HotWingConspiracy: Nobody would blink about an obesity study, which is what it is. Add in the word lesbian and it's pearl clutching time.
LouDobbsAwaaaay: Congress controls spending.
jso2897: What part of "across the board" don't these retards understand? That's why letting this happen was a bad idea.But, they stuck it to Obummer, and that's all that really matters.2014, assholes. It's coming sooner than you think.
Pants full of macaroni!!: DAMN YOU FARTB0NG0 AND YOUR ONE POINT FIVE MILLION DOLLAR DOLLAR FAT LESBIAN STUDY
Voiceofreason01: HotWingConspiracy: Nobody would blink about an obesity study, which is what it is. Add in the word lesbian and it's pearl clutching time.most of the money is going to be used to pay a professor and a gaggle of grad students, why does subby and CNS News hate putting people to work?
BobDeluxe: HotWingConspiracy: Nobody would blink about an obesity study, which is what it is. Add in the word lesbian and it's pearl clutching time.Perhaps the problem is that there are already quite a few obesity studies and now we apparently MUST know how obesity is related to being a lesbian. So much so that the program is protected.Of course, that argument doesn't support your drama so carry on. I'm sure it won't stop you.
silvervial: Women aren't shallow (generally) and men are (generally). Where's my money?
SlothB77: Obama and the dems are making cuts to inflict the most pain and media coverage.Given a choice between cutting TSA agents, which would result in longer lines at airports or cutting studies on fat lesbians, they have chosen to cut the TSA agents. They are playing politics with the cuts. For this admin, it isn't about trimming pork or cutting the fat, no pun intended, it is about making republicans look bad.
Joe Blowme: thurstonxhowell: Joe Blowme: Projector was for Edsel .... and by the pic i was saying he was projecting his hatred.Edsel: Conservatives hate ... government spendingNo..." Edsel: Conservatives hate science, government spending, gay people, and efforts to fight obesity. Man, this story really has it all as far as they're concerned.Not just the spending part that yo.... wow, i just got trolled, bravo[assets0.ordienetworks.com image 339x192]
Joe Blowme: thurstonxhowell: Joe Blowme: thurstonxhowell: Joe Blowme: Edsel: Conservatives hate science, government spending, gay people, and efforts to fight obesity. Man, this story really has it all as far as they're concerned.[www.best-of-web.com image 91x100]So you're saying that liberals are projecting their fears of government spending onto conservatives? That's an interesting point of view in that literally no one would agree with it.Well then i guess its good i did not say that then huh?Who was projecting what onto whom, then? You put a projector after a statement that conservatives hate government spending. That leads me to believe that you think liberals are projecting their own hatred of government spending onto conservatives. If that's not what you meant, that's fine, but it definitely looks like it's what you said.Projector was for Edsel .... and by the pic i was saying he was projecting his hatred. Next time i will just post the word definition alongside the pic so you can better understand the point.
hitlersbrain: DROxINxTHExWIND: hitlersbrain:...That's why disgustingly fat guys get all the chicks, amirite?No, that's why it does not matter if they are disgustingly fat. I can name LOTS of fat guys that have been considered 'sexy' by women,Brief summary of how classes of guys do sexually with women.1. Rich sociopaths. High level corporate executives and such. (Very Well)2. Middle class guys. (Very Poor. A women will probably eventually settle for you though.)3. Poor sociopaths. Violent criminals, drug dealers and such. (Very Well)Nowhere in there will 'looks' improve a male's chances very much.
DROxINxTHExWIND: That's why disgustingly fat guys get all the chicks, amirite?
hitlersbrain: Men like sex.Male sexual arousal is closely tied with physical attractiveness.Being a fit, gay man is rewarded by lots of attention and sex.Lot's of rewards for being fit.(This is why fewer hetero men than women exercise regularly - at least after men figure out it won't get them anything)Women could care less about sex (but not much less).Female sexual arousal is based on money, power and/or crazy bullshiat.Being a fit, gay woman won't get you much.No real rewards for being fit.PM me for the address to send my 1.5 million dollars,Thanks.
hitlersbrain: Female sexual arousal is based on money, power and/or crazy bullshiat.
Chameleon: This is why we don't let politicians decide who gets grants.
HotWingConspiracy: I think this is the actual grant requestTo be honest, I don't know what they're hoping to learn here because we already know that fat flocks together. It's a social thing.
JackieRabbit: It appears that some people don't understand how NIH grants work. The money has already be allocated. The "across-the-board" part of the sequester is just political bullshiat and many programs are exempt.
vingamm: LMAO I find it incredibly interesting that if I do a google search on this article I cannot not find it being covered on Any major news site. Not NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, BBC News, NY Time, NY Post, Fortune, WSJ, The Register, CSPAN or......drum roll....FOX News. I can only find it on rightwing nut job websites. Not saying it is not a credible story but my daddy use to tell me if sometime quacks like a duck............
Tman144: I heard this from a defendant on Judge Judy, its as true now as it ever was:"Women fall in love with their ears, not their eyes."
SlothB77: Britney Spear's Speculum: 1.5 million for a study that could help save billions in health care costs down the roadi love how every study related to health is going to save us billions in the future. If even half the studies we have done saved us 1/10 the savings we expected from them, our health costs would be negative by now and we'd be getting paid to eat doughnuts by pharmaceutical companies.This study, like the close door button in an elevator, will do nothing.
Britney Spear's Speculum: 1.5 million for a study that could help save billions in health care costs down the road
SlothB77: Given a choice between cutting TSA agents, which would result in longer lines at airports or cutting studies on fat lesbians, they have chosen to cut the TSA agents.
BobDeluxe: You don't actually expect me to RTFA, much less research the topic, do you? I would never put that much effort into something for a fark discussion post. I just come here to watch people act like a bunch of dumbasses and join in the fun.
Freakin Rican: still no cure for cancer?
HMS_Blinkin: And good work CNS, you've found about 1/100th of a single F-35 worth of wasteful spending. Congrats.
SDRR: I_Am_Weasel: Too much pie.too many clams
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: May 27 2017 18:02:24
Runtime: 0.436 sec (435 ms)