If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Great Falls Tribune)   Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle   (greatfallstribune.com) divider line 38
    More: Scary, Sportsman Channel, man of feeling, Global Adventure Outfitters, Sugar Land, rifles, Flathead County  
•       •       •

9462 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Mar 2013 at 8:08 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-03-08 07:51:23 PM
6 votes:

Hey subby:

kubrickfilms.tripod.com
2013-03-08 08:39:01 PM
5 votes:
.
goodcomics.comicbookresources.com
2013-03-08 07:48:25 PM
5 votes:
Ban straight marriage
2013-03-08 07:55:19 PM
4 votes:
rack.0.mshcdn.com

I don't always kill the host of A Rifleman's Journal, beat my wife, take my toddler to a relative's house, drive 25 miles home, and then kill myself; but when I do I make it a Dos Equis.
2013-03-08 05:59:45 PM
3 votes:
This would have never have happened if the victim had been ar --oh.

Well, who cares.
2013-03-08 08:57:09 PM
2 votes:
It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

At the pelvis?
2013-03-08 08:53:56 PM
2 votes:

Propain_az: Hey, fark it, raise my taxes, fark me in the ass, and take my guns.  It is over. Game over.


And people wonder why you guys get called "nuts"
2013-03-08 08:19:11 PM
2 votes:
This is what happens when you take god out of TV shows.
2013-03-08 08:13:48 PM
2 votes:
  Good thing the fishing guy had already left....
2013-03-08 07:52:42 PM
2 votes:

violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.


The expression of something other than the literal intention! That. Is. Irony!
2013-03-08 06:31:00 PM
2 votes:
He probably had a huge magazine and emptied it into her.

/I mean he put his large penis in her vagina and ejaculated.
2013-03-09 06:13:29 PM
1 votes:
http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/changing_the_way_peopl e _think_about_rifles/30399

swangoatman: lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.


The Bengston's are a very well established reputable family.  So many people in the community know Wayne and or Lindsey or someone else that does.  It has shocked all.  But I haven't heard any other news from official sources.  It is sad and a shame that some finely breed Montana men cannot accept the fact of infidelity.  I believe the son is his, of course there are others who wonder.  I met Lindsey about 10 years ago when she was with a different man...she broke his heart.  I know of women who don't want the men they are dating around her.  I have done a couple minor favors for her myself, and she was fun to party with.  I don't believe Mr. TV guy and her were discussing business.  Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.  A lot of local men seem to think he should have shot her also, I find it much better revenge not to.  And poetic justice for the animal killer.  If I hear more I'll let you know...
2013-03-09 11:00:27 AM
1 votes:
At least he died from something he loved.
2013-03-09 10:18:29 AM
1 votes:

PrinceofFark: Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot

Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.


Ok there Captian America... Is it a bad time to mention that I'm banging your wife?
2013-03-09 01:28:51 AM
1 votes:

atomicmask: We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.


Well, we had two (Jackson and Lincoln, and in the latter's case he managed to persuade the guy it was a really bad idea).

You'll notice we had such duels back when weapons were really shiatty, and it was rare to actually hit your opponent. Burr was surprised he hit Hamilton.  Lincoln managed to avoid a duel by picking swords instead of the usual smooth-bore pistols.

Once weapons became good enough that someone was probably going to get killed, the tradition stopped completely.

So, really, not a parallel to pulling out the trusty Bushmaster and shooting your wife's bushmaster.
2013-03-09 12:09:46 AM
1 votes:
This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.
2013-03-08 11:16:00 PM
1 votes:
  P.S.   I live in a small town and I've often heard it said...You don't lose your wife..You just lose your turn.
2013-03-08 11:14:26 PM
1 votes:

Waxing_Chewbacca: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

I think Wyatt Earp might just be a closet case


His comment about gay bars did seem to come out of the blue... maybe he secretly wants to be a cuckold.
2013-03-08 11:07:19 PM
1 votes:

atomicmask: however I did not have to force anyone.


Sure. Is that why you're threatening to blow holes in people with your boomstick if you catch them noodling your wife, Hick Mcfarkstick?

atomicmask: It is something two people agree to


Funny, so is cheating.
2013-03-08 10:43:08 PM
1 votes:

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?

Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.


Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.
2013-03-08 10:36:52 PM
1 votes:

atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.


I like other men's wives. They tend to like me, too. Maybe I've met yours.
2013-03-08 09:27:47 PM
1 votes:

atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder


No sense in trying to pass laws against guns murder and mayhem.  Criminals will simply ignore them, and only the innocent will not have murder and mayhem.
Besides, if I choose to live in a civilized society, what right is it of civilized society to tell me how to live?  Fark that.  Let them all leave.  U-S-A!  U-S-A!
2013-03-08 09:11:55 PM
1 votes:

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: theorellior: Infernalist: That's exactly what he's saying. He wants to be able to shoot someone and walk away from it.

I thought that was spelled out in the Second Amendment (praise be unto the Lord)?

I think it's one of the commandments, actually: "Ye shall killeth he that commit adultery" or some-such.



     Thou shalt not shooteth a man in Reno just to watch him die.....
2013-03-08 08:54:04 PM
1 votes:

Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.


All I got was he has mommy issues.
2013-03-08 08:36:52 PM
1 votes:

atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.


Societal progress comes in pendulum swings. One culture will be virile and manly, the next will be fertile and womanly, then they switch back. It's the natural cycle.

First you have the Iroquois with their five nations and very sensible laws. Then you have a bunch of Europeans who come and cut them down. Then we take a step back, crib from their notes, and decide mother England is too tyrannical and cut the tie. Then, we decide a little more expansion can't hurt. Then we feel bad, start freeing the slaves. Then we decide a six gun's the only real law in the Western Territories. Then we decide that's barbaric and shut it down. Then we decide it's romantic and Wyatt Earp becomes a movie hero. But then we ban alcohol because of fights. Then we restore alcohol because wars at home and abroad. Then free love. Then preppies. Now a swarm of scruffy milquetoast hipsters who don't like violence. Their kids will be bloodthirsty spartan types. Back and forth.
2013-03-08 08:34:49 PM
1 votes:
Why did he not shoot his wife?  Clearly she's just as responsible for the infidelity as the other man.  Or is it that she's considered property -- for better or worse entirely faultless?
2013-03-08 08:33:28 PM
1 votes:

Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.


I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.
2013-03-08 08:22:37 PM
1 votes:
Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.
2013-03-08 08:18:48 PM
1 votes:

ecmoRandomNumbers: Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.


I think that all goes back to fathers who idolized The Duke and then parented the way they think he would.  Their kids grow up broken sociopaths.
2013-03-08 08:18:28 PM
1 votes:
It seems the hunter has become the hunted (and dead).
2013-03-08 08:17:32 PM
1 votes:

edmo: Another responsible gun owner sacrifices innocent victims in the name of Constitutional Freedoms.


Dont mow another guys lawn.
2013-03-08 08:10:27 PM
1 votes:
Another responsible gun owner sacrifices innocent victims in the name of Constitutional Freedoms.
2013-03-08 07:58:36 PM
1 votes:
So, only one of them was shooting blanks.
2013-03-08 06:59:18 PM
1 votes:
Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.
2013-03-08 06:51:02 PM
1 votes:

dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.


I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.
2013-03-08 06:33:34 PM
1 votes:

violentsalvation: Link


"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.
2013-03-08 06:18:09 PM
1 votes:
He was hunting the elusive and dangerous bunfish, by the sounds of it.
2013-03-08 06:04:06 PM
1 votes:
It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.
 
Displayed 38 of 38 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report