If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Jerusalem Post)   Iran is building 16 new nuclear processing plants and announces discovery of large new uranium deposits. Totally for peaceful purposes, of course   (jpost.com) divider line 234
    More: Scary, Atomic Energy Organization, Iran, uranium deposits, uranium enrichment, Danny Ayalon, Caspian Sea, Sea of Oman, mining  
•       •       •

2512 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Feb 2013 at 1:21 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



234 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-24 03:30:20 PM

Amos Quito: Learn the difference between "Semites" and Zionists, Tappy.


Always hilarious coming from Fark's resident anti-semite.
You mean like you blamed the jews for the deaths in Holodomor ? "rationalizing" the slaughter of jews by Ukrainians as revenge against the jews ?
Farking hilarious anti-semitism bullshiat but the icing on the cake was when a  Lithuanian  farker posted that you are talking nonsense.

Blaming the jews for their own slaughter is classic anti-semitism. Especially when pulling that kind of lying bullshiat out of your ass.

Amos Quito: Theories" implies that they are merely conjecture, and not based on historically accurate evidence.


You mean like your conspiracy bullshiat based on out of context quotes ?

Amos Quito: How much memory do you believe your imaginary "files" might require?


You must hate google site search with a passion. With it i can pull out all your anti-semitic gems:

Amos Quito: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion ? based on fact! we can't discredit that fine piece of work just because a tiny bit of it is a forgery..

Amos Quito:The Holocaust was a zionist conspiracy! You see there was this zionist scheme..

Amod Quito:The revolution in Egypt ?  It was Israel all along. A Mossad job.

Amos Quito: some more Zionists Holocaust scheming.

Did you know that Google was founded by jews ? this is part of the conspiracy!

Amos Quito: sometimes wonder if your delusions run so deep that you actually believe them.


Amos Quito: Israel is behind JFK's murder.

Tell us again how the Jews caused WWI and WWII, are behind 9/11, JFK's murder but do it in your distinctive style by insinuating only so when people call you out on your anti-semitism you can roll your eyes and say 'but i never said that!' like a retarded child.  <--- a prevention clause, because predictable anti-semite is predictable.
 
2013-02-24 03:33:56 PM

Uncle Tractor: "Iran is not going to nuke Israel because 20% of the israeli population is muslim" is not the same as "muslims won't hurt each other."


Yes, yes it is. Unless you meant that the 20% of muslim population are not muslim.
You farked up, royally. Why is it so hard to admit it ?
 
2013-02-24 05:52:16 PM

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Learn the difference between "Semites" and Zionists, Tappy.

Always hilarious coming from Fark's resident anti-semite.
You mean like you blamed the jews for the deaths in Holodomor ? "rationalizing" the slaughter of jews by Ukrainians as revenge against the jews ?



There was no mention of "Jews" anywhere in that post, Tappy. Are you suffering from dementia, or simply pathological liar?


TappingTheVein: Farking hilarious anti-semitism bullshiat but the icing on the cake was when a Lithuanian farker posted that you are talking nonsense.



And now a link to a post where vygramul is answering DavidVincent? Are you suffering from dementia, or simply pathological liar?

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Theories" implies that they are merely conjecture, and not based on historically accurate evidence.

You mean like your conspiracy bullshiat based on out of context quotes ?


And as "evidence" you link to one of your own posts (with links to more of your own posts - with links to yet more of your own posts) - ring around the rosies, Tappy?  Are you suffering from dementia, or simply pathological liar?


 

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: How much memory do you believe your imaginary "files" might require?

You must hate google site search with a passion. With it i can pull out all your anti-semitic gems:



LOL, Tappy.  Are you suffering from dementia, or simply pathological liar?


 

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion ? based on fact! we can't discredit that fine piece of work just because a tiny bit of it is a forgery..


And now a link to a 120 post thread where I said nothing even remotely similar to what you claim, Tappy? Starting to look more like pathological liar.


TappingTheVein: Amos Quito:The Holocaust was a zionist conspiracy! You see there was this zionist scheme..


And (again) as "evidence" you link to one of your own posts (again with links to more of your own posts)  as "proof", Tappy? Yep, starting to look more like pathological liar.


TappingTheVein: Amod Quito:The revolution in Egypt ? It was Israel all along. A Mossad job.


CORRECTION: "a CIA/Mossad controlled "changing of the guard". But congratulations on finally saying something  semi-relevant, Tappy.  Stopped clock syndrome?


TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: some more Zionists Holocaust scheming.


AAANNND yet (again) as "evidence" you link to one of your own posts (again with links to more of your own posts)  as "proof", Tappy? Yep, starting to look more like pathological liar.


TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Israel is behind JFK's murder.



You really believe that Israel was behind the assassination of JFK, Tappy? Sounds like a wild-eyed theory to me.


Do you know why I reposted ALL of your (worthless) links in my reply? Because they are worthless, Tappy. Your accusations are a hollow and impotent as your cranium.

I'm still not quite sure whether you're a pathological liar or simply delusional, but you certainly seem to be frustrated.

Ever considered anxyolitics? Maybe antipsychotics?
 
2013-02-24 06:04:23 PM

TappingTheVein: Uncle Tractor: "Iran is not going to nuke Israel because 20% of the israeli population is muslim" is not the same as "muslims won't hurt each other."

Yes, yes it is. Unless you meant that the 20% of muslim population are not muslim.
You farked up, royally. Why is it so hard to admit it ?


Who do you think you're fooling?
 
2013-02-24 06:16:42 PM

dragonchild: That doesn't mean it's not still "experimental".  Both Russia and the U.S. made a few, just to see if they could, but the results weren't anything to write home about, so they didn't get too far past the experiments.


Actually, the SADM and it's slightly larger cousin, the MADM, were deployed from 1962 to 1970 with US Special Operations Forces in Europe. They were not just experiments. The Davy Crocket system was used from 1956 to 1968 in West Germany, as well, deployed with the 55th and 56th infantry platoons of the 82nd Airborne. NATO forces on the Euro-Soviet borders also utilized nuclear anti-tank mine designs that were miniturized.

The Soviets had their equivalents in service until the early 80s. The difference is that the US and NATO know where all of these are. The soviets have lost around a thousand nuclear warheads of ALL design types since the 1990s and the breakup.

dragonchild:For a suitcase bomb?  You really, really don't understand how nuclear weapons work.  Will there be fallout?  Yes, but I'd worry more about smoke inhalation.

No, you really don't know how Nuclear weapons work, do you? Any nuclear detonation will produce a massive local burst of gamma radiation which will be just as lethal to unshielded people as the overpressure wave will be. You also have Alpha and Beta to worry about, from inhalation and dermal exposure specifically. What you mention as "smoke inhalation" is the effect of fallout - namely the massive amounts of Alpha and beta particles produced.

dragonchild: Probably because they don't understand physics.  I do.  The worry about a dirty bomb is that 99.99% of the damage will be done by the media.  Oh, radiation poisoning will kill a few people, but the same few would've died if the bomb was a mixture of C-4 and nails because of their proximity to the blast.  It's not like all nukes create this magical cloud of death that has no correlation to blast yield whatsoever.

I mean, hey, if you wanna hide under your bed worried about backpack nukes, go ahead, but if you're gonna spread your fear like a disease then STFU.  You're far more likely to get killed by your own food because of the USDA falling down on the job.


Yeah, that's nice you "understand physics and all", but that's the whole point about using a dirty weapon, long term heath effects and short term panic. The fact that you're pointing and laughing at people who don't know as much as you ignores the reality of the situation. Panic can be just as powerful a destructive weapon as a nuclear missile.

As far as "fear of suitcase nukes", the fact of the matter is that miniaturized nuclear weapons have been in existence for the last 50 years, and used for the exact purpose that YOU claimed they didn't exist for outside of a lab. Yes, they ARE a concern to emergency planners because of the amount of devastation they can inflict because they were designed specifically for that. The SADM was designed to destroy large buildings, power plants, dams, and other major infrastructure sites that are generally considered "secure".
 
2013-02-24 07:01:47 PM

Uncle Tractor: Who do you think you're fooling?


Why do you keep insisting that you didn't say something when the post where you did say it is right here ?
 
2013-02-24 07:12:28 PM

TappingTheVein: Uncle Tractor: Who do you think you're fooling?

Why do you keep insisting that you didn't say something when the post where you did say it is right here ?



Pathological Liar - Definition

Pathological liar refers to a liar that is compulsive or impulsive, lies on a regular basis and is unable to control their lying despite of foreseeing inevitable negative consequences or ultimate disclosure of the lie. Generally lies told by a pathological liar have self-defeating quality to them and don't serve the long term material needs of the person. Therefore pathological lying is lying that is caused by a pathology, occurs on a regular basis, is compulsive or impulsive & uncontrolled, and has self-defeating, self-trapping quality to it.

[...]

Lots of great info there, Tappy.

I suggest you print it and take a copy to your therapist.


/Good luck
 
2013-02-25 03:23:13 AM

Amos Quito: Lots of great info there, Tappy.

I suggest you print it and take a copy to your therapist.


Hard not to notice how you gave up on trying to squirm your way out of the anti-semitic conspiracy extravaganza and instead focused on  Uncle Tractor's reading comprehension problems.

Oh and FYI: "Iran is not going to nuke Israel. Why? Because 20% of the israeli population is muslim " means Iran is not going to attack muslims. This is kindergarten level reading comprehension so i understand why you both seem to have a difficult time with this.
 
2013-02-25 04:19:05 AM
TappingTheVein:
Oh and FYI: "Iran is not going to nuke Israel. Why? Because 20% of the israeli population is muslim " means Iran is not going to attack muslims.

No, it means Iran isn't going to nuke muslims. "Nuke" is not synonymous with "attack." You need to work on your reading skills.

 This is kindergarten level reading comprehension so i understand why you both seem to have a difficult time with this.

upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-02-25 05:56:24 AM

Uncle Tractor: No, it means Iran isn't going to nuke muslims. "Nuke" is not synonymous with "attack." You need to work on your reading skills.


And you need to finally grasp that rationality and sanity are not the strong points of islamic fundamentalist nutjobs and when they can they will attackin any means at their disposal. Any means, that include nukes, chemical weapons, anything.

Especially, and i'm sure you had no farking clue about this, when said muslims belong to what they perceive as worse than infidels (shia vs. sunni). We are talking about people with the mentality of joy over  blowing themselves up for the chance of murdering women and children, like i said you are extremely naive if you think they will hold back when they have their hands on the most powerful weapon, especially, and this is something you have a very hard time getting, when they themselves won't attack but use one of their proxy jihadist terrorist organizations.

And yes when you said Iran won't nuke (attack, harm, mutilate, insert whatever, it doesn't matter) them because of a large population of muslims, you had no farking clue what you were talking about.
 
2013-02-25 07:26:07 AM

TappingTheVein: And you need to finally grasp that rationality and sanity are not the strong points of islamic fundamentalist nutjobs and when they can they will attackin any means at their disposal. Any means, that include nukes, chemical weapons, anything.

Especially, and i'm sure you had no farking clue about this, when said muslims belong to what they perceive as worse than infidels (shia vs. sunni). We are talking about people with the mentality of joy over  blowing themselves up for the chance of murdering women and children, like i said you are extremely naive if you think they will hold back when they have their hands on the most powerful weapon, especially, and this is something you have a very hard time getting, when they themselves won't attack but use one of their proxy jihadist terrorist organizations.

And yes when you said Iran won't nuke (attack, harm, mutilate, insert whatever, it doesn't matter) them because of a large population of muslims, you had no farking clue what you were talking about.


Nuke is not synonymous with attack. Never has been and will never be, and there is nothing you can do about it.
 
2013-02-25 07:34:25 AM

Uncle Tractor: Nuke is not synonymous with attack. Never has been and will never be, and there is nothing you can do about it.


Again, with visual aids:

And you need to finally grasp that rationality and sanity are not the strong points of islamic fundamentalist nutjobs and when they can they will  attackin any means at their disposal.Any means, that include nukes, chemical weapons, anything.

Especially, and i'm sure you had no farking clue about this, when said muslims belong to what they perceive as worse than infidels (shia vs. sunni). We are talking about people with the mentality of joy over  blowing themselves up for the chance of murdering women and children, like i said you are extremely naive if you think they will hold back when they have their hands on the most powerful weapon, especially, and this is something you have a very hard time getting, when they themselves won't attack but use one of their proxy jihadist terrorist organizations.
 
2013-02-25 08:29:04 AM

TappingTheVein: And you need to finally grasp that rationality and sanity are not the strong points of islamic fundamentalist nutjobs and when they can they will  attackin any means at their disposal.Any means, that include nukes, chemical weapons, anything.


Spin like a top if you want, bold it, underscore it, big it, it won't change the fact that you seem to think "nuke" is synonymous with "attack." No amount of dodging, goalshifting, strawmen, ad hominems, belittling, or like tactics will change that fact.

You farked up, plain and simple. Nuke is not synonymous with attack.
 
2013-02-25 09:49:32 AM

Uncle Tractor: Spin like a top if you want, bold it, underscore it, big it, it won't change the fact that you seem to think "nuke" is synonymous with "attack."


Look, this is very very simple.
If it kills the infidel, it's all good. Nuke, as horrific as it is including all the applications of it, everything as i explained 345 times now, as long as it defeats the infidels is A-OK,
Especially, and this is a very very important point so pay close attention, if they (the iraninas) are not the ones using it because they have a habit of using proxy jihadist terrorist organizations to carry out their "jihad".

You're simply too naive to comprehend this sort of mentality and not aware of the ruthless horrific cruelty muslims have no problems committing on each other. Do some research on what is happening right now in Syria, it's a good clue.

Uncle Tractor: You farked up, plain and simple. Nuke is not synonymous with attack.


And you need to finally grasp that rationality and sanity are not the strong points of islamic fundamentalist nutjobs and when they can they willattackin any means at their disposal.Any means, thatinclude nukes, chemical weapons, anything.

Notice the including nukes part ? is it too subtle for you ?
And to think this little debate started when you made the hilarious comment that iranians won't attack (Nuke, Burn, Annahilate, insert whatever, it doesn't matter) Israel because of the 20% of muslims there. Farking hysterical.
 
2013-02-25 11:01:42 AM

TappingTheVein: Look, this is very very simple.


Yes, it is very simple: You think "nuke" is a synonym for "attack."
 
2013-02-25 11:18:27 AM

Uncle Tractor: Yes, it is very simple: You think "nuke" is a synonym for "attack."


No, i'm saying they'll have no issues with using this weapon. I explained about 14 times.
And you made the stupid statement about not attacking/nuking/burning/ etc.doesn't matter, because they are muslims, indicating that you have no farking clue.
 
2013-02-25 01:04:39 PM

TappingTheVein: No, i'm saying they'll have no issues with using this weapon. I explained about 14 times.
And you made the stupid statement about not attacking/nuking/burning/ etc.doesn't matter, because they are muslims, indicating that you have no farking clue.


This is what you claim I said:

TappingTheVein: 'but they won't hurt other muslims!'


...But this is what I actually said:

Uncle Tractor: Iran is not going to nuke Israel. Why? Because 20% of the israeli population is muslim. Not only that, the fallout from a nuke in Israel will almost certainly end up in a muslim country or five ...or maybe in Europe. The iranian leaders might be crazy, but they're not that crazy. After all, they've managed to stay in power ever since 1979(?).


In short; you made shiat up, you got caught making shiat up, and now you're squirming like a hagfish trying to rid itself of excess slime.
 
2013-02-25 01:22:38 PM

Uncle Tractor: In short; you made shiat up, you got caught making shiat up, and now you're squirming like a hagfish trying to rid itself of excess slime.


Yes, i made it up that you said "Iran is not going to nuke Israel. Why? Because 20% of the israeli population is muslim".
 
2013-02-25 02:58:34 PM

Amos Quito: TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Learn the difference between "Semites" and Zionists, Tappy.



Wow. You're a whole bunch of crazy, you know that right? If you're smart, and it appears you're semi intelligent, you'll go and get some professional help for whatever the hell is wrong with you. You're really not normal at all?
 
2013-02-25 05:11:35 PM

TappingTheVein: Uncle Tractor: In short; you made shiat up, you got caught making shiat up, and now you're squirming like a hagfish trying to rid itself of excess slime.

Yes, i made it up that you said "Iran is not going to nuke Israel. Why? Because 20% of the israeli population is muslim".


upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-02-25 05:37:03 PM
Uncle Tractor:  [upload.wikimedia.org image 320x193]

i.qkme.me
 
2013-02-25 10:37:44 PM

indarwinsshadow: Amos Quito: TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Learn the difference between "Semites" and Zionists, Tappy.


Wow. You're a whole bunch of crazy, you know that right? If you're smart, and it appears you're semi intelligent, you'll go and get some professional help for whatever the hell is wrong with you. You're really not normal at all?



I have to question: On what input did you base you assessment?

Tell you what, friend, if you you disagree with some (all?) of my observations, why not name some specifics, and we'll discuss them individually, and in their rational/historical context.

Otherwise just read the linked threads and the references I provide therein for your personal edification.

Mmmkay?

:-)
 
2013-02-26 09:58:35 AM

Amos Quito: indarwinsshadow: Amos Quito: TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Learn the difference between "Semites" and Zionists, Tappy.


Wow. You're a whole bunch of crazy, you know that right? If you're smart, and it appears you're semi intelligent, you'll go and get some professional help for whatever the hell is wrong with you. You're really not normal at all?


I have to question: On what input did you base you assessment?

Tell you what, friend, if you you disagree with some (all?) of my observations, why not name some specifics, and we'll discuss them individually, and in their rational/historical context.

Otherwise just read the linked threads and the references I provide therein for your personal edification.

Mmmkay?

:-)


You're kidding right? You know you're not normal. No one in their sane mind blames one group for all of the worlds ills. It's not just ludicrous, it's an illness. I don't have to diagnose you. In my job as a police officer, I meet messed up people everyday. They don't know they're messed up, but everyone else does. It's a sad situation. You don't know how mentally ill you are, you just assume the problem is everyone else. I'm not putting you down when I say you should go an talk with someone. You really should. There's lots of free help available at hospitals and help lines. You'd feel better, and maybe get the help you need. You don't realize how ill you are.
 
2013-02-26 11:06:45 AM

indarwinsshadow: You're kidding right? You know you're not normal.



LOL! Define "normal". Thanks.


indarwinsshadow: No one in their sane mind blames one group for all of the worlds ills.



LOL!  Which "group" do you presume I "blame"? And for which "ills"? Please be specific.


indarwinsshadow: I don't have to diagnose you. In my job as a police officer

...


I hope you're joking here. If you are a "police officer", you're a piss-poor example. The stuff of nightmares, dude. I asked you above to cite specific examples of my observations that you feel may be incorrect or "crazy", and we'll discuss them - you know - examine the EVIDENCE. But instead you belch out further unfounded accusations so ludicrous that you make Tappy sound rational.

If you ARE a cop, you should turn in your badge post-haste. God only knows how many lives you've destroyed with your reckless and unprofessional methodology and behavior.

Again I ask, on what "evidence" are you basing your assessments? Find specifics - not Tappy's inane mumblings, but material that I have written that you believe to be incorrect or historically inaccurate, and we'll discuss.

Otherwise kindly STFU, troll.

And if you ARE a cop, for God's sake quit, as you clearly lack the minimal observational skills and sound judgement necessary to carry out your duties in the public interest.

Have a nice day!
 
2013-02-26 11:10:59 AM
Not a troll Amos. I see people like you everyday. I don't get upset when they yell at me, and no, you aren't a normal guy. Haven't you read some of the replies back to your insults. You can't be that ignorant that it doesn't bother you or make you wonder? I really sincerely hope you do get some help. Good luck, I mean that.
 
2013-02-26 12:07:39 PM

indarwinsshadow: Not a troll Amos. I see people like you everyday. I don't get upset when they yell at me, and no, you aren't a normal guy. Haven't you read some of the replies back to your insults.



Ah, there we are.

As I presumed, you haven't bothered to read anything that I have written, but are basing your assessments solely on the shrieks and howls of others who don't appreciate certain subjects being broached, and certain facts brought to light. When I ask these "critics" to rationally discuss these facts, they inevitably decline to do so and opting instead for baseless accusations, misquotes / misinterpretations, and, like you, launching ad hominem attacks.


indarwinsshadow: You can't be that ignorant that it doesn't bother you or make you wonder?



I am  a student of history. If you actually read the material I write, you will see that it is all fully cited and referenced, and that my sources are unbiased and impeccable. Certain historical facts may tend to irritate those dogmatically obsessed with one ideological / political agenda or another. That these (predictably) gibber and howl has no bearing on the legitimacy of the observations.

Facts are facts. Why should their impotent indignant rage "bother" me?

And yes, I do derive a bit of morbid pleasure from biatch-slapping these lying, libelous whiners with a bit of snide sarcasm.

Is that wrong?
 
2013-02-26 01:01:59 PM

Amos Quito: I am  a student of history. If you actually read the material I write, you will see that it is all fully cited and referenced, and that my sources are unbiased and impeccable


Ok, that made me fall off my chair laughing. You mean all the lying bullshiat anti-semitic conspiracy nuttery ? man.. thanks for the laugh.
Where did you study history ? Klan University ?

indarwinsshadowis right. Maybe therapy will do you good. How about going to an AA(*) meeting.

/*Antisemites Anonymous
 
2013-02-26 01:25:37 PM

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: I am  a student of history. If you actually read the material I write, you will see that it is all fully cited and referenced, and that my sources are unbiased and impeccable

Ok, that made me fall off my chair laughing. You mean all the lying bullshiat anti-semitic conspiracy nuttery ? man.. thanks for the laugh.
Where did you study history ? Klan University ?

indarwinsshadowis right. Maybe therapy will do you good. How about going to an AA(*) meeting.

/*Antisemites Anonymous



LOL!

You're always good for a laugh, Tappy.

I would invite you to discuss your spittle-strewn allegations, but you have repeatedly shown (including in your "discussions" with Uncle Tractor in this thread) that you are incapable of rational discourse, and immediately launch in to tirades of misquotes, misrepresentations, outright lies and/or fantastic fabrications - apparently deluding yourself into believing that the oft repeated lie becomes "truth".


/Keep on posting, Poster Child
 
2013-02-26 02:34:41 PM

Amos Quito: I would invite you to discuss your spittle-strewn allegations, but you have repeatedly shown (including in your "discussions" with Uncle Tractor in this thread) that you are incapable of rational discourse


Um, sir, your anti-semitic conspiracy bullcrap is posted right here in this thread for all to see, in details, with proof against your lying anti-semitic bullshiat.
Don't seek professional help. I like my anti-semites crazy as shiathouse rat.

Amos Quito: immediately launch in to tirades of misquotes, misrepresentations, outright lies and/or fantastic fabrications - apparently deluding yourself into believing that the oft repeated lie becomes "truth".


Which is exactly what you did as explained in details in my posts. I'll add 'psychological projection' to the diagnosis.
 
2013-02-26 02:50:08 PM

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: I would invite you to discuss your spittle-strewn allegations, but you have repeatedly shown (including in your "discussions" with Uncle Tractor in this thread) that you are incapable of rational discourse

Um, sir, your anti-semitic conspiracy bullcrap is posted right here in this thread for all to see, in details, with proof against your lying anti-semitic bullshiat.
Don't seek professional help. I like my anti-semites crazy as shiathouse rat.

Amos Quito: immediately launch in to tirades of misquotes, misrepresentations, outright lies and/or fantastic fabrications - apparently deluding yourself into believing that the oft repeated lie becomes "truth".

Which is exactly what you did as explained in details in my posts. I'll add 'psychological projection' to the diagnosis.



And as "proof" Tappy  ONCE AGAIN links to one of his OWN POSTS that link to MORE of his own posts which in turn link to MORE of his own posts ...


i.snag.gy


What TappingTheVein might look like.
 
2013-02-26 03:10:17 PM

Amos Quito: And as "proof" Tappy  ONCE AGAIN links to one of his OWN POSTS that link to MORE of his own posts which in turn link to MORE of his own posts ...


Nope, i gave detailed proof for your insane anti-semitic conspiracy bullshiat, it's right here in this thread. Keep lying to yourself it it helps, i don't mind.
I gave links to my own posts earlier because i already refuted and explained your lying anti-semtic bullshiat in detail, later i provided direct links for the challenged reader.

You, of course, chose to ignore that part.

AmosQuito looks like a combination of:

www.rickross.com

And this:

guardyoureyes.org
 
2013-02-26 03:17:29 PM
TappingTheVein:

Amos Quito:


I'm starting to think the two of you are the same person i.e. Sybil, Norman Bates or Gollum. Nobody argues this much with someone they know will never agree with them. You should really ignore each other if you are truly two different 'real' people.
 
2013-02-26 03:24:53 PM

George Babbitt: Nobody argues this much with someone they know will never agree with them.


You do if they are a great source of amusement.
Real anti-semites are rare on Fark and  his anti-semitic bullshiat conspiracies are a delight.
 
2013-02-26 06:41:01 PM

George Babbitt: TappingTheVein:

Amos Quito:

I'm starting to think the two of you are the same person i.e. Sybil, Norman Bates or Gollum. Nobody argues this much with someone they know will never agree with them.



Tappy doesn't disagree with me, George. He knows I'm right, and that's what pisses him off.

:-)


/Besides, he's more entertaining than worm farm
//Nowhere near as intelligent
///But more entertaining
 
Displayed 34 of 234 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report