Saiga410: Stating McVeigh's justification = personally think it is justified? Wow the derp is strong in this one.
The Muthaship: what_now: But if you start defending the Family Research Counsel, you're going to get pushback.Not defending them, honestly. I disagree with everything they say. But, I don't think they are a hate group. They are fundies for sure. They believe homosexuality is a sin. They believe same sex marriage is a sin. I still can't find anything credible that said they advocate violence of any kind. The SPLC plays fast and loose with their labeling because it drives donations. Unfortunately, it has consequences, too. And, IMO, it casts them in a bad light.
IlGreven: Parthenogenetic: I thought his fears of a dark, technological dystopia were interesting. The hippies who hate pervasive corporatism and the sovereign citizens who fear the New World Order probably share the same enemy....because the right-wingers fear the evil jack-booted corporations.Wait...most of them think those corporations are the ones keeping the big, bad, EEEEEEBIL gubmint in check./If you're not as scared of corporations as you are of the government, there is something wrong with you.
Dancin_In_Anson: Saiga410: Stating McVeigh's justification = personally think it is justified? Wow the derp is strong in this one."To understand something does not mean approval of it"Something quite lost on self righteous here on Fark.
The Muthaship: Whiskey Pete: The Muthaship: Ah, the SPLC.Moving along.....Oh, PLEASE elaborate!SPLC requirements for being labeled a hate group:1. Fail to fully support the agenda of the SPLC with every word and deed.
abb3w: The Muthaship: You guys really can't take a little dissent in the CJ, can you?Farkers are mostly fine with dissent. However, if you can't give an well-informed, evidence-based, logically reasoned basis for the dissent, they won't dignify your position with anything beyond mockery and LOL-cat pictures.
Zafler: abb3w: The Muthaship: You guys really can't take a little dissent in the CJ, can you?Farkers are mostly fine with dissent. However, if you can't give an well-informed, evidence-based, logically reasoned basis for the dissent, they won't dignify your position with anything beyond mockery and LOL-cat pictures.How does DIA keep getting bites then?
Whiskey Pete: You're welcome.
Zafler: No, some people still respond seriously to him.
Parthenogenetic: Surely there are other "normal" people who don't like the encroaching Nanny/surveillance state?
Parthenogenetic: Reverend Monkeypants: Parthenogenetic: Dancin_In_Anson: what_now: It bothered him so much he blew up 168 American citizens?The sickening irony does not escape me either.His methods could be criticized, but I am sure his intentions were sincerely patriotic. He was simply doing whatever was in his power to preserve America (Land of the Free and Home of the Brave), by performing an act of resistance against the jackbooted thuggery of the vast left wing liberal conspiracy to subvert the government of the American people, by the American people, and for the American people, and to hand over the reins of power to the UN.I'm not saying those people individually deserved what they got. But by working for the federal government, they were willing collaborators with the vast left wing conspiracy; little Eichmanns. And in war, collateral damage sometimes happens. McVeigh was trying to blow up a Federal building, it wasn't his fault there were people inside. Isn't that the rationale you libs use when you defend 0bama's cowardly drone strikes?I'm not necessarily defending McVeigh, not in public. I'm just asking questions. But you can see why, in the face of liberal tyranny, why doing that might have made sense. Assuming it was his idea, and that it wasn't a false flag operation conducted by the CIA, MK-ULTRA, ACORN, and George Soros to justify rounding up real American patriots, of course.So, the UnaBomber should be revered too as well then?.....*sigh* The "Little Eichmanns" reference didn't trigger a little red flag? Fine.No. No, the UnaBomber is completely different. So were the Weather Underground. You see, they were liberal terrorists, not patriots.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Feb 19 2017 08:15:30
Runtime: 0.338 sec (337 ms)