If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Wisconsin Gazette)   Who looks more like a real woman? The drag queen on the left or the anti-gay Christian-right leader on the right?   (wisconsingazette.com) divider line 162
    More: Amusing, sexual immorality, homophobias, drag queens, Wisconsin Constitution, certification mark, RuPaul  
•       •       •

24291 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Mar 2013 at 4:04 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



162 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-03-08 04:32:28 PM

C0rf: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.

[memedepot.com image 152x143]


WELL ISN'T THAT SPECIAL!
 
2013-03-08 04:33:32 PM
Thats a man baby!
 
2013-03-08 04:33:59 PM
A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.
 
2013-03-08 04:35:19 PM
If I were forced to pick which one I had to sleep with, I think I would cut off my own penis.
 
2013-03-08 04:35:46 PM
I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Romans 1:18, 26, 27, 32
 
2013-03-08 04:39:54 PM
Julaine Appling (lady on the right in the picture made me think of the God Warrior lady...

God Warrior Lady
 
2013-03-08 04:45:19 PM

C0rf: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.

[memedepot.com image 152x143]


I bet their carpets are very clean.
 
2013-03-08 04:45:39 PM
Since drag queen threads on Fark are few and far between I'll just leave this here.

Willam's Beatdown, the crudest/funniest YouTube beauty video review hosted by a drag queen out there.
 
2013-03-08 04:45:42 PM

Nineinchnosehair: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.


Every time I read this quote in this thread I start guffawing loudly.
 
2013-03-08 04:46:15 PM
Don't like it? Then don't farking watch it, you twat.
 
2013-03-08 04:53:03 PM
HORSE CACK TRANNY THREAD!!
 
2013-03-08 04:53:30 PM

asynchron: Wow, subby, nice argument ad hominem. You are what's wrong with the world.

"Ooh, an article about a serious social issue! Let's compare how good-looking the two sides are! That will be super meaningful!"


Shh, your derp is showing.
 
2013-03-08 04:53:38 PM
in this thread: anyone who is anti-gay is secretly gay, including 95% of all historical figures
 
2013-03-08 04:54:25 PM

asynchron: Wow, subby, nice argument ad hominem. You are what's wrong with the world.

"Ooh, an article about a serious social issue! Let's compare how good-looking the two sides are! That will be super meaningful!"


Another idiot who doesn't understand what "ad hominem" means.

Insulting someone you disagree with isn't an ad hominem attack. An ad hominem attack is when you insult someone, then use that insult to dismiss the argument without actually refuting it.


"You're ugly" is just an insult. "You're ugly and therefore I don't have to refute your argument" is an ad hominem.
 
2013-03-08 04:55:04 PM

Chinchillazilla: I just don't understand the knee-jerk reaction to homosexuality from fundies. They ignore almost everything else in Leviticus.

Jesus died for our sins so that we would be able to get into heaven without worrying about following all the crazy Old Testament rules, right? Is Jesus's sacrifice not good enough for you, fundies?


I've never understood this either.  Seriously, can someone with a better understanding of Christian theology explain this one for us?  I mean, if Jesus died for our sins and this means that as long as we accept Jebus as our savior we can now eat bacon for breakfast or have lobster for dinner or do a bunch of the other list of things that Leviticus says is a no-no if you want to get into heaven, then why is a guy sucking another guy's dick is still considered the equivalent of a "Go directly to Hell, do not meet Jesus, do not collect 200 sheckels" card?

I really do wish someone could explain this.  I'm sure there's gotta be some sort of theological justification for it--what is it?
 
2013-03-08 04:56:02 PM

Nineinchnosehair: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.


Uh huh, riiiiiiight. A defender of traditional marrage who is not married and lives with another unmarried woman? The only problem with this theory is that it means someone would have had to stick their tongue in there.
 
2013-03-08 04:56:18 PM

Douchie McBaggus: If those two were the only other humans left in the world...and I had to choose one...

/impossible choices


I'd just write a beautiful eulogy for the human race and take the drag queen.
 
2013-03-08 04:59:53 PM
Actually, they both look like women. Only one of them looks like a reasonably attractive woman.
 
2013-03-08 05:02:21 PM
I want the repressed dyker washed
then done up like the retraining scene in clockwork orange

she can watch what I do to the other
 
2013-03-08 05:03:22 PM

nmrsnr: Here's a question: How does being transgender fit into the "no gay marriage" platform? Does your birth gender control, or your post-op gender? Or, can you just not marry, period? How about after you're married. If one spouse in a married couple undergoes gender reassignment, do they have to get divorced?


To the fundies, anything other than repressing all sexual urges, and farking only your wife, to make her pregnant, is a crime against their religion. No matter who is doing the farking or how unrelated and distant the fundie is from the act.
 
2013-03-08 05:03:52 PM
in all fairness, that outfit would make anyone look frumpy.
 
2013-03-08 05:07:53 PM

Cyberluddite: Chinchillazilla: I just don't understand the knee-jerk reaction to homosexuality from fundies. They ignore almost everything else in Leviticus.

Jesus died for our sins so that we would be able to get into heaven without worrying about following all the crazy Old Testament rules, right? Is Jesus's sacrifice not good enough for you, fundies?

I've never understood this either.  Seriously, can someone with a better understanding of Christian theology explain this one for us?  I mean, if Jesus died for our sins and this means that as long as we accept Jebus as our savior we can now eat bacon for breakfast or have lobster for dinner or do a bunch of the other list of things that Leviticus says is a no-no if you want to get into heaven, then why is a guy sucking another guy's dick is still considered the equivalent of a "Go directly to Hell, do not meet Jesus, do not collect 200 sheckels" card?

I really do wish someone could explain this.  I'm sure there's gotta be some sort of theological justification for it--what is it?


There is no special justification for it. They just make shiat up..

Spent years in church before I figured that out.
 
2013-03-08 05:10:17 PM

xen0blue: in this thread: anyone who is anti-gay is secretly gay, including 95% of all historical figures


did you see this part in the article? "A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown. "

This is most of the backlash right there
 
2013-03-08 05:12:56 PM
I finally went to check the photos, lemme tell you, I'm getting a definite scent of camphor and kerosene from Ms. Appling.
 
2013-03-08 05:27:41 PM
Which one was the drag queen?
 
2013-03-08 05:31:27 PM
I've seen some VERY attractive transgender folks- I would almost categorically say that 99% of men would be attracted to some of the misdirected sex assignments the good lord above has made. There is a case for the man in a women's body and vice versa. I'm reminded of the lyrics in Lola by The Kinks. Some of them don't even require much work to finish the transformation. That pic of "Shangela" in the article is a prime example of how at first glance, it's almost impossible to tell someones gender. No need to get phobic or confused. It's just aesthetics-

Drove a cab in San Francisco in the late 70's/early 80's for a number of years and was confused numerous times over exactly who was sitting in the back seat of my cab. Gorgeous girl with a deep husky voice. Learned all about adam's apples and the only real way to tell-by the fingers on the hand. MANY a out-of-town businessman thought he had sex with a chick, when he was being gayer than he could know. The drunk ones especially; so sloppy they couldn't tell what was going where in whom.
 
2013-03-08 05:31:34 PM
c) Justin Bieber

/It's always c
 
2013-03-08 05:32:28 PM

Cyberluddite: Chinchillazilla: I just don't understand the knee-jerk reaction to homosexuality from fundies. They ignore almost everything else in Leviticus.

Jesus died for our sins so that we would be able to get into heaven without worrying about following all the crazy Old Testament rules, right? Is Jesus's sacrifice not good enough for you, fundies?

I've never understood this either.  Seriously, can someone with a better understanding of Christian theology explain this one for us?  I mean, if Jesus died for our sins and this means that as long as we accept Jebus as our savior we can now eat bacon for breakfast or have lobster for dinner or do a bunch of the other list of things that Leviticus says is a no-no if you want to get into heaven, then why is a guy sucking another guy's dick is still considered the equivalent of a "Go directly to Hell, do not meet Jesus, do not collect 200 sheckels" card?

I really do wish someone could explain this.  I'm sure there's gotta be some sort of theological justification for it--what is it?


Short answer:  You are right.
Long answer:
a)  Catholicism:  Because Dogma (Priests who like their wine are fun at parties, even more fun when they are relatives)
b)  Other:  Levitical Law is about location and time period and much is not applicable anymore.  New justification for anti-gay is God creating man and woman to be with each other in Genesis. Heaven is not earned, but can be denied for unrepentant sins.  To summarize: it is bad to be gay, but worse not to repent it and it is better not to sin than to sin and repent.

//every two weeks - breakfast with a christian mens group.  Challenging the 2 fundies in the group on their own turf  is a hoot.  Mostly we just vent about life, our wives, and kids.
 
2013-03-08 05:33:46 PM

Mija: I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Romans 1:18, 26, 27, 32


1 Peter 3:6 "- Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, when they see your respectful and pure conduct. Do not let your adorning be external-the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear- but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious. For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their own husbands..."

Restated in numerous other passages, such as 1 Timothy 2:9 and Isaiah 3:16-24

Sounds like Ms. Unmarried Gold-chain Pretty-blouse-wearing Appling will be there as well.

/If you're going to cherry-pick, expect me to bake your ass into a pie
//I can guarantee I can find a Biblical passage that can be translated to condemn ANY person  you put forward
 
2013-03-08 05:34:17 PM

Mija: I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Romans 1:18, 26, 27, 32


fark off,  you Westboro Baptist coont.
*PLONK*
 
2013-03-08 05:37:43 PM
 
2013-03-08 05:40:21 PM

Cyberluddite: Chinchillazilla: I just don't understand the knee-jerk reaction to homosexuality from fundies. They ignore almost everything else in Leviticus.

Jesus died for our sins so that we would be able to get into heaven without worrying about following all the crazy Old Testament rules, right? Is Jesus's sacrifice not good enough for you, fundies?

I've never understood this either.  Seriously, can someone with a better understanding of Christian theology explain this one for us?  I mean, if Jesus died for our sins and this means that as long as we accept Jebus as our savior we can now eat bacon for breakfast or have lobster for dinner or do a bunch of the other list of things that Leviticus says is a no-no if you want to get into heaven, then why is a guy sucking another guy's dick is still considered the equivalent of a "Go directly to Hell, do not meet Jesus, do not collect 200 sheckels" card?

I really do wish someone could explain this.  I'm sure there's gotta be some sort of theological justification for it--what is it?


The way I understand it is that the Old Testament Law required blood sacrifices to atone for sins committed (breaking the laws as laid out in Leviticus, etc). Jesus was the final sacrifice that atoned for all sins forever, thereby completing the requirements of the Law. Since the requirements have been completed, those who accept that Jesus was the final sacrifice (aka Christians) are no longer bound by the OT Law and no longer have to follow it.
 
2013-03-08 05:40:45 PM

asynchron: Wow, subby, nice argument ad hominem. You are what's wrong with the world.

"Ooh, an article about a serious social issue! Let's compare how good-looking the two sides are! That will be super meaningful!"


2/10
 
2013-03-08 05:43:47 PM
These 'morality' lunatics really need to start another religion. I'm sure Christ would spit in their face if they were in front of him (well, he probably wouldn't but I'm sure he'd want to).
 
2013-03-08 05:49:32 PM

LavenderWolf: nmrsnr: Here's a question: How does being transgender fit into the "no gay marriage" platform? Does your birth gender control, or your post-op gender? Or, can you just not marry, period? How about after you're married. If one spouse in a married couple undergoes gender reassignment, do they have to get divorced?

To the fundies, anything other than repressing all sexual urges, and farking only your wife, to make her pregnant, is a crime against their religion. No matter who is doing the farking or how unrelated and distant the fundie is from the act.


I'm sure there is no relationship between these teachings, toe tapping in public restrooms and child molestation. 99% of the time it's a 'straight' married, religious man.
 
2013-03-08 05:51:38 PM

catmandu: Cyberluddite: Chinchillazilla: I just don't understand the knee-jerk reaction to homosexuality from fundies. They ignore almost everything else in Leviticus.

Jesus died for our sins so that we would be able to get into heaven without worrying about following all the crazy Old Testament rules, right? Is Jesus's sacrifice not good enough for you, fundies?

I've never understood this either.  Seriously, can someone with a better understanding of Christian theology explain this one for us?  I mean, if Jesus died for our sins and this means that as long as we accept Jebus as our savior we can now eat bacon for breakfast or have lobster for dinner or do a bunch of the other list of things that Leviticus says is a no-no if you want to get into heaven, then why is a guy sucking another guy's dick is still considered the equivalent of a "Go directly to Hell, do not meet Jesus, do not collect 200 sheckels" card?

I really do wish someone could explain this.  I'm sure there's gotta be some sort of theological justification for it--what is it?

The way I understand it is that the Old Testament Law required blood sacrifices to atone for sins committed (breaking the laws as laid out in Leviticus, etc). Jesus was the final sacrifice that atoned for all sins forever, thereby completing the requirements of the Law. Since the requirements have been completed, those who accept that Jesus was the final sacrifice (aka Christians) are no longer bound by the OT Law and no longer have to follow it.


Hit "add" too soon. The reason most fundies still follow their cherry picked version of the OT as "God's Law" is because they want a list of rules and regulations that tell them what to do. Living their lives according to principle instead of rules is just too hard. It makes them feel like they are following God's will when they can point to something in the Bible and say that they are doing that. Easier to tithe the OT law of 10% and say they did their financial duty than to pray about where they should apply their money. If they do that, God may ask them for more and may actually want them to help out the poor.
 
2013-03-08 05:53:35 PM
Wow. It's like somebody mated Emma Thompson and Christopher Walken and then stuck the head onto the "Darksided" mom from Wife Swap.
 
2013-03-08 05:58:34 PM

Sofa King Smart: vudukungfu: She's jells

I'd like to think that if she went to the show, the queens would take her backstage and show her how to do hair, makeup and wardrobe... something that no one has ever cared enough to show her... and they would bond over this, she would gain some femininity, self-esteem and compassion and they would all become close friends.


To Shangela,
Thanks for everything.
Julaine Appling
 
2013-03-08 05:59:34 PM

Mija: I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Romans 1:18, 26, 27, 32


You do, huh?

Matthew 7:1-5
John 8:7
 
2013-03-08 06:03:02 PM
You do can, huh?

FTFM
 
2013-03-08 06:03:19 PM
static1.businessinsider.com
 
2013-03-08 06:09:01 PM

Mija: I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Romans 1:18, 26, 27, 32

 
2013-03-08 06:10:20 PM

blatz514: C0rf: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.

[memedepot.com image 152x143]

Would like to point out the Watertown is a shiat hole.  So, it seems fitting she lives there.


With batshiat crazy like that I figured she was out of something like West Bend.
 
2013-03-08 06:10:36 PM

Acharne: Mija: I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Romans 1:18, 26, 27, 32


That post was a witty retort, Fark had the image working in the preview but when posted it failed. I am *not* 'QFT' Mija's silly and ignorant post.
 
2013-03-08 06:19:35 PM

Ken VeryBigLiar: blatz514: C0rf: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.

[memedepot.com image 152x143]

Would like to point out the Watertown is a shiat hole.  So, it seems fitting she lives there.

With batshiat crazy like that I figured she was out of something like West Bend.


I was guessing somewhere in the Delafield/Wales/Muckwanago derpfecta

/In-laws live in Wales. I love 'em but they fit the Waukesha County stereotype
 
2013-03-08 06:20:35 PM

KellyKellyKelly: Sofa King Smart: vudukungfu: She's jells

I'd like to think that if she went to the show, the queens would take her backstage and show her how to do hair, makeup and wardrobe... something that no one has ever cared enough to show her... and they would bond over this, she would gain some femininity, self-esteem and compassion and they would all become close friends.

To Shangela,
Thanks for everything.
Julaine Appling


John Leguizamo might be willing to reprise his role for that.
 
2013-03-08 06:33:45 PM

Ed Grubermann: asynchron: Wow, subby, nice argument ad hominem. You are what's wrong with the world.

"Ooh, an article about a serious social issue! Let's compare how good-looking the two sides are! That will be super meaningful!"

Drag queens are a serious social issue? Since when?


24.media.tumblr.com

Since I've been making boys cry when they ask for BIE.
 
2013-03-08 06:34:32 PM

grokca: C0rf: A self-proclaimed defender of "traditional marriage," Appling has never married and has lived for decades with another never-married woman in a home the two own jointly in Watertown.

I bet their carpets are very clean.


Subaru on the drive?
 
2013-03-08 06:37:37 PM

Mija: I don't know but I can tell you who will be going to hell.


No, only God can do that. Been a heretic long?
 
2013-03-08 06:44:34 PM
The one on the right looks like she gets hit with an ugly stick every morning.
 
Displayed 50 of 162 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report