If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Digital Spy)   Kristen Stewart voted the least sexy actress working today. LINE   (digitalspy.com) divider line 257
    More: Obvious, Kristen Stewart, Mischa Barton, comedy drama, Hilary Swank, Uma Thurman, Seth MacFarlane, Sarah Jessica Parker, Lindsay Lohan  
•       •       •

15751 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Feb 2013 at 8:35 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



257 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-20 02:29:14 PM
Actually, let me boil it down this way:

If you don't see the difference between being sexy and just being pretty, then you're probably a generally superficial person who cares way more about looks than about attitude, personality, mannerisms, etc.

Stewart is undoubtedly pretty. She's also bland and uninteresting. She's a pretty hunk of wood, for all intents and purposes. Some of us  like partners who actually show some sort of facial expression or signs of life when they're with us. Apparently, some other folks think being a dud is okay as long as they look good doing it.

/Or, as I said earlier,  superficiality.
 
2013-02-20 02:30:13 PM

AngryJailhouseFistfark: cman: WhippingBoy: cman: [www4.pictures.stylebistro.com image 464x594]

Really how in gods name could she lose to that?

That is the unsexiest woman in hollywood

Is that Claire Danes? If so, then yes. You win +1 internetz.
She is definitely the unsexiest woman in hollywood.

Close
Patricia Arquette

Maybe it was the tall beer I had at lunch, but I read that as Cloaca Arquette.


Ewwwwwwwww....
 
2013-02-20 02:30:44 PM

Madbassist1: meanmutton: Madbassist1: meanmutton: I still think that you'd be hard pressed to find anyone less sexy than her who is even remotely near her age.

That's farking ridiculous.

The only one mentioned in the thread in over 120 comments was Gabourey Sidibe, who absolutely counts on the less sexy and is near her in age (29 versus 22) but really isn't much of a "working actress" -- she's had three small parts in the last three years.

If it's "farking ridiculous", go ahead -- give me a few names of working actresses who are under, say, 35 who are obviously less sexy than Kristen Stewart.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 800x1197][graphics8.nytimes.com image 600x380]


I can't speak for the one with the tattoo, she's rather homely and I haven't seen her do anything so I will not judge. Homely is not a deal-breaker, though, as the Sexy v. Attractive camp is asserting.

Kristen Schaal from the John Stewart show is no kind of classical beauty by any stretch, but watching her do her schtick doth emboner me mightily. She's sexy as all get-out and I suspect she would give you The Business in the sack. Lemme tellya, sport, between Kristen Schaal and Kristen Stewart I'd take Schall 10 times out of 10 for sexy.

As for sexy versus attractive I'll say this about that: Classically beautiful features can get you on the cover of the fashion and glamour magazines, but how do you move? How do you talk? Is there any erotic appeal in whatever it is you do? Because if not, you're strictly "attractive", and nothing more. Meanwhile, if you may not be cover-model "media ready" beautiful, but there's a vibe you give off that says you know what you like, you're in touch with your sensuality, and you know how to have a good time, well, that's about ten-thousand times sexier than the pretty-but-dead-inside covergirl.

Give me the homely babe who loves to fark over the prettiest-girl-in-town who lays there like a corpse and can't find her pussy with both hands. Any day.
 
2013-02-20 02:35:42 PM

Madbassist1: meanmutton: Madbassist1: meanmutton: I still think that you'd be hard pressed to find anyone less sexy than her who is even remotely near her age.

That's farking ridiculous.

The only one mentioned in the thread in over 120 comments was Gabourey Sidibe, who absolutely counts on the less sexy and is near her in age (29 versus 22) but really isn't much of a "working actress" -- she's had three small parts in the last three years.

If it's "farking ridiculous", go ahead -- give me a few names of working actresses who are under, say, 35 who are obviously less sexy than Kristen Stewart.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 800x1197][graphics8.nytimes.com image 600x380]


I don't think you can really count Kristen Schaal. She's more of a comedian/voice actress. She's been on a couple of shows, but not as a sex symbol.
 
2013-02-20 02:42:26 PM

Snargi: Farce-Side: I'm upset that Lucy Liu is on that list...sure she's getting up there in years as far as hollywood actresses go, but she's ASIAN.  Come on man!!!  Auto-hotness!!

Lucy Liu is an ugly Asian...


i1247.photobucket.com

Yep she sure is....It is alright to be openly gay in this day and age sir!
 
2013-02-20 02:43:49 PM
I suppose she has "sharp knees" too?
 
2013-02-20 02:43:56 PM
The list would be better titled "Women Hollywood is Trying to Pass Off as Sexy that Just Aren't." And the difference between sexy and pretty is the key.  Kristin Stewart, like Shania Twain, is beautiful but she wouldn't know sexy if it came up and smacked her on the ass with a riding crop.
 
2013-02-20 02:45:53 PM
I don't find her pretty in the slightest. She's average. Plain Jane. Pale, no remarkable features, and a bland expression - zero smile. I don't see the appeal but farkers love these types of chicks.
 
2013-02-20 02:50:29 PM

ZeroCorpse: Okay, let me rephrase.

A person can be sexy but not beautiful.
A person can be beautiful but not sexy.
A person can be both sexy AND beautiful.

There are a lot of people who are not pretty in the classical sense, but are damned sexy.
There are a lot of people who are not sexy in any way, but are very pretty.

If you can't see this or acknowledge it, then you have a strange perception of the world or you haven't gotten around very much. You seem to think "sexy" merely means you'd like to have sex with someone because of how they look. You seem to be completely abandoning mannerisms, facial expressions, the way they carry themselves, and the things they do.

A sexy person is skilled at seduction, regardless of looks (as long as they aren't hideous, of course).
An unsexy person may be nice to look at, but when they move, talk, or try to interact with you, they come off as uninteresting, boring, dull, clumsy, awkward, or bland.

And if you don't know the difference, then you just haven't been in the company of people who fit these descriptions. I don't know what else to say. Most people can tell there IS a difference between being sexy and just being pretty.

They're not mutually-exclusive, but they aren't necessarily connected, either.


Changing which words are being used doesn't help your case.   No one was talking about her "beauty" - just her sexual attractiveness.  More than half the actresses out there are less sexy (aka less sexually attractive).  That is the point of discussion...not "beauty."
 
2013-02-20 02:50:48 PM
is she talented? No.

Is she hot? Yes.

Obviously yes.

If you disagree you are gay, there is nothing wrong with that - but your opinion has no bearing on this matter.
 
2013-02-20 02:52:00 PM
weknowmemes.com

Cheating Whore thread?
 
2013-02-20 02:57:21 PM

IamAwake: ZeroCorpse: Okay, let me rephrase.

A person can be sexy but not beautiful.
A person can be beautiful but not sexy.
A person can be both sexy AND beautiful.

There are a lot of people who are not pretty in the classical sense, but are damned sexy.
There are a lot of people who are not sexy in any way, but are very pretty.

If you can't see this or acknowledge it, then you have a strange perception of the world or you haven't gotten around very much. You seem to think "sexy" merely means you'd like to have sex with someone because of how they look. You seem to be completely abandoning mannerisms, facial expressions, the way they carry themselves, and the things they do.

A sexy person is skilled at seduction, regardless of looks (as long as they aren't hideous, of course).
An unsexy person may be nice to look at, but when they move, talk, or try to interact with you, they come off as uninteresting, boring, dull, clumsy, awkward, or bland.

And if you don't know the difference, then you just haven't been in the company of people who fit these descriptions. I don't know what else to say. Most people can tell there IS a difference between being sexy and just being pretty.

They're not mutually-exclusive, but they aren't necessarily connected, either.

Changing which words are being used doesn't help your case.   No one was talking about her "beauty" - just her sexual attractiveness.  More than half the actresses out there are less sexy (aka less sexually attractive).  That is the point of discussion...not "beauty."


farkability is the word we're looking for. It's more than just looks, but looks are a necessary prerequisite.
 
2013-02-20 02:58:00 PM
Beauty is more than skin deep, being a vapid whore definitely counts against you.  The only reason we even know her name is that she sleeps with directors, and likely anyone else who can help her career.  She made her fame on her back.
 
2013-02-20 03:01:02 PM
That is the ugliest one of all.  Personality and looks
 
2013-02-20 03:02:41 PM
They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone, Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.
 
2013-02-20 03:08:34 PM

Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone, Charlize Theron,  Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.


She was on Hollywood's least sext horses list.
 
2013-02-20 03:16:29 PM
Many of you folk are strange to me, with the expectation that "beautiful and stirring to behold" equals "amazing in bed".

If all you want is a pretty face and a vagina that doesn't fight you, buy a fleshlight and tape a picture of a model to a pillow.
 
2013-02-20 03:18:56 PM

VodkaGimlet: Many of you folk are strange to me, with the expectation that "beautiful and stirring to behold" equals "amazing in bed".

If all you want is a pretty face and a vagina that doesn't fight you, buy a fleshlight and tape a picture of a model to a pillow.


apocalypsecakes.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-02-20 03:21:27 PM
She made her fame on her back.

Her beauty is even more than just skin deep.
 
2013-02-20 03:27:10 PM
In this thread, about 2 posts saying she's sexy because she's pretty, about 180 posts saying that everybody is stupid because they think pretty = sexy.

Listen, if there is any actress at all that you would like to have sex with less than Kristen Stewart, she is not the least sexy actress. That's what sexy is - how much they make you want to have sex with them.
 
2013-02-20 03:42:26 PM

ajt167: In this thread, about 2 posts saying she's sexy because she's pretty, about 180 posts saying that everybody is stupid because they think pretty = sexy.

Listen, if there is any actress at all that you would like to have sex with less than Kristen Stewart, she is not the least sexy actress. That's what sexy is - how much they make you want to have sex with them.


I'm a guy; I'd have sex with a piece of raw liver warmed up in the microwave; doesn't make raw liver sexy...
 
2013-02-20 03:44:19 PM

ZeroCorpse: Okay, let me rephrase.

A person can be sexy but not beautiful.
A person can be beautiful but not sexy.
A person can be both sexy AND beautiful.

There are a lot of people who are not pretty in the classical sense, but are damned sexy.
There are a lot of people who are not sexy in any way, but are very pretty.

If you can't see this or acknowledge it, then you have a strange perception of the world or you haven't gotten around very much. You seem to think "sexy" merely means you'd like to have sex with someone because of how they look. You seem to be completely abandoning mannerisms, facial expressions, the way they carry themselves, and the things they do.

A sexy person is skilled at seduction, regardless of looks (as long as they aren't hideous, of course).
An unsexy person may be nice to look at, but when they move, talk, or try to interact with you, they come off as uninteresting, boring, dull, clumsy, awkward, or bland.

And if you don't know the difference, then you just haven't been in the company of people who fit these descriptions. I don't know what else to say. Most people can tell there IS a difference between being sexy and just being pretty.

They're not mutually-exclusive, but they aren't necessarily connected, either.


So sexy is all about attitude? You can find something as beautiful as hell, but as alluring as a brick?
So, if you put a "come fark me" smile on her face, would that help?
 
2013-02-20 03:44:26 PM

Rev. Skarekroe: Brittany Murphy


Pretty sure she died...
 
2013-02-20 03:48:44 PM

Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone,  Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.


wtf? I'm female and I can see the sexy.

/her and Emily Deschanel, yup.
 
2013-02-20 03:54:15 PM

AngryJailhouseFistfark: As for sexy versus attractive I'll say this about that: Classically beautiful features can get you on the cover of the fashion and glamour magazines, but how do you move? How do you talk? Is there any erotic appeal in whatever it is you do? Because if not, you're strictly "attractive", and nothing more. Meanwhile, if you may not be cover-model "media ready" beautiful, but there's a vibe you give off that says you know what you like, you're in touch with your sensuality, and you know how to have a good time, well, that's about ten-thousand times sexier than the pretty-but-dead-inside covergirl.

Give me the homely babe who loves to fark over the prettiest-girl-in-town who lays there like a corpse and can't find her pussy with both hands. Any day.


Well fark, dude, why didnt you just save me the trouble and say up front that you had made up your mind and not to bother. I can tell I would have put Lassie up there and you'd be making excuses to fark her. Christ. You asked for chicks that werent sexy, I provided them. You can twist into a pretzel all you want saying Schall is more farkable than Stewart, but duuuuude.

Treygreen13: She's been on a couple of shows, but not as a sex symbol.


Is this the new criteria? First it was women...then actresses...now I guess its actresses who are considered sex symbols? WTF.
 
2013-02-20 03:54:51 PM

myne: Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone,  Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.

wtf? I'm female and I can see the sexy.

/her and Emily Deschanel, yup.


I think your sarcasm meter is broken.
 
2013-02-20 03:59:42 PM

WhippingBoy: ajt167: In this thread, about 2 posts saying she's sexy because she's pretty, about 180 posts saying that everybody is stupid because they think pretty = sexy.

Listen, if there is any actress at all that you would like to have sex with less than Kristen Stewart, she is not the least sexy actress. That's what sexy is - how much they make you want to have sex with them.

I'm a guy; I'd have sex with a piece of raw liver warmed up in the microwave; doesn't make raw liver sexy...


Why do you always feel the need to hump raw liver to prove a point? Every damn time it's "you disagree with my ideas on taxation or literature or science stuff? I'll stick my dick into this liver to show you why you're wrong" or some such nonsense.
 
2013-02-20 04:05:30 PM

Madbassist1: myne: Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone,  Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.

wtf? I'm female and I can see the sexy.

/her and Emily Deschanel, yup.

I think your sarcasm meter is broken.


I'd meat her sore chasm, if you know what I mean.
 
2013-02-20 04:07:24 PM

Madbassist1: myne: Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone,  Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.

wtf? I'm female and I can see the sexy.

/her and Emily Deschanel, yup.

I think your sarcasm meter is broken.


Yeah, I stop drinking at work, and look what happens.
*facepalm*
 
2013-02-20 04:10:00 PM

Madbassist1: myne: Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone,  Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.

wtf? I'm female and I can see the sexy.

/her and Emily Deschanel, yup.

I think your sarcasm meter is broken.


myne: Flash314: They didn't even mention any of the real hags of Hollywood, like Emma Stone,  Charlize Theron, Penélope Cruz, Anneliese van der Pol, Drew Barrymore, Hayden Panettiere, or Kate Beckinsale. All of them have sharp knees.

wtf? I'm female and I can see the sexy.

/her and Emily Deschanel, yup.


Something just for you.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mjymf.sarcasmomete r
 
2013-02-20 04:19:08 PM

Madbassist1: Well fark, dude, why didnt you just save me the trouble and say up front that you had made up your mind and not to bother. I can tell I would have put Lassie up there and you'd be making excuses to fark her. Christ. You asked for chicks that werent sexy, I provided them. You can twist into a pretzel all you want saying Schall is more farkable than Stewart, but duuuuude.


It's not that I'd fark anything other than Kristen Stewart (though thanks for offering up Lassie, but that's not my kink). You presented Kristen Shaal as an example of less sexy than Kristen Stewart. I disagreed for the reasons I stated. There was no twisting involved. Tell ya what: You have your way with Kristen Stewart and I'll have mine with Kristen Shaal (in Fantasyland for both of us, of course), and then we'll enjoy a cold, virtual beer and discuss the biatchin' times we had with our respective partners. I suspect we'll both feel like we got the better end of the deal, and that's fine too.
 
2013-02-20 04:40:54 PM
Not unsexy, just untalented at the one thing she is supposed to be good at - acting.
 
2013-02-20 04:45:37 PM

Snargi: Farce-Side: I'm upset that Lucy Liu is on that list...sure she's getting up there in years as far as hollywood actresses go, but she's ASIAN.  Come on man!!!  Auto-hotness!!

Lucy Liu is an ugly Asian...


This is a gorgeous Asian...
www.besthdwallpaper.com
 
2013-02-20 04:51:05 PM

Slackfumasta: Of course, Kristen has been on the decline since Panic Room.

[www.teenidols4you.com image 800x457]


HOLY CRAP!  You just blew my mind...that is Kristen Stewart!!  WTF!!
 
2013-02-20 05:07:37 PM
who the hell came up with this? those stupid, ignorant----what? really? ok I'm being told that I read Kristen Stewart but thought it said Kristin schall from the daily show....

//puts down torch
//puts down pirchfork
 
2013-02-20 05:16:30 PM

Slackfumasta: Of course, Kristen has been on the decline since Panic Room.

[www.teenidols4you.com image 800x457]


I thought that was a boy.
 
2013-02-20 05:51:22 PM

deschinc: bark_atda_moon: Did Sarah Jessica Parker retire?

She's been put to pasture.


She's #3 on the list.


illbeinmybunk: who the hell came up with this? those stupid, ignorant----what? really? ok I'm being told that I read Kristen Stewart but thought it said Kristin schall from the daily show....

//puts down torch
//puts down pirchfork


I find Kristen Schaal hot in a really inexplicable way.


Evil Mackerel: Slackfumasta: Of course, Kristen has been on the decline since Panic Room.

[www.teenidols4you.com image 800x457]

I thought that was a boy.


We all did.
 
2013-02-20 06:23:10 PM
I totally transposed Kristen Johnson and French Stewart from 3rd Rock when I read the headline and was very confused.

/yes, yes...my lawn; get off it
 
2013-02-20 06:43:49 PM

EyeballKid: I presume nobody calls what Melissa McCarthy does "work."


Watch her in 'The Nines'. She's more than fat jokes and stupid comedy, surprisingly.
 
2013-02-20 06:58:59 PM
IMHO:

Very Much Belong:  Kristen Stewart, Sarah Jessica Parker, Lindsay Lohan, Mischa Barton.

Not Only Belongs But Should Be Higher Up: Tilda Swinton.  Something about her just says freaky, and not in the good kind of way.

This Would Be Ridiculous If It Were 10-15 Years Ago: Denise Richards, Kirsten Dunst.  Richards in "Wild Things"? Dunst in "Bring It On" or that rainy scene in "Spiderman"?  Hot.  But no, the years have not necessarily been kind to either.

I Can See Why She's There, But ... : Hilary Swank.  I can see why she's there, namely for her rather manly or tough-girl roles in a few movies.  But she does clean up pretty nice.

DaFuq? Lucy Liu, Uma Thurman. Did the survey-taker just not like "Kill Bill"?  Not only is Liu put together nicely, she gives off the smart, sassy chick vibe, which is hot.  And Uma?  Did anyone see "The Producers"?  C'mon.
 
2013-02-20 07:04:36 PM
There is no part of her I wouldn't eat.
/Literally
//With a fork and spoon

i626.photobucket.com


allthingsignant.files.wordpress.com


i.huffpost.com
 
2013-02-20 07:04:51 PM
i know its trendy to dump on her and everything, but really, no one saw her in Into the Wild in her bra and panties and thought got daaaayum, id jizz all over that?

4.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-02-20 07:23:17 PM

fusillade762: I find Kristen Schaal hot in a really inexplicable way.


She has that Amanda Plummer type thing going on. Not hot, but still hot?

/wat?
 
2013-02-20 07:36:41 PM
I'd do things to Ms. Stewart that would make her change her facial expression

granted, it might be in disgust but it'd be so worth it.

kristen, call me!

i234.photobucket.com
 
2013-02-20 07:38:26 PM

maggoo: Biv: There is not one fatty on the list. Not one. The whole list should be fatties and women over 40. List is garbage.

Here's a pic of a 37-yo Hollywood fatty:
[i.dailymail.co.uk image 634x408]


Bathe her in flour and bring her to my chamber!
 
2013-02-20 09:10:31 PM
I'll say this, Kristin Stewart can dress up nice and have a stylist do her hair and makeup person do her up real nice and she'll look good, but she's far from sexy. Sexy isn't just about looks, it's in how she carries herself, her attitude, and about a billion other factors, and she just doesn't have it.

Pfighting Polish: IMHO:

Very Much Belong:  Kristen Stewart, Sarah Jessica Parker, Lindsay Lohan, Mischa Barton.

Not Only Belongs But Should Be Higher Up: Tilda Swinton.  Something about her just says freaky, and not in the good kind of way.

This Would Be Ridiculous If It Were 10-15 Years Ago: Denise Richards, Kirsten Dunst.  Richards in "Wild Things"? Dunst in "Bring It On" or that rainy scene in "Spiderman"?  Hot.  But no, the years have not necessarily been kind to either.

I Can See Why She's There, But ... : Hilary Swank.  I can see why she's there, namely for her rather manly or tough-girl roles in a few movies.  But she does clean up pretty nice.

DaFuq? Lucy Liu, Uma Thurman. Did the survey-taker just not like "Kill Bill"?  Not only is Liu put together nicely, she gives off the smart, sassy chick vibe, which is hot.  And Uma?  Did anyone see "The Producers"?  C'mon.


I agree with most of your post except Kirsten Dunst still looked pretty decent in Melancholia. And I've had a thing for Hilary Swank since that Karate Kid movie she was in years ago. Definitely agree with you on Lucy Liu. Uma Thurman is a mixed bag. Sometimes she's pretty hot, others she's been very meh.
 
2013-02-20 09:14:28 PM
I think the list might have been better served if it was called "Least sexy women that Hollywood tries to pass off as sexy" to eliminate the Roseanne Barr and Kathy Bates responses.

I disagree with some of the choices.  Krinsten Dunst and Lucy Liu are both hot.   But I certainly never found Sarah Jessica Parker to be "hot".

I would have put Maggie Gyllenhaal and Minnie Driver on the list as well.  Why were they ever pushed by the Hollywood establishment as "sexy"?
 
2013-02-20 10:59:43 PM
Somedays I wish I was Tilda Swinton.
 
2013-02-20 11:18:17 PM
Attractive, but not sexy: Fran.
 
2013-02-21 01:12:33 AM

rickycal78: I agree with most of your post except Kirsten Dunst still looked pretty decent in Melancholia. And I've had a thing for Hilary Swank since that Karate Kid movie she was in years ago. Definitely agree with you on Lucy Liu. Uma Thurman is a mixed bag. Sometimes she's pretty hot, others she's been very meh.


Dunst last year:

media.komonews.com

She was girlishly cute.  Now she's starting to look like a cross between Maggie Gyllenhaal and Michelle Pfeiffer - not that there's anything wrong with Gyllenhaal or Pfeiffer, or that last name, but both have shown a sultriness that Dunst seems to lack, or at least I haven't seen out of her.  That look and "cute" just don't seem to go together.

Thurman has had a few roles where, like Swank, she had to grunge it up some.  But Charlize Theron was in "Monster," and is still considered tremendously desirable.  Like I say, if you haven't watched the new "Producers" movie, do check it out because it shows what kind of range Thurman has.  Singer, dancer, sense for comedy, drama and action ("Kill Bill," "Pulp Fiction,"), all the above.  She's smart, damn talented, and can be as hot as she wants, or doesn't want, to be.  Which is ... well, hot.
 
Displayed 50 of 257 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report