If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Ars Technica)   New SimCity game is a steaming pile of suck   (arstechnica.com) divider line 8
    More: Fail, SimCity, city limits  
•       •       •

6106 clicks; posted to Geek » on 05 Mar 2013 at 7:49 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-03-05 12:12:32 PM
2 votes:

Bullseyed: If the next iPhone requires a buttplug be inserted to work, is that a design choice or a design flaw?


Depends, do I have to purchase the accessory separate from the phone?
2013-03-05 07:58:33 AM
2 votes:
You know what's a steaming pile of suck? Being so farking lazy, talentless, and desperate to be "first" in your stupid farking review that you can't be bothered to distill your goddamn IM conversation into summary.
2013-03-05 06:26:54 PM
1 votes:
i.imgur.com
2013-03-05 11:36:52 AM
1 votes:

Epicedion: Bullseyed: Social features won't fix basic errors like "my city is tiny and can only hold 200,000 people". There is no fix for that. It is a design flaw.

I'm wondering if that's really a flaw. It could certainly be a design choice, but to be fair previous Sim City games haven't exactly been about carefully styling a city and learning its ins and outs -- they've mostly been about perfecting a segment and moving on to add new segments in a logical fashion. The fact that a place is smaller and more personal might be a bonus, since I don't have a single old Sim City map that stands out in my memory, just a vague recollection of repetitive grids.


What is the difference between a wildly unpopular design choice and a design flaw?

If the next iPhone requires a buttplug be inserted to work, is that a design choice or a design flaw?
2013-03-05 11:21:51 AM
1 votes:

Celerian: PanicMan: Celerian: YOU CAN'T CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS!

That guy made that game perfect.  Seriously.

fark that guy. I could easily cut Fire, Police, Education, Healthcare down to really low levels and everyone was always, "Oh, that's cool. We have enough. We're doing pretty good." You take away even a little bit from the transportation budget, even if you have one 1X1 square of road and he flips his shiat.

"POTHOLES WILL BE HAD! ROADSIGNS WILL GET ERECTED LESS EFFICIENTLY! BUSES WILL BE 5 MINUTES LATE, ALL OVER TOWN!!!!"


STOP HITTING THE TORNADO BUTTON, YOU CHUCKLEFARK
2013-03-05 08:44:16 AM
1 votes:
Seriously.. the cities are obscenely small. let us build.
2013-03-05 08:30:13 AM
1 votes:
Unless it has Shift+FUNDS I ain't buyin it!
2013-03-05 08:06:14 AM
1 votes:
Don't like the tiny city size deal that they were whining about. If accurate, it's a legit whine. No saving so you can experiment a bit kind of breaks the experience of the game too.
 
Displayed 8 of 8 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report