If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   NC lawmakers say women should duct tape their nipples to stay out of jail (pic in link is mildly Not safe for work)   (rawstory.com) divider line 191
    More: Asinine, North Carolina, North Carolina Republicans, lawmakers  
•       •       •

26272 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Feb 2013 at 11:04 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



191 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-15 12:17:14 PM
So, now you are telling me that the fallback position is fear of nipples, but breasts are OK?
Breast w/ nipple = sex
Breast w/o nipple = just foolin'

it just keeps getting better inch by inch
don't play with your food, kid
 
2013-02-15 12:17:15 PM
100 comments in and not a single Butcher Babies pic?

Slackers!!
 
2013-02-15 12:19:28 PM

StaleCoffee: So we're letting women carry duct tape now? What next, chloroform? This whole thing smacks of a plot against traditional gender roles.


Please continue...slowly.
 
2013-02-15 12:19:49 PM
content.clearchannel.com
Wendy O approved.
 
2013-02-15 12:20:46 PM

HypnozombieX: My gawd we are a nation of prudes. Reminds me of when people get all tripped out when women breastfeed in public, almost like we havn't been doing so since before the dawn of time.


Oddly enough, I'm fine with the idea of topless women (although I would probably do a double take at first) but breast feeding actually freaks me right the hell out. Which made living with my SIL and her kid for a while sort of awkward.
 
2013-02-15 12:21:49 PM

Pocket Ninja: Personally, I find sideboob every bit as distracting as nipples, and that's not even getting into the very obvious area of exposed cleavage. Exposed cleavage is at least twice as distracting and dangerous as sideboob, which makes it perhaps 4, 5 times as dangerous as nipples. I mean, nipples are small, when you think about it. Well, not the  aerlioa aerloea aerloeieae puffy area, I mean, that's bigger, but in reality that's really no more than discolored skin and who cares about that. But nipples from a distance? Heck, you might not even realize they're nipples. You might think they're little points of acne or something. Bugbites, I don't know. But that's not my point. My point is that you're driving along, minding your own business, and bazonga -- there's some hugely endowed woman in a too-small jogging bra at the side of the road, cleavage and sideboob everywhere. What happens then? Your eyes leave the road for a moment, and suddenly there's a school bus and your life flashes yellow and 36 children are dead. It's absurd that we accept such daily risk as "normal" or "accepted" in a civilized society. Is some exposed cleavage worth dozens of dead children? I hope not. I want to believe we live in a world where that's not the case. The bottom line is that exposed breasts are really nothing more than a softer, fleshier brand of terrorism, and we need to draw a line. And if duct tape can help us do that, I'm all for it.


For some reason I read this in the voice of Daffy Duck.
 
2013-02-15 12:23:13 PM

unfarkingbelievable: The Angry Hand of God: Dreyelle: As a woman I get distracted by the bulge in the front of mens pants.  I think all men must be required to wear skirts or kilts to hide it.  When I see "The Bulge" I am often compelled to show my nipple.  It's a tragic series of events.

So, I had to click your profile.  I see you are from Atlanta, where we have a man famous for the bulge in his pants.  Ever shown a nipple to bicycle shorts man?

As a woman, I'd love to see pic of said bicycle shorts bulge man. Please post. Thank you.


^^^^^

(As long as bike shorts =/= cyclist...well...yeah, we'll need a pic.)
 
2013-02-15 12:23:31 PM

Stone Meadow: Does this mean my wife has to wear a shirt while we're farking? Cuz she definitely exposes her "private parts" to me while we're enjoying sexitime.


Neither of you should be removing your church chemise for any purpose, including bathing.  Neither of you should be enjoying sexitime.  You are to have sex through a blanket with only a hole cut through to allow for sex.  You should both be looking away in shame.  You should only do this for the expressed purpose of procreation.  Your bodies are abhorrent and sinful and filthy, exactly as G*d created them, and you should remember that.

You should both be ashamed of yourselves.
 
2013-02-15 12:28:49 PM
Not real but hey, first thing I thought of:

i15.tinypic.com
 
2013-02-15 12:29:06 PM
This is what we pay these aholes to do? Legislate nipples? If it wasn't freezing cold where I am right now I would spend the next three days walking around topless in protest.
 
2013-02-15 12:31:29 PM

Weaver95: But sex?


No thanks.
 
2013-02-15 12:31:40 PM

2and4: Gaffers tape > duct tape. Less residue when removed.


As a lighting designer, I approve this message.
 
2013-02-15 12:33:00 PM

YEREVAN: Elegy: Soooo..... boob thread?
NSFW NSFW  NSFW

You're doing the Lord's work, sir - thank you.


All I need is a little encouragement...

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW
 
2013-02-15 12:33:50 PM

fireclown: [content.clearchannel.com image 425x315]
Wendy O approved.


That looks like W.O.W made a baby with Vanilla Ice!!!
 
2013-02-15 12:34:00 PM
Play NSFW video.... Back to the Loch with you Nessie

Jump to 2:43...  EEEEWWWWWWWWW

Jump to 4:43...  MY EEEEYYYYYEESSS

Jump to 6:05... That's better
 
2013-02-15 12:34:43 PM
Cool story bro alert!!!!!!

Circa 1980's ... that bar with the fake legs swinging in NO...
My buddy tells the dancer under the red light she has the squarest nipples he has ever seen...
She says its clear packing tape... keeps the nips from going popping up in the sometimes cool air.
And it was required by the bar... O_o
 
2013-02-15 12:40:20 PM
Darth_Lukecash:
To paraphrase the most important cinematic movie Zardox, "boobies is bad. Boobies spreads the seed of life. Gun is good. Gun destroys the seed of life.

It's Zardoz you insensitive clod.

upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-02-15 12:41:34 PM

Endive Wombat: What about pepperoni or bologna sized nipples?


OM NOM NOM NOM NOM
 
2013-02-15 12:46:35 PM

unfarkingbelievable: The Angry Hand of God: Dreyelle: As a woman I get distracted by the bulge in the front of mens pants.  I think all men must be required to wear skirts or kilts to hide it.  When I see "The Bulge" I am often compelled to show my nipple.  It's a tragic series of events.

So, I had to click your profile.  I see you are from Atlanta, where we have a man famous for the bulge in his pants.  Ever shown a nipple to bicycle shorts man?

As a woman, I'd love to see pic of said bicycle shorts bulge man. Please post. Thank you.


Not so CSB

I had a bad vasectomy experience, bleeding in my sack. It swelled up like i had stuffed a softball in it. Doctor wanted to let my body naturally absorb it. I had to wear the spandex-like underwear for support. The pain was horrible but it looked like I had a monster member.

After several trips to the doctor and ultrasounds (the poor tech girl even gasped at how bad it looked), I told him I wanted it taken care of. They put me under and cleaned out a blood clot the size of a large avacodo. I spent three days in the hospital and rode a scooter for a week before I went back to work.

/Not CSB

But I did have a huge bulge for a while....
 
2013-02-15 12:46:58 PM
FTFA

Republican state Rep. Rayne Brown told lawmakers that she was co-sponsoring the bill because activists had held a topless women's rights rally in Asheville last summer, where as many as a dozen women bared their breasts... she felt it was important to act before women tried to assert their rights again by going topless at another rally.

Apparently NC Lawmakers don't realize that first amendment rights trump local ordinance. Also, pretty sure the "for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire," part of the law will render the law toothless.
 
2013-02-15 12:57:50 PM
Pocket Ninja:

i'm even more appalled that this bill doesn't cover man-boobies and nipples as well! men run around topless in public everyday, exposing their bare breasts and nipples to innocent bystanders like children! they should be required to duct tape their nipples too! think of the children!
 
2013-02-15 01:03:20 PM

If it weren't for the natural, droppy boobkes that clearly prove that she is in fact a woman.

I would say,

That's A Man Baby
i877.photobucket.com


I'm guessing this AW dresses like that to draw attention away from her, uh, eyes. Kinda like the Shiney Object Syndrome
 
2013-02-15 01:07:45 PM

palelizard: Stone Meadow: Does this mean my wife has to wear a shirt while we're farking? Cuz she definitely exposes her "private parts" to me while we're enjoying sexitime.

Neither of you should be removing your church chemise for any purpose, including bathing.  Neither of you should be enjoying sexitime.  You are to have sex through a blanket with only a hole cut through to allow for sex.  You should both be looking away in shame.  You should only do this for the expressed purpose of procreation.  Your bodies are abhorrent and sinful and filthy, exactly as G*d created them, and you should remember that.

You should both be ashamed of yourselves.


Benedictine...is that you? ;^)

/well played, sir!
 
2013-02-15 01:08:40 PM

FTFA:


"You know what they say, duct tape fixes everything," Republican state Rep. Tim Moore agreed.

Jeebus, who elects these  American Taliban zealots?

FFS. Please DIAF immediately.


i651.photobucket.com
Not today.
 
2013-02-15 01:11:14 PM
I wonder if women who flash their breasts in public will now be committing a sex offense.

Boy, being tough on crime sure is working out great, isn't it?
 
2013-02-15 01:11:16 PM
Just when you think the state has moved in a positive direction, mouth-breathing teatards from Kinston vote in these morons and the result is this bullshiat.  Do we REALLY need to remind the country that we are the state that was willing to constantly re-elect Jesse Helms?
 
2013-02-15 01:12:32 PM

IRQ12: A felony, are you kidding me?


Here's the law.
"any person who shall willfully expose the private parts of his or her person in any public place and in the presence of any other person or persons ... (lots of qualifying statements) ...  shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor." (That part already exists and is law.)

The felony comes in with "any person at least 18 years of age who shall willfully expose the private parts of his or her person in any public place in the presence of any other person less than 16 years of age for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire shall be guilty of a Class H felony." (Also current law.)

This is the new part: "For the purposes of this section, the term "private parts" means external organs of sex and of excretion, including the nipple, or any portion of the areola, of the human female breast. "

The giant hole in this thing is the "purpose of...". So you get a Class 2 misdemeanor for any willful exposure, but that jumps to a Class H felony if it's for sexytime with someone under 16. This change clamps down on women flashing their boobies at little kids to get off.

Really, the article and the quotations from the lawmaker miss the point of this change entirely.
 
2013-02-15 01:15:14 PM

Gaseous Anomaly: TOSViolation: I seriously need to find out what I can do about this.  I have an old friend who is in the NC senate, I think.  This is beyond wrong.

We NCers should push for an anti-gerrymandering State constitutional amendment. That's probably the only thing that can fix it short of waiting for enough Republicans to die off.

Serious question: Is there such a movement already in place? If not, ought we create one? Does the NCGA gate all amendment proposals, or can we use petition or somesuch to get it on the ballot?



I happen to be a Republican.  Unfortunately, I don't have the authority to kick all of the morons out of the party.
 
2013-02-15 01:28:19 PM
god forbid we permit people to acknowledge and celebrate their bodies and sexuality, we might start to realize that a society structured on excessive work and consumption sucks.
 
2013-02-15 01:54:24 PM
Dear North Carolina, you're stupid.
 
2013-02-15 02:10:23 PM

Dreyelle: As a woman I get distracted by the bulge in the front of mens pants.  I think all men must be required to wear skirts or kilts to hide it.  When I see "The Bulge" I am often compelled to show my nipple.  It's a tragic series of events.


Skirts are really not very good at hiding boners.
 
2013-02-15 02:19:11 PM

Dreyelle: As a woman I get distracted by the bulge in the front of mens pants.  I think all men must be required to wear skirts or kilts to hide it.  When I see "The Bulge" I am often compelled to show my nipple.  It's a tragic series of events.


I'll show you mine, if...yeah.
 
2013-02-15 02:22:29 PM

Pocket Ninja: Personally, I find sideboob every bit as distracting as nipples, and that's not even getting into the very obvious area of exposed cleavage. Exposed cleavage is at least twice as distracting and dangerous as sideboob, which makes it perhaps 4, 5 times as dangerous as nipples. I mean, nipples are small, when you think about it. Well, not the  aerlioa aerloea aerloeieae puffy area, I mean, that's bigger, but in reality that's really no more than discolored skin and who cares about that. But nipples from a distance? Heck, you might not even realize they're nipples. You might think they're little points of acne or something. Bugbites, I don't know. But that's not my point. My point is that you're driving along, minding your own business, and bazonga -- there's some hugely endowed woman in a too-small jogging bra at the side of the road, cleavage and sideboob everywhere. What happens then? Your eyes leave the road for a moment, and suddenly there's a school bus and your life flashes yellow and 36 children are dead. It's absurd that we accept such daily risk as "normal" or "accepted" in a civilized society. Is some exposed cleavage worth dozens of dead children? I hope not. I want to believe we live in a world where that's not the case. The bottom line is that exposed breasts are really nothing more than a softer, fleshier brand of terrorism, and we need to draw a line. And if duct tape can help us do that, I'm all for it.


Oh, PocketNinja. This is why your posts are in green. Can I help it that I think you're the real-life Church Lady, and Dana Carvey is going straight to hell because he basically stole everything from you?
 
2013-02-15 02:22:50 PM

FizixJunkee: But dudes can show their nipples, right?

And what about moobs?  I've seen plenty o' men with bigger breasts than mine.  Why are they allowed to expose theirs when I can't expose mine?


Hey, expose away! EIP, and I know and obey the Rules.
 
2013-02-15 02:23:59 PM
27.org


theDesertHamster:
Too far?

I'm just trying to imagine the pain of removing that...
 
2013-02-15 02:31:18 PM
FFS, assholes, let women go topless if they want. Society will not farking crumble because of a farking nipple.
 
2013-02-15 02:38:39 PM

5monkeys: This is what we pay these aholes to do? Legislate nipples? If it wasn't freezing cold where I am right now I would spend the next three days walking around topless in protest.


We need to get 5monkeys to a warmer climate NOW, Farkers! Who's with me?
 
2013-02-15 02:38:42 PM

Elegy: YEREVAN: Elegy: Soooo..... boob thread?
NSFW NSFW  NSFW

You're doing the Lord's work, sir - thank you.

All I need is a little encouragement...

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW


leanneellington.com
 
2013-02-15 02:44:22 PM
Yes, this is our New, SuperConservative NC Legislature doing all it can to create jobs in our unemployed state. First, though, they want to cut unemployment benefits by a third, reduce how long you can get unemployment benefits, allow possums to be dropped for New Year's celebrations, tell the Federal government that no, NC is not going to participate in setting up health insurance exchanges, fire all the regulators on various regulatory boards and replace them with yes men, allow offshore oil and natural gas drilling in sight of the Outer Banks, approve giving the Panthers' owner millions of taxpayer dollars so he can get his stadium renovated (he's poor you know), pass a voter ID bill before the entire state is awash in illegal voters voting illegally, vote to make showing women's nipples downright illegal (what about strip clubs?), get rid of the state income tax and replace it with....well, they'll think of something to replace it with eventually, and maybe, just maybe, they'll start trying to get some jobs into this state.

I predict there's going to be an increase in sales of those round band-aids you can get, especially the deluxe sizes. They stick on well and don't irritate anything when you pull them off.

Yeah, this state is being punished for who we voted for back in 2008...
 
2013-02-15 02:50:53 PM

jasenj1: "For the purposes of this section, the term "private parts" means external organs of sex and of excretion, including the nipple, or any portion of the areola, of the human female breast. "


Sweat glands are organs of excretion. As written, this forbids a the showing of any skin whatsoever, by either sex.
 
2013-02-15 02:52:03 PM
The NSFW video link was fair.

It just wasn't well organized. An assortment of topless women and guys who were curious, and others who were just ogling the tits.
That wouldn't happen (so much) if nudity was common.
 
2013-02-15 02:52:25 PM

Bendal: Yeah, this state is being punished for who we voted for back in 2008...


It's okay, it's just because they love us citizens customers of NC so much; if only we didn't make them hurt us, if only we would LISTEN and OBEY they wouldn't have to beat us into submission. They're going to get help, some new medications or maybe some counseling, and if that doesn't work it's our fault at forcing their hands against us. They're sorry. They promise to never do it again and OMFG! WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU!? THAT'S NOT HOW YOU FOLD THE LAUNDRY! AND DID YOU BURN MY PANCAKE AGAIN! *smack* Oh, did you walk into a door knob again?
 
2013-02-15 03:01:24 PM

AndreMA: jasenj1: "For the purposes of this section, the term "private parts" means external organs of sex and of excretion, including the nipple, or any portion of the areola, of the human female breast. "

Sweat glands are organs of excretion. As written, this forbids a the showing of any skin whatsoever, by either sex.


...or if one takes a more precise definition, the excretory organs are limited to the kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra -- those involved in liquid waste. The anus is considered part of the digestive system and would be OK to expose. (per wikipedia)
 
2013-02-15 03:04:52 PM

Boeheimian Rhapsody: Elegy: YEREVAN: Elegy: Soooo..... boob thread?
NSFW NSFW  NSFW

You're doing the Lord's work, sir - thank you.

All I need is a little encouragement...

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW


Continuing with the gif theme then...

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW (and a personal fav)

NSFW
 
2013-02-15 03:04:58 PM
FTA:  "On Wednesday, the state House Judiciary Committee C approved House Bill 34, which makes it a Class H felony to purposefully expose "private parts" for  the "purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire."

Apparently the law was sponsored after GoTopless.org sponsored a topless event to protest the fact that women are treated differently than men when it comes to bear chests.  From the GoTopless.org website:  ""As long as men are allowed to be topless in public, women should have the same constitutional right."

So when women expose their breasts at these protests they are not doing it for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire, it is done to draw attention to what they believe is something akin to discrimination based on the sex of the person.  Therefore this law will not prevent women from participating in these rally's by exposing their breasts, and if a law enforcement officer arrests a women under such circumstances, preventing the woman from exercising her right to protest, the officer could face a civil rights suit.
 
2013-02-15 03:06:29 PM
The bill expands the state's definition of "private parts" to include a woman's "nipple, or any portion of the areola."

They distinguish between nipple and areola?  Wow, that makes them more biological savvy than most farkers.
 
2013-02-15 03:08:34 PM

theDesertHamster: Too far?
[www.themontyminute.com image 500x666]
/hot
//in a linked sort of way
///ok in a that sort of way too.


I hope that isn't taped to the skin; I shiver at the thought of trying to remove it.
 
2013-02-15 03:20:20 PM
really Duct tape?
 
2013-02-15 03:43:38 PM

AndreMA: jasenj1: "For the purposes of this section, the term "private parts" means external organs of sex and of excretion, including the nipple, or any portion of the areola, of the human female breast. "

Sweat glands are organs of excretion. As written, this forbids a the showing of any skin whatsoever, by either sex.


The law specifies for the purpose of sexual arousal.  Showing it just to piss off prudes is fine.
 
2013-02-15 03:54:37 PM

Elegy: Boeheimian Rhapsody: Elegy: YEREVAN: Elegy: Soooo..... boob thread?
NSFW NSFW  NSFW

You're doing the Lord's work, sir - thank you.

All I need is a little encouragement...

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW

Continuing with the gif theme then...

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW

NSFW (and a personal fav)

NSFW


Damn. Just............damn.
 
Displayed 50 of 191 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report