Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Ancient Egyptian text reveals that before Jesus Christ became an omnipotent omniscient immortal, he was a shape shifter. Apparently some people have a problem with this   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 146
    More: Strange, Egyptian Christian, jesus, Coptic, Pilates, copy pasting, last supper, Maundy Thursday, St. Michael  
•       •       •

13464 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Mar 2013 at 11:50 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



146 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-03-13 12:23:43 PM  
Jesus had the ability to change shape

You mean like Mitt?

bennaon.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-03-13 12:24:10 PM  
Weaver95:

possibility two:
so they get the dumbest, most trusting guy in the pile to assume the persona of Jesus telling him that hey, it's cool..


Was his name Brian? Roderick? Biggus Dickus?

/love this theory!
 
2013-03-13 12:25:06 PM  

Bartleby the Scrivener: Weaver95: redlegrick: I'm on board with option #2. And I can see that done up as a screenplay. My only question is, who'd direct it?

let me finish writing the screenplay first, then we'll start shopping for a director.

John Waters


Eli Roth
 
2013-03-13 12:26:17 PM  
Not only a shape shifter, but also a time traveler.

img41.imageshack.us
 
2013-03-13 12:26:20 PM  
I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A
 
2013-03-13 12:26:34 PM  
Probability #1: It's all a load of crap. Even the bible (KJV) says, "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."

Just... apparently, not the belief in magic and imaginary friends.
 
2013-03-13 12:29:29 PM  

Crewmannumber6: Magorn: Having read that I find it utterly remarkable tht in the 2,000 year history of Christian tradtion, that nobody seems to have ever written a gospel that suggested that Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Jesus, was one and the same as Judas, Jesus' kid brother.

I'm not certain, but I don't think it's the same Judas, that's why they differentiate him by calling him Judas Iscariot. I do know that Jesus' brother James is not the apostle James.


Historically that's the accepted  tradition, but given all the other lines that blurred in the century or so between the actual events and thier first written versions, I'm a little surprised those characters din't get combined by someone looking to amp up the drama of the story.  Hell there's an entire Persian religion called Mandeanism  based on the idea that Jesus and John the Baptist were enlightened masters of their gnostic sect (which is why they had the title "Nasorean) and that Whereas John was a revered and worshipped figure for them, Jesus was regarded as an evil betrayer who broke sacred oaths by spilling the sect's secrets to the masses and making himself out to be a god
 
2013-03-13 12:31:13 PM  
And his dinosaur was really a shape shifting donkey.
 
2013-03-13 12:32:02 PM  
Athena and the rest of the Greek gods are not impressed.
 
2013-03-13 12:33:00 PM  

Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


You're willing to risk the wrath of farkers by posting this?
 
2013-03-13 12:33:25 PM  

master_of_rayality: Weaver95:

possibility two:
so they get the dumbest, most trusting guy in the pile to assume the persona of Jesus telling him that hey, it's cool..

Was his name Brian? Roderick? Biggus Dickus?

/love this theory!


well think about it.  every group has someone in it who's kind of a loveable idiot.  loyal, just smart enough to help with the con they're running and easy going enough not to get greedy.  My read is that Peter and Judas were the big brains of the operation.  everyone else was a mix of hangers on or actively in on the scam and not inherently loyal to the outfit.  i'll bet they scattered to the winds after they pulled that body out of the crypt.  when things started taking on a life of its own, Peter gets a couple of hard nosed realists among the remaining disciples together and cleans house.  He gets organized and figures he can ride this thing till the day he dies.  But Judas and a few of the others had time to think it through.  they're feeling guilty about how it all turned out and they wanna go legit.  But they're in too deep - they know too much.  Peter and his buddies know they need to keep a handle on the story.  Judas going all soft and blabby would destroy their religion before it gets off the ground.  So they show up all 'mexican standoff' spaghetti western style and Judas ends up dangling from the end of a rope.  that keeps the others in line when they hear about it, and Peter spreads some cash around to keep everyone in line.
 
2013-03-13 12:34:42 PM  

TheXerox: FTFA:  A newly deciphered Egyptian text, dating back almost 1,200 years...

The Gospels in the New Testament were written closer to 1,900, to 2,000 years ago - still within the lifetimes of some of the people mentioned in them. This manuscript would have been written around 700-900 AD, long after the events took place and centuries after the deaths anybody who was around then and could dispute its veracity.

in short, fanfic until proven otherwise.



Actually, no one knows exactly when they were written and estimates date up to the second century. If they were all written within the lifetimes of the people within those stories you might expect to see less inconsistency between the different versions. It's generally accepted that they were most likely written years or decades apart, one following another.
 
2013-03-13 12:36:08 PM  
1200 years ago is practically "current events" by Egyptian standards.  Ancient it is not.
 
2013-03-13 12:36:38 PM  

redlegrick: Weaver95: possibility one: Jesus was a trickster god, or maybe a trickster god created christianity as a joke that later got outta hand.

possibility two: 'Jesus' was the user name on the account.  the disciples created 'Jesus' as a persona.  they made up a costume, perfected the stage act and then swapped identities around whenever they went into a big town.  But things get too big too fast, and Judas and Peter figure they gotta find a way to calm that shiat down before they ALL end up getting stoned in the town square.  so they get the dumbest, most trusting guy in the pile to assume the persona of Jesus telling him that hey, it's cool...one more big score and they'll all blow town.  the fix is in, they'll get him out of it before he goes down for good.  He just has to play the role and Pilate will rough him up, let him go.   things are going great until the crowd goes nuts.  Pilate took the bribe but to keep the crowd from going all stabby he's got no choice - he HAS to sell 'Jesus' down the river.  So this guy ends up playing the role of his life: the whole deal....whipping, crucifixion, torture...the whole bit.  Judas and Peter are appalled, this wasn't part of the plan but they're in too deep.  they hang around for a bit, not knowing what to do next.  after 'Jesus' is dead, they figure they'd better go get the body because with all this attention someone might go dig up 'Jesus' and see if descriptions match.  if someone figures out 'Jesus' is just an actor playing a role, they'll ALL go down in flames.  they get Mary and the girls to make up a crazy story about angels, haul the body out of town in the dead of night, and bury it in an unmarked grave out in the desert.  then they spend the next 50 years playing up the cult from behind the scenes, Peter lets it go to his head and Judas gets a serious case of the guilts and either hangs himself or the other disciples off him and make it look like a suicide.

I'm on board with option #2. And I can see that done up ...


Guy Ritchie.  With Peter played by Jason Statham and Judas by Vinnie Jones.
 
2013-03-13 12:37:30 PM  

Weaver95: possibility one: Jesus was a trickster god, or maybe a trickster god created christianity as a joke that later got outta hand.

possibility two: 'Jesus' was the user name on the account.  the disciples created 'Jesus' as a persona.  they made up a costume, perfected the stage act and then swapped identities around whenever they went into a big town.  But things get too big too fast, and Judas and Peter figure they gotta find a way to calm that shiat down before they ALL end up getting stoned in the town square.  so they get the dumbest, most trusting guy in the pile to assume the persona of Jesus telling him that hey, it's cool...one more big score and they'll all blow town.  the fix is in, they'll get him out of it before he goes down for good.  He just has to play the role and Pilate will rough him up, let him go.   things are going great until the crowd goes nuts.  Pilate took the bribe but to keep the crowd from going all stabby he's got no choice - he HAS to sell 'Jesus' down the river.  So this guy ends up playing the role of his life: the whole deal....whipping, crucifixion, torture...the whole bit.  Judas and Peter are appalled, this wasn't part of the plan but they're in too deep.  they hang around for a bit, not knowing what to do next.  after 'Jesus' is dead, they figure they'd better go get the body because with all this attention someone might go dig up 'Jesus' and see if descriptions match.  if someone figures out 'Jesus' is just an actor playing a role, they'll ALL go down in flames.  they get Mary and the girls to make up a crazy story about angels, haul the body out of town in the dead of night, and bury it in an unmarked grave out in the desert.  then they spend the next 50 years playing up the cult from behind the scenes, Peter lets it go to his head and Judas gets a serious case of the guilts and either hangs himself or the other disciples off him and make it look like a suicide.


Who gets the dame?

/read this with Bogarts' voice
 
2013-03-13 12:37:33 PM  

Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


What if God thinks he'd rather hang out with independent thinkers with a sense of humor instead of a bunch of cringing sycophants?

Also, as per the rest of Pascal's Wager, it could be that God doesn't like a smartass.
 
2013-03-13 12:39:17 PM  

Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


Dude, really? Your deity is the quintessential Negligent Parent of monumental proportions. Knowingly lets an agent of evil into the garden of paradise, knowingly leaves his "beloved children" with said agent of evil, then has the audacity to blame everybody else for the product of his own neglect when they are corrupted in their naivety. Does your god accept even a single shred of responsibility for his own neglect? You know what? In my imperfect state, I could have done better then that. Since your "All-powerful and Ever-loving God" apparently couldn't, he is obviously less than your holy book makes him out to be, and therefore, false. In fact, he falls far short of the level of responsibility we humans expect of even young, new parents, under penalty of law. As such, he is unworthy of worship.

Period.
 
2013-03-13 12:40:18 PM  
Bongo Blue:

Who gets the dame?

/read this with Bogarts' voice


I'm guessing Judas.  Peter and his buddies weren't interested in women.  if they weren't flat out homosexuals, they were definitely misogynist  asshole control freaks.  Judas looked like he could party down and get with the ladies.
 
2013-03-13 12:42:12 PM  

Crewmannumber6: At the Nicean Council the Coptics and Aryans were basically shouted down by the other sects (probably to curry favor with Rome) and this is when the story of Jesus took on supernatural characteristics. Until then then the majority of The Jesus Movement considered Jesus a holy man, but a man nonetheless.


Uh, not to be pedantic, but it was the "Arian" heresy, not "Aryan". It was named after Arius. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arius). Arius was yet another Egyptian Christian; it's not surprising that unusual ideas about Jeebus would arise in that environment, as they never really stopped arising.
 
2013-03-13 12:43:31 PM  

Magorn: (yeah I know the RC church's official line is that he was an only child and his Momma somehow remained a virgin even after having it, but that's so pants-on-head stupid that like Most Catholics I just point and laugh when someone brings that up)


The bible mentions James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas as Jesus's brothers.  I don't believe it has ever been argued that Jesus was an only child.  Only that Mary remained without sin, which isn't the same as staying a virgin.
 
2013-03-13 12:45:09 PM  

Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-03-13 12:45:20 PM  

Master Sphincter: And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


Don't Do What Donny Don't Does

angryrunner.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-03-13 12:47:44 PM  

Master Sphincter: You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles?


Well, yes, actually. I'm only using the free will Eve scored for me thanks to that "apple" deal back in the day.

/the serpent never lied.
 
2013-03-13 12:48:46 PM  

Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


Leviticus, eh? Some of the juiciest stuff in the bible is there.

There's human sacrifice: Leviticus 27:28-29
God will kill you and your siblings if your parents refuse to convert: Leviticus 26:21-22
God condones slavery - as long as it's not Jew on Jew slavery: Leviticus 25:44-46
Etc. etc., including the death penalty for all sorts of ridiculous things like beard cutting or talking back to your parents.

Even if I did believe that the christian god was real I'd have to be either completely ignorant of him or an amoral son of a biatch to actually worship that evil piece of garbage.
 
2013-03-13 12:49:16 PM  
Yes, Jesus was initiated into the Hermetic mysteries in Egypt. That is the thesis of The Magdalen Manuscript.  Now the text found at Nag Hammadi in 1945 are sometimes called the Gnostic Gospels (including the Gospel Of Thomas)
 
2013-03-13 12:49:22 PM  

Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A


0/10 - You forgot to switch to your other user account.
 
2013-03-13 12:50:03 PM  
Siddhis.

Jesus most certainly would have attained them.  E.g.::

1. PARKAYA PRAVESH - entering one's soul in the body of some other person.

2. HAADI VIDYA - a person neither feels hungry nor thirsty and he can remain without eating food or drinking water for several days at a stretch. Several Yogis of the Himalayas, remain engrossed in deep Sadhanas for months and years without eating or drinking anything.

 3. KAADI VIDYA - person shall not feel cold even if he sits in the snow laden mountains and shall not feel hot even if he sits in the fire. Thus a Sadhak can perform incessant penance without being affected by change of weather or seasons.

4. MADALASA VIDYA - a person becomes capable of increasing or decreasing the size of his body according to his wish.  Through this siddhi one may enter into stone or change the density in one's body, enabling one to pass through solid matter. Mahima Siddhi - The ability to increase the size of one's body, ultimately enveloping the universe.

5. VAYU GAMAN SIDDHI Through this Siddhi a person can become capable of flying in the skies and traveling from one place to another in just a few seconds. The Jain scriptures speak of Jain ascetics who could fly from place to place in a few seconds.

6. KANAKDHARA SIDDHI One can acquire immense and unlimited wealth through this Siddhi. It's said that once Shankaracharya saw a very poor and destitute woman and with the help of the Kanakdhara Yantra he showered gold in her house.

7. PRAKYA SADHANA Through this Sadhana a yogi can direct his disciple to take birth from the womb of a woman, who is childless or cannot bear children. Several Yogis have thus blessed infertile women with children. Swami Vishuddhanand had accomplished this Sadhana and had used it to bring happiness into the lives of several women. But today only two or three persons are accomplished in this Sadhana.

8. SURYA VIGYAN - one substance can be transformed into another through the medium of sun rays. Swami Vishudhananda had demonstrated the miracles of this science about 50-60 years ago, by transforming a paper into rose and a cotton ball into gold, otherwise it has become almost extinct.

9. MRIT SANJIVANI VIDYA - Through it even a dead person can be brought back to life. This practice may seem to be a myth but it had been used by Guru Gorakhnath several times. Today only a few persons have practical knowledge of this Vidya.
 
2013-03-13 12:52:35 PM  
kid_icarus: ...bunchof dirty Arabian looking people.


Must you?
 
2013-03-13 12:52:44 PM  

Precision Boobery: Not only a shape shifter, but also a time traveler.

[img41.imageshack.us image 500x570]


That is.... interesting.  Thanks.
 
2013-03-13 12:53:41 PM  

Dion Fortune: Siddhis.

Jesus most certainly would have attained them.  E.g.::

1. PARKAYA PRAVESH - entering one's soul in the body of some other person.

2. HAADI VIDYA - a person neither feels hungry nor thirsty and he can remain without eating food or drinking water for several days at a stretch. Several Yogis of the Himalayas, remain engrossed in deep Sadhanas for months and years without eating or drinking anything.

 3. KAADI VIDYA - person shall not feel cold even if he sits in the snow laden mountains and shall not feel hot even if he sits in the fire. Thus a Sadhak can perform incessant penance without being affected by change of weather or seasons.

4. MADALASA VIDYA - a person becomes capable of increasing or decreasing the size of his body according to his wish.  Through this siddhi one may enter into stone or change the density in one's body, enabling one to pass through solid matter. Mahima Siddhi - The ability to increase the size of one's body, ultimately enveloping the universe.

5. VAYU GAMAN SIDDHI Through this Siddhi a person can become capable of flying in the skies and traveling from one place to another in just a few seconds. The Jain scriptures speak of Jain ascetics who could fly from place to place in a few seconds.

6. KANAKDHARA SIDDHI One can acquire immense and unlimited wealth through this Siddhi. It's said that once Shankaracharya saw a very poor and destitute woman and with the help of the Kanakdhara Yantra he showered gold in her house.

7. PRAKYA SADHANA Through this Sadhana a yogi can direct his disciple to take birth from the womb of a woman, who is childless or cannot bear children. Several Yogis have thus blessed infertile women with children. Swami Vishuddhanand had accomplished this Sadhana and had used it to bring happiness into the lives of several women. But today only two or three persons are accomplished in this Sadhana.

8. SURYA VIGYAN - one substance can be transformed into another through the medium of sun rays. Swami Vishudhanan ...


10. CHUTNEY BURRITO - The ability to feel fulfilled between the hours of 7 and 11.
 
2013-03-13 12:55:16 PM  

gbv23: Yes, Jesus was initiated into the Hermetic mysteries in Egypt. That is the thesis of The Magdalen Manuscript.  Now the text found at Nag Hammadi in 1945 are sometimes called the Gnostic Gospels (including the Gospel Of Thomas)


I don't trust the Magdalenes
i207.photobucket.com
 
2013-03-13 12:56:32 PM  

HAMMERTOE: Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A

Dude, really? Your deity is the quintessential Negligent Parent of monumental proportions. Knowingly lets an agent of evil into the garden of paradise, knowingly leaves his "beloved children" with said agent of evil, then has the audacity to blame everybody else for the product of his own neglect when they are corrupted in their naivety. Does your god accept even a single shred of responsibility for his own neglect? You know what? In my imperfect state, I could have done better then that. Since your "All-powerful and Ever-loving God" apparently couldn't, he is obviously less than your holy book makes him out to be, and therefore, false. In fact, he falls far short of the level of responsibility we humans expect of even young, new parents, under penalty of law. As such, he is unworthy of worship.

Period.



There's quite a lot about slavery in the bible. Rules about taking slaves, justifications for raping your slaves, Jehova ordering his followers to slaughter other people and take the survivors as slaves... Even Jesus' message to slaves was that they should obey their slavemasters' commands as if they were the words of god himself.

I've yet to hear a revision or apology for perpetuating the clearly evil practice of slavery from Jehova or his earthly representative, Jesus. Until the Christian god has the common decency to so much as issue an unambiguous apology he is a patently unworthy of worship. Christians worship a clearly evil figure.
 
2013-03-13 12:56:40 PM  

Weaver95: well think about it.  every group has someone in it who's kind of a loveable idiot.  loyal, just smart enough to help with the con they're running and easy going enough not to get greedy.  My read is that Peter and Judas were the big brains of the operation.  everyone else was a mix of hangers on or actively in on the scam and not inherently loyal to the outfit.  i'll bet they scattered to the winds after they pulled that body out of the crypt.  when things started taking on a life of its own, Peter gets a couple of hard nosed realists among the remaining disciples together and cleans house.  He gets organized and figures he can ride this thing till the day he dies.  But Judas and a few of the others had time to think it through.  they're feeling guilty about how it all turned out and they wanna go legit.  But they're in too deep - they know too much.  Peter and his buddies know they need to keep a handle on the story.  Judas going all soft and blabby would destroy their religion before it gets off the ground.  So they show up all 'mexican standoff' spaghetti western style and Judas ends up dangling from the end of a rope.  that keeps the others in line when they hear about it, and Peter spreads some cash around to keep everyone in line.


Seriously, it's a Guy Ritchie movie.

Peter:  Roight.  Judas, quit yer bawlin'.  Oi'm tellin' ya, we can ride this out, keep it going.  We'll be fine, Oi say, just so long as you can keep yer bloody head in the game.  Otherwoise Oi'm gonna stick this sword up yer arse and fark ye blind with it.

Judas:  That sword?

Peter:  Yes, this sword.  Do you see any other farkin' swords lying about?

Judas:  Just that sword, what says 'Replica' on the side, and this sword, what says 'Deus Vult'.

(Peter drops the replica sword and gives Judas a jump kick to the head)
 
2013-03-13 12:57:19 PM  

Charlie Chingas: Master Sphincter: I'm all for fun, but all this blasphemy is really unnecessary. What if you are wrong? You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles? If this doesn't make you rethink your "humor" maybe heaven isn't for you anyway:

"I am the Lord your God, creator of heaven and earth. The wicked who take my name in vain shall wander in darkness for an eternity" Leviticus:69

 And this:
"The ways of the wicked attract the vanity of men. Do not as they do, but as they do not do" Leviticus: 69-A

You're willing to risk the wrath of farkers by posting this?


LOL, you owe me a new keyboard

/we will beat him over the head with ITGs!
 
2013-03-13 12:58:00 PM  

Master Sphincter: You are willing to risk your salvation for a few chuckles?


Salvation from what ?

// man up coward
 
2013-03-13 12:58:54 PM  

Weaver95: possibility two:


I like it.  Instead of the poor sap asking dumbfounded "I killed the clerk?"  he was "I'm the son of God?"    Once they get that confession on tape, they kind of overlook the interrogative and assume the declarative.
 
2013-03-13 12:59:12 PM  

God Is My Co-Pirate: [i49.tinypic.com image 200x268]


"Let's go kill Jesus."

/best Christmas episode ever


That show just wasn't the same after that twat left...
 
2013-03-13 12:59:24 PM  

mongbiohazard: Leviticus, eh? Some of the juiciest stuff in the bible is there.

There's human sacrifice: Leviticus 27:28-29
God will kill you and your siblings if your parents refuse to convert: Leviticus 26:21-22
God condones slavery - as long as it's not Jew on Jew slavery: Leviticus 25:44-46
Etc. etc., including the death penalty for all sorts of ridiculous things like beard cutting or talking back to your parents.

Even if I did believe that the christian god was real I'd have to be either completely ignorant of him or an amoral son of a biatch to actually worship that evil piece of garbage.


But,but,but... That's the stuff we choose to ignore because it's not really meant to be taken literally! Except for all that other stuff in the Bible that we take literally!
 
2013-03-13 01:00:44 PM  

Weaver95: redlegrick: I'm on board with option #2. And I can see that done up as a screenplay. My only question is, who'd direct it?

let me finish writing the screenplay first, then we'll start shopping for a director.


goddamn, I wanna see this movie...
 
2013-03-13 01:02:54 PM  

gadian: I don't believe it has ever been argued that Jesus was an only child. Only that Mary remained without sin, which isn't the same as staying a virgin.


http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_virginity_of_Mary

You sure about that?
 
2013-03-13 01:04:23 PM  

Cuthbert Allgood: Weaver95: redlegrick: I'm on board with option #2. And I can see that done up as a screenplay. My only question is, who'd direct it?

let me finish writing the screenplay first, then we'll start shopping for a director.

goddamn, I wanna see this movie...


before or after I get burned at the stake for heresy?
 
2013-03-13 01:04:43 PM  

Weaver95: Bongo Blue:

Who gets the dame?

/read this with Bogarts' voice

I'm guessing Judas.  Peter and his buddies weren't interested in women.  if they weren't flat out homosexuals, they were definitely misogynist  asshole control freaks.  Judas looked like he could party down and get with the ladies.


good point! Judas gets the money and the girl.

/a lady prefers a man with a little coin in his tunic
// Hollywood ending!
 
2013-03-13 01:05:09 PM  
I just read Wikipedia's page on the First Council of Nicaea and was surprised to see that there's no evidence they hand-picked the gospels at that time. I always thought they had.
 
2013-03-13 01:05:29 PM  

gadian: Magorn: (yeah I know the RC church's official line is that he was an only child and his Momma somehow remained a virgin even after having it, but that's so pants-on-head stupid that like Most Catholics I just point and laugh when someone brings that up)

The bible mentions James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas as Jesus's brothers.  I don't believe it has ever been argued that Jesus was an only child.  Only that Mary remained without sin, which isn't the same as staying a virgin.


Sadly, the official Catholic line is that Mary is the "ever-virgin mother of God"  which, as you note is simply stupid, despite it having been around as a "thing" since the early  centuries AD.  It basis, I think anyway, is the basic misogyny that has permeated the church for centuries, as best summed up by this 4th century  Pope's take on the subject: "

Pope Siricius I


"You had good reason to be horrified at the thought that another birth might issue from the same virginal womb from which Christ was born according to the flesh. For the Lord Jesus would never have chosen to be born of a virgin if he had ever judged that she would be so incontinent as to contaminate with the seed of human intercourse the birthplace of the Lord's body, that court of the eternal king" (Letter to Bishop Anysius[A.D. 392]).
 "

which translated into the modern vulgar reads roughly:

"EWWWWWW girl parts.  Sex is just icky"
 
2013-03-13 01:09:28 PM  

Gonz: gadian: I don't believe it has ever been argued that Jesus was an only child. Only that Mary remained without sin, which isn't the same as staying a virgin.

http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_virginity_of_Mary

You sure about that?


And we're back to anal sex... god I love these tardilicious threads...
 
2013-03-13 01:10:01 PM  

mcreadyblue: Very interesting.

Shows how divisive the early Christians really were only a few years into their founding.


Thank God they're over that.
 
2013-03-13 01:10:51 PM  

Precision Boobery: Not only a shape shifter, but also a time traveler.

[img41.imageshack.us image 500x570]


He shows up every now and again to see if the humans are ready to evolve and gets killed for his efforts every time.  I'm sure if he poked his head into this day and age he'd be toast just the same. Today's Christians, Muslims and Jews don't want to be told to get along and just grow up already.
 
2013-03-13 01:12:02 PM  

Magorn: "EWWWWWW girl parts. Sex is just icky"


While I was in the middle of reading your post I was planning on responding to you with this. Then I saw that you had already written it.
 
2013-03-13 01:17:43 PM  

gadian: Magorn: (yeah I know the RC church's official line is that he was an only child and his Momma somehow remained a virgin even after having it, but that's so pants-on-head stupid that like Most Catholics I just point and laugh when someone brings that up)

The bible mentions James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas as Jesus's brothers.  I don't believe it has ever been argued that Jesus was an only child.  Only that Mary remained without sin, which isn't the same as staying a virgin.


In fact, that's precisely the orthodox Catholic position (or was?). The "perpetual virginity of Mary" (yes, even after giving birth to Jesus) is dogma. I understand that the Catholic Church's position is that those others mentioned were Joseph's children by a previous marriage, and so Jesus' half-siblings. That's why Catholic iconography often depicts Joseph as an old man, even when Jesus was an infant.

And yes, this is completely arbitrary ret-conning, but it is what the Catholic Church asserts.
 
2013-03-13 01:21:01 PM  

mikaloyd: Ancient egypt ended several hundred years BC

So this is very much newsworthy.


Or more properly, Egypt and Rome had functionally merged by this point, with Egypt being essentially a Roman territory or possession (much like what would happen to Israel itself some 70 years later under more violent circumstances).  People still followed the old religion and culture (in fact, there were actually synchretic Egypto-Roman and Egypto-Greek religions cropping up, some traces of which STILL exist in modern "spiritual alchemy" practice (the specific identification of Hermes Trigesimus with Ptah, for instance).

The Egpytians were among the first to take to the whole Christianity thing, and the Coptic Church and the Dewahedo Churches of Ethiopia and Eritrea have a number of books NOT in the Roman or Orthodox canon (being pretty much essentially a third ancient branch of Christianity that never was subsumed into Catholicism) so this isn't too surprising.

And re Jesus being portrayed as a shapeshifter in Egypt specifically, where at the time the Old Kemetic Faith was still very much alive (to the point the liturgical language of the Coptic church is actually a form of the old Egyptian language written in a Hellenicised script with some extra characters from Demotic for sounds that didn't exist in the Greek alphabet):..kind of interesting that eagle symbolism was used, as that is a sign of Horus that would have been known at the time...
 
Displayed 50 of 146 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report