If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Patch)   Tebow bill sacked   (reston.patch.com) divider line 18
    More: Obvious, Tim Tebow, Virginia, United States Senate committees, extracurricular activities  
•       •       •

11912 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Feb 2013 at 11:05 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-02-16 11:11:09 AM
6 votes:

Derwood: The home school families are still paying school taxes, so why not let them participate?

Seems petty


The 80-year-old widow next door to me also pays school taxes. Let's make her a linebacker!
2013-02-16 11:59:10 AM
3 votes:
I work with kids. The home-school kids are certainly more educated, in the sense of book-learning. However, they are SO very incapable of socialization, they might as well be engineers. It's actually kinda spooky. I don't however, want to build a "sports" school, since all of the guys are going to wind up being sociopaths of a different order...like the NFL, NBA, etc.

An anecdote: An acquaintance of mine once ran the carnival business in the lower SE. He also ran the midget wrestling league. He kept them in their trailer. "Ya caint let em out", he said, "cuz they just go to a bar, git drunk, and gang up on somebody. What you do is open the trailer door, throw in some Veeny Weenies, and let em eat. Otherwise you got a mess on your hands, and no show!"

True.
2013-02-16 11:27:28 AM
3 votes:
2.bp.blogspot.com
2013-02-16 11:08:25 AM
3 votes:
On one hand, those homeschool kids need all the reality exposure they can get. So welcome to the team.

OTOH, they're usually homeschooled for reasons like OMG TEH RELIJUNZ, which makes me want to deprive them of as many things as we possibly can.

So I'm ambivalent.
2013-02-16 01:00:27 PM
1 votes:

Talondel: Fuggin Bizzy: Ow! That was my feelings!: If the family pays property taxes in the district they seek to play in, their kids should be allowed to play. Paying any associated fees, of course. The opposition to this smacks of a general anti-homeschooling bias.

helpwerebeingoppressed.jpg

Yes, because if there's anything that can be learned from this thread, it's that there certainly is not any bias against people who home school.  Nope, not a bit.


Thank you. I'm glad we're in agreement on that point.
2013-02-16 12:23:51 PM
1 votes:
More issues:

There are limited spots on sports teams. Why should a student at a school, who is part of the school community, be bumped from a team or benched so that someone from outside the school can play instead.

How does it work at awards times? "Let's all congratulate our basketball team for a great season. And winning the county championship. We all know the team and are happy for their success. Well - not many of you know know Bob, who you won't have seen in classes because his parents dislike the school so much that they go to a lot of effort to avoid sending him here but apparently out basketball team is worthy of Bob, so congratulate Bob too, even though none of you know him.
2013-02-16 12:13:04 PM
1 votes:

Lil' Max Meatboots: Who'stheBossisNotaFood: As an atheist who intends on homeschooling next year, I am getting a big kick out of these replies... There are many other reasons to homeschool besides religion. As a former teacher, I plan on homeschooling because the schools in my town are failing and I know that school is mostly a waste of time. That doesn't mean I am going to keep my kids locked in the house however. My one daughter has already gone to swimming and gymnastics classes and she currently attends a private preschool.

If these kids want to be on the team, why shouldn't they be allowed to try out?


As was mentioned earlier, I attended public school, I failed a class my first semester my senior year over attendance. As a result I was not allowed to run track in the spring. Sooooo...why should your kid be allowed to try out? How can you prove he passed YOUR first semester? If you want your damn kids on the team, let them go to that school.


Good point. In-school students have to keep up certain academic standards. You could pull your kid from school, make up BS academic stuff, say he passed and let him play football and get his free ride to <insert name of college you hate the most>.
2013-02-16 11:43:55 AM
1 votes:
I'll go one further.

Let's remove all the competitive sports from our public schools and relegate them to special schools where all they do is sports and other athletic activities. No academics whatsoever-- Just sports.

We take the kids who are going to public school just to aim for a sports scholarship, and we stick them in the sports school, where they can play football, wrestle, cheer, or play other sports without all that messy learning to get in their way. They can put 100% of their efforts toward getting that scholarship to a sports college where they can be scouted and eventually make some sort of career out of their sports focus.

This has the added effect of getting all the stupid jocks out of the regular schools so that they aren't distracting students who actually want to learn something. It stops public schools from being tempted to pass total idiots through the system just because they're on the sports teams. It cuts down on bullying, I'm sure, because the jocks tend to also be the bullies. It cuts down on date-rape in the public schools, since-- again-- the jocks tend to be the ones who do this sort of thing (oh, come on. You know it's true.)

We get the disruptive jocks out of the academic system and get to focus on education, while the jocks get the benefit of not being bothered by having to learn anything that doesn't pertain to their sports of choice. Why should a guy whose sole career goal is playing football be concerned with algebra or creative writing? Even if he ends up as a sports announcer or sports radio DJ, he'll have the necessary skills for his audience without that academic stuff getting in the way of his game.

Public schools could actually spend some money on other extracurricular activities, instead of funneling every extra dollar into the sports programs. The other kids would get decent programs for a change.

I remember when I was in high school, the school board actually voted two years in a row for the music boosters to divert a large portion of their funds to the football program, because the football team needed new jerseys and a new scoreboard. How nice it would have been for the music programs to get the equipment they needed!

I used to live in a town where they put most of their focus on the jazz music program, and very little focus on their sports teams. It was strange to see, but their jazz band was a huge draw for the school. The concerts they held were attended by people who didn't even have kids in the school. The money they made on ticket sales was significant. Students were scouted by universities and the military for their music programs. It was a whole different world, and the coolest thing was that the students who participated in the music program were also doing well in all their other classes. Nobody passed a kid just so he could be in the band. The students, being in an environment where sports was not at the top of the food chain, were driven to succeed in their classes because they wanted to, and because they weren't watching drooling idiots on the sports teams getting passed through classes without doing anything.

I have nothing against kids playing sports. I just see no reason why sports should be taught in a place where we send kids to get an education. It should be something that is separate from school. If people want their kid to be an athlete, then they should have to send them to a school that is for sports and sports alone. No public school should be taking a penny out of their budget for sports.

Yes, have a P.E. class. Teach them general fitness, exercise, and personal hygiene. Teach them about their body's health and how to maintain it. Leave sports as an activity that occurs outside the school, without school funds, and without it impacting students who do not participate in sports.

This whole idea that sports  belong in public schools is an old-fashioned, outdated, foolish notion that does nothing but make generation after generation produce hordes of uneducated idiots. It's time to separate sports from education. They have no reason to be paired together.
2013-02-16 11:27:54 AM
1 votes:

dv-ous: On one hand, those homeschool kids need all the reality exposure they can get. So welcome to the team.

OTOH, they're usually homeschooled for reasons like OMG TEH RELIJUNZ, which makes me want to deprive them of as many things as we possibly can.

So I'm ambivalent.


So basically, on one hand you want them to socialize with others to become better members of society.

But on the other hand, you want them to stay away from others because they believe in different things than you.

How tolerant.
2013-02-16 11:25:37 AM
1 votes:

Ow! That was my feelings!: If the family pays property taxes in the district they seek to play in, their kids should be allowed to play. Paying any associated fees, of course. The opposition to this smacks of a general anti-homeschooling bias.


helpwerebeingoppressed.jpg
2013-02-16 11:17:30 AM
1 votes:
our = are. Obviously my school spent too much on ping pong and not enough on English.
2013-02-16 11:16:52 AM
1 votes:
Why our sports programs in the United States so tightly intertwined with schools? Even though the university level they're combined. Can't cities and towns sponsor teams and let schools stick to education?

Derwood: The home school families are still paying school taxes, so why not let them participate?

Seems petty


In other threads on the subject I've been told that school sports are paid entirely by booster clubs. If this is true, why would being a taxpayer make a difference? And if it is not true, why are education dollars being spent on sports?
2013-02-16 11:16:36 AM
1 votes:

EkimProx: img.imageResizerActiveClass{cursor:nw-resize !important;outline:1px dashed black !important;} img.imageResizerChangedClass{z-index:300 !important;max-width:none !important;max-height:none !important;} img.imageResizerBoxClass{margin:auto; z-index:99999 !important; position:fixed; top:0; left:0; right:0; bottom:0; border:1px solid white; outline:1px solid black;}That bill didn't have a prayer.


It was pretty unreadable, now that you mention it.
2013-02-16 11:14:27 AM
1 votes:

Derwood: The home school families are still paying school taxes, so why not let them participate?

Seems petty


Very petty. If society isn't good enough for them, we're probably better off without 'em too.

Petty makes the world go round. Vietnam happened because LBJ had a big dick. Not letting some holy roller play on the football team "because fark those guys" is small potatoes.
2013-02-16 11:14:04 AM
1 votes:
I don't have kids and  a I pay school taxes. I need free beer.
2013-02-16 11:12:04 AM
1 votes:
But......SOCIALISM!
2013-02-16 11:11:56 AM
1 votes:
Separate but equal.  The religious nuts want separate and the liberals want equal.
2013-02-16 11:11:46 AM
1 votes:
Let's just do away with competitive sports, anyway.  Check sometime to see how much it is costing your local school district.
 
Displayed 18 of 18 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report