If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Lowell Sun)   If a cop going 75 in a 30 zone with a BAC of 0.14% dies in a wreck, how many motions for reconsideration must the prosecutor file before the judge lets police blame the civilian driver with a BAC of 0.13%?   (lowellsun.com) divider line 10
    More: Asinine, BAC, motions, bus drivers, prosecutors, stop signs  
•       •       •

10720 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Mar 2013 at 3:46 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-03-16 04:48:07 PM
3 votes:

GBB: Followup question: Is it possible for 2 independent parties to be 100% at fault for the same incident?


Yeah, it's called pregnancy.
2013-03-16 04:33:16 PM
2 votes:
So if a cop is killed in an accident he caused, is he still put on paid administrative leave?
2013-03-16 04:04:43 PM
2 votes:
Looks like this is bad news for Chan.

/DNRTFA
2013-03-17 01:02:48 AM
1 votes:

kingoomieiii: Drunk cop doing 75 on a motorcycle HITS drunk civilian doing 22 in a car. Civilian still tied up in court a year later.


Ding ding ding!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taman_Inquiry
2013-03-16 06:15:15 PM
1 votes:
geeze. both were drunk.  no charges should have been filed as the officer is just as to blame for his death as the other driver..

if the cop had no drank and drive he would not have been in the accident that claimed his life.

at worst the guy driving the car should lose his license and pay a fine as the cop should be expected to use good judgement even whennot onthe joband the officer clearly did not.

My condolences to the officer's family.
2013-03-16 04:46:14 PM
1 votes:
Couple folks in this thread with their GEDs in law need to brush up on contributory negligence.
2013-03-16 04:14:22 PM
1 votes:
They were both at fault since both were drunk.  If the guy in the car hadn't run the stop sign, the cop wouldn't have plowed into him.  If the cop weren't drunk, he would probably have been doing much less than 75.  Then he would have arrived at the intersection later and probably after the other guy was gone.  If the cop had survived the wreck, he would deserve to be fired and treated like any other person who did what he did.
2013-03-16 04:07:10 PM
1 votes:
If Florida had a sane helmet law, the cop would be back on the force and the other driver would be in prison where he belongs.
2013-03-16 04:00:52 PM
1 votes:
Why do I think that if the cop had run the stop sign and been hit by the speeding civilian, it would still be the cop's fault, according to the FARK legal experts.
2013-03-16 12:13:34 PM
1 votes:
Trick question!

The cops would have covered up their fellow officer's drunkenness and blamed the civilian from the beginning.
 
Displayed 10 of 10 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report