If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Atlantic)   Who watches the watchmen?   (theatlantic.com) divider line 93
    More: Scary, Haiti, UNHCR, European Court of Justice, Institute for Justice, International Court of Justice, river systems, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, municipal law  
•       •       •

15723 clicks; posted to Main » on 26 Feb 2013 at 10:31 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



93 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-26 11:39:36 PM

GoSurfing: Fell In Love With a Chair: GoSurfing: Is it farfetched to think the UN did this on purpose, to get at the true problem of overpopulation?

No sir, not at all. In fact, if you adjust your tinfoil hat juuust so- ah, there!- why now it's perfectly plausible, if not precisely what occurred!

Never said that's what I believed, dick. "The most intelligent minds are those that can entertain an idea without necessarily believing it." -Aristotle.

/thoughts, how do they work?


Nice Aristotle quote...I agree.
 
2013-02-26 11:41:10 PM
They would have to contend with Interpol cream pie attack.

Hell, I pay extra for that.
 
2013-02-26 11:41:12 PM
images.tvrage.com
Wanted for questioning
 
2013-02-26 11:47:01 PM

GoSurfing: Never said that's what I believed, dick. "The most intelligent minds are those that can entertain an idea without necessarily believing it." -Aristotle.


3.bp.blogspot.com
Aristotle also said:
"The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet."
And eat my bitter ass for entertaining idiotic ideas like the UN being capable of doing ANYTHING effectively.
 
2013-02-26 11:51:04 PM
Upthread you have a bunch of people chiming in saying the only real way to fix Haiti is to remove a significant amount of human inhabitants. I'm not implying the UN had a master plan to reduce the population. My thought is that they simply cheapened out on the "basic sanitation measures" because they figured that if a few people died from cholera, it would be a net-gain, homeostasis-ically speaking. This isn't a conspiracy. Just them (The UN) saying "fark it".
 
2013-02-26 11:51:47 PM
Nobody.  Nobody watches that opium dream we've run out of super hero ideas so here's a big blue mormon buddha superman with carny freak sidekicks movie.
 
2013-02-26 11:53:28 PM

BuckTurgidson: You didn't just entertain that idea, you took it out on the town and Instagrammed that joint, bro.


Do you know the difference between a query and a statement? I posed a question, I did not make a declaration, "bro".
 
2013-02-26 11:53:54 PM

al's hat: spawn73: sno man: Haiti was a clusterfark way before the earthquake, and hehe we get to blame the French for that.  Since then it's just about everyone's fault. Only about half of all those donations we all made have managed to get there so far too...

It started out when the Haitian slaved overthrew the slaveowners and abolish slavery.

So of course the rest of the world, USA in particular (France is kinda a long away from there), placed them under embargo that they've never shook off he ramifications of.

It's funny how a possibly insightful comment goes to shiat when I have to read a sentence multiple times because the grammar distracts me... "the Haitian slaved", "abolish" instead of "abolished", and "never shook off".  WTF?   You must be more drunk than I am and I thought I was pretty far gone at this point.


It's funny how a comment that rewrites history so America can be blamed is automatically judged "possibly insightful," in spite of its errors in grammar and spelling.

/the DR and Haiti suffered the same judgements and embargoes
//the DR used austerity to pay off their debt, while Haiti pitched a fit over it
///but that doesn't fit the narrative, so it must be ignored
 
2013-02-26 11:56:35 PM
Whoa, whoa, whoa.  Let me get this straight.  Random UN soldier brings cholera infection to Haiti.  Because its infrastructure was utterly destroyed by an earthquake, Haiti has no real sanitation system, and cholera rapidly spreads through the populace.  How is this the UN's fault?

Do they screen everyone at the Haitian ports and airports for cholera?  Because this could have been any other aid worker just as well...
 
2013-02-26 11:57:20 PM

GoSurfing: BuckTurgidson: You didn't just entertain that idea, you took it out on the town and Instagrammed that joint, bro.

Do you know the difference between a query and a statement? I posed a question, I did not make a declaration, "bro".


Did I say you did, pal?
 
2013-02-26 11:57:31 PM
Were Unilever or Coca-Cola responsible for a cholera outbreak that killed 8,000 people and infected 640,000 more, and for subsequently covering up its employees' failure to adhere to basic sanitation standards, it is likely their executives would have difficulty visiting countries claiming universal legal jurisdiction.

While what the UN did might be despicable this line is bullshiat. Corporations cause people's deaths all over the world every day and are rarely held accountable. The only reason BP had to launch their "Please stop suing us!" PR campaign was because their shenanigans effected Americans.
 
2013-02-27 12:03:51 AM
I dunno, without immunity from prosecution there would have been no aid to Haiti in the first place, it sucks but there's a good-samaritan rule for that very reason, even if the help winds up hindering sometimes.
 
2013-02-27 12:06:55 AM

Tatterdemalian: al's hat: spawn73: sno man: Haiti was a clusterfark way before the earthquake, and hehe we get to blame the French for that.  Since then it's just about everyone's fault. Only about half of all those donations we all made have managed to get there so far too...

It started out when the Haitian slaved overthrew the slaveowners and abolish slavery.

So of course the rest of the world, USA in particular (France is kinda a long away from there), placed them under embargo that they've never shook off he ramifications of.

It's funny how a possibly insightful comment goes to shiat when I have to read a sentence multiple times because the grammar distracts me... "the Haitian slaved", "abolish" instead of "abolished", and "never shook off".  WTF?   You must be more drunk than I am and I thought I was pretty far gone at this point.

It's funny how a comment that rewrites history so America can be blamed is automatically judged "possibly insightful," in spite of its errors in grammar and spelling.

/the DR and Haiti suffered the same judgements and embargoes
//the DR used austerity to pay off their debt, while Haiti pitched a fit over it
///but that doesn't fit the narrative, so it must be ignored


Like I said, I've been drinking and after hitting "add comment" I thought about the "possibly insightful" portion of my comment.  I probably should have bolded "possibly insightful".  As a side note, I should probably stop going grammar Nazi after X number of beers due to the possibility/likelihood of committing a grammar/spelling fails myself.  I should also probably go back to the class action beer suit thread and just keep my comments to myself.  ;)
 
2013-02-27 12:07:06 AM

Tatterdemalian: al's hat: spawn73: sno man: Haiti was a clusterfark way before the earthquake, and hehe we get to blame the French for that.  Since then it's just about everyone's fault. Only about half of all those donations we all made have managed to get there so far too...

It started out when the Haitian slaved overthrew the slaveowners and abolish slavery.

So of course the rest of the world, USA in particular (France is kinda a long away from there), placed them under embargo that they've never shook off he ramifications of.

It's funny how a possibly insightful comment goes to shiat when I have to read a sentence multiple times because the grammar distracts me... "the Haitian slaved", "abolish" instead of "abolished", and "never shook off".  WTF?   You must be more drunk than I am and I thought I was pretty far gone at this point.

It's funny how a comment that rewrites history so America can be blamed is automatically judged "possibly insightful," in spite of its errors in grammar and spelling.

/the DR and Haiti suffered the same judgements and embargoes
//the DR used austerity to pay off their debt, while Haiti pitched a fit over it
///but that doesn't fit the narrative, so it must be ignored


those slashies are really close [without the rest read totally bullshiat] to (Republican) fantasy, so really should be ignored.
 
2013-02-27 12:51:57 AM
www.wedapeeps.com
 
2013-02-27 12:58:13 AM

GoSurfing: Is it farfetched to think the UN did this on purpose, to get at the true problem of overpopulation?


I would love to give them that sort of props, as I believe Haiti is unsalvageable, but I suspect random shiat.
 
2013-02-27 01:05:23 AM

Valiente: I would love to give them that sort of props, as I believe Haiti is unsalvageable, but I suspect random shiat.


That is how cholera is usually spread.
 
2013-02-27 01:09:43 AM

vpb: GAT_00: Who watches the watchmen?

People who enjoy blue dong?

sno man: Haiti was a clusterfark way before the earthquake, and hehe we get to blame the French for that.  Since then it's just about everyone's fault. Only about half of all those donations we all made have managed to get there so far too...

Haiti is an unfixable hellhole because there is little to no soil left capable of growing crops.  There is no way that country could ever sustain itself.

Yep.  But there is a reason for that.


No, believe it or not, "Why Haiti is a shiathole" is one of the few things that's virtually impossible to blame on the United States.
 
2013-02-27 01:17:55 AM
Ya know... That can make it "legal" for locals to kill U.N. agents... If U.N. personal can't be sued or prosecuted for damages they cause, then it seems logical that locals can't be prosecuted for damage done to U.N. agents.
 
2013-02-27 01:20:51 AM
Power is farking awesome, isn't it?
 
2013-02-27 01:22:38 AM

vpb: Haiti has been independent since 1804. How does this have anything to do with France in modern times?


To paraphrase, "Americans think 100 years is a long time and Europeans thinks 100 miles is a long distance"
 
2013-02-27 01:43:32 AM

vpb: Yep.  But there is a reason for that.


That might have been an interesting article, but I'll never know since you have to "login" to read it.
 
2013-02-27 01:50:53 AM

sno man: vpb: sno man:
Have you seen a sat photo of hispaniola?  Dominican Republic is doing fine... Haiti is a desert... The screws the French had them under basically drained all the resources.  the rest of us deserve some shiat for screwing them out of the wee local pigs that would eat the scraps, and replacing them with the big-ass pigs that only eat corn that they don't/can't grow on their own... they are so very broken... I'm not sure unfixable, but it's going to be a long ugly road back to sustainability.

Haiti has been independent since 1804.  How does this have anything to do with France in modern times?

They have been farked since then, yea that long, either way it's fun to blame the French!


I thought we were supposed to (NSFW)  blame Canada?
 
2013-02-27 02:13:11 AM
I think corporate rape by American corporations, along with a need to prevent an uppity bunch of n-s to have their own republic might also be a reason why this country is farked.

/yeah yeah, American exceptionalism
//it's ok when we do it
///if they had only remained house n-s like the Dominican Republic
 
2013-02-27 03:04:06 AM

Need_MindBleach: vpb: GAT_00: sno man: Haiti was a clusterfark way before the earthquake, and hehe we get to blame the French for that.  Since then it's just about everyone's fault. Only about half of all those donations we all made have managed to get there so far too...

Haiti is an unfixable hellhole because there is little to no soil left capable of growing crops.  There is no way that country could ever sustain itself.

Yep.  But there is a reason for that.

No, believe it or not, "Why Haiti is a shiathole" is one of the few things that's virtually impossible to blame on the United States.


Yeah, about that.

Despite enjoying widespread support by the majority of Haitians, the Washington Post informed their readers that regime change was looming on 21 November 2003: "Aristide has pushed with mixed success a populist agenda of higher minimum wages, school construction, literacy programs, higher taxes on the rich and other policies that have angered an opposition movement run largely by a mulatto elite that has traditionally controlled Haiti's economy."[16]

After Aristide took office in February 2001, Washington played a leading role in forcing hundreds of millions of dollars in international aid to be cut off, while bolstering a minority opposition led by Haiti's tiny elite. In the three years leading up to the coup, the nation's already moribund economy further deteriorated and the government ground to a halt as the opposition refused to participate in elections. Washington ignored pleas from the Aristide government for an international peacekeeping force as a motley band of armed thugs led by a suspected drug trafficker and fugitive death squad leaders overran more than half the country. US marines in Haiti made no effort to disarm the terrorists. US policy toward Haiti appeared to be a war of attrition, driven by animosity towards Aristide
 
2013-02-27 04:07:50 AM
The only thing wrong with Haiti is it's run by the Haitian Government.

I'd be willing to bet if they ceded local control to the Dominicans they'd be in better shape.
 
2013-02-27 05:21:47 AM

vpb: sno man:
Have you seen a sat photo of hispaniola?  Dominican Republic is doing fine... Haiti is a desert... The screws the French had them under basically drained all the resources.  the rest of us deserve some shiat for screwing them out of the wee local pigs that would eat the scraps, and replacing them with the big-ass pigs that only eat corn that they don't/can't grow on their own... they are so very broken... I'm not sure unfixable, but it's going to be a long ugly road back to sustainability.

Haiti has been independent since 1804.  How does this have anything to do with France in modern times?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A_o-nU5s2U
 
2013-02-27 06:17:57 AM
What a dump
25.media.tumblr.com
But Kanye and Lauryn Hill care...
 
2013-02-27 09:03:56 AM
I was under the impression that Haiti suffered a devastating earthquake and most of their meager infrastructure was smashed.  This typically leads to cholera outbreaks.

FTFA: Brian Concannon, director of the

Or am I mistaken?
 
2013-02-27 09:06:08 AM
What the hell?

FTFA: Brian Concannon, director of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti and a lawyer representing Haitian claimants against the U.N. Former president Bill Clinton, the U.N.'s special envoy for Haiti, has admitted that U.N. peacekeepers were responsible for the outbreak

That's better.

What he's admitted is that he's a money grubbing douchebag with a friend at the Atlantic.
 
2013-02-27 09:07:27 AM

MrBentor: Ya know... That can make it "legal" for locals to kill U.N. agents... If U.N. personal can't be sued or prosecuted for damages they cause, then it seems logical that locals can't be prosecuted for damage done to U.N. agents.


They should sue the earthquake that caused all the damage, but it doesn't have any money, so there you go.
 
2013-02-27 09:08:29 AM
The UN is not about helping anyone it's purpose is to spread communism~!
 
2013-02-27 09:11:33 AM
This guy watches the watchers.
i.ytimg.com
 
2013-02-27 09:49:01 AM

FARK rebel soldier: Valiente: I would love to give them that sort of props, as I believe Haiti is unsalvageable, but I suspect random shiat.

That is how cholera is usually spread.


Actually, cholera is spread not from random shiat, but from someone the shiat of a person who has cholera in a contagious state.

/it's funny how many people still believe in spontaneous generation
//they always call it by a different name, but the belief that life (in this case, vibrio cholerae) just spontaneously appears out of nowhere will never die as long as people can hide behind euphemisms
///NotSayingItWasAliens.jpg
 
2013-02-27 09:51:37 AM

sno man: The screws the French had them under basically drained all the resources.


I didn't think the french were respnsible for the deforestation...
 
2013-02-27 10:08:57 AM

Tatterdemalian: pedantry


You're ruining a perfectly good poop joke you know that right?
 
2013-02-27 10:31:13 AM

FARK rebel soldier: Tatterdemalian: pedantry

You're ruining a perfectly good poop joke you know that right?


Meh, 8000 people dead and the killers immune to any prosecution whatsoever, even though they knew dumping their shiat into the river was wrong but they did it anyhow because it's the traditional way Nepal handles sewage, kind of kills my sense of humor.

/no, I don't think Haitians deserve to die
//they would rather drink water with shiat in it than die of thirst, but apparently this makes them irredeemable in many FARKers eyes
///what's funny is that many FARKers can't comprehend how I can express this view as well as the previous one regarding the difference between DC and Haiti stated above, but that's because they're so sociopathic they think normal people are the real sociopaths
 
2013-02-27 11:39:21 AM

al's hat: spawn73: sno man: Haiti was a clusterfark way before the earthquake, and hehe we get to blame the French for that.  Since then it's just about everyone's fault. Only about half of all those donations we all made have managed to get there so far too...

It started out when the Haitian slaved overthrew the slaveowners and abolish slavery.

So of course the rest of the world, USA in particular (France is kinda a long away from there), placed them under embargo that they've never shook off he ramifications of.

It's funny how a possibly insightful comment goes to shiat when I have to read a sentence multiple times because the grammar distracts me... "the Haitian slaved", "abolish" instead of "abolished", and "never shook off".  WTF?   You must be more drunk than I am and I thought I was pretty far gone at this point.


Yeah, I remember having trouble with that sentence.

Anyway, Haiti ended on everyones shiat list in 1805, when the slaves rebelled against slavery and France.

USA was certainly one of the nations that took part in the embargo, and due to their relative location mattered far more than France.
 
2013-02-27 12:14:00 PM
The U.N. Meh.

And still, some people believe that a single world government would be a good thing.
 
2013-02-27 12:38:37 PM

liam76: sno man: The screws the French had them under basically drained all the resources.

I didn't think the french were respnsible for the deforestation...


Directly, no.  120ish years of France taking basically everything of value to pay for it's freedom certainly got the ball rolling.
The Duvalier's pretty much jumped into the void post France, sure, but I think you could make a case for France being a bad guy here.
 
2013-02-27 03:46:45 PM

Loadmaster: The U.N. Meh.

And still, some people believe that a single world government would be a good thing.


alternativemedia.ca

At least it will bring back pageantry into politics again.
I simply cannot wait to see their Illuminati robes!  Silk no doubt.
 
2013-02-27 07:32:00 PM

sno man: liam76: sno man: The screws the French had them under basically drained all the resources.

I didn't think the french were respnsible for the deforestation...

Directly, no.  120ish years of France taking basically everything of value to pay for it's freedom certainly got the ball rolling.
The Duvalier's pretty much jumped into the void post France, sure, but I think you could make a case for France being a bad guy here.


I don't think they were a good guy, but I thought prior to the revolution it was little different than DR.
 
2013-02-28 01:56:23 AM
25.media.tumblr.com
 
Displayed 43 of 93 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report