Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Cincinnati Enquirer)   How do you protest anti-abortion demonstrators? With 4-by-6 foot posters of the genitals of female students, of course   ( divider line 214
    More: Strange, Collegiate Ministry Association, genitals, University of California, posters, academic community, objections, female genitalia  
•       •       •

17845 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Mar 2013 at 11:44 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

214 Comments   (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
2013-03-09 09:04:22 PM  

Hal5423: Random question here: If these women are so proud of their vaginas and claim to draw so much personal strength from this aspect of their womanhood, then why do so many of them feel the need to shave or use Brazilian waxes? This phenomenon of a hairless vagina as a standard of beauty if both the result of peer pressure and the practices of the porno industry, and ultimately results in unhealthy body image given the fact that a woman must remove a naturally-occurring part of her body in order to seem normal. Furthermore, the absence of pubic hair as a standard of beauty seeks to diminish the idea of an adult woman as sexually liberated and independent by determining that she must appear as a prepubescent girl in order to be "sexually acceptable" for men. This social pressure has the psychological repercussion of creating a sort of "woman-child" standard of beauty, thus implicitly diminishing the perception of a woman's intellectual capabilities and has wide implications on the state of gender equality.

HoozierDaddy: Assuming you're not trolling, consider this: Crabs are almost unheard of these days, thanks to shaving.

SirHolo: Because it is hot, hot, hot. Who doesn't like to please their mate? Easier to keep clean. Easier access for me to give her oral pleasure. And everything is slippery no matter what angle you are entering from. Allows for lots of new, pleasurable positions for both parties. And last, it's hot.
FYI, many of us guys wax/Epilady™/shave/get electrolysis as well.
Hairless junk on hairless junk is more fun for all involved.

rkiller1: I thought it was a) more comfortable, you know, like shaving chin whiskers, and b) an invitation to a mate saying, "easy access, open for business". Call me bonkers, but I'd rather stroke Telly Savalas' head than Castro's beard.

Nope, Hal5423 is spot on. You other guys are creepy closet-dwelling pedos. The question is, why are you fighting it? Find out what you are, and be that with pride.  It's a free country, right?
2013-03-09 10:17:38 PM  
Ah yes, the Doug Stanhope tactic with dealing with anti-abortionists.
2013-03-09 10:26:53 PM  
"equated mutilated fetuses with genocide victims in an effort to shame women, comparing reproductive choice to holocaust,"

Yeah! Killing babies is nothing like killing adults.  Stoopid pro life idiots!
2013-03-09 10:28:12 PM  

Jose628: [ image 480x740]

[ image 717x960]

[ image 480x360]

[ image 333x500]

[ image 500x667]
Are you a Star Wars fan, by any chance?
2013-03-09 10:32:22 PM  

Somacandra: bunner: I do not, however, seem to be able to invest much credence in the notion that "But, vuh GYE nuh!" is inherently some sort of political statement, fraught with gravitas

Fortunately, your mere opinion is irrelevant. Since elected officials can and are today banned from speaking in their legislatures if they even say the word "vagina", we have incontrovertible proof that in fact saying the word (much less displaying the picture) is an inherently political statement, fraught with precisely enough gravitas to cause said censorship. If it wasn't, elected officials wouldn't be banned from speaking about in during legislative debates. If it doesn't have power, it couldn't make people angry and afraid, by definition.

These people are absolutely terrified of vaginas.  It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
2013-03-09 10:47:27 PM  

Altitude5280: Molavian: LGBTQ LOL WTFBBQ?

Bisexual, Transsexual, Questioning.

Transgender (including intersex and transsexual)
Queer / Questioning

And there are some people who don't obviously fit into any of the above categories, such as the asexuals, so some people say "LBGTQ+" now, with the "+" being anyone else who doesn't fall under L,B,G,T, or Q.

Personally, I would like to see one simple word, such as "queer" be used to mean all of the above, but not everybody is on-board with  the idea of using "queer," so we're stuck with alphabet soup for now.
2013-03-09 11:48:20 PM  
What's strange is fetus worship.
2013-03-09 11:50:41 PM  

KrispyKritter: would like to know how many anti-abortion demonstrators have adopted two or three children and how many should just STFU.

"Pro-life... You don't see many of these white anti-abortion women volunteering to have any black fetuses transplanted into their uteruses, do you? No, you don't see them adopting a whole lot of crack babies, do you? No, that might be something Christ would do. And, you won't see alot of these pro-life people dousing themselves in kerosene and lighting themselves on fire. You know, moraly committed religious people in South Vietnam knew how to stage a goddamn demonstration, didn't they?! They knew how to put on a farking protest. Light yourself on FIRE!! C'mon, you moral crusaders, let's see a little smoke. To match that fire in your belly." -George
2013-03-09 11:57:56 PM  

Eddie Adams from Torrance: That's nice... now the anti-abortion nuts can find out what female genitalia look like.

"Why, why, why, why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are people you wouldn't want to fark in the first place, huh?" -George
2013-03-10 12:03:34 AM  

/NSFW, obviously...
2013-03-10 08:30:08 AM  

suburbanguy: Jon iz teh kewl: suburbanguy: Jon iz teh kewl: slepygryhnd: Images of bodies in a non-sexual context is pornographic? Okay. Got it. You're a prude. I see. I bet you have sex in the dark. I'm medicated, though, after a surgery, so I'm blathering. Back to sleep.

umm by definition, sexual organs are a sexual context.  I'D masturbate to them.

No. Reproductive organs are sex organs, not sexual organs. Sex != sexual.

as long as there's sperm in that there testes it's sexual

No, as long as there's sperm in there, it's reproductive. As long as you're physically attracted to looking at his junk, it's sexual.

Sexual means related to the physical attraction between 2 people. It has to have a point of view or context. By themselves, organs are not sexual.

ooh you mean thexual
2013-03-10 09:16:14 AM  

Bigfoot829: NSFW
I repeat, NSFW

/Not Sure if you're welcome
//Not what anyone thought when they heard Giant Vajayjay pics
///Also, NSFW
2013-03-10 10:25:00 AM  

MikeSass: /Pro-tip to women getting photos taken of your cootchies: Have a little consideration and tuck in the string.

Maxi-Pads! Tampons! Stem the Crimson Tide!
2013-03-11 03:33:53 PM  

ciberido: These people are absolutely terrified of vaginas.

I have head that most sociopolitical "movements" are largely made up of outlandish assertions designed to lend credence to the the most tattered fringes of the faction that promotes them.  Sort of like taking a sh*t on the dining room table and acting like something very philosophically challenging just happened.  But that's just hearsay.
Displayed 14 of 214 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter

In Other Media

  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.