attack people who attack them. End of story.

They should take the kid gloves off, start being really tough.

Have a nice day, Hitler.
 
2013-03-22 01:14:58 PM  
Amos Quito: [static6.depositphotos.com image 850x719]

Anyone?

we already did this dance, in this very thread.

But keep up with your moronic logic of since there is anti semetism after the rise of zionism, it must be because of zionism.


I was hoping for an answer from a genuine human, not an anti-Semitic agent provocateur.
 
2013-03-22 01:27:06 PM  

Amos Quito: Amos Quito: [static6.depositphotos.com image 850x719]

Anyone?

we already did this dance, in this very thread.

But keep up with your moronic logic of since there is anti semetism after the rise of zionism, it must be because of zionism.

I was hoping for an answer from a genuine human, not an anti-Semitic agent provocateur.


Just because it takes near superhuman patience to deal with your continued dishonesty, doesn't mean I am not a genuine human.

Care to explain how I am an "anti-semite"?  And pelase remember me pointing out your BS of believing that jews are behind the holocaust, or the cause of anti-semitism does't fit the bill.
 
2013-03-22 02:12:16 PM  

liam76: Amos Quito: Amos Quito: [static6.depositphotos.com image 850x719]

Anyone?

we already did this dance, in this very thread.

But keep up with your moronic logic of since there is anti semetism after the rise of zionism, it must be because of zionism.

I was hoping for an answer from a genuine human, not an anti-Semitic agent provocateur.

Just because it takes near superhuman patience to deal with your continued dishonesty, doesn't mean I am not a genuine human.


First, you didn't address the questions above:

~~~~

On the whole, would you say that Political Zionism has been a "good thing"?
Good for the Jews of Israel?
Good for the Jews as a whole?
Good for the Palestinians?
Good for the world at large?
Why or why not?

~~

liam76: Care to explain how I am an "anti-semite"?


What is an "anti-Semite"? How would you define this term, and what would be the identifying characteristics of such an individual? If you can honestly answer this question - especially in context with the questions I posed above, you may find yourself enlightened.

See also: Enabling (negative sense)


liam76: And pelase remember me pointing out your BS of believing that jews are behind the holocaust, or the cause of anti-semitism does't fit the bill.


No, that's YOUR dishonest BS, liam76. I have never said that "jews are behind the holocaust", and you know it, yet you incessantly repeat the charge. Go ahead, post a link to the J'accuse! Put your blatant dishonesty on display for all to see - you've done it before.

You are an anti-Semite because what you pretend to do "in the best interests" of Jews effectively works to their detriment by serving to perpetuate, rather than to solve "the question".

Have a nice day!
 
2013-03-22 02:25:13 PM  
While Fark's resident antisemites are yammering on, I thought I should point out that in 2 years, Syria has killed more Syrians than Israel has killed Syrians in 65 years.

You know what's keeping the Israelis from matching the brutality of their neighbors and going Arab on someone's ass?

That's right: the good old USA keeping the Israelis on a leash.

You're welcome, Palestinians.

farking ingrates.
 
2013-03-22 02:26:56 PM  
What is an "anti-Semite"? How would you define this term, and what would be the identifying characteristics of such an individual?

Amos QUito, for starters.

On this very thread, you have asserted that the anti-Jewish demonization around 1897, what Hertzl witnessed, was somethign the Jews had coming to them

We can argue definitions, but you certainly match any reasonable definition of antisemite.

And any reasonable definition of farkwit.
 
2013-03-22 02:27:49 PM  

Amos Quito: First, you didn't address the questions above:


Well aside from the fact that we can't see alternative universes so any answer is pure conjecture, Iknow where it is going.

Anti semetism after the growth of zionism doesn;t prove zionism is repsonsible, as anti semetism has been around much lionger.


Amos Quito: What is an "anti-Semite"?


What you called me int he thread above.  Why play games now?

Amos Quito: How would you define this term, and what would be the identifying characteristics of such an individual? If you can honestly answer this question - especially in context with the questions I posed above, you may find yourself enlightened.


My defintion?  Someone who dislikes jews.


Amos Quito: No, that's YOUR dishonest BS, liam76. I have never said that "jews are behind the holocaust", and you know it, yet you incessantly repeat the charge. Go ahead, post a link to the J'accuse! Put your blatant dishonesty on display for all to see - you've done it before.


Yes.

Just like you never said "jews declared war on Germany".  But you did post pictures numerous time to support that piece of Nazi propaganda.

You clearly said jews in general and zionists in particluar were behind the events that led to the formation of Israel.

You admitted that the holocaust was one of the events that led to the formation of Israel.

Not very complicated to see what that means, now is it?

Amos Quito: You are an anti-Semite because what you pretend to do "in the best interests" of Jews effectively works to their detriment by serving to perpetuate, rather than to solve "the question".


We know how your kind has a final solution to answer the "question."
 
2013-03-22 03:09:49 PM  

ocschwar: What is an "anti-Semite"? How would you define this term, and what would be the identifying characteristics of such an individual?

Amos QUito, for starters.

On this very thread, you have asserted that the anti-Jewish demonization around 1897, what Hertzl witnessed, was somethign the Jews had coming to them



I did?

Scroll up to where you think I made such an "assertion", and repost the "smoking gun" text for me, if you'd be so kind.

Thanks.
 
2013-03-22 03:13:06 PM  
Scroll up to where you think I made such an "assertion", and repost the "smoking gun" text for me, if you'd be so kind.

You know full well what you said up there, and what it amounts to. So I have a better idea: go fark yourself.
 
2013-03-22 03:33:42 PM  

ocschwar: Scroll up to where you think I made such an "assertion", and repost the "smoking gun" text for me, if you'd be so kind.

You know full well what you said up there, and what it amounts to. So I have a better idea: go fark yourself.



Yes, I do know full well hat I "said up there", and so do you. And you also know that nothing I said could be construed to support your above accusation - so you're going to DENY and run away.

That's constructive.


/Same as it ever was
//Same as it ever was
///Same as it ever was
 
2013-03-22 03:36:11 PM  
Liam76:

I see you want to rehash the same worn-out accusations that you've floated time and again. Damn you're a slow learner.

Anyway, I have some errands to run. I may get back with you later - if I'm bored.
 
2013-03-22 03:39:23 PM  
Your own words, Amos QUito:
Because someone who noticed the Jew-hate before the Nazi party emerged must obviously have caused it.


So, what did "cause it", then?


You know full well what you're implying with that rhetorical question.

And you know full well that this shows 1. you're an antisemite, and 2. you're a worthless sack of shiat.
 
2013-03-22 09:09:51 PM  

ocschwar: Your own words, Amos QUito:
Because someone who noticed the Jew-hate before the Nazi party emerged must obviously have caused it.


So, what did "cause it", then?

You know full well what you're implying with that rhetorical question.

And you know full well that this shows 1. you're an antisemite, and 2. you're a worthless sack of shiat.



You know, I just wrote you a long, detailed and thoughtful reply - but the Fark, it eated it.

:-(

No matter. You're trapped in your myopic dogma anyway - and now that you've called me an "antisemite" and a "worthless sack of shiat", all of your troubles are over, and there is peace on earth at last.

Right?

Chag Pesach Sameach, ocschwar.
 
2013-03-22 09:28:24 PM  

liam76: Yes.

Just like you never said "jews declared war on Germany". But you did post pictures numerous time to support that piece of Nazi propaganda.


You're right. I never said that. And the pictures that I posted were not of "Nazi propaganda", but of propaganda produced by ZIONISTS who sought to stir up hatred against the Germans.

And you know it.


liam76: You clearly said jews in general and zionists in particluar were behind the events that led to the formation of Israel.


Um, that's kind of a no-brainer, liam76. Who did you think was behind the Zionist scheme? Samoans?


liam76: You admitted that the holocaust was one of the events that led to the formation of Israel.


I "admitted"? Do you deny? That's another no-brainer, liam76. Had it not been for the persecution of the Jews by the Nazis, the Zionists would likely never have been able to corral enough Jews in Palestine to form the population base they needed to form their Zionist State. The shortage of warm Jewish bodies was a HUGE problem that was driving Ben Gurion and his pals mad. This is all well documented, and said documents have been presented to you many times.

Where's the smoking gun?


liam76: Not very complicated to see what that means, now is it?


What DOES it mean, liam76?


I'm not even going to honor your last little accusation with a reply.

LOL!

And you wonder why I rarely bother to read your mewlings anymore?
 
2013-03-23 06:58:18 AM  

Amos Quito: You're right. I never said that. And the pictures that I posted were not of "Nazi propaganda", but of propaganda produced by ZIONISTS who sought to stir up hatred against the Germans.


When you frame it as an excuse or a reason for the holocaust, as you did, it is Nazi propaganda.

Your absurd ideas about "zionists" controlling the media would is laughable.  Also a jew being upset that jews in another country are mistreated hardly makes them a zionist.


Amos Quito: What DOES it mean, liam76?


If you say A caused the events that led to C.

And you say that C wouldn't be possible without B.

Then you are saying A caused B.

A=Jews in general and zionists in particular.
B=the Holocaust
C=Israel

No wonder you can cling to such stupid beliefs.  You can't even appreciate the simplest logical conclusions of your absurd statements.
  

Amos Quito: And you wonder why I rarely bother to read your mewlings anymore?


I don't wonder.  I know why.  Because your idiot claims and ideas about jews and zionists being behind all the ills of the world, while well researched, are just that idiotic claims.  You don't like that I recognize your little dance of cherry picking little bits of info then doing massive copy pasta of all those little bits together and pretending it paints the whole picture.  You don't even like when I poit out how absurd that "whole picture" is.

You get mad when I point out how stupid your idea of the jews being behind the holocaust is, yet your arguments about an evil group of jews pulling the strings to create Israel rests upon them causing the holocaust.
 
Displayed 48 of 148 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report