If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NBC News)   North Korea warns the US that it faces "miserable destruction," which as destructions go is one of the worst kinds   (worldnews.nbcnews.com) divider line 214
    More: Fail, North Koreans, military drills, United Nations Security Council, commanders, KCNA, Pak Rim Su, Security Council resolutions  
•       •       •

9245 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Feb 2013 at 7:27 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



214 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-23 08:04:41 PM  

Kumana Wanalaia: Ima4nic8or: Why do we put up with crap from those roaches? We should drop a few dozen nukes on their asses then ask them if they'd like to talk some more shiat.

because they would level Seoul with artillery. that and we're the good guy who is too much of a boyscout.


"Too much of a boyscout"=not frying 20 million people cause fark it, I'm bored an' I hate furrners an' nothin' good on tv, an *hic* so *hic* what, ain' nobody *hic* gon' do nothin' cause this Murica we kick ass man

/October 2001
//I remember it
 
2013-02-23 08:07:31 PM  
Fatty Leader getting fatter?
 
2013-02-23 08:08:36 PM  
Do they have nuclear weapons?  Yes.
Do they have rockets?  Yes.
Do they have the ability to place nuclear weapons on rockets?  Yes, within 5 years.
Do they have rockets that can reach Japan?  Yes.
Do they have rockets that can reach the US?  Yes, within 5 years - some think now.
Can the US respond with nuclear weapons?  No, not without massive radioactive fallout on Japan.

Argue with the details, but the day will come in the not too distant future when they can and may launch nuclear missiles.
 
2013-02-23 08:09:19 PM  

NutWrench: [upload.wikimedia.org image 300x250]
I choose Mr Stay-Puft.



www.thetimes.co.ukpoggroup.com
 
2013-02-23 08:09:38 PM  
HA! Riiight.

i.imgur.com
 
2013-02-23 08:09:53 PM  

Glancing Blow: Do they have nuclear weapons?  Yes.
Do they have rockets?  Yes.
Do they have the ability to place nuclear weapons on rockets?  Yes, within 5 years.
Do they have rockets that can reach Japan?  Yes.
Do they have rockets that can reach the US?  Yes, within 5 years - some think now.
Can the US respond with nuclear weapons?  No, not without massive radioactive fallout on Japan.

Argue with the details, but the day will come in the not too distant future when they can and may launch nuclear missiles.


but they won't, because we won't be trying to take over North Korea
they're worried about nothing
 
2013-02-23 08:10:38 PM  

Kumana Wanalaia: Ima4nic8or: Why do we put up with crap from those roaches? We should drop a few dozen nukes on their asses then ask them if they'd like to talk some more shiat.

because they would level Seoul with artillery. that and we're the good guy who is too much of a boyscout.


Seoul is actually like 45 minutes away from DMZ by driving, or 35 miles according to google articles. 35 puts it far far out of range of most artillery that the north has. so pummeled, yes it would be. But this frequent quote of 'within artillery range' is by and large not even close to being true. Especially once counter-battery comes into play, those artillery shells wont be incoming long.
 
2013-02-23 08:11:58 PM  

Notabunny: BumpInTheNight: I'd settle for destruction by Snu-Snu.

I'd take a snu-snuing for the team


Sign me up. Ill take one for the team.
 
2013-02-23 08:12:14 PM  
Come at us, bro.
 
2013-02-23 08:14:55 PM  
In a protracted war, I wonder how long it would take the NK military to crumble under the weight of starvation?

/my guess - 3 months
 
2013-02-23 08:15:03 PM  
img836.imageshack.us
Amazing
 
2013-02-23 08:15:41 PM  

Ima4nic8or: Why do we put up with crap from those roaches? We should drop a few dozen nukes on their asses then ask them if they'd like to talk some more shiat.


3.bp.blogspot.com

Better yet, let's just drop a few of these babies on them instead and really teach them the fear of Jesus.
 
2013-02-23 08:15:42 PM  
What a strange situation for Kim Jong-un.  He was educated in Europe, then has to go home and run a country in that manner.  He must realize what a sham his life is, how can he stand it?
 
2013-02-23 08:15:44 PM  
Glass parking lot says what?
 
2013-02-23 08:22:12 PM  

Glancing Blow: Do they have rockets that can reach the US? Yes, within 5 years - some think now.


As soon as you have the ability to put something in orbit, you can hit anywhere on earth.
 
2013-02-23 08:22:33 PM  

clowncar on fire: Ima4nic8or: Why do we put up with crap from those roaches? We should drop a few dozen nukes on their asses then ask them if they'd like to talk some more shiat.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 420x451]

Better yet, let's just drop a few of these babies on them instead and really teach them the fear of Jesus.


That wasn't very nice, it's dinner time here on the west coast.
 
2013-02-23 08:23:47 PM  
Best Korea is right. USA is facing miserable destruction except not how they think. US is destroying itself. Their whole country is an autoimmune disease.
 
2013-02-23 08:25:00 PM  
Pity Truman had no balls or spine (hey even Roosevelt didn't read him in on the Manhattan project...) and sorry South Korea, but IMO nuke the norks off the map before they start selling nukes to every achmed, aziz and farquad durka durka mohammed jihad type.

/serial y0, truman shouldve nuked the norks/red china and split the result with mother russia, wouldve made the world a much better place and spared us Vietfarkingnam
 
2013-02-23 08:25:10 PM  

Glancing Blow: Do they have nuclear weapons?  Yes.
Do they have rockets?  Yes.
Do they have the ability to place nuclear weapons on rockets?  Yes, within 5 years.
Do they have rockets that can reach Japan?  Yes.
Do they have rockets that can reach the US?  Yes, within 5 years - some think now.
Can the US respond with nuclear weapons?  No, not without massive radioactive fallout on Japan.

Argue with the details, but the day will come in the not too distant future when they can and may launch nuclear missiles.


I'd be more apt to believe your scenario if their last rocket wasn't hand-welded. Plus we do have surface-to-air ICBM intercept missiles and whatnot.
 
2013-02-23 08:25:57 PM  
How much fun would it be if China just sent their 500k troops most in need of some real live training into NK and overthrew the country.  Then they said "We don't want it, South Korea can have it.  We'll just be selling them stuff in 10 years anyway.  You're welcome, rest of the world." and went home.
China gets to flex their muscles, North Koreans get to eat regularly, South Korea gets unification, and the rest of the world doesn't have to deal with the Kim family of loonies and their bombs.  It's a win/win/win/win!
 
2013-02-23 08:29:13 PM  
Yeah, Kathy Bates. Can't get much worse than that.
fafi.coolcats.fr
 
2013-02-23 08:29:47 PM  

ontariolightning: Best Korea is right. USA is facing miserable destruction except not how they think. US is destroying itself. Their whole country is an autoimmune disease.


i guess we should legalize pot, it's the obvious solution
 
2013-02-23 08:31:57 PM  

clowncar on fire: Better yet, let's just drop a few of these babies on them instead and really teach them the fear of Jesus.


Underwear should not have more fabric than my 3-season tent, including the rain fly.
 
2013-02-23 08:32:40 PM  
Everyone keeps underestimating the North Koreans, just as we did with the Japanese prior to December 7th, 1941 and with the Viet Cong & North Vietnamese in 1965 when Johnson sent in the Marines.   We must not go off on our own dreams about these people...they were bastards to fight against in 1951-53 ands will  be so again as they have been training for the day they can take us on since then...training for 60 years.

What they are going to do is build missiles to reach the US and then put nukes on them.  When they get to this point, they are going to come rushing out of thosse tunnels thay have been building fdor the past 60 years under the DMZ and hit the South with all they've got as well as telling the US not to interfere or they will fire their missiles at LA, San Francisco, et al.  Do you really think Obama has the cajones to risk the US cities then?  Especially not LA/Hollywood as that is one of his core supporter areas.  He couldn't get re-elected again if he loses Hollywood.  This is what lil Kim is planning..get nukes, invade the South and blackmail the US.

Obama is not goinga to do anything about it and then will retreat when threatened.  Just remember, you saw it here first!
 
2013-02-23 08:34:58 PM  
Will they invade the US before destructing us?

/pretty please?

i48.tinypic.com
 
2013-02-23 08:36:54 PM  

Reverend J: I'd be more apt to believe your scenario if their last rocket wasn't hand-welded. Plus we do have surface-to-air ICBM intercept missiles and whatnot


That program has met with very very limited success.  As you may recall Bush stopped allowing the testing and results from being public in early 2003, I believe.  Even the new Israel iron-dome is only 80-90% effective.  In my judgment, the biggest hurdle they face will be landing it where they want it to go.  I don't really know the technology, but I think not taking this threat seriously is a grave error.
 
2013-02-23 08:38:52 PM  

SurelyShirley: Will they invade the US before destructing us?

/pretty please?

[Best_K_Armyette]


Ooh! Naughty boarder penetration!
 
2013-02-23 08:47:37 PM  
phojo1946: they were bastards to fight against in 1951-53

They were bastards for the South and a small UN contingent to fight against during the summer of 1950. They were run over like roadkill from 15 Sep 1950-18 Oct 1950. By then the war was over for the KPA. They sat out 1951-1953 and let the Chinese take the ball.

/read your history
 
2013-02-23 08:48:46 PM  

Mr. Eugenides: Glancing Blow: Do they have rockets that can reach the US? Yes, within 5 years - some think now.

As soon as you have the ability to put something in orbit, you can hit anywhere on earth.


You do realize how utterly and completely wrong you are, right?
 
2013-02-23 08:49:48 PM  

Githerax: What a strange situation for Kim Jong-un.  He was educated in Europe, then has to go home and run a country in that manner.  He must realize what a sham his life is, how can he stand it?


The regime leaders control his food supply. Dance for us, fatty. Dance on the world stage. Look - we bought the recipeinstructions for Twinkies when Hostess went out of business. Keep stirring up that anti-American sentiment.
 
2013-02-23 08:52:39 PM  
Christ, what assholes.
 
2013-02-23 08:53:58 PM  
Aw, somebody's hungry and cranky.

Seriously, anyone could handle US foreign policy if they have ever had a 2 year old.
 
2013-02-23 08:55:21 PM  

ko_kyi: Aw, somebody's hungry and cranky.

Seriously, anyone could handle US foreign policy if they have ever had a 2 year old.


what if they're GAY?

img.ezinemark.com
 
2013-02-23 08:56:30 PM  

lemortede: Notabunny: BumpInTheNight: I'd settle for destruction by Snu-Snu.

I'd take a snu-snuing for the team

Sign me up. Ill take one for the team.


okay but it's not like you think

24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-02-23 08:56:40 PM  
Herro, I am a ordinary American pig dog. I to am to be raughing at mighty North Korea. I am perhaps totarry unawares of mighty fighting army of DPRK. And how their mighty reader Kim Jong Un, who I totarry have no knowredge of is most strong and has the biggest penis in the worrd and is a most handsome and cunning and can totarry preform the sex and is certainry not a gay homosexuar unrike what certain individuar says. I do not know that DPRK has rowist rates of obesity in worrd, and is number one country in entire earth. Well, nice making conversation with fellow imperiarist, now I go to make sex with fat wife whire eating cheeseburger and riding on scooter cart in war-mart.
 
2013-02-23 08:57:12 PM  
Unless their plan is to get their fissionable materials production geared up and, what was the phrase... "become the 7-11 of the nuclear weapons industry".  They don't need planes, missiles, armies, navies, etc., if they can secretly supply bomb fuel to other crazies and let *them* smuggle nukes into the US.

/Still a lot of drawbacks to that plan, such as that anything ever happened, and the isotope-identification folks ever fingerprint the remains to Korea, we would be *most* unhappy.  But a plan like that might be seen as doable to these lunatics.

//IMO, probably the most credible threat that Stupid Korea could be to the US.

///No third slashie.
 
2013-02-23 08:58:35 PM  

clowncar on fire: Ima4nic8or: Why do we put up with crap from those roaches? We should drop a few dozen nukes on their asses then ask them if they'd like to talk some more shiat.



Better yet, let's just drop a few of these babies on them instead and really teach them the fear of Jesus.


Those two ladies would get stewed and eaten on their first day in Hungriest Korea.
 
2013-02-23 09:02:13 PM  

SuperNinjaToad: jake_lex: I gotta imagine that even Kim Jong Fatty knows that North Korea would be quickly destroyed if they actually attacked South Korea, Japan, or the US, and that China wouldn't do much more to back them up than sending a strongly worded letter to the State Department.  These threats are probably more for internal consumption than anything.

I just wish that China would step up here and say, "Look, you wanna talk, we can talk.  Cut the crazy bomber bullshiat."  But China seems to want to be thought of as a superpower, but doesn't want to do any of the work that a superpower needs to do.

The only people who is viewing china as a superpower are mainly people like you. They couldn't care less either way and the term 'superpower' itself doesn't even exist in Mandarin. It was a termed coined by Americans for America.


Terminology may be different but the desire to (unhindered) extend your influence globally is the basis behind being a superpower.  Chinese focus on the 1st island chain or the "near sea" but they are shifting that to a "far sea" capability.  They are doing this through their weapons and military as well as economically, through nation-building efforts ongoing in places like the African Continent, or diplomatically like they are trying with India (of all countries!) now.
 
2013-02-23 09:02:31 PM  
Do you really think Obama has the cajones to risk the US cities then?  Especially not LA/Hollywood as that is one of his core supporter areas.  He couldn't get re-elected again if he loses Hollywood.  This is what lil Kim is planning..get nukes, invade the South and blackmail the US.

Obama is not goinga to do anything about it and then will retreat when threatened.  Just remember, you saw it here first!


And I was counting on the third term for Barry.

/ You have to take your meds, even on the weekend.
 
2013-02-23 09:03:48 PM  
Well, miserable isn't nice
But would ice suffice?
 
2013-02-23 09:05:11 PM  

Summa cum loudly: Mr. Eugenides: Glancing Blow: Do they have rockets that can reach the US? Yes, within 5 years - some think now.

As soon as you have the ability to put something in orbit, you can hit anywhere on earth.

You do realize how utterly and completely wrong you are, right?


beat me to it
 
2013-02-23 09:07:28 PM  
JDJoeE: Pity Truman had no balls or spine (hey even Roosevelt didn't read him in on the Manhattan project...)

Wait...  According to you, the *ONLY* man in history to order the use of nuclear weapons in anger has "no balls or spine"?!?!?!

Really?  You want to stick with that?
 
2013-02-23 09:07:38 PM  

Glancing Blow: Can the US respond with nuclear weapons? No, not without massive radioactive fallout on Japan.


You watch too many movies. As long as you use the proper yield and keep it off the ground the fallout is pretty minimal.
 
2013-02-23 09:07:48 PM  

Summa cum loudly: Mr. Eugenides: Glancing Blow: Do they have rockets that can reach the US? Yes, within 5 years - some think now.

As soon as you have the ability to put something in orbit, you can hit anywhere on earth.

You do realize how utterly and completely wrong you are, right?


Honestly, no, I don't.  A shallow north-south orbit can be de-orbited anywhere on the globe.  So once you have the tech to put something into orbit you have the tech to drop it anywhere.  How is that wrong?
 
2013-02-23 09:09:05 PM  

Glancing Blow: Reverend J: I'd be more apt to believe your scenario if their last rocket wasn't hand-welded. Plus we do have surface-to-air ICBM intercept missiles and whatnot

That program has met with very very limited success.  As you may recall Bush stopped allowing the testing and results from being public in early 2003, I believe.  Even the new Israel iron-dome is only 80-90% effective.  In my judgment, the biggest hurdle they face will be landing it where they want it to go.  I don't really know the technology, but I think not taking this threat seriously is a grave error.


i think if you google "Missile Defense Agency", "AEGIS BMD" , or "Ground Based Midcourse Defense" you should get a lot of data.
I agree with limited success..AEGIS being far more successful than THAAD or GMD...but it's hard..it is really rocket science and is the best we have right now.
 
2013-02-23 09:10:08 PM  

Nicholas D. Wolfwood: JDJoeE: Pity Truman had no balls or spine (hey even Roosevelt didn't read him in on the Manhattan project...)

Wait...  According to you, the *ONLY* man in history to order the use of nuclear weapons in anger has "no balls or spine"?!?!?!

Really?  You want to stick with that?


anger?  it was smart.  he did what he was told
 
2013-02-23 09:14:25 PM  

Mr. Eugenides: Summa cum loudly: Mr. Eugenides: Glancing Blow: Do they have rockets that can reach the US? Yes, within 5 years - some think now.

As soon as you have the ability to put something in orbit, you can hit anywhere on earth.

You do realize how utterly and completely wrong you are, right?

Honestly, no, I don't.  A shallow north-south orbit can be de-orbited anywhere on the globe.  So once you have the tech to put something into orbit you have the tech to drop it anywhere.  How is that wrong?


from my laymans perspective:  putting it into orbit means giving it enough boost and in the proper direction. ICBMS do not go into orbit, they are fired and then they "coast" in a paraballa (sp?  terminology?) until they hit what they are going after.  The end game is the hardest part.
I think weaponized satellites are a UN violation also.
 
2013-02-23 09:14:53 PM  

Glancing Blow: Do they have nuclear weapons?  Yes.
Do they have rockets?  Yes.
Do they have the ability to place nuclear weapons on rockets?  Yes, within 5 years.
Do they have rockets that can reach Japan?  Yes.
Do they have rockets that can reach the US?  Yes, within 5 years - some think now.
Can the US respond with nuclear weapons?  No, not without massive radioactive fallout on Japan.

Argue with the details, but the day will come in the not too distant future when they can and may launch nuclear missiles.


There are nuclear weapons that do not leave significant radioactive fallout, and they are in the US's arsenal.
 
2013-02-23 09:14:56 PM  

phojo1946: Everyone keeps underestimating the North Koreans, just as we did with the Japanese prior to December 7th, 1941 and with the Viet Cong & North Vietnamese in 1965 when Johnson sent in the Marines.   We must not go off on our own dreams about these people...they were bastards to fight against in 1951-53 ands will  be so again as they have been training for the day they can take us on since then...training for 60 years.

What they are going to do is build missiles to reach the US and then put nukes on them.  When they get to this point, they are going to come rushing out of thosse tunnels thay have been building fdor the past 60 years under the DMZ and hit the South with all they've got as well as telling the US not to interfere or they will fire their missiles at LA, San Francisco, et al.  Do you really think Obama has the cajones to risk the US cities then?  Especially not LA/Hollywood as that is one of his core supporter areas.  He couldn't get re-elected again if he loses Hollywood.  This is what lil Kim is planning..get nukes, invade the South and blackmail the US.

Obama is not goinga to do anything about it and then will retreat when threatened.  Just remember, you saw it here first!


2/10 a little heavy on the Obama lack of resolve.
 
2013-02-23 09:15:04 PM  
i2.ytimg.com
 
Displayed 50 of 214 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report