Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Great Falls Tribune)   Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle   ( greatfallstribune.com) divider line
    More: Scary, Sportsman Channel, man of feeling, Global Adventure Outfitters, Sugar Land, rifles, Flathead County  
•       •       •

9500 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Mar 2013 at 8:08 PM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



204 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2013-03-08 10:23:27 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


I guess you see the teachings of Jesus as emasculating. Turn the other cheek, forgive 70 times 70, thou shalt not kill, act not in anger, and so on. Personally, I think it takes more discipline and honor to step back and take control of a situation than to lose it and destroy your life by your own hand.
 
2013-03-08 10:26:26 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.


Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?
 
2013-03-08 10:26:26 PM  

felching pen: atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.

I guess you see the teachings of Jesus as emasculating. Turn the other cheek, forgive 70 times 70, thou shalt not kill, act not in anger, and so on. Personally, I think it takes more discipline and honor to step back and take control of a situation than to lose it and destroy your life by your own hand.


I just tend to have empathy, if I was in that mans situation, and what I viewed as my life was ending anyway, what exactly would I have to lose? It is hard for me not to have sympathy, the real villain in the story is the wife who decided it was time to whore it up before she got a divorce. But again, this is a new world. The man is wrong no matter what, he deserves to have nothing, nothing is sacred, nothing is worth fighting for according to the law and the majority.
 
2013-03-08 10:27:49 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?


Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.
 
2013-03-08 10:28:20 PM  
Bung_Howdy: "The accused shot the man, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself, Whitefish police said."

The fact he beat his wife and did NOT kill his son (or wife for that matter) paints him as poor schlub who just lost it when he found out the guy was farking his wife (as opposed to your typical crazy nowadays)- Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-

/guilt can be a biatch

AcesFull: or...or he coulda swallowed his pride and got a divorce..you know,for Sonny Boys sake..

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Considering Dad just abandon sonny boy about as effectively as humanly possible("My own insecurities are much more important to me than you are, son.", I doubt it.


Hey now: NOT condoning his behavior or course of action at all; just (almost happily) observing that he didn't go full tilt "crazy" like you see a lot of nowadays, killing everybody (kid, wife, neighbors, dog, cat) with no discretion. This just seemed like a sad, classic case of a schlub that couldn't handle the thought of his wife with another man.

I think the "guilt" comment still holds true- he's unaccountable at this point and made a HUGE error on committing his selfish and thoughtless act of murder and suicide, but I wouldn't want to be the Mom explaining "what had set Daddy off that day"... I suppose she could spin it as Dad's problem all the way around (probably will) but I still think sonny Jim may have some issues with Mom if he gets the full story (as will Mom with guilt over the sad event)

/just classic sad
 
2013-03-08 10:29:11 PM  

atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.


Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.
 
2013-03-08 10:30:25 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.


Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.
 
2013-03-08 10:31:08 PM  

atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.


     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...
 
2013-03-08 10:31:36 PM  

BummerDuck: Funny, I was gonna say I know a few guys that would quickly take out a camera, take some shots, thank the guy, and file for a divorce.

No love left in their marriages, and getting a divorce without something like this is financial death for the guy.


Montana's a no-fault divorce state, so pretty much irrelevant here.
 
2013-03-08 10:32:56 PM  

atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.


Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.
 
2013-03-08 10:33:17 PM  

AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...


If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.
 
2013-03-08 10:35:32 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.


Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.
 
2013-03-08 10:36:52 PM  

atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.


I like other men's wives. They tend to like me, too. Maybe I've met yours.
 
2013-03-08 10:38:49 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.

I like other men's wives. They tend to like me, too. Maybe I've met yours.


Not likely, she tends not to hang out in gay bars.
 
2013-03-08 10:38:55 PM  
That's a damned effective troll we have up there. well done douchebag well done.
 
2013-03-08 10:40:48 PM  
The most significant thing this guy ever did, the only thing he'll be remembered for.

And his ultimate advice to his two-year-old son:

"Whenever you're badly embarrassed, just kill yourself. Your kids can just look out for themselves."
 
2013-03-08 10:43:08 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?

Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.


Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.
 
2013-03-08 10:45:03 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?

Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.


Thank you for describing everything wrong with our society currently. The fact that a woman can behave like that, and the man can do nothing is wrong. especially if the man behaves on equal terms, vomiting on the woman and then she can turn around and hit him or strike or even shoot or stab and be considered empowered is farking stupid. That is not equality.
 
2013-03-08 10:45:27 PM  

dr_blasto: dj_bigbird: It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.

They had an explosive relationship.


Bullets mushroomed, too.
 
2013-03-08 10:46:39 PM  

atomicmask: Not likely, she tends not to hang out in gay bars.


LOL. You might as well have gone with a "jerk store" insult. This was terrible.

MaliFinn: And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her,


It certainly doesn't, based on what I've seen in this thread.
 
2013-03-08 10:47:23 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.

Thank you for describing everything wrong with our society currently. The fact that a woman can behave like that, and the man can do nothing is wrong. especially if the man behaves on equal terms, vomiting on the woman and then she can turn around and hit him or strike or even shoot or stab and be considered empowered is farking stupid. That is not equality.


Your are mistaken if you ever think that you own your wife or can control her behavior, no more than she would be if she felt the same about you or tried to control your life.  Marital property laws do not mean what you think they mean.
 
2013-03-08 10:48:50 PM  
Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.
 
2013-03-08 10:50:33 PM  

atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...

If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.


   Let me put it this way...why would anyone want someone who is unhappy with them?  Is it so noble to have a big sign in your yard that says..I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO FARKS MY WIFE...  I'm sorry guy but this fellow got his pride hurt by an unfaithful wife...And he couldn't take the heat.  He shoulda walked..He lost nothing.
 
2013-03-08 10:51:27 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.

Thank you for describing everything wrong with our society currently. The fact that a woman can behave like that, and the man can do nothing is wrong. especially if the man behaves on equal terms, vomiting on the woman and then she can turn around and hit him or strike or even shoot or stab and be considered empowered is farking stupid. That is not equality.

Your are mistaken if you ever think that you own your wife or can control her behavior, no more than she would be if she felt the same about you or tried to control your life.  Marital property laws do not mean what you think they mean.


You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.
 
2013-03-08 10:52:37 PM  

atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.


If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.
 
2013-03-08 10:52:37 PM  
i'm loving the posts thinking the guy & other guys wife were having cake and coffee at the dining room table of her Mom's house while pouring over the HS year book innocently recalling old times. morans.
 
2013-03-08 10:52:50 PM  

AcesFull: atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...

If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.

   Let me put it this way...why would anyone want someone who is unhappy with them?  Is it so noble to have a big sign in your yard that says..I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO FARKS MY WIFE...  I'm sorry guy but this fellow got his pride hurt by an unfaithful wife...And he couldn't take the heat.  He shoulda walked..He lost nothing.


Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?
 
2013-03-08 10:54:26 PM  

atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.


Civil disobedience isn't murder
 
2013-03-08 10:54:36 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.


Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.
 
2013-03-08 10:56:06 PM  

atomicmask: You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.


You may expect that respect, but it doesn't mean you're going to get it.  And your available recourse is not to kill everyone involved, but to simply end your relationship.  Boo hoo.  Be a man, get over it.
 
2013-03-08 10:56:36 PM  

jaytkay: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

Civil disobedience isn't murder


So tell me, where do you draw the line to give up? If civil disobedience doesn't work, do you just pack your ball and go home, accept things are just shiatty and give up? Or do you begin to fight. Perhaps start with damage to buildings and property? Where is the line drawn for you.

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep deciding who to have for dinner, liberty is a well armed and determined sheep contesting the vote.
 
2013-03-08 10:58:28 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.

You may expect that respect, but it doesn't mean you're going to get it.  And your available recourse is not to kill everyone involved, but to simply end your relationship.  Boo hoo.  Be a man, get over it.


You forget, marriage is a contract. a part of that contract is to honor, in sickness and health, till death do you part.

Again you seem to think marriage is a meaningless thing, if its enough of a binding contract to make a man lose half his property, it should be enough of a binding contract to illicit a response when its breached.
 
2013-03-08 10:59:08 PM  

atomicmask: Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?


You can't make someone love you, you sociopathic guttershiate.
 
2013-03-08 11:00:05 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?

You can't make someone love you, you sociopathic guttershiate.


maybe YOU cant, but I can see that, however I did not have to force anyone. It is something two people agree to, again, marriage is a contract.

How farking stupid are you going to make yourself look?
 
2013-03-08 11:01:43 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.

Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.


American history is filled with injustice and then corrections to injustice.  You can't pick and choose which pieces you like, you need to abide by the law and make change within the system.  As for the civil rights movement, the most effective part of the movement was the civil and nonviolent assembly of people exercising their free speech.  Eventually, the government stopped murdering Indians.  Eventually, women were allowed to vote.  Eventually, racial equality became the law of the land.  We are no longer burning Salem's witches, or owning slaves, or exerting gender dominance.  We're in continual pursuit of a more perfect union, and part of that means you can't shoot people who fark your wife.
 
2013-03-08 11:05:16 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.

You may expect that respect, but it doesn't mean you're going to get it.  And your available recourse is not to kill everyone involved, but to simply end your relationship.  Boo hoo.  Be a man, get over it.

You forget, marriage is a contract. a part of that contract is to honor, in sickness and health, till death do you part.

Again you seem to think marriage is a meaningless thing, if its enough of a binding contract to make a man lose half his property, it should be enough of a binding contract to illicit a response when its breached.


Yes, a binding contract.  In the church, and under the law.  I'm not going to speak to the quirky cultisms of the church, but I think I read somewhere that under the law you can't shoot someone for farking your wife.  That's part of the preexisting contract that exists between you and the government as a US citizen.
 
2013-03-08 11:06:10 PM  

atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...

If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.

   Let me put it this way...why would anyone want someone who is unhappy with them?  Is it so noble to have a big sign in your yard that says..I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO FARKS MY WIFE...  I'm sorry guy but this fellow got his pride hurt by an unfaithful wife...And he couldn't take the heat.  He shoulda walked..He lost nothing.

Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?


    He did not lose a wife...He was living with a woman who wanted an open relationship..and was acting on it....I got nowhere else to go with this...Plus we're starting to sound like attorneys...I do hope you're never put in a position to act based on your beliefs...
 
2013-03-08 11:07:16 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


Wow... You must be a hoot at parties there Hoss.
 
2013-03-08 11:07:19 PM  

atomicmask: however I did not have to force anyone.


Sure. Is that why you're threatening to blow holes in people with your boomstick if you catch them noodling your wife, Hick Mcfarkstick?

atomicmask: It is something two people agree to


Funny, so is cheating.
 
2013-03-08 11:07:43 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.

Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.

American history is filled with injustice and then corrections to injustice.  You can't pick and choose which pieces you like, you need to abide by the law and make change within the system.  As for the civil rights movement, the most effective part of the movement was the civil and nonviolent assembly of people exercising their free speech.  Eventually, the government stopped murdering Indians.  Eventually, women were allowed to vote.  Eventually, racial equality became the law of the land.  We are no longer burning Salem's witches, or owning slaves, or exerting gender dominance.  We're in continual pursuit of a more perfect union, and part of that means you can't shoot people who fark your wife.


Alright of those examples...You know the native americans were disarmed, massacred, and DIDN'T GET WHAT THEY SET OUT FOR, right?

Racial equality became law of the land, 200 years after independence?

Burning salem witches stopped because honestly, even the founding fathers of towns and cities was getting accused, it had nothing to do with protest or peacable assembly.

So of the examples you listed, 1...1 time did civil disobedience work, and it had more to do with a changing of the politicians then marching.
 
2013-03-08 11:09:18 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.


I think Wyatt Earp might just be a closet case
 
2013-03-08 11:09:59 PM  

BarkingUnicorn: dr_blasto: dj_bigbird: It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.

They had an explosive relationship.

Bullets mushroomed, too.


In the end, their feelings were hollow, point is that she was banging this guy for that high-velocity feeling since they pulled the trigger on taking their relationship to this level and her husband was clearly off-target in meeting her needs.
 
2013-03-08 11:14:26 PM  

Waxing_Chewbacca: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

I think Wyatt Earp might just be a closet case


His comment about gay bars did seem to come out of the blue... maybe he secretly wants to be a cuckold.
 
2013-03-08 11:14:38 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.

Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.

American history is filled with injustice and then corrections to injustice.  You can't pick and choose which pieces you like, you need to abide by the law and make change within the system.  As for the civil rights movement, the most effective part of the movement was the civil and nonviolent assembly of people exercising their free speech.  Eventually, the government stopped murdering Indians.  Eventually, women were allowed to vote.  Eventually, racial equality became the law of the land.  We are no longer burning Salem's witches, or owning slaves, or exerting gender dominance.  We're in continual pursuit of a more perfect union, and part of that means you can't shoot people who fark your wife.

Alright of those examples...You know the native americans were disarmed, massacred, and DIDN'T GET WHAT THEY SET OUT FOR, right?

Racial equality became law of the land, 200 years after independence?

Burning salem witches stopped because honestly, even the founding fathers of towns and cities was getting accused, it had nothing to do with protest or peacable assembly.

So of the examples you listed, 1...1 time did civil disobedience work, and it had more to do with a changing of the politicians then marching.


You don't seem to understand the point.  The Constitution of this country was written so that we could evolve as a country, in pursuit of more freedom and to better provide justice for all citizens.  You can't say "well, people were shot 100 years ago" as some sort of justification for how you get to behave today.  You follow the law, as a base minimum.  Up and above that, you apply any additional moral code (religious or otherwise) that guides your behavior, where it does not conflict with the law.  Part of that, according to both the US government and the millions of people who live in this country, is that you can't indiscriminately shoot people for farking your wife.
 
2013-03-08 11:16:00 PM  
  P.S.   I live in a small town and I've often heard it said...You don't lose your wife..You just lose your turn.
 
2013-03-08 11:17:21 PM  

KrispyKritter: i'm loving the posts thinking the guy & other guys wife were having cake and coffee at the dining room table of her Mom's house while pouring over the HS year book innocently recalling old times. morans.


Cake or death?
 
2013-03-08 11:17:52 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: however I did not have to force anyone.

Sure. Is that why you're threatening to blow holes in people with your boomstick if you catch them noodling your wife, Hick Mcfarkstick?

atomicmask: It is something two people agree to

Funny, so is cheating.


I never threatened to shoot or "blow holes" in anyone. The only one talking about blowing anything holes or otherwise is you, which you have the typical anti-gun ultra lib infatuation with. I just have empathy for the man. I can understand how you cant, being as how the touch of a woman is obviously alien to you as well as standing up for anything other then a reach around, but you should try it some time. And by it I mean being a man and standing up for something other then a reach around.
 
2013-03-08 11:22:26 PM  
Why shoot the guy?
Better to shoot a woman once than a different man every week.
(Am i doing it right?)
 
2013-03-08 11:32:40 PM  

atomicmask: empathy


That's not surprising, given that he obviously sucked at pleasing his wife, too.

atomicmask: being as how the touch of a woman is obviously alien to you as well as standing up for anything other then a reach around, but you should try it some time. And by it I mean being a man and standing up for something other then a reach around.


Waxing_Chewbacca, I think you might be onto something!
 
2013-03-08 11:38:20 PM  

atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.


Can someone translate this response?
 
Displayed 50 of 204 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report