If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   "Folk neuroscience" is part of how we talk about ourselves now, but much of what passes as knowledge is inaccurate   (guardian.co.uk) divider line 3
    More: Obvious, Neuroscience, cognitive sciences, scientific data, government spending, physical effects, HBP  
•       •       •

1836 clicks; posted to Geek » on 04 Mar 2013 at 12:48 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-03-04 02:33:13 PM
1 votes:
My take on the article: Popular neuroscience is incorrect, but I'm not going to go into specifics on which popular takes are incorrect or why they're incorrect. Take my word for it; I'm a neuropsychologist.
2013-03-04 01:37:13 PM
1 votes:
can we just fast forward this thread to the "Time Cube" level of mental dilusion and take off from there?
2013-03-04 12:58:12 PM
1 votes:
otherwise know as "Why do people believe a hastily put together photoshopped email attachment than actual research"
 
Displayed 3 of 3 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report