Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Great Falls Tribune)   Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle   (greatfallstribune.com) divider line 204
    More: Scary, Sportsman Channel, man of feeling, Global Adventure Outfitters, Sugar Land, rifles, Flathead County  
•       •       •

9469 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Mar 2013 at 8:08 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



204 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-03-08 11:42:55 PM  
I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot
 
2013-03-08 11:45:03 PM  

MrHappyRotter: Why did he not shoot his wife?  Clearly she's just as responsible for the infidelity as the other man.  Or is it that she's considered property -- for better or worse entirely faultless?


He probably had a love-anger conflict going on.
I think we can assume that this guy was not acting rationally, only emotionally, and as such was immune to reasoning of this sort.  I mean...

A northwestern Montana man shot and killed the host of the Sportsman Channel show "A Rifleman's Journal" while the TV personality was visiting the shooter's wife, police said Friday.Wayne Bengston, 41, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself
You have to imagine that if the guy had sat down and evaluated the outcome if this little jealousy-anger spree before he had done anything, that he would not have gone about "solving" things the way he did.
 
2013-03-08 11:57:37 PM  

Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

Can someone translate this response?


Pete:  Wink.  Nudge.  Hey Officer Fred, I think I hear someone calling for you.
Fred:  Yeah, me too Pete.  Better go check it out.
Pete:  Now I'm going to defend my manhood, you traitorous vixen.
Wife:  Oh no, I thought I could fark John and you wouldn't do anything, I'm so disloyal and evil-hearted.
Pete beats wife with lead pipe.
Pete shoots John in the face.
Fred:  Good Lord, what was that noise?
Pete:  Just the sounds of Justice, and a man defending his honor.
Fred:  Ah, right.  Wink.  Nudge.  Let's get a beer.
 
2013-03-09 12:05:02 AM  
THIS is what happens when immature people have access to deadly (toys) weapons.

And man, most of America is too immature for these (toys) weapons.
 
2013-03-09 12:05:56 AM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over.


Thank goodness we've come to our senses and realized that life is more important than respect for someone's vague and ill-defined concept of "honor", and that handling things that way doesn't actually help anyone involved at all.


atomicmask: Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important.


I have yet to see a good reason for why those things were important in the first place.


atomicmask: You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens?


This isn't about LETTING things happen, you're just choosing how to respond to it if it does.  Murdering some dude out of some stupid, misguided sense of honor because your wife acted like an untrustworthy slutbag doesn't erase what happened, nor does it fix any of the problems that will arise because of it.  All it does is make someone dead for no reason other than that you want to exact revenge on someone in retribution for your wounded ego and pride.  You don't lose any less by doing it, you lose MORE -- it doesn't FIX anything, it's only someone's dumbass concept of what "being a man" entails.  Everything you need to do to keep life from farking with you this way needs to be done BEFORE this happens, not AFTER.


atomicmask: Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


Lots of things are, just not the stupid shiat that you think is.
 
2013-03-09 12:09:46 AM  
This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.
 
2013-03-09 12:11:08 AM  

MaliFinn: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

Can someone translate this response?

Pete:  Wink.  Nudge.  Hey Officer Fred, I think I hear someone calling for you.
Fred:  Yeah, me too Pete.  Better go check it out.
Pete:  Now I'm going to defend my manhood, you traitorous vixen.
Wife:  Oh no, I thought I could fark John and you wouldn't do anything, I'm so disloyal and evil-hearted.
Pete beats wife with lead pipe.
Pete shoots John in the face.
Fred:  Good Lord, what was that noise?
Pete:  Just the sounds of Justice, and a man defending his honor.
Fred:  Ah, right.  Wink.  Nudge.  Let's get a beer.


No no no, don't you watch the movies?  It's so much more romantic and cinematic than that!
 
2013-03-09 12:14:34 AM  

Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot


It's easy.  Just forget that you know the difference between then and than, and when faced with facts and logic, double down on the stupid!!!!
 
2013-03-09 12:15:48 AM  

Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

Can someone translate this response?


I THINK he means that if men were allowed to 'discipline' their wives as they pleased then this sort of thing wouldn't happen. But I'm not sure, he may just have had a stroke.
 
2013-03-09 12:16:37 AM  

Pincy: This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.


No, no, no, they're only responsible until they break the law, see? That way they aren't and never were representative of responsible gun owners.
 
2013-03-09 12:21:10 AM  

James F. Campbell: Pincy: This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.

No, no, no, they're only responsible until they break the law, see? That way they aren't and never were representative of responsible gun owners.


That's gotta be it. It's so clear to me now. Gay Wyatt Earp was right all along!
 
2013-03-09 12:33:58 AM  
Well, chances are he used a shotgun so he did it the way Joe Biden would want him to, so we have that at least.
 
2013-03-09 12:49:14 AM  

WaffleStomper: Well, chances are he used a shotgun so he did it the way Joe Biden would want him to, so we have that at least.


If he did use a Vice President weapon, he used it better than Cheney did.
 
2013-03-09 12:53:15 AM  

atomicmask: Yeah, it's not like you could pass a law that required the gun be safely stored, so that when someone flips out the target has some chance to get away before the lead starts flyin'.

You know he drove like, really far to kill the guy right? he had time to drive, you think he wouldn't have time to open a safe?


You know this  happened at his house, right?

Let's see, I'm boning his wife.  Mmmm, mmmm, that's some good adultery I'm enjoying.

Uh oh, her husband arrived.  He seems....concerned. He's ranting about how he's going to kill me, and he'd kill her too if it wasn't International Day of the Woman.  He's heading for his gun safe!

This might be a good time for me to exit, stage right. But gee, I was boning his wife the whole time he was driving over here, it hardly seems sporting to just leave now.  Might as well wait for him to get his gun safe open, get a round jacked in to the chamber, etc.  While he's doing that, I'll be pondering whether this could make a good segment on my show.

Well, here he comes, and...oh, dang, maybe I should have left as soon as I saw him arrive....
 
2013-03-09 01:05:14 AM  

BummerDuck: angrymonday: You should get a free pass for killing the person your spouse is cheating with. Some people deserve killing.

Funny, I was gonna say I know a few guys that would quickly take out a camera, take some shots, thank the guy, and file for a divorce.

No love left in their marriages, and getting a divorce without something like this is financial death for the guy.

It seems unfortunate that this guy must have actually still loved his wife, but she didn't give a fark about him. She caused the death of 2 people. Hope she is proud of her accomplishment.



Yeah, man kills another man and himself, but it's the WOMAN's fault.

You've managed to post the most hateful AND stupid comment in this thread so far, and that's WITH atomicmask doing his best.   Hope you are proud of your accomplishment.
 
2013-03-09 01:06:46 AM  
While I don't agree with everything atomicmask is saying, some of what he says does make sense. Right or wrong, there are consequences to every action. What would you do if your whole life, (family, happiness, marriage) was blown up in an instant. Your dreams, everything you had hoped for gone... there is a significant segment of the population who just aren't equipped to handle that type of cluster*
 
2013-03-09 01:08:39 AM  
Just a couple responsible upstanding gun owners settling their differences. Nothing to see here.
 
2013-03-09 01:10:46 AM  

theorellior: atomicmask: No, murder is premeditated violence with the intent to kill against someone. A crime of passion is if you walk in, catch the guy, and plug him in the head with a bullet.

So you're saying one is okay then?


Yes.   If you dont want to roll the dice and take a chance that someone shoots you in the head, then go bang your own wife.
 
2013-03-09 01:17:40 AM  
You've managed to post the most hateful AND stupid comment in this thread so far, and that's WITH atomicmask doing his best. Hope you are proud of your accomplishment

The shooter is obviously the person most at fault, but the woman does share some responsibility for what happened. Everyone has a breaking point, unfortunately this man met his (via the actions of his spouse). You get married, most likely swear in front of your family and God to be forever faithful, etc., and then are surprised that some people lose it when the other person betrays you/cheats. I can't believe that it doesn't happen more often.
 
2013-03-09 01:22:52 AM  
 
2013-03-09 01:28:51 AM  

atomicmask: We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.


Well, we had two (Jackson and Lincoln, and in the latter's case he managed to persuade the guy it was a really bad idea).

You'll notice we had such duels back when weapons were really shiatty, and it was rare to actually hit your opponent. Burr was surprised he hit Hamilton.  Lincoln managed to avoid a duel by picking swords instead of the usual smooth-bore pistols.

Once weapons became good enough that someone was probably going to get killed, the tradition stopped completely.

So, really, not a parallel to pulling out the trusty Bushmaster and shooting your wife's bushmaster.
 
2013-03-09 01:29:47 AM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Rodriguez and the woman, who works for a firearms manufacturer in the Flathead Valley, met at a trade show and struck up a casual relationship that police do not believe was romantic, Dial said.

She and Rodriguez were sitting at the kitchen table, talking over a glass of wine, when Bengston entered the house and shot Rodriguez, Dial said.


She wasn't even banging the guy? Sounds like this guy did her a favor by offing himself.
 
2013-03-09 01:31:05 AM  

lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


And so stable that instead of counselling, or a divorce, he shoots the adulterous man, and then puts a bullet in his own head, depriving his son of his love forever. Not the action of a sweet man at all. There's wrong ( adultery) and then there's WRONG.
 
2013-03-09 01:34:37 AM  

lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


You were friends with this asshole? I'm guessing we'll probably see your name in the paper at some point, too.
 
2013-03-09 01:35:43 AM  

MisterRonbo: So, really, not a parallel to pulling out the trusty Bushmaster and shooting your wife's bushmaster.


lol.

And do y'all suppose a man who resorts to murder, wife-beating and suicide may have previously exhibited behaviors detrimental to his marriage?
 
2013-03-09 01:42:58 AM  

felching pen: violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.

Clearly, this is Obama's doing, just like all the other shootings lately.


I'd never say anything like that. But if I do, you can be certain I'm joking.
 
2013-03-09 02:13:42 AM  

atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder


And yet, you're here, advocating people break those laws against murder for semi-petty "offenses".  Of course, by gun nut logic, murder laws aren't necessary because law-abiding citizens don't murder anyway, and dedicated murderers ignore the law.
 
DuX
2013-03-09 03:37:24 AM  
Ladies, this is why you never marry a man with a small peener.
It always ends badly.

Is it just me or do men who have the most problems with "de ladies" seem to fetishize their guns more than your average gun whacko?
 
2013-03-09 04:31:33 AM  

Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot


Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.
 
2013-03-09 05:31:36 AM  

PrinceofFark: Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.


You're a rabid dog.
 
2013-03-09 05:39:03 AM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Rodriguez and the woman, who works for a firearms manufacturer in the Flathead Valley, met at a trade show and struck up a casual relationship that police do not believe was romantic, Dial said.

She and Rodriguez were sitting at the kitchen table, talking over a glass of wine, when Bengston entered the house and shot Rodriguez, Dial said.


well i'll be damned.  like i said, was there any actual evidence they were cheating with each other?  maybe they were just talking after all, and the husband was a possessive psychopath.  looks like i might have been right.
 
2013-03-09 06:52:57 AM  
I guess she gave love a bad name.
 
2013-03-09 07:23:07 AM  
Why does the police department have mug shots of two dead men? Do they have a time machine?
 
2013-03-09 07:37:07 AM  

The Smails Kid: Why does the police department have mug shots of two dead men? Do they have a time machine?


No pics of the mother, two wives, nor the three children mentioned. Plus, what year for the wine?
 
2013-03-09 09:26:24 AM  

Perducci: Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle

That seems like an overly complicated headline.  Wouldn't it be simpler to just say "Gun nut shot and killed by another gun nut"?


No shiat! And I'm sick of all the car nuts killing other car nuts.

/blood for the blood god
 
2013-03-09 09:49:19 AM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder

Not a leap in logic at all.  You said murdering someone was a reasonable reaction to finding him in bed with your wife.  This implies that you both approve of that sort of thing.  Of course, you labeled it as 'fighting for someone you love/care for', but murder's murder when you strip off the poetic words.


Sorry, God says stoning is in order. Christian nation and all.
 
2013-03-09 10:03:46 AM  
I was stationed in Montana (MAFB) in the late 70's.  Crimes of passion were legal, as long as you killed BOTH of them.

/Crimes of Passion
//343 MSS
 
2013-03-09 10:18:29 AM  

PrinceofFark: Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot

Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.


Ok there Captian America... Is it a bad time to mention that I'm banging your wife?
 
2013-03-09 10:19:53 AM  

PrinceofFark: Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot

Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.


   Prince...Should you ever decide to act on any of what you say here..I can assure you..with no malice intended..you will be disappointed with your new social circle in the penitentiary...very very disappointed.
 
2013-03-09 10:32:10 AM  
Anyone given the thought that the husband knew the child was not his,loved the wife and kid,but when he found out mommy was banging baby daddy did indeed lose his mind? Spared the child and the wife whom he loved ,killed the man who was a banger and killed himself out of guilt for what he did. Sounds like an old tale of betrayal , forgiveness,betrayal, anger, death.
If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.
 
2013-03-09 10:34:31 AM  

lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.



If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.
 
2013-03-09 11:00:27 AM  
At least he died from something he loved.
 
2013-03-09 11:34:03 AM  
I can't believe I stumbled into the greatest thread of the day, this is amazing.
 
2013-03-09 01:48:32 PM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.


Not to change the subject, but if you switched the genders around in the musical "Chicago", had two men kill a cheating woman, and then have them sing "She Had It Coming", I suppose that THEN it would be reprehensible instead of empowering, amirite?
 
2013-03-09 01:51:05 PM  
""A Rifleman's Journal" tracks Rodriguez's hunting travels to exotic locations, according to a Sportsman Channel description."

The spirits of dead Snow Leopard and Cape Buffalo can fap to this.
 
2013-03-09 02:21:30 PM  
So, the great hunter got shot?!?!? WTF?
 
2013-03-09 02:27:02 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over.


So what' you're saying is no human society has ever been matriarchal or matrilineal, for 50,000 years it's always been a Man's world and ego is the only thing that matters. US public school education in full effect yo!
 
2013-03-09 04:22:03 PM  

violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.


Hiro-ACiD: atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over.

So what' you're saying is no human society has ever been matriarchal or matrilineal, for 50,000 years it's always been a Man's world and ego is the only thing that matters. US public school education in full effect yo!


I think a lot of people would be surprised at how egalitarian history has been.

Everyone's had their turn to steer the ship into the iceberg, and everyone has successfully sunk their ship.
 
2013-03-09 06:13:29 PM  
http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/changing_the_way_peopl e _think_about_rifles/30399

swangoatman: lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.


The Bengston's are a very well established reputable family.  So many people in the community know Wayne and or Lindsey or someone else that does.  It has shocked all.  But I haven't heard any other news from official sources.  It is sad and a shame that some finely breed Montana men cannot accept the fact of infidelity.  I believe the son is his, of course there are others who wonder.  I met Lindsey about 10 years ago when she was with a different man...she broke his heart.  I know of women who don't want the men they are dating around her.  I have done a couple minor favors for her myself, and she was fun to party with.  I don't believe Mr. TV guy and her were discussing business.  Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.  A lot of local men seem to think he should have shot her also, I find it much better revenge not to.  And poetic justice for the animal killer.  If I hear more I'll let you know...
 
2013-03-09 08:01:11 PM  

lakefivedi: http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/changing_the_way_peopl e _think_about_rifles/30399swangoatman: lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.

The Bengston's are a very well established reputable family.  So many people in the community know Wayne and or Lindsey or someone else that does.  It has shocked all.  But I haven't heard any other news from official sources.  It is sad and a shame that some finely breed Montana men cannot accept the fact of infidelity.  I believe the son is his, of course there are others who wonder.  I met Lindsey about 10 years ago when she was with a different man...she broke his heart.  I know of women who don't want the men they are dating around her.  I have done a couple minor favors for her myself, and she was fun to party with.  I don't believe Mr. TV guy and her were discussing business.  Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.  A lot of local men seem to think he should have shot her also, I find it much better revenge not to.  And poetic justice for the animal killer.  If I hear more I'll let you know...


Hope you have a better weekend than what this is turning out as.
 
Displayed 50 of 204 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report