Smidge204: cgraves67: Why would the company even run the risk of reusing those containers? They should all be melted down and reformed.Assuming that's even possible with the type of plastic used (not all plastics can be recycled), they'd have to deal with the labels and caps for each bottle before they can be processed. And each time they are broken down and re-used, the quality of the plastic degrades, often significantly. It's easier and cheaper to sterilize and refill them. There's also nothing wrong with that approach 99.9% of the time... until some dipsh*t decides to return a bottle they used for holding hazardous chemicals and nobody catches it.Perhaps a simple new rule: Since there zero reason to remove the cap entirely, use that as evidence of tampering. If the cap is damaged or missing, no refund on the deposit.=Smidge=
cgraves67: Why would the company even run the risk of reusing those containers? They should all be melted down and reformed.
Want to see behind the curtain? Try
It's how we feed the squirrel
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Sep 24 2017 12:25:41
Runtime: 0.156 sec (155 ms)