If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Hollywood Reporter)   Time Warner may be selling most of its magazines to other companies. Maybe there's hope for DC Comics yet   (hollywoodreporter.com) divider line 12
    More: Spiffy, Time Inc., Time Warner, Ladies' Home Journal, Meredith Corporation, InStyle, Real Simple, magazines  
•       •       •

441 clicks; posted to Business » on 14 Feb 2013 at 8:58 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



12 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-02-14 06:22:53 AM
Nope.
 
2013-02-14 09:07:22 AM
Time to save Mad?
 
2013-02-14 10:17:27 AM

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Nope.


This; doubt that DC's gonna be sold off to someone when the possibility of Fox, Viacom, etc. could buy it and then make the movies everyone's wanted to see.

Time Warner does not want to get spectacularly bitten in the ass; they'd rather submarine DC on their own.
 
2013-02-14 10:28:51 AM
Kevin Smith to lead a consortium to buy DC. Calling it.
 
2013-02-14 10:52:55 AM
DC Comics is not part of the Time publishing unit. It is part of Warner Bros.
 
2013-02-14 12:17:20 PM

Rwa2play: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Nope.

This; doubt that DC's gonna be sold off to someone when the possibility of Fox, Viacom, etc. could buy it and then make the movies everyone's wanted to see.

Time Warner does not want to get spectacularly bitten in the ass; they'd rather submarine DC on their own.


that

dumbobruni: DC Comics is not part of the Time publishing unit. It is part of Warner Bros.


and that
 
2013-02-14 06:09:39 PM
DC exists now as a free source of characters to make movies out of, not as a company that publishes actual comic books.  Like how Mickey Mouse isn't really a cartoon character but something to make stuffed animals out of.
 
2013-02-14 08:48:07 PM

Geotpf: DC exists now as a free source of characters to make movies out of, not as a company that publishes actual comic books.  Like how Mickey Mouse isn't really a cartoon character but something to make stuffed animals out of.


Like me, I guessing you weren't happy with DC's "nu52" reboot either....
 
2013-02-14 09:17:09 PM

Forbidden Doughnut: Geotpf: DC exists now as a free source of characters to make movies out of, not as a company that publishes actual comic books.  Like how Mickey Mouse isn't really a cartoon character but something to make stuffed animals out of.

Like me, I guessing you weren't happy with DC's "nu52" reboot either....


*raises hand*  Ditto.
 
2013-02-14 10:19:59 PM

Rwa2play: Like me, I guessing you weren't happy with DC's "nu52" reboot either....

*raises hand* Ditto.


Me too....it still feels like an Imaginary Story out of Earth 3 or something.
 
2013-02-15 02:13:36 AM

Kurmudgeon: Rwa2play: Like me, I guessing you weren't happy with DC's "nu52" reboot either....

*raises hand* Ditto.

Me too....it still feels like an Imaginary Story out of Earth 3 or something.


Made me finally quit reading comics.
 
2013-02-15 10:54:35 AM

FirstNationalBastard: Kurmudgeon: Rwa2play: Like me, I guessing you weren't happy with DC's "nu52" reboot either....

*raises hand* Ditto.

Me too....it still feels like an Imaginary Story out of Earth 3 or something.

Made me finally quit reading comics.


Nah, DC's on "time out" with me until they finally get their heads on straight and return to the status quo.  That first year might've been profitable for them but ever since they've been going around in circles.  Cancelling low-selling titles and replacing them with new titles...that sell low before the series' first year elapses, rinse and repeat.
 
Displayed 12 of 12 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report