If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Great Falls Tribune)   Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle   (greatfallstribune.com) divider line 204
    More: Scary, Sportsman Channel, man of feeling, Global Adventure Outfitters, Sugar Land, rifles, Flathead County  
•       •       •

9465 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Mar 2013 at 8:08 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



204 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-03-08 05:59:45 PM  
This would have never have happened if the victim had been ar --oh.

Well, who cares.
 
2013-03-08 06:04:06 PM  
It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.
 
2013-03-08 06:18:09 PM  
He was hunting the elusive and dangerous bunfish, by the sounds of it.
 
2013-03-08 06:22:11 PM  
 
2013-03-08 06:31:00 PM  
He probably had a huge magazine and emptied it into her.

/I mean he put his large penis in her vagina and ejaculated.
 
2013-03-08 06:33:34 PM  

violentsalvation: Link


"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.
 
2013-03-08 06:35:57 PM  

dj_bigbird: It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.


They had an explosive relationship.
 
2013-03-08 06:51:02 PM  

dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.


I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.
 
2013-03-08 06:59:18 PM  
Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.
 
2013-03-08 07:48:25 PM  
Ban straight marriage
 
2013-03-08 07:51:23 PM  

Hey subby:

kubrickfilms.tripod.com
 
2013-03-08 07:52:42 PM  

violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.


The expression of something other than the literal intention! That. Is. Irony!
 
2013-03-08 07:55:19 PM  
rack.0.mshcdn.com

I don't always kill the host of A Rifleman's Journal, beat my wife, take my toddler to a relative's house, drive 25 miles home, and then kill myself; but when I do I make it a Dos Equis.
 
2013-03-08 07:58:36 PM  
So, only one of them was shooting blanks.
 
2013-03-08 08:10:27 PM  
Another responsible gun owner sacrifices innocent victims in the name of Constitutional Freedoms.
 
2013-03-08 08:11:06 PM  

dj_bigbird: It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.


Indeed; I figure this is a story about a woman cheating on her hubby. How else would you explain it?
 
2013-03-08 08:13:48 PM  
  Good thing the fishing guy had already left....
 
2013-03-08 08:16:55 PM  
Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle

That seems like an overly complicated headline.  Wouldn't it be simpler to just say "Gun nut shot and killed by another gun nut"?
 
2013-03-08 08:17:32 PM  

edmo: Another responsible gun owner sacrifices innocent victims in the name of Constitutional Freedoms.


Dont mow another guys lawn.
 
2013-03-08 08:18:28 PM  
It seems the hunter has become the hunted (and dead).
 
2013-03-08 08:18:48 PM  

ecmoRandomNumbers: Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.


I think that all goes back to fathers who idolized The Duke and then parented the way they think he would.  Their kids grow up broken sociopaths.
 
2013-03-08 08:19:11 PM  
This is what happens when you take god out of TV shows.
 
2013-03-08 08:21:32 PM  

ecmoRandomNumbers: Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.


Dear god, my step-son's middle name is Wayne...
 
2013-03-08 08:21:37 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: I think that all goes back to fathers who idolized The Duke and then parented the way they think he would. Their kids grow up broken sociopaths.


Or awesome!
 
2013-03-08 08:22:37 PM  
Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.
 
2013-03-08 08:23:16 PM  
Saying "We can't have new gun laws because criminals won't follow them." is like saying "Why should I shower? I'm gonna get dirty again.".
 
2013-03-08 08:25:38 PM  

Bith Set Me Up: Saying "We can't have new gun laws because criminals won't follow them." is like saying "Why should I shower? I'm gonna get dirty again.".


Actually, its more akin to saying "I already have a shower, but I need a shower in my shower before I can use it properly"

There are already laws against this behavior.
 
2013-03-08 08:26:06 PM  
Hope you all feel like lowlife buttsurfers when it turns out it was his sister or something.
 
2013-03-08 08:27:16 PM  

Bith Set Me Up: Saying "We can't have new gun laws because criminals won't follow them." is like saying "Why should I shower? I'm gonna get dirty again.".


Watching conservatives reconcile drug laws and gun laws is funny.
 
2013-03-08 08:32:04 PM  

atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.


So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.
 
2013-03-08 08:33:28 PM  

Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.


I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.
 
2013-03-08 08:34:49 PM  
Why did he not shoot his wife?  Clearly she's just as responsible for the infidelity as the other man.  Or is it that she's considered property -- for better or worse entirely faultless?
 
2013-03-08 08:35:03 PM  

atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.


What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.
 
2013-03-08 08:36:52 PM  

atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.


Societal progress comes in pendulum swings. One culture will be virile and manly, the next will be fertile and womanly, then they switch back. It's the natural cycle.

First you have the Iroquois with their five nations and very sensible laws. Then you have a bunch of Europeans who come and cut them down. Then we take a step back, crib from their notes, and decide mother England is too tyrannical and cut the tie. Then, we decide a little more expansion can't hurt. Then we feel bad, start freeing the slaves. Then we decide a six gun's the only real law in the Western Territories. Then we decide that's barbaric and shut it down. Then we decide it's romantic and Wyatt Earp becomes a movie hero. But then we ban alcohol because of fights. Then we restore alcohol because wars at home and abroad. Then free love. Then preppies. Now a swarm of scruffy milquetoast hipsters who don't like violence. Their kids will be bloodthirsty spartan types. Back and forth.
 
2013-03-08 08:36:56 PM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.


That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder
 
2013-03-08 08:39:01 PM  
.
goodcomics.comicbookresources.com
 
2013-03-08 08:40:05 PM  

atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder


Not a leap in logic at all.  You said murdering someone was a reasonable reaction to finding him in bed with your wife.  This implies that you both approve of that sort of thing.  Of course, you labeled it as 'fighting for someone you love/care for', but murder's murder when you strip off the poetic words.
 
2013-03-08 08:40:30 PM  

doglover: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

Societal progress comes in pendulum swings. One culture will be virile and manly, the next will be fertile and womanly, then they switch back. It's the natural cycle.

First you have the Iroquois with their five nations and very sensible laws. Then you have a bunch of Europeans who come and cut them down. Then we take a step back, crib from their notes, and decide mother England is too tyrannical and cut the tie. Then, we decide a little more expansion can't hurt. Then we feel bad, start freeing the slaves. Then we decide a six gun's the only real law in the Western Territories. Then we decide that's barbaric and shut it down. Then we decide it's romantic and Wyatt Earp becomes a movie hero. But then we ban alcohol because of fights. Then we restore alcohol because wars at home and abroad. Then free love. Then preppies. Now a swarm of scruffy milquetoast hipsters who don't like violence. Their kids will be bloodthirsty spartan types. Back and forth.


I think there is a lot of truth to that. I think its all about being "against the popular established crowd" over and over again. Warrior culture to wimpy culture and back and forth.
 
2013-03-08 08:41:37 PM  

Infernalist: What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.


It's called a duel.

Go get a $20 bill. That man? He fought so many duels that "he rattled like a sack of marbles" when he was serving in the White House. There's historical precedent and enough rules, laws, and examples that it's well worth looking into.

My personal favorite is the German Judaical Duel for battles between husbands and wives.

The man had to stand in a pit and was armed with a solid club. The woman was given freedom of movement and armed with a rock in a sock.

i25.photobucket.com
 
2013-03-08 08:42:42 PM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder

Not a leap in logic at all.  You said murdering someone was a reasonable reaction to finding him in bed with your wife.  This implies that you both approve of that sort of thing.  Of course, you labeled it as 'fighting for someone you love/care for', but murder's murder when you strip off the poetic words.


No, murder is premeditated violence with the intent to kill against someone. A crime of passion is if you walk in, catch the guy, and plug him in the head with a bullet.

Again you do not seem to know what you are talking about.
 
2013-03-08 08:44:16 PM  
you'd think he would know better than to put his gun in another mans holster.
 
2013-03-08 08:45:30 PM  

atomicmask: Bith Set Me Up: Saying "We can't have new gun laws because criminals won't follow them." is like saying "Why should I shower? I'm gonna get dirty again.".

Actually, its more akin to saying "I already have a shower, but I need a shower in my shower before I can use it properly"

There are already laws against this behavior.


Yeah, it's not like you could pass a law that required the gun be safely stored, so that when someone flips out the target has some chance to get away before the lead starts flyin'.
 
2013-03-08 08:46:26 PM  

doglover: Infernalist: What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

It's called a duel.

Go get a $20 bill. That man? He fought so many duels that "he rattled like a sack of marbles" when he was serving in the White House. There's historical precedent and enough rules, laws, and examples that it's well worth looking into.

My personal favorite is the German Judaical Duel for battles between husbands and wives.

The man had to stand in a pit and was armed with a solid club. The woman was given freedom of movement and armed with a rock in a sock.

[i25.photobucket.com image 500x383]


Lol awesome, yeah, let's go back to duels.  Lemme log into my lvl 90 destro lock.
 
2013-03-08 08:46:44 PM  
You should get a free pass for killing the person your spouse is cheating with. Some people deserve killing.
 
2013-03-08 08:46:56 PM  

MisterRonbo: atomicmask: Bith Set Me Up: Saying "We can't have new gun laws because criminals won't follow them." is like saying "Why should I shower? I'm gonna get dirty again.".

Actually, its more akin to saying "I already have a shower, but I need a shower in my shower before I can use it properly"

There are already laws against this behavior.

Yeah, it's not like you could pass a law that required the gun be safely stored, so that when someone flips out the target has some chance to get away before the lead starts flyin'.


You know he drove like, really far to kill the guy right? he had time to drive, you think he wouldn't have time to open a safe?
 
2013-03-08 08:47:16 PM  
I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.
 
2013-03-08 08:47:56 PM  

angrymonday: You should get a free pass for killing the person your spouse is cheating with. Some people deserve killing.


Adam Lanza certainly agreed with you.
 
2013-03-08 08:48:53 PM  

atomicmask: Warrior culture to wimpy culture and back and forth.


Not wimpy: passive.

The passive types are way into horrible oppressive laws that are anything but wimpy. Do as I say.

The aggressive types are way into bloody war and taking lands and slaves for their warriors to be free in. Do as thou wilt.

Of course, the lower classes are always oppressed and the upper classes are always free, and it's all complicated and the best system is an alloy of many different types.... BUUUUUUUUT, in general it goes war, peace, war, peace, war, peace pretty much on the generational line.
 
2013-03-08 08:49:31 PM  
I wish more of these gun nuts would dispose of each other...
 
2013-03-08 08:51:33 PM  
Hey, fark it, raise my taxes, fark me in the ass, and take my guns.  It is over. Game over.
 
2013-03-08 08:52:14 PM  

TomD9938: edmo: Another responsible gun owner sacrifices innocent victims in the name of Constitutional Freedoms.

Dont mow another guys lawn.


I'm not a gardener. I only play on a field that's been freshly cut.

/snicker
 
2013-03-08 08:53:56 PM  

Propain_az: Hey, fark it, raise my taxes, fark me in the ass, and take my guns.  It is over. Game over.


And people wonder why you guys get called "nuts"
 
2013-03-08 08:54:04 PM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.


All I got was he has mommy issues.
 
2013-03-08 08:55:57 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Propain_az: Hey, fark it, raise my taxes, fark me in the ass, and take my guns.  It is over. Game over.

And people wonder why you guys get called "nuts"


It was sarcasm.
 
2013-03-08 08:56:06 PM  

atomicmask: No, murder is premeditated violence with the intent to kill against someone. A crime of passion is if you walk in, catch the guy, and plug him in the head with a bullet.


So you're saying one is okay then?
 
2013-03-08 08:56:25 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Propain_az: Hey, fark it, raise my taxes, fark me in the ass, and take my guns.  It is over. Game over.

And people wonder why you guys get called "nuts"


"Reasonable" doesn't come to mind, that's for sure.
 
2013-03-08 08:57:09 PM  
It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

At the pelvis?
 
2013-03-08 08:57:53 PM  
Gotta love the internet tough guys who come out and yearn for days where they could "shoot" (read: biatch on the internet) someone for taking their "woman."

We're a civilized society. Don't like it? Go live on a mountain, far away from modern weaponry, medicine, electricity, etc.
 
2013-03-08 08:57:59 PM  

theorellior: atomicmask: No, murder is premeditated violence with the intent to kill against someone. A crime of passion is if you walk in, catch the guy, and plug him in the head with a bullet.

So you're saying one is okay then?


That's exactly what he's saying.  He wants to be able to shoot someone and walk away from it.
 
2013-03-08 08:59:34 PM  
Sometimes I think I'll never understand the logic of gun nuts, but then I remember: everything's better with a gun! And then it becomes crystal clear.

Bad grout job? Shoot the contractor!
Cut off in traffic? Perforate the sumbiatch!
Catch the wife cheating? Plug his ass!
Hear a bump in the night? Lay down suppressing fire!

It's a brave new world out there.
 
2013-03-08 09:01:10 PM  

redTiburon: Hope you all feel like lowlife buttsurfers when it turns out it was his sister or something.


   rump rangers..butt pirates...doughnut punchers..pillow biters...ass rammers...turd burglars..fudge packers..
 
2013-03-08 09:01:32 PM  

Infernalist: That's exactly what he's saying. He wants to be able to shoot someone and walk away from it.


I thought that was spelled out in the Second Amendment (praise be unto the Lord)?
 
2013-03-08 09:03:42 PM  

atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong


Somalia awaits you. Go there.

Please.
 
2013-03-08 09:05:56 PM  

theorellior: Infernalist: That's exactly what he's saying. He wants to be able to shoot someone and walk away from it.

I thought that was spelled out in the Second Amendment (praise be unto the Lord)?


I think it's one of the commandments, actually: "Ye shall killeth he that commit adultery" or some-such.
 
2013-03-08 09:10:50 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: theorellior: Infernalist: That's exactly what he's saying. He wants to be able to shoot someone and walk away from it.

I thought that was spelled out in the Second Amendment (praise be unto the Lord)?

I think it's one of the commandments, actually: "Ye shall killeth he that commit adultery" or some-such.


content7.flixster.com

These guys approve.
 
2013-03-08 09:11:55 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: theorellior: Infernalist: That's exactly what he's saying. He wants to be able to shoot someone and walk away from it.

I thought that was spelled out in the Second Amendment (praise be unto the Lord)?

I think it's one of the commandments, actually: "Ye shall killeth he that commit adultery" or some-such.



     Thou shalt not shooteth a man in Reno just to watch him die.....
 
2013-03-08 09:13:08 PM  

ecmoRandomNumbers: Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.


Seriously. Wayne or DeWayne as a first or middle name gauranf*ckintees a murdering sociopath.

Also, good headline subs.
 
2013-03-08 09:15:13 PM  

AbbeySomeone: ecmoRandomNumbers: Want your kid to kill somebody someday? Name him Wayne.

Seriously. Wayne or DeWayne as a first or middle name gauranf*ckintees a murdering sociopath.

Also, good headline subs.


t.qkme.me

Sought for questioning.
 
2013-03-08 09:15:48 PM  

inglixthemad: TomD9938: edmo: Another responsible gun owner sacrifices innocent victims in the name of Constitutional Freedoms.

Dont mow another guys lawn.

I'm not a gardener. I only play on a field that's been freshly cut.

/snicker


Ok, that's funny just 'cuz I've never heard it before.
 
2013-03-08 09:19:53 PM  
"The accused shot the man, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself, Whitefish police said."

The fact he beat his wife and did NOT kill his son (or wife for that matter) paints him as poor schlub who just lost it when he found out the guy was farking his wife (as opposed to your typical crazy nowadays)- Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-

/guilt can be a biatch
 
2013-03-08 09:22:51 PM  
www.batmanwallpapers.com

Never Rub another man's rhubarb.
 
2013-03-08 09:27:06 PM  

Bung_Howdy: "The accused shot the man, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself, Whitefish police said."

The fact he beat his wife and did NOT kill his son (or wife for that matter) paints him as poor schlub who just lost it when he found out the guy was farking his wife (as opposed to your typical crazy nowadays)- Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-

/guilt can be a biatch


8.5
 
2013-03-08 09:27:47 PM  

atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder


No sense in trying to pass laws against guns murder and mayhem.  Criminals will simply ignore them, and only the innocent will not have murder and mayhem.
Besides, if I choose to live in a civilized society, what right is it of civilized society to tell me how to live?  Fark that.  Let them all leave.  U-S-A!  U-S-A!
 
2013-03-08 09:28:08 PM  

Bung_Howdy: "The accused shot the man, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself, Whitefish police said."

The fact he beat his wife and did NOT kill his son (or wife for that matter) paints him as poor schlub who just lost it when he found out the guy was farking his wife (as opposed to your typical crazy nowadays)- Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-

/guilt can be a biatch


or...or he coulda swallowed his pride and got a divorce..you know,for Sonny Boys sake..
 
2013-03-08 09:28:26 PM  
Random thoughts:
If somebody commits adultery, leave them. Don't go on a shooting spree.

Murder is worse than adultery.

If you based your whole identity on your spouse's faithfulness, you have problems.
 
2013-03-08 09:29:14 PM  

atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.




I have a hard time interpreting what you are trying to get across. It almost sounds like an episode of Gunsmoke.
 
2013-03-08 09:29:37 PM  

AcesFull: or...or he coulda swallowed his pride and got a divorce..you know,for Sonny Boys sake..


Obviously, that's not what the manly men of 80 years ago would have done. Better a bloodbath with weapons blazing!
 
2013-03-08 09:29:54 PM  

Bung_Howdy: Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-


Considering Dad just abandon sonny boy about as effectively as humanly possible("My own insecurities are much more important to me than you are, son.", I doubt it.
 
2013-03-08 09:44:09 PM  

jsfrancis: .
[goodcomics.comicbookresources.com image 400x554]


Is that boy handling that man's wood?
 
2013-03-08 09:45:09 PM  

jsfrancis: .


The most awesome TV show EVER.
 
2013-03-08 09:47:32 PM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Bung_Howdy: Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-

Considering Dad just abandon sonny boy about as effectively as humanly possible("My own insecurities are much more important to me than you are, son.", I doubt it.


seems more like revenge.  Wayne was a decent man, SWAT team at his door, baby at grandma's  WTF?  bang.
 
2013-03-08 09:52:40 PM  

99.998er: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

I have a hard time interpreting what you are trying to get across. It almost sounds like an episode of Gunsmoke.


Or, any time period before 1950...but I guess its easier to shoehorn "the way life was before ultra-liberalism took over" into a stereotype so you can defeat it easier.
 
2013-03-08 09:52:52 PM  

angrymonday: You should get a free pass for killing the person your spouse is cheating with. Some people deserve killing.


Funny, I was gonna say I know a few guys that would quickly take out a camera, take some shots, thank the guy, and file for a divorce.

No love left in their marriages, and getting a divorce without something like this is financial death for the guy.

It seems unfortunate that this guy must have actually still loved his wife, but she didn't give a fark about him. She caused the death of 2 people. Hope she is proud of her accomplishment.
 
2013-03-08 10:02:19 PM  
For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.
 
2013-03-08 10:04:39 PM  
You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.
 
2013-03-08 10:07:11 PM  

atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them


Gee, I wonder why conservatives yearn for earlier times
 

www.atlantatimemachine.com
 
2013-03-08 10:07:21 PM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.


You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?
 
2013-03-08 10:07:37 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.

The expression of something other than the literal intention! That. Is. Irony!


grumble
 
2013-03-08 10:10:38 PM  

violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.


Clearly, this is Obama's doing, just like all the other shootings lately.
 
2013-03-08 10:10:44 PM  

jaytkay: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them

Gee, I wonder why conservatives yearn for earlier times
 

[www.atlantatimemachine.com image 525x490]


Yeah its GOTTA BE RACISM. right?
 
2013-03-08 10:11:47 PM  

atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?


Maybe if mommy had breastfed you a little longer you wouldn't be projecting your insecurities all over the thread, needledick.
 
2013-03-08 10:12:36 PM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Maybe if mommy had breastfed you a little longer you wouldn't be projecting your insecurities all over the thread, needledick.


Talks about projection

Mentions a dick every time gun threads come up...

Thy name is hypocrite.
 
2013-03-08 10:13:45 PM  

atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?


Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.
 
2013-03-08 10:16:06 PM  

atomicmask: jaytkay: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them

Gee, I wonder why conservatives yearn for earlier times
 

[www.atlantatimemachine.com image 525x490]

Yeah its GOTTA BE RACISM. right?


Who said anything about racism? I just illustrated strong, manly conservatives like yourself deciding for themselves what's right and wrong.
 
2013-03-08 10:16:13 PM  
Bengston's wife told police that Rodriguez was in town on business and visiting her at her mother's house in Whitefish when her husband showed up Thursday night.

is there any actual evidence yet that she was cheating with him?  if you're going to cheat on your husband, why would you do it at your mother's house?  somehow i think this whole tragedy is a totally bizarre misunderstanding.  it turns out that she knew the tv host back in high school and they were just catching up as old friends or something.
 
2013-03-08 10:16:25 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.


I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.
 
2013-03-08 10:16:45 PM  

atomicmask: e


Alas, in times past, when men weren't cowards, they would do what they felt was right, with little regard for the law, I'ms ure.

So obviously, you're still just a coward.

Deal with it.
 
2013-03-08 10:17:20 PM  

atomicmask: Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


Ahhhh. Nice. You had me going. 8/10.
 
2013-03-08 10:17:30 PM  

atomicmask: I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.


Then go break out men who do such things out of prison. Free them, if they're convicted for it.

OR are you a coward, too afraid to stand up for those you deem have been wronged by society?

Coward.
 
2013-03-08 10:20:03 PM  

jaytkay: atomicmask: jaytkay: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them

Gee, I wonder why conservatives yearn for earlier times
 

[www.atlantatimemachine.com image 525x490]

Yeah its GOTTA BE RACISM. right?

Who said anything about racism? I just illustrated strong, manly conservatives like yourself deciding for themselves what's right and wrong.


Indeed, see here is the thing you are going to hate about the point you just made, it worked both ways.

The two you are trying to point as evil are indeed doing exactly what you said..

You are forgetting the part about how the black man, and other black men before them, did not obey the law and did not accept the morale majority when the law stated they were unequal, or that they were not citizens, or that they could not vote.

The black man is ALSO being a strong, manly "conservative" by going against the law and doing what is right.

But I guess according to milktoast panzies like you, THE LAW AND GOVERNMENT ARE ABSOLUTE, so I guess the black man should just take inequality and indignity because its legalized. RIght?

I will get a mop and bucket for when your ultra-lib head explodes.
 
2013-03-08 10:23:27 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


I guess you see the teachings of Jesus as emasculating. Turn the other cheek, forgive 70 times 70, thou shalt not kill, act not in anger, and so on. Personally, I think it takes more discipline and honor to step back and take control of a situation than to lose it and destroy your life by your own hand.
 
2013-03-08 10:26:26 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.


Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?
 
2013-03-08 10:26:26 PM  

felching pen: atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.

I guess you see the teachings of Jesus as emasculating. Turn the other cheek, forgive 70 times 70, thou shalt not kill, act not in anger, and so on. Personally, I think it takes more discipline and honor to step back and take control of a situation than to lose it and destroy your life by your own hand.


I just tend to have empathy, if I was in that mans situation, and what I viewed as my life was ending anyway, what exactly would I have to lose? It is hard for me not to have sympathy, the real villain in the story is the wife who decided it was time to whore it up before she got a divorce. But again, this is a new world. The man is wrong no matter what, he deserves to have nothing, nothing is sacred, nothing is worth fighting for according to the law and the majority.
 
2013-03-08 10:27:49 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?


Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.
 
2013-03-08 10:28:20 PM  
Bung_Howdy: "The accused shot the man, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself, Whitefish police said."

The fact he beat his wife and did NOT kill his son (or wife for that matter) paints him as poor schlub who just lost it when he found out the guy was farking his wife (as opposed to your typical crazy nowadays)- Bet she'll have a tough time dealing with that when sonny boy gets older and wants more details on the day Dad killed himself-

/guilt can be a biatch

AcesFull: or...or he coulda swallowed his pride and got a divorce..you know,for Sonny Boys sake..

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Considering Dad just abandon sonny boy about as effectively as humanly possible("My own insecurities are much more important to me than you are, son.", I doubt it.


Hey now: NOT condoning his behavior or course of action at all; just (almost happily) observing that he didn't go full tilt "crazy" like you see a lot of nowadays, killing everybody (kid, wife, neighbors, dog, cat) with no discretion. This just seemed like a sad, classic case of a schlub that couldn't handle the thought of his wife with another man.

I think the "guilt" comment still holds true- he's unaccountable at this point and made a HUGE error on committing his selfish and thoughtless act of murder and suicide, but I wouldn't want to be the Mom explaining "what had set Daddy off that day"... I suppose she could spin it as Dad's problem all the way around (probably will) but I still think sonny Jim may have some issues with Mom if he gets the full story (as will Mom with guilt over the sad event)

/just classic sad
 
2013-03-08 10:29:11 PM  

atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.


Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.
 
2013-03-08 10:30:25 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.


Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.
 
2013-03-08 10:31:08 PM  

atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.


     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...
 
2013-03-08 10:31:36 PM  

BummerDuck: Funny, I was gonna say I know a few guys that would quickly take out a camera, take some shots, thank the guy, and file for a divorce.

No love left in their marriages, and getting a divorce without something like this is financial death for the guy.


Montana's a no-fault divorce state, so pretty much irrelevant here.
 
2013-03-08 10:32:56 PM  

atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.


Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.
 
2013-03-08 10:33:17 PM  

AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...


If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.
 
2013-03-08 10:35:32 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.


Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.
 
2013-03-08 10:36:52 PM  

atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.


I like other men's wives. They tend to like me, too. Maybe I've met yours.
 
2013-03-08 10:38:49 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

Yeah, I am completely internet tough guying by debating on fark, right? Jesus christ you people are such twats, you attack everything when you are wrong from the person making the point you dislike to the manhood.

I like other men's wives. They tend to like me, too. Maybe I've met yours.


Not likely, she tends not to hang out in gay bars.
 
2013-03-08 10:38:55 PM  
That's a damned effective troll we have up there. well done douchebag well done.
 
2013-03-08 10:40:48 PM  
The most significant thing this guy ever did, the only thing he'll be remembered for.

And his ultimate advice to his two-year-old son:

"Whenever you're badly embarrassed, just kill yourself. Your kids can just look out for themselves."
 
2013-03-08 10:43:08 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?

Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.


Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.
 
2013-03-08 10:45:03 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: You guys really want to throw a halo on a murderer, wife-beater and ultimate deadbeat dad?

This is exactly the kind of loser who thinks a gun makes him a man and will punish the world when it doesn't turn his way.

You really wanna treat a cheating disgraceful wife and a back stabbing wife stealer like a victim?

Ok, he's not a vicitm.  Murder is now the appropriate punishment for adultery?  Me and the other dozen folks will wait outside while the rest of you finish killing each other off then.

I think there are reactions to every action. fark a mans wife and you roll the dice of maybe getting your head blown off. He rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. Don't pretend he is an innocent little victim or the husband was in the wrong, unless you are such a weak little person that you take indignities like that with a soft sigh and shuffle your way off to listen quietly in the hall.

Yes, I'm a weak little person because I don't murder people who offend me.
Were you raised by Hitler?

Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.


Thank you for describing everything wrong with our society currently. The fact that a woman can behave like that, and the man can do nothing is wrong. especially if the man behaves on equal terms, vomiting on the woman and then she can turn around and hit him or strike or even shoot or stab and be considered empowered is farking stupid. That is not equality.
 
2013-03-08 10:45:27 PM  

dr_blasto: dj_bigbird: It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.

They had an explosive relationship.


Bullets mushroomed, too.
 
2013-03-08 10:46:39 PM  

atomicmask: Not likely, she tends not to hang out in gay bars.


LOL. You might as well have gone with a "jerk store" insult. This was terrible.

MaliFinn: And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her,


It certainly doesn't, based on what I've seen in this thread.
 
2013-03-08 10:47:23 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.


Thank you for describing everything wrong with our society currently. The fact that a woman can behave like that, and the man can do nothing is wrong. especially if the man behaves on equal terms, vomiting on the woman and then she can turn around and hit him or strike or even shoot or stab and be considered empowered is farking stupid. That is not equality.

Your are mistaken if you ever think that you own your wife or can control her behavior, no more than she would be if she felt the same about you or tried to control your life.  Marital property laws do not mean what you think they mean.
 
2013-03-08 10:48:50 PM  
Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.
 
2013-03-08 10:50:33 PM  

atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...

If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.


   Let me put it this way...why would anyone want someone who is unhappy with them?  Is it so noble to have a big sign in your yard that says..I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO FARKS MY WIFE...  I'm sorry guy but this fellow got his pride hurt by an unfaithful wife...And he couldn't take the heat.  He shoulda walked..He lost nothing.
 
2013-03-08 10:51:27 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Let me explain this to you really simple-like.

Your wife.  Her.
She can do whatever she wants, and there isn't shiat you can do about it.
She can go from one end of the block to the other sucking dicks, come home and vomit on you, then go back out and fark the other side of the street and there's NOT A farkING THING you can do about it.
The only thing she stands to lose is you.  And if that doesn't sound like a penalty to her, then maybe you should treat her better.

Thank you for describing everything wrong with our society currently. The fact that a woman can behave like that, and the man can do nothing is wrong. especially if the man behaves on equal terms, vomiting on the woman and then she can turn around and hit him or strike or even shoot or stab and be considered empowered is farking stupid. That is not equality.

Your are mistaken if you ever think that you own your wife or can control her behavior, no more than she would be if she felt the same about you or tried to control your life.  Marital property laws do not mean what you think they mean.


You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.
 
2013-03-08 10:52:37 PM  

atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.


If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.
 
2013-03-08 10:52:37 PM  
i'm loving the posts thinking the guy & other guys wife were having cake and coffee at the dining room table of her Mom's house while pouring over the HS year book innocently recalling old times. morans.
 
2013-03-08 10:52:50 PM  

AcesFull: atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...

If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.

   Let me put it this way...why would anyone want someone who is unhappy with them?  Is it so noble to have a big sign in your yard that says..I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO FARKS MY WIFE...  I'm sorry guy but this fellow got his pride hurt by an unfaithful wife...And he couldn't take the heat.  He shoulda walked..He lost nothing.


Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?
 
2013-03-08 10:54:26 PM  

atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.


Civil disobedience isn't murder
 
2013-03-08 10:54:36 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.


Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.
 
2013-03-08 10:56:06 PM  

atomicmask: You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.


You may expect that respect, but it doesn't mean you're going to get it.  And your available recourse is not to kill everyone involved, but to simply end your relationship.  Boo hoo.  Be a man, get over it.
 
2013-03-08 10:56:36 PM  

jaytkay: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

Civil disobedience isn't murder


So tell me, where do you draw the line to give up? If civil disobedience doesn't work, do you just pack your ball and go home, accept things are just shiatty and give up? Or do you begin to fight. Perhaps start with damage to buildings and property? Where is the line drawn for you.

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep deciding who to have for dinner, liberty is a well armed and determined sheep contesting the vote.
 
2013-03-08 10:58:28 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.

You may expect that respect, but it doesn't mean you're going to get it.  And your available recourse is not to kill everyone involved, but to simply end your relationship.  Boo hoo.  Be a man, get over it.


You forget, marriage is a contract. a part of that contract is to honor, in sickness and health, till death do you part.

Again you seem to think marriage is a meaningless thing, if its enough of a binding contract to make a man lose half his property, it should be enough of a binding contract to illicit a response when its breached.
 
2013-03-08 10:59:08 PM  

atomicmask: Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?


You can't make someone love you, you sociopathic guttershiate.
 
2013-03-08 11:00:05 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?

You can't make someone love you, you sociopathic guttershiate.


maybe YOU cant, but I can see that, however I did not have to force anyone. It is something two people agree to, again, marriage is a contract.

How farking stupid are you going to make yourself look?
 
2013-03-08 11:01:43 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.

Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.


American history is filled with injustice and then corrections to injustice.  You can't pick and choose which pieces you like, you need to abide by the law and make change within the system.  As for the civil rights movement, the most effective part of the movement was the civil and nonviolent assembly of people exercising their free speech.  Eventually, the government stopped murdering Indians.  Eventually, women were allowed to vote.  Eventually, racial equality became the law of the land.  We are no longer burning Salem's witches, or owning slaves, or exerting gender dominance.  We're in continual pursuit of a more perfect union, and part of that means you can't shoot people who fark your wife.
 
2013-03-08 11:05:16 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: You assume a lot. I expect the same level of respect that I give her. If I am finished with the relationship I would be honorable and kind enough to consider how she feels, let her know that I do not feel love anymore, and begin breaking up the marriage. That is all I expect from her also. It may hurt, but that is something people like you do not understand, honorable behavior among couples. That is the issue here, not her being owned or any woman being owned, a mutual level of respect and honor between the partners.

Somehow you coonts wanna twist this into a bad thing.

You may expect that respect, but it doesn't mean you're going to get it.  And your available recourse is not to kill everyone involved, but to simply end your relationship.  Boo hoo.  Be a man, get over it.

You forget, marriage is a contract. a part of that contract is to honor, in sickness and health, till death do you part.

Again you seem to think marriage is a meaningless thing, if its enough of a binding contract to make a man lose half his property, it should be enough of a binding contract to illicit a response when its breached.


Yes, a binding contract.  In the church, and under the law.  I'm not going to speak to the quirky cultisms of the church, but I think I read somewhere that under the law you can't shoot someone for farking your wife.  That's part of the preexisting contract that exists between you and the government as a US citizen.
 
2013-03-08 11:06:10 PM  

atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: AcesFull: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

     The moment the husband realized she was farking someone else..he had nothing to defend or love..PERIOD!   If she's unhappy and needing someone else...You can murder a hundred people but nothing will change her being unsatisfied wth you...

If she was unhappy, she should divorce. And you are wrong, and I disagree, he had his honor and dignity to defend. If she would have said she was divorcing him and moved out, then yeah he wouldn't have much to be mad about, but she was farking someone behind his back.

   Let me put it this way...why would anyone want someone who is unhappy with them?  Is it so noble to have a big sign in your yard that says..I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO FARKS MY WIFE...  I'm sorry guy but this fellow got his pride hurt by an unfaithful wife...And he couldn't take the heat.  He shoulda walked..He lost nothing.

Besides a wife, family, the respect of his son, respect from co-workers and others. I mean, he lost all that, but NOTHING you value right?


    He did not lose a wife...He was living with a woman who wanted an open relationship..and was acting on it....I got nowhere else to go with this...Plus we're starting to sound like attorneys...I do hope you're never put in a position to act based on your beliefs...
 
2013-03-08 11:07:16 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


Wow... You must be a hoot at parties there Hoss.
 
2013-03-08 11:07:19 PM  

atomicmask: however I did not have to force anyone.


Sure. Is that why you're threatening to blow holes in people with your boomstick if you catch them noodling your wife, Hick Mcfarkstick?

atomicmask: It is something two people agree to


Funny, so is cheating.
 
2013-03-08 11:07:43 PM  

MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.

Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.

American history is filled with injustice and then corrections to injustice.  You can't pick and choose which pieces you like, you need to abide by the law and make change within the system.  As for the civil rights movement, the most effective part of the movement was the civil and nonviolent assembly of people exercising their free speech.  Eventually, the government stopped murdering Indians.  Eventually, women were allowed to vote.  Eventually, racial equality became the law of the land.  We are no longer burning Salem's witches, or owning slaves, or exerting gender dominance.  We're in continual pursuit of a more perfect union, and part of that means you can't shoot people who fark your wife.


Alright of those examples...You know the native americans were disarmed, massacred, and DIDN'T GET WHAT THEY SET OUT FOR, right?

Racial equality became law of the land, 200 years after independence?

Burning salem witches stopped because honestly, even the founding fathers of towns and cities was getting accused, it had nothing to do with protest or peacable assembly.

So of the examples you listed, 1...1 time did civil disobedience work, and it had more to do with a changing of the politicians then marching.
 
2013-03-08 11:09:18 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.


I think Wyatt Earp might just be a closet case
 
2013-03-08 11:09:59 PM  

BarkingUnicorn: dr_blasto: dj_bigbird: It wasn't clear how Rodriguez and the woman were acquainted.

Yeah, sure. Rodriguez was probably putting bullets in her, if ya know what I mean.

They had an explosive relationship.

Bullets mushroomed, too.


In the end, their feelings were hollow, point is that she was banging this guy for that high-velocity feeling since they pulled the trigger on taking their relationship to this level and her husband was clearly off-target in meeting her needs.
 
2013-03-08 11:14:26 PM  

Waxing_Chewbacca: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: James F. Campbell: atomicmask: Offend? Offense is when someone calls you a twat or a weakling, WRONG is when you fark someones wife. You WRONG a man when you do that. If you can't see the difference then yes, you are a weak little person.

Maybe if you were more of a man, you wouldn't be so insecure about it... friend.

Maybe, but im enough of a man to stand up for myself, and not let half men try to define me.

Yes, show those Internet people a thing or two. That will prove your manhood.

I think Wyatt Earp might just be a closet case


His comment about gay bars did seem to come out of the blue... maybe he secretly wants to be a cuckold.
 
2013-03-08 11:14:38 PM  

atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: MaliFinn: atomicmask: Still waiting for you social justice asstards to tell me why the law is all knowing and all seeing and right in all cases, yet the civil rights movement (which disobeyed the law in order for a just cause) is acceptable.

If you need to have that explained to you then you clearly don't understand America.

Friend I am the one drawing on all of american history for my side of the argument. We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.

American history is filled with injustice and then corrections to injustice.  You can't pick and choose which pieces you like, you need to abide by the law and make change within the system.  As for the civil rights movement, the most effective part of the movement was the civil and nonviolent assembly of people exercising their free speech.  Eventually, the government stopped murdering Indians.  Eventually, women were allowed to vote.  Eventually, racial equality became the law of the land.  We are no longer burning Salem's witches, or owning slaves, or exerting gender dominance.  We're in continual pursuit of a more perfect union, and part of that means you can't shoot people who fark your wife.

Alright of those examples...You know the native americans were disarmed, massacred, and DIDN'T GET WHAT THEY SET OUT FOR, right?

Racial equality became law of the land, 200 years after independence?

Burning salem witches stopped because honestly, even the founding fathers of towns and cities was getting accused, it had nothing to do with protest or peacable assembly.

So of the examples you listed, 1...1 time did civil disobedience work, and it had more to do with a changing of the politicians then marching.


You don't seem to understand the point.  The Constitution of this country was written so that we could evolve as a country, in pursuit of more freedom and to better provide justice for all citizens.  You can't say "well, people were shot 100 years ago" as some sort of justification for how you get to behave today.  You follow the law, as a base minimum.  Up and above that, you apply any additional moral code (religious or otherwise) that guides your behavior, where it does not conflict with the law.  Part of that, according to both the US government and the millions of people who live in this country, is that you can't indiscriminately shoot people for farking your wife.
 
2013-03-08 11:16:00 PM  
  P.S.   I live in a small town and I've often heard it said...You don't lose your wife..You just lose your turn.
 
2013-03-08 11:17:21 PM  

KrispyKritter: i'm loving the posts thinking the guy & other guys wife were having cake and coffee at the dining room table of her Mom's house while pouring over the HS year book innocently recalling old times. morans.


Cake or death?
 
2013-03-08 11:17:52 PM  

James F. Campbell: atomicmask: however I did not have to force anyone.

Sure. Is that why you're threatening to blow holes in people with your boomstick if you catch them noodling your wife, Hick Mcfarkstick?

atomicmask: It is something two people agree to

Funny, so is cheating.


I never threatened to shoot or "blow holes" in anyone. The only one talking about blowing anything holes or otherwise is you, which you have the typical anti-gun ultra lib infatuation with. I just have empathy for the man. I can understand how you cant, being as how the touch of a woman is obviously alien to you as well as standing up for anything other then a reach around, but you should try it some time. And by it I mean being a man and standing up for something other then a reach around.
 
2013-03-08 11:22:26 PM  
Why shoot the guy?
Better to shoot a woman once than a different man every week.
(Am i doing it right?)
 
2013-03-08 11:32:40 PM  

atomicmask: empathy


That's not surprising, given that he obviously sucked at pleasing his wife, too.

atomicmask: being as how the touch of a woman is obviously alien to you as well as standing up for anything other then a reach around, but you should try it some time. And by it I mean being a man and standing up for something other then a reach around.


Waxing_Chewbacca, I think you might be onto something!
 
2013-03-08 11:38:20 PM  

atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.


Can someone translate this response?
 
2013-03-08 11:42:55 PM  
I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot
 
2013-03-08 11:45:03 PM  

MrHappyRotter: Why did he not shoot his wife?  Clearly she's just as responsible for the infidelity as the other man.  Or is it that she's considered property -- for better or worse entirely faultless?


He probably had a love-anger conflict going on.
I think we can assume that this guy was not acting rationally, only emotionally, and as such was immune to reasoning of this sort.  I mean...

A northwestern Montana man shot and killed the host of the Sportsman Channel show "A Rifleman's Journal" while the TV personality was visiting the shooter's wife, police said Friday.Wayne Bengston, 41, then beat his wife, took his 2-year-old son to a relative's house and drove to his home about 25 miles away in West Glacier, where he apparently killed himself
You have to imagine that if the guy had sat down and evaluated the outcome if this little jealousy-anger spree before he had done anything, that he would not have gone about "solving" things the way he did.
 
2013-03-08 11:57:37 PM  

Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

Can someone translate this response?


Pete:  Wink.  Nudge.  Hey Officer Fred, I think I hear someone calling for you.
Fred:  Yeah, me too Pete.  Better go check it out.
Pete:  Now I'm going to defend my manhood, you traitorous vixen.
Wife:  Oh no, I thought I could fark John and you wouldn't do anything, I'm so disloyal and evil-hearted.
Pete beats wife with lead pipe.
Pete shoots John in the face.
Fred:  Good Lord, what was that noise?
Pete:  Just the sounds of Justice, and a man defending his honor.
Fred:  Ah, right.  Wink.  Nudge.  Let's get a beer.
 
2013-03-09 12:05:02 AM  
THIS is what happens when immature people have access to deadly (toys) weapons.

And man, most of America is too immature for these (toys) weapons.
 
2013-03-09 12:05:56 AM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over.


Thank goodness we've come to our senses and realized that life is more important than respect for someone's vague and ill-defined concept of "honor", and that handling things that way doesn't actually help anyone involved at all.


atomicmask: Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important.


I have yet to see a good reason for why those things were important in the first place.


atomicmask: You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens?


This isn't about LETTING things happen, you're just choosing how to respond to it if it does.  Murdering some dude out of some stupid, misguided sense of honor because your wife acted like an untrustworthy slutbag doesn't erase what happened, nor does it fix any of the problems that will arise because of it.  All it does is make someone dead for no reason other than that you want to exact revenge on someone in retribution for your wounded ego and pride.  You don't lose any less by doing it, you lose MORE -- it doesn't FIX anything, it's only someone's dumbass concept of what "being a man" entails.  Everything you need to do to keep life from farking with you this way needs to be done BEFORE this happens, not AFTER.


atomicmask: Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


Lots of things are, just not the stupid shiat that you think is.
 
2013-03-09 12:09:46 AM  
This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.
 
2013-03-09 12:11:08 AM  

MaliFinn: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

Can someone translate this response?

Pete:  Wink.  Nudge.  Hey Officer Fred, I think I hear someone calling for you.
Fred:  Yeah, me too Pete.  Better go check it out.
Pete:  Now I'm going to defend my manhood, you traitorous vixen.
Wife:  Oh no, I thought I could fark John and you wouldn't do anything, I'm so disloyal and evil-hearted.
Pete beats wife with lead pipe.
Pete shoots John in the face.
Fred:  Good Lord, what was that noise?
Pete:  Just the sounds of Justice, and a man defending his honor.
Fred:  Ah, right.  Wink.  Nudge.  Let's get a beer.


No no no, don't you watch the movies?  It's so much more romantic and cinematic than that!
 
2013-03-09 12:14:34 AM  

Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot


It's easy.  Just forget that you know the difference between then and than, and when faced with facts and logic, double down on the stupid!!!!
 
2013-03-09 12:15:48 AM  

Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

Can someone translate this response?


I THINK he means that if men were allowed to 'discipline' their wives as they pleased then this sort of thing wouldn't happen. But I'm not sure, he may just have had a stroke.
 
2013-03-09 12:16:37 AM  

Pincy: This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.


No, no, no, they're only responsible until they break the law, see? That way they aren't and never were representative of responsible gun owners.
 
2013-03-09 12:21:10 AM  

James F. Campbell: Pincy: This just can't be.  All gun owners are responsible people who would never do anything like that.

No, no, no, they're only responsible until they break the law, see? That way they aren't and never were representative of responsible gun owners.


That's gotta be it. It's so clear to me now. Gay Wyatt Earp was right all along!
 
2013-03-09 12:33:58 AM  
Well, chances are he used a shotgun so he did it the way Joe Biden would want him to, so we have that at least.
 
2013-03-09 12:49:14 AM  

WaffleStomper: Well, chances are he used a shotgun so he did it the way Joe Biden would want him to, so we have that at least.


If he did use a Vice President weapon, he used it better than Cheney did.
 
2013-03-09 12:53:15 AM  

atomicmask: Yeah, it's not like you could pass a law that required the gun be safely stored, so that when someone flips out the target has some chance to get away before the lead starts flyin'.

You know he drove like, really far to kill the guy right? he had time to drive, you think he wouldn't have time to open a safe?


You know this  happened at his house, right?

Let's see, I'm boning his wife.  Mmmm, mmmm, that's some good adultery I'm enjoying.

Uh oh, her husband arrived.  He seems....concerned. He's ranting about how he's going to kill me, and he'd kill her too if it wasn't International Day of the Woman.  He's heading for his gun safe!

This might be a good time for me to exit, stage right. But gee, I was boning his wife the whole time he was driving over here, it hardly seems sporting to just leave now.  Might as well wait for him to get his gun safe open, get a round jacked in to the chamber, etc.  While he's doing that, I'll be pondering whether this could make a good segment on my show.

Well, here he comes, and...oh, dang, maybe I should have left as soon as I saw him arrive....
 
2013-03-09 01:05:14 AM  

BummerDuck: angrymonday: You should get a free pass for killing the person your spouse is cheating with. Some people deserve killing.

Funny, I was gonna say I know a few guys that would quickly take out a camera, take some shots, thank the guy, and file for a divorce.

No love left in their marriages, and getting a divorce without something like this is financial death for the guy.

It seems unfortunate that this guy must have actually still loved his wife, but she didn't give a fark about him. She caused the death of 2 people. Hope she is proud of her accomplishment.



Yeah, man kills another man and himself, but it's the WOMAN's fault.

You've managed to post the most hateful AND stupid comment in this thread so far, and that's WITH atomicmask doing his best.   Hope you are proud of your accomplishment.
 
2013-03-09 01:06:46 AM  
While I don't agree with everything atomicmask is saying, some of what he says does make sense. Right or wrong, there are consequences to every action. What would you do if your whole life, (family, happiness, marriage) was blown up in an instant. Your dreams, everything you had hoped for gone... there is a significant segment of the population who just aren't equipped to handle that type of cluster*
 
2013-03-09 01:08:39 AM  
Just a couple responsible upstanding gun owners settling their differences. Nothing to see here.
 
2013-03-09 01:10:46 AM  

theorellior: atomicmask: No, murder is premeditated violence with the intent to kill against someone. A crime of passion is if you walk in, catch the guy, and plug him in the head with a bullet.

So you're saying one is okay then?


Yes.   If you dont want to roll the dice and take a chance that someone shoots you in the head, then go bang your own wife.
 
2013-03-09 01:17:40 AM  
You've managed to post the most hateful AND stupid comment in this thread so far, and that's WITH atomicmask doing his best. Hope you are proud of your accomplishment

The shooter is obviously the person most at fault, but the woman does share some responsibility for what happened. Everyone has a breaking point, unfortunately this man met his (via the actions of his spouse). You get married, most likely swear in front of your family and God to be forever faithful, etc., and then are surprised that some people lose it when the other person betrays you/cheats. I can't believe that it doesn't happen more often.
 
2013-03-09 01:22:52 AM  
 
2013-03-09 01:28:51 AM  

atomicmask: We had presidents have duels over minor things, even insults, its twats like you who think america=modern pathetic society.


Well, we had two (Jackson and Lincoln, and in the latter's case he managed to persuade the guy it was a really bad idea).

You'll notice we had such duels back when weapons were really shiatty, and it was rare to actually hit your opponent. Burr was surprised he hit Hamilton.  Lincoln managed to avoid a duel by picking swords instead of the usual smooth-bore pistols.

Once weapons became good enough that someone was probably going to get killed, the tradition stopped completely.

So, really, not a parallel to pulling out the trusty Bushmaster and shooting your wife's bushmaster.
 
2013-03-09 01:29:47 AM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Rodriguez and the woman, who works for a firearms manufacturer in the Flathead Valley, met at a trade show and struck up a casual relationship that police do not believe was romantic, Dial said.

She and Rodriguez were sitting at the kitchen table, talking over a glass of wine, when Bengston entered the house and shot Rodriguez, Dial said.


She wasn't even banging the guy? Sounds like this guy did her a favor by offing himself.
 
2013-03-09 01:31:05 AM  

lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


And so stable that instead of counselling, or a divorce, he shoots the adulterous man, and then puts a bullet in his own head, depriving his son of his love forever. Not the action of a sweet man at all. There's wrong ( adultery) and then there's WRONG.
 
2013-03-09 01:34:37 AM  

lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


You were friends with this asshole? I'm guessing we'll probably see your name in the paper at some point, too.
 
2013-03-09 01:35:43 AM  

MisterRonbo: So, really, not a parallel to pulling out the trusty Bushmaster and shooting your wife's bushmaster.


lol.

And do y'all suppose a man who resorts to murder, wife-beating and suicide may have previously exhibited behaviors detrimental to his marriage?
 
2013-03-09 01:42:58 AM  

felching pen: violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.

Clearly, this is Obama's doing, just like all the other shootings lately.


I'd never say anything like that. But if I do, you can be certain I'm joking.
 
2013-03-09 02:13:42 AM  

atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder


And yet, you're here, advocating people break those laws against murder for semi-petty "offenses".  Of course, by gun nut logic, murder laws aren't necessary because law-abiding citizens don't murder anyway, and dedicated murderers ignore the law.
 
DuX
2013-03-09 03:37:24 AM  
Ladies, this is why you never marry a man with a small peener.
It always ends badly.

Is it just me or do men who have the most problems with "de ladies" seem to fetishize their guns more than your average gun whacko?
 
2013-03-09 04:31:33 AM  

Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot


Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.
 
2013-03-09 05:31:36 AM  

PrinceofFark: Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.


You're a rabid dog.
 
2013-03-09 05:39:03 AM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Rodriguez and the woman, who works for a firearms manufacturer in the Flathead Valley, met at a trade show and struck up a casual relationship that police do not believe was romantic, Dial said.

She and Rodriguez were sitting at the kitchen table, talking over a glass of wine, when Bengston entered the house and shot Rodriguez, Dial said.


well i'll be damned.  like i said, was there any actual evidence they were cheating with each other?  maybe they were just talking after all, and the husband was a possessive psychopath.  looks like i might have been right.
 
2013-03-09 06:52:57 AM  
I guess she gave love a bad name.
 
2013-03-09 07:23:07 AM  
Why does the police department have mug shots of two dead men? Do they have a time machine?
 
2013-03-09 07:37:07 AM  

The Smails Kid: Why does the police department have mug shots of two dead men? Do they have a time machine?


No pics of the mother, two wives, nor the three children mentioned. Plus, what year for the wine?
 
2013-03-09 09:26:24 AM  

Perducci: Host of "A Rifleman's Journal" TV show shot and killed when local man feels his wife takes too keen an interest in victim's rifle

That seems like an overly complicated headline.  Wouldn't it be simpler to just say "Gun nut shot and killed by another gun nut"?


No shiat! And I'm sick of all the car nuts killing other car nuts.

/blood for the blood god
 
2013-03-09 09:49:19 AM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.

That is a funny leap in logic, considering I state laws are already in place to prohibit murder

Not a leap in logic at all.  You said murdering someone was a reasonable reaction to finding him in bed with your wife.  This implies that you both approve of that sort of thing.  Of course, you labeled it as 'fighting for someone you love/care for', but murder's murder when you strip off the poetic words.


Sorry, God says stoning is in order. Christian nation and all.
 
2013-03-09 10:03:46 AM  
I was stationed in Montana (MAFB) in the late 70's.  Crimes of passion were legal, as long as you killed BOTH of them.

/Crimes of Passion
//343 MSS
 
2013-03-09 10:18:29 AM  

PrinceofFark: Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot

Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.


Ok there Captian America... Is it a bad time to mention that I'm banging your wife?
 
2013-03-09 10:19:53 AM  

PrinceofFark: Waxing_Chewbacca: I'd try but I don't speak fluent idiot

Don't bother, from the looks of this thread most of you speak fluent pussy, a talent I find cowards tend to have in spades. It is unfortunate that some of us Men have been born into a time period where many Men take soul-crushing treachery like adultery in stride.

In many states in America, if the husband even so much as struck the offending interloping male in his very own house, he would be charged, thrown in jail and the wife and the 'new guy' will be back farking in the hubby's bed before the hour is out. Then, the husband can kiss goodbye the matrimonial home, the kids may see him once every few weeks, less than the 'new guy' will be though since wifey may move him in now. I will not elaborate on how destructive this is to a Man's pride.  This country has no more values, no one has any fear of reprisal for such travesties that for all of human history have been punished severely for their destructive force they have on inter-gender relations and the sanctity of marriage. Eventually the lying, cheating and utter disrespect shown to Men like the above is going to push more of them 'over the edge'.

What some of you call 'over the edge', hundreds of better generations of Men called 'taking care of business', and it worked. When a would-be cheating wife or interloping male decided to ruin a family be starting a tryst, they had to ask themselves "do I want to risk a brutal death over destroying a family for some immoral fun"? There is no such concern these days, which is why infidelity is more or less accepted now. This thread should be saved in a time capsule to clearly illustrate to future generations of Males what the few of us had to put up with during this time.

Have some god damned respect for yourselves.


   Prince...Should you ever decide to act on any of what you say here..I can assure you..with no malice intended..you will be disappointed with your new social circle in the penitentiary...very very disappointed.
 
2013-03-09 10:32:10 AM  
Anyone given the thought that the husband knew the child was not his,loved the wife and kid,but when he found out mommy was banging baby daddy did indeed lose his mind? Spared the child and the wife whom he loved ,killed the man who was a banger and killed himself out of guilt for what he did. Sounds like an old tale of betrayal , forgiveness,betrayal, anger, death.
If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.
 
2013-03-09 10:34:31 AM  

lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.



If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.
 
2013-03-09 11:00:27 AM  
At least he died from something he loved.
 
2013-03-09 11:34:03 AM  
I can't believe I stumbled into the greatest thread of the day, this is amazing.
 
2013-03-09 01:48:32 PM  

Infernalist: atomicmask: Tak the Hideous New Girl: atomicmask: Up until around 80 years ago, this was considered a personally reasonable reason to shoot another man.

For some reason, the current generations have found no reason to fight, or defend anything they love or care for. It is a great grey blur of violations against one another and victims unable to reprise those who offend them.

So you yearn for the days when murder was the just and proper response to adultery? I believe that Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia is lovely this time of year.

I yearn for a time in which adults could decide for themselves if something was right and wrong without 300 people in beaucracy deciding for them. Murder was still against the law, murder in cold blood was punishable by death. However you could resolve problems at the lowest level, between the two who actually have a problem.

What I managed to get from your post is that you want to be able to shoot someone when they do something to piss you off, and not get in trouble.


Not to change the subject, but if you switched the genders around in the musical "Chicago", had two men kill a cheating woman, and then have them sing "She Had It Coming", I suppose that THEN it would be reprehensible instead of empowering, amirite?
 
2013-03-09 01:51:05 PM  
""A Rifleman's Journal" tracks Rodriguez's hunting travels to exotic locations, according to a Sportsman Channel description."

The spirits of dead Snow Leopard and Cape Buffalo can fap to this.
 
2013-03-09 02:21:30 PM  
So, the great hunter got shot?!?!? WTF?
 
2013-03-09 02:27:02 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over.


So what' you're saying is no human society has ever been matriarchal or matrilineal, for 50,000 years it's always been a Man's world and ego is the only thing that matters. US public school education in full effect yo!
 
2013-03-09 04:22:03 PM  

violentsalvation: dr_blasto: violentsalvation: Link

"The former editor ofGuns & Ammo magazine is accused of using a gun and ammo to kill a man visiting his house yesterday."

Heh.

I used to enjoy his articles and how he'd dismantle the anti-gun talking points.

And then the jackass became an anti-gun talking point.


Hiro-ACiD: atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over.

So what' you're saying is no human society has ever been matriarchal or matrilineal, for 50,000 years it's always been a Man's world and ego is the only thing that matters. US public school education in full effect yo!


I think a lot of people would be surprised at how egalitarian history has been.

Everyone's had their turn to steer the ship into the iceberg, and everyone has successfully sunk their ship.
 
2013-03-09 06:13:29 PM  
http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/changing_the_way_peopl e _think_about_rifles/30399

swangoatman: lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.


The Bengston's are a very well established reputable family.  So many people in the community know Wayne and or Lindsey or someone else that does.  It has shocked all.  But I haven't heard any other news from official sources.  It is sad and a shame that some finely breed Montana men cannot accept the fact of infidelity.  I believe the son is his, of course there are others who wonder.  I met Lindsey about 10 years ago when she was with a different man...she broke his heart.  I know of women who don't want the men they are dating around her.  I have done a couple minor favors for her myself, and she was fun to party with.  I don't believe Mr. TV guy and her were discussing business.  Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.  A lot of local men seem to think he should have shot her also, I find it much better revenge not to.  And poetic justice for the animal killer.  If I hear more I'll let you know...
 
2013-03-09 08:01:11 PM  

lakefivedi: http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/changing_the_way_peopl e _think_about_rifles/30399swangoatman: lakefivedi: I knew the shooter.  He was as decent of a man that any could find.  This situation is tragic and his wife now has to live with the fact.  He loved her so much and was very happy the other day at breakfast with his son & buddies.  She is totally to blame.  Wayne was a lovable soul and the photo they show is kinda a smurk. But what better guy to kill than an animal killing pompus ass?  RIP Wayne.


If the poster who knew the man could give us all an update (follow up please GREEN) when the smoke clears I would appreciate it.
And sorrow for your loss of a friend.

The Bengston's are a very well established reputable family.  So many people in the community know Wayne and or Lindsey or someone else that does.  It has shocked all.  But I haven't heard any other news from official sources.  It is sad and a shame that some finely breed Montana men cannot accept the fact of infidelity.  I believe the son is his, of course there are others who wonder.  I met Lindsey about 10 years ago when she was with a different man...she broke his heart.  I know of women who don't want the men they are dating around her.  I have done a couple minor favors for her myself, and she was fun to party with.  I don't believe Mr. TV guy and her were discussing business.  Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.  A lot of local men seem to think he should have shot her also, I find it much better revenge not to.  And poetic justice for the animal killer.  If I hear more I'll let you know...


Hope you have a better weekend than what this is turning out as.
 
2013-03-09 11:05:29 PM  
what gun did he use?
it obviously is effective.
 
2013-03-10 12:49:21 AM  

lakefivedi: Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.


No. He beat his wife and abandon his kid. He loved no one but himself. He's not sad or tragic, he's just another asshole.
 
2013-03-10 11:43:25 AM  

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: lakefivedi: Wayne loved her and his child so very much, he would and did die for them.

No. He beat his wife and abandon his kid. He loved no one but himself. He's not sad or tragic, he's just another asshole.


THIS^^^^^
 
2013-03-12 03:19:11 PM  

atomicmask: For the past 50,000+ years, stuff like a mans honor, dignity, and freedom is what has mattered. Dishonoring a man by sleeping with his wife was something you fought to the death over. Taking his dignity was equally worth fighting and dying over. Again I have yet to see a reasonable excuse for as to why these things are no longer important. I have only seen a trend in trying to de-fang the rights of humans in general. You shouldn't ever get mad, just take it with a solumn sigh and let the world fark your wife, your life, your job, your family...I mean what do YOU lose when this happens? not like the poor guys family was going to fall apart, his kids were going to go threw a horrible divorce, his son would see his father emasculated by this, or anything.

Ultra-libs...nothing is sacred or worth fighting for.


podcastmachine-attachements.s3.amazonaws.com

LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBS!!!!
 
Displayed 204 of 204 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report