If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   Zen Master: you must forego attachment to all things, even your attachment to personal modesty. Zen student: Is that some kind of metaphonical koan? Zen Master: No, seriously, whip out 'dem boobies   (nytimes.com) divider line 123
    More: Asinine, patriarchy, female students  
•       •       •

13281 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Feb 2013 at 12:52 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



123 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-02-12 12:44:51 AM
Well, OK.  Is there an application involved to get this job?  Anyone know?


/DNRTA, obviously.
 
2013-02-12 12:54:55 AM
LGT paywall. Awesome job subby.
 
2013-02-12 12:55:06 AM
What is the sound of one hand fapping?
 
2013-02-12 12:55:19 AM
Where is the "awesome" tag?
 
2013-02-12 12:55:26 AM
I will fill you with the holiest of holy seeds

so swallow
 
2013-02-12 12:58:08 AM
i291.photobucket.com
 
2013-02-12 12:58:10 AM
John Friend
http://nymag.com/news/features/john-friend-yoga-2012-4/  laughs at these amateurs
 
2013-02-12 01:00:42 AM

DarkLancelot: What is the sound of one hand fapping?


/thread
 
2013-02-12 01:01:29 AM
 
2013-02-12 01:01:33 AM
fta a "career of misconduct,"

See, mom? I wasn't a smartass delinquent. I just started on my career path in grade school.
 
2013-02-12 01:01:34 AM
Zen Boobism.

i.huffpost.com
 
2013-02-12 01:01:42 AM
Nice work if you can get it.
 
2013-02-12 01:02:31 AM
That...  That's brilliant.

"Now, female grasshopper, to reach the next stage of enlightenment, you must attach these weighted nipple clamps to each of your breasts and lean forward to see how much those puppies stretch out."
 
2013-02-12 01:03:21 AM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: LGT paywall. Awesome job subby.


You've used up your monthly allotment of freebies, apparently.
 
2013-02-12 01:05:35 AM
I almost peed myself a bit laughing when I found out a term for him was roshi.
25.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-02-12 01:06:10 AM
It's actually true though. Unethical, but true.

Japan's most famous monk, the legendary Daruma, sat on a rock until his arms and legs rotted away. You think a little grope would have distirbed him?

But still, I mean come on Zen monk guy. Show a little class. Also you should be beyond such desires yourself if you're running the temple.
 
2013-02-12 01:06:45 AM
The guy looks spectacular for 105 years old. Must be all that groping and harassing.
 
2013-02-12 01:06:55 AM

lelio: John Friend
http://nymag.com/news/features/john-friend-yoga-2012-4/  laughs at these amateurs


For future reference:  if there's no sex in the first six paragraphs, please don't bother.
 
2013-02-12 01:07:28 AM
Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders?  Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion.  All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

... reads TFA...

Oh, not actual Buddhists.  Taoists and Shintoists claiming the name and symbolism of Buddhism in order to sound cool and get money and political power.
 
2013-02-12 01:07:28 AM

Notabunny: fta a "career of misconduct,"

See, mom? I wasn't a smartass delinquent. I just started on my career path in grade school.


Couldn't commit to a career of evil?

burnsburdick11.wikis.birmingham.k12.mi.us
 
2013-02-12 01:09:10 AM
Groping is a hard habit to break if you grow up riding the subway in Japan.
 
2013-02-12 01:12:15 AM
I've forgone using attachments for years...to many damn Word documents of policies about TPS reports and such.
 
2013-02-12 01:12:59 AM

DarkLancelot: What is the sound of one hand fapping?


You magnificent bastard.
 
2013-02-12 01:18:37 AM

HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders?  Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion.  All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

... reads TFA...

Oh, not actual Buddhists.  Taoists and Shintoists claiming the name and symbolism of Buddhism in order to sound cool and get money and political power.


Actually Buddhism is quite well organized and has been from the outset.

The Buddha, the darma, and the sangha.

The Buddha, the teachings, and the community.

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?
 
2013-02-12 01:18:45 AM

HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders? Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion. All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.


What the hell are you talking about?

Just because you're in the West doesn't mean everybody thinks like you or how you fantasize Xanadu & Orientalism to be... but, free Tibet, and fight the man, or something.
 
2013-02-12 01:19:09 AM
Mr. Martin, now a Zen abbot in Victoria, British Columbia

Oh, fer f*ck's sake, that's like being a Nietzschian pope.
 
2013-02-12 01:23:00 AM
Actually, it was a koan:

How can you forego attachment to modesty and my hand?
 
2013-02-12 01:24:28 AM
I never did trust them Zen types.  But they're not as weird as those Pure Land dudes.
 
2013-02-12 01:24:46 AM

HotWingAgenda: Mr. Martin, now a Zen abbot in Victoria, British Columbia

Oh, fer f*ck's sake, that's like being a Nietzschian pope.


It's not really. Zazen is a specific school of mahayana Budhism and like most schools it is highly structured.
 
2013-02-12 01:25:32 AM

Brainsick: Notabunny: fta a "career of misconduct,"

See, mom? I wasn't a smartass delinquent. I just started on my career path in grade school.

Couldn't commit to a career of evil?

[burnsburdick11.wikis.birmingham.k12.mi.us image 155x151]


I won't apologize.
 
2013-02-12 01:26:27 AM

Thanks for the Meme-ries: [i291.photobucket.com image 420x456]


What event was that for?  That looks like the parking lot at Qualcomm stadium in San Diego....


A Chargers/Raiders game?
 
2013-02-12 01:26:31 AM

Lionel Mandrake: I never did trust them Zen types.  But they're not as weird as those Pure Land dudes.


Pure land Buddhism is like Jesus for Budhists. "If I just surrender at some point before I die, Amida will help me be reborn in a better world so I can be s better person.
 
2013-02-12 01:27:37 AM

doglover: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders?  Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion.  All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

... reads TFA...

Oh, not actual Buddhists.  Taoists and Shintoists claiming the name and symbolism of Buddhism in order to sound cool and get money and political power.

Actually Buddhism is quite well organized and has been from the outset.

The Buddha, the darma, and the sangha.

The Buddha, the teachings, and the community.

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?


You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions.  Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism.  Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all.  The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.

legion_of_doo: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders? Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion. All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

What the hell are you talking about?

Just because you're in the West doesn't mean everybody thinks like you or how you fantasize Xanadu & Orientalism to be... but, free Tibet, and fight the man, or something.


Tibet is basically Taoist.  When Buddhism was first spreading East along the silk road from Kushan, and got into territories under the cultural influence of China, due to a language gap the locals thought the Buddhists were just describing the religion they had been practicing all along.  So they kept practicing their same centralized, organized Taoist religion, with rigorous controls over what people could wear, eat, say, do, etc., but coopted the symbols of Buddhism because they liked it better.  Things got even further distorted when the Buddhist scholars reached the Shintoists in Japan.
 
2013-02-12 01:30:01 AM

Satanic_Hamster: Brainsick: Notabunny: fta a "career of misconduct,"

See, mom? I wasn't a smartass delinquent. I just started on my career path in grade school.

Couldn't commit to a career of evil?

[burnsburdick11.wikis.birmingham.k12.mi.us image 155x151]

I won't apologize.


Fluffy?
 
2013-02-12 01:32:14 AM

HotWingAgenda: doglover: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders?  Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion.  All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

... reads TFA...

Oh, not actual Buddhists.  Taoists and Shintoists claiming the name and symbolism of Buddhism in order to sound cool and get money and political power.

Actually Buddhism is quite well organized and has been from the outset.

The Buddha, the darma, and the sangha.

The Buddha, the teachings, and the community.

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?

You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions.  Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism.  Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all.  The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.

legion_of_doo: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders? Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion. All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

What the hell are you talking about?

Just because you're in the West doesn't mean everybody thinks like you or how you fantasize Xanadu & Orientalism to be... but, free Tibet, and fight the man, or something.

Tibet is ...


Oh shiat! Two East Asia experts in the house. It's on like Donkey Kong!
 
2013-02-12 01:36:06 AM

doglover: Lionel Mandrake: I never did trust them Zen types.  But they're not as weird as those Pure Land dudes.

Pure land Buddhism is like Jesus for Budhists. "If I just surrender at some point before I die, Amida will help me be reborn in a better world so I can be s better person.


Yeah...like I said, weird!
 
2013-02-12 01:39:26 AM
Perhaps he did not know the car guys was logging the events ?


/ Wrong tread but works ?
 
2013-02-12 01:42:25 AM
Silly zen teacher, abusing women is reserved exclusively for the Aqua Buddha.
 
2013-02-12 01:50:59 AM
if a man has a sex drive at that age, i say let him be.
 
2013-02-12 01:52:57 AM

AverageAmericanGuy: HotWingAgenda: doglover: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders?  Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion.  All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

... reads TFA...

Oh, not actual Buddhists.  Taoists and Shintoists claiming the name and symbolism of Buddhism in order to sound cool and get money and political power.

Actually Buddhism is quite well organized and has been from the outset.

The Buddha, the darma, and the sangha.

The Buddha, the teachings, and the community.

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?

You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions.  Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism.  Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all.  The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.

legion_of_doo: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders? Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion. All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

What the hell are you talking about?

Just because you're in the West doesn't mean everybody thinks like you or how you fantasize Xanadu & Orientalism to be... but, free Tibet, and fight the man, or someth ...


Nah. One Expert in Tokyo walkin' to Koenji for shoppin' and one HotWingAgenda who doesn't know basic Buddhist history.
 
2013-02-12 01:59:01 AM

frestcrallen: Groping is a hard habit to break if you grow up riding the subway in Japan.


It's an especially hard habit to break if you're in Chicago.
 
2013-02-12 02:00:42 AM

Rufus Lee King: Being Jewish, I usually meditate upon metaphonical Cohens.


Are they the ones who make the movies?
 
2013-02-12 02:03:00 AM
I'd really rather stay attached to my boobies, thanks.
 
2013-02-12 02:03:04 AM

DarkLancelot: What is the sound of one hand fapping?


Bet me to it...

/was too busy fapping
 
2013-02-12 02:05:05 AM

HotWingAgenda: doglover: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders?  Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion.  All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

... reads TFA...

Oh, not actual Buddhists.  Taoists and Shintoists claiming the name and symbolism of Buddhism in order to sound cool and get money and political power.

Actually Buddhism is quite well organized and has been from the outset.

The Buddha, the darma, and the sangha.

The Buddha, the teachings, and the community.

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?

You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions.  Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism.  Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all.  The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.

legion_of_doo: HotWingAgenda: Since when do we have our own senior counsel of leaders? Buddhism is a philosophy and decentralized school of thought, not an organized religion. All our leading scholars are centuries dead, anyhow... not in a position to be groping anyone.

What the hell are you talking about?

Just because you're in the West doesn't mean everybody thinks like you or how you fantasize Xanadu & Orientalism to be... but, free Tibet, and fight the man, or something.

Tibet is ...


Wow, I never ran into someone this insistent on spreading misinformation about Buddhism before.
 
2013-02-12 02:08:18 AM
One of the few reasons why I can't fully respect Buddhist teachings (I respect some) because of the philosophy of care about nothing, the world is suffering/not good enough thus abandon hope and desire and you'll be enlightened. Guess what happens when you teach that, shiat like this.
 
2013-02-12 02:16:21 AM

doglover: HotWingAgenda: Mr. Martin, now a Zen abbot in Victoria, British Columbia

Oh, fer f*ck's sake, that's like being a Nietzschian pope.

It's not really. Zazen is a specific school of mahayana Budhism and like most schools it is highly structured.


This is like a hot iron ball stuck in my throat. I can neither swallow it nor can I spit it out. So I suffer.

/not really, I can spit it out.
//but it would have been better if HotWingAgenda had been born brainless.
 
2013-02-12 02:25:08 AM

HotWingAgenda: doglover:

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?

HotWingAgenda: You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions.  Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism.  Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all.  The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.


Recall the Four Noble Truths, the foundation of Buddhism:

The truth of dukkha (suffering, anxiety, dissatisfaction)
The truth of the origin of dukkha
The truth of the cessation of dukkha
The truth of the path leading to the cessation of dukkha

The "whole point" of Buddhist practice is the cessation of suffering.


Immediately, we come to the first great fork in the tree of Buddhist sects.  Who's suffering; just yours, or the suffering of all sentient beings?  Theravada Buddhists focus on ending their own suffering through personal understanding.  Mahayana Buddists take the vow of the Bodhisattva:  to forego the end of their personal  suffering until the suffering of every other sentient being is ended.

Zen Buddhism is a subsect of Mahayana.  The Zen practitioner may practice alone - Zen's founder, Bodhidharma, spent nine years staring at a wall, speaking to no one. But when enlightenment is achieved, it is to be passed along to others to help them end their suffering.  This is why Zen features the transmission of Dharma from master to pupil.

Based on what HotWingsAgenda has said,  I surmise he is leans towards Theravada.
 
2013-02-12 02:26:22 AM
doglover:

Actually Buddhism is quite well organized and has been from the outset.

The Buddha, the darma, and the sangha.

The Buddha, the teachings, and the community.

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?


Seems like every religion is involved in some sort of debauchery these days, eh? Also, as doglover says, Buddhism is, indeed, a religion...
 
2013-02-12 02:35:01 AM
i.imgur.com
 
2013-02-12 02:37:23 AM

DarkLancelot: What is the sound of one hand fapping?


Probably "fap, fap, fap" for most of us, Mr. Jeremy. ;)
 
2013-02-12 02:40:12 AM
Man, I just came here for the tit jokes. Somehow I got clickjacked to alt.talk.religion.weirdo
 
2013-02-12 02:43:30 AM
My Kentucky version of Buddhism: 1. Get cat. 2. Put cat on lap. 3. Pet cat until you fall asleep. Congratulations! You achieved zen!
 
2013-02-12 02:51:24 AM
At least its with adults of the opposite sex - which beats Catholic Priests hands down
 
2013-02-12 02:54:33 AM

BarkingUnicorn: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: LGT paywall. Awesome job subby.

You've used up your monthly allotment of freebies, apparently.


Yes, but apparently it's subby's fault that Dow Jones doesn't know how the NYT paywall works. It's also subby's fault that Dow Jones doesn't know how badly it works and how it's so easy to get around that my 70-year-old mother figured it out on her own and can bypass it in less than a second.

Now, I'll grant that not everyone knows this, and not everyone has the time or inclination to figure it out. But I'm guessing most people wouldn't be a dick about it, blame a total stranger, and come off looking like a fool in front of a whole thread full of people, many of whom already think you're kind of a tool for the way you behave in political threads.

But I could be wrong. Maybe being a dick about things makes the world a better place, and maybe such behavior will shame subby into finding a magical way to link to the NYT that magically erases the cookies on Dow's browser before loading TFA. Maybe I'll try this being a dick thing and see if it helps me get into websites without paying. I think I try a few pron sites to start. If there's anywhere I should be able to get in for free by being a dick, it's a pron site.
 
2013-02-12 03:13:02 AM

Jezrael: Seems like every religion is involved in some sort of debauchery these days, eh? Also, as doglover says, Buddhism is, indeed, a religion...


Every religion has adherents who are involved in debauchery. Every profession, industry, corporation, political party, sport, youth organization, nation, etc., has members who are involved in debauchery.  Debauchery is a characteristic of humans, not of their institutions.

Yes, Buddhism is a religion; it requires belief in things that cannot be proved or disproved by science.  You cannot tell if someone has achieved Enlightenment.  When someone dies, you can't tell whether he is reincarnated or passes into Nirvana.  There is a Zen saying,

"Great faith, great doubt, great effort: these are the things that lead to  enlightenment."

One can almost imagine a scientist saying the same.  Many scientists certainly act as if they believe it.

Buddhism is focused on something easily proven by science:  suffering exists.  Buddhism is not concerned with the existence of God, or the origin of the universe.  It is concerned with the cessation of suffering.

All the gods, demons, hells, ghosts, etc., that are attached to  various schools of Buddhism are simply teaching aids.  Their stories and rituals help many people follow the Eight-Fold Path to the cessation of suffering.

Zen Buddhism doesn't employ such aids.  Meditation is Zen's essential practice.  Different schools of Zen have different aids to meditation, but none is supernatural.  Sometimes all it takes is a place to sit.

While Buddhism is a religion, it is practiced scientifically.
 
2013-02-12 03:16:40 AM

100 Watt Walrus: BarkingUnicorn: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: LGT paywall. Awesome job subby.

You've used up your monthly allotment of freebies, apparently.

Yes, but apparently it's subby's fault that Dow Jones doesn't know how the NYT paywall works. It's also subby's fault that Dow Jones doesn't know how badly it works and how it's so easy to get around that my 70-year-old mother figured it out on her own and can bypass it in less than a second.

Now, I'll grant that not everyone knows this, and not everyone has the time or inclination to figure it out. But I'm guessing most people wouldn't be a dick about it, blame a total stranger, and come off looking like a fool in front of a whole thread full of people, many of whom already think you're kind of a tool for the way you behave in political threads.

But I could be wrong. Maybe being a dick about things makes the world a better place, and maybe such behavior will shame subby into finding a magical way to link to the NYT that magically erases the cookies on Dow's browser before loading TFA. Maybe I'll try this being a dick thing and see if it helps me get into websites without paying. I think I try a few pron sites to start. If there's anywhere I should be able to get in for free by being a dick, it's a pron site.


Careful; you'll use up your monthly allotment of snark! :-)  Sounds the bourbon allowance is already gone.
 
2013-02-12 03:35:45 AM

BarkingUnicorn: 100 Watt Walrus: BarkingUnicorn: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: LGT paywall. Awesome job subby.

You've used up your monthly allotment of freebies, apparently.

Yes, but apparently it's subby's fault that Dow Jones doesn't know how the NYT paywall works. It's also subby's fault that Dow Jones doesn't know how badly it works and how it's so easy to get around that my 70-year-old mother figured it out on her own and can bypass it in less than a second.

Now, I'll grant that not everyone knows this, and not everyone has the time or inclination to figure it out. But I'm guessing most people wouldn't be a dick about it, blame a total stranger, and come off looking like a fool in front of a whole thread full of people, many of whom already think you're kind of a tool for the way you behave in political threads.

But I could be wrong. Maybe being a dick about things makes the world a better place, and maybe such behavior will shame subby into finding a magical way to link to the NYT that magically erases the cookies on Dow's browser before loading TFA. Maybe I'll try this being a dick thing and see if it helps me get into websites without paying. I think I try a few pron sites to start. If there's anywhere I should be able to get in for free by being a dick, it's a pron site.

Careful; you'll use up your monthly allotment of snark! :-)  Sounds the bourbon allowance is already gone.


I'm just trying out the being-a-dick thing. Hang on. Gotta go kick the cat.
 
2013-02-12 03:44:04 AM
ZIE (Zen In Email) thread?

/EIP
 
2013-02-12 03:47:47 AM

flemardo: I almost peed myself a bit laughing when I found out a term for him was roshi.


Came here looking for Master Hroshi, leaving satisfied.

/but seriously, as corny as Dragonball was, are you surprised?

//not to mention the same tropes in Ranma 1/2?
 
2013-02-12 03:52:21 AM

flemardo: I almost peed myself a bit laughing when I found out a term for him was roshi.
[25.media.tumblr.com image 500x375]


Something funny about the term for "old master"?
 
2013-02-12 04:15:20 AM
www.buddhanet.net
Pfffttt...amateur!
 
2013-02-12 05:50:25 AM
FTA: "...Nikki Stubbs, who now lives in Vancouver, and who studied and worked at Mount Baldy, Mr. Sasaki's Zen center 50 miles east of Los Angeles..."

Mount Baldy? She certainly did...
 
2013-02-12 06:05:22 AM

BarkingUnicorn: HotWingAgenda: doglover:

You CAAAAAN be a Buddhist alone, but that's a piss poor application of the middle path. Ideally you should be helping others find the way and if not at least easing their suffering. An organized temple, especially one that helps with healing, sickness, and deaths, is almost essential for a Buddhist community. If you're not organized, you're helping fewer people than you could be, right? If grieving mothers don't have a monk to talk to, who'll help them be strong in front of their kids? Who'll keep your ancestor's graves clear of vines and bird shiat?

HotWingAgenda: You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions.  Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism.  Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all.  The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.

Recall the Four Noble Truths, the foundation of Buddhism:

The truth of dukkha (suffering, anxiety, dissatisfaction)
The truth of the origin of dukkha
The truth of the cessation of dukkha
The truth of the path leading to the cessation of dukkha

The "whole point" of Buddhist practice is the cessation of suffering.

Immediately, we come to the first great fork in the tree of Buddhist sects.  Who's suffering; just yours, or the suffering of all sentient beings?  Theravada Buddhists focus on ending their own suffering through personal understanding.  Mahayana Buddists take the vow of the Bodhisattva:  to forego the end of their personal  suffering until the suffering of every other sentient being is ended.

Zen Buddhism is a subsect of Mahayana.  The Zen practitioner may practice alone - Zen's founder, Bodhidharma, spent nine years staring at a wall, speaking to no one. But when enlightenment is achieved, it is to be passed along to others to help them end their suffering.  This is why Zen features the transmission of Dharma from master t ...


I would have typed something like that, but like I said, I had important walkin' to do. Koenji isn't gonna scour itself for American sized jeans.
 
2013-02-12 06:07:57 AM

skinink: Zen Boobism.

[i.huffpost.com image 570x856]


i.imgur.com
 
2013-02-12 06:09:51 AM

illannoyin: skinink: Zen Boobism.

[i.huffpost.com image 570x856]

[i.imgur.com image 656x656]


On an American, it's a dress. On a Japanese, it's a tunic.
 
2013-02-12 06:10:37 AM

HotWingAgenda: You just rendered a great description of Taoism and other organized Eastern religions. Which has f*ckall to do with Buddhism. Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all. The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.


Yeah, yeah. You take your hinayana and you stay in India with all the other naked fakirs.
 
2013-02-12 06:36:37 AM
I learned everything i need to know about buddhism from the movie point break.

Surfs up, brah.
 
2013-02-12 06:45:37 AM
I don't know what happened here...  I was reading the article, and the site refreshed itself saying, "Oh, we're sorry.  We seem to have lost the article.  If you sign up, this likely won't happen in the future."

Nice...  Assholes.

I was really interested in those boobs, uh, I mean, the article.  About boobs.
 
2013-02-12 07:04:48 AM

BarkingUnicorn: While Buddhism is a religion, it is practiced scientifically


If it was practiced scientificially they would only teach or advocate things they know will help you escape from the cycle of rebirth.  Since the cycle itself is impossible to prove, and escaping it is impossibl;e to prove you can't say it is practiced scientificially.

BarkingUnicorn: Buddhism is not concerned with the existence of God, or the origin of the universe. It is concerned with the cessation of suffering


Buddhism has a pretty in depth cosmology.  Not sure hwo you can say theya ren't concerend with the originof the universe.

Depending on the flavor there are gods.
 
2013-02-12 07:08:09 AM

Brainsick: Notabunny: fta a "career of misconduct,"

See, mom? I wasn't a smartass delinquent. I just started on my career path in grade school.

Couldn't commit to a career of evil?

[burnsburdick11.wikis.birmingham.k12.mi.us image 155x151]


Something wrong with Astronomy?
 
2013-02-12 07:16:37 AM
graphics8.nytimes.com
Men constantly touch this woman inappropriately...
 
2013-02-12 07:17:58 AM

liam76: hwo you


liam76: theya ren't concerend


liam76: originof


I`ve started typing in this way lately. I`m worried I might have early symptoms of parkinsons.
 
2013-02-12 07:21:28 AM

dready zim: liam76: hwo you

liam76: theya ren't concerend

liam76: originof

I`ve started typing in this way lately. I`m worried I might have early symptoms of parkinsons.


I have just always been terrible at typing.  Autocorrect has made me even worse and we don't have it at my broweser at work.
 
2013-02-12 07:26:56 AM

dready zim: I`ve started typing in this way lately. I`m worried I might have early symptoms of parkinsons.


I thought this once while I was in a period of slurred typing.  Realized it was more that I had a serious case of not sleeping the fark enough.

Seriously.  Try it.
 
2013-02-12 07:27:25 AM

Gyrfalcon: I'd really rather stay attached to my boobies, thanks.


I'm sure a lot of guys feel that way about your boobies.
 
2013-02-12 08:04:14 AM

flamingboar: My Kentucky version of Buddhism: 1. Get cat. 2. Put cat on lap. 3. Pet cat until you fall asleep. Congratulations! You achieved zen!


A friendly pussy can make life much more pleasant.
 
2013-02-12 08:04:59 AM

liam76: If it was practiced scientificially they would only teach or advocate things they know will help you escape from the cycle of rebirth.


Uh, not quite.

The cycle of death and rebirth is not provable to physics. However that the nature of dukkha (commonly suffering but actually a profound dissatisfaction of which physical and mental suffering are but a facet) is such that everything that exists at this level of enlightenment is flawed is simple observation.

There's simply nothing but oh so fleeting instances of true satisfaction. Even your highest highs can be pierced by the littlest things and soon fade to memory which clutch in vain like a photograph of a beautiful woman who has passed away never to return trying to ekk out a little more to ease your disquiet and it never quite works well enough. If you will contest this point, the burden of proof is simple. All you have to do is find true, lasting happiness in this life. The kind that celebrates the present fully as it is and is never tarnished by longing for what is not nor longing for what was. A trifling thing, that happiness. I'm sure you've found such a thing already, right?

But for those of us who are not as wise as you, there is the Buddha's teachings. The Middle Way, also known as the 8-Fold Path. The "greater vehicle" upon which we shall all be transported to a state of Nirvana eventually. Perhaps there are no Bodhisattva guiding us and perhaps one life is all we get. However the meditations handed down and the truths in the many sutras the Buddha left us seem to work enough. That is why it is called The Middle Way, because it works.

It is not, however, called The Only Way, because it is not. That's why Buddhism spread so fast across Asia. It was compatible with every local belief. Even science cannot find fault with it upon close investigation because while each school has their own dogma, the Buddha was FAMOUS as a teacher who talked at the level of the listener, so he made many contradictory seeming statements about the nature of enlightenment depending on if he was addressing farmers who'd never seen a prince before or his closest disciples. Many, many, many more monks have since added their own insights to the practice in a similar fashion, following the Buddha's example of talking at a level the audience can understand. So ultimately the proof of the teaching is in the enlightenment of those who practice it diligently, not the dogma of the particular school.

If you find something that works better than previous schools' teachings, it is a boon, not heresy. Practices change over time as better meditations are developed. Schools wax and wane in popularity based on their effectiveness and local culture. Sometimes local religious elements are worked in because that speaks to the monks of that area. Texts are carefully translated into the local languages. Practices are altered to get people the most advancement as quickly as possible.

Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found.
 
2013-02-12 08:06:06 AM
So, today I learned that Zen Buddism is pretty much like all the other religions.
 
2013-02-12 08:16:52 AM

HotWingAgenda: Buddhism is not about communities, or parents, or dealing with other people at all. The whole point is looking inward to know yourself, and therefore achieve greater understanding of the basic mechanics of the universe.


The central message of Buddhism is not "Every man for himself."
www.screeninsults.com

/hot
 
2013-02-12 08:40:02 AM

doglover: liam76: If it was practiced scientificially they would only teach or advocate things they know will help you escape from the cycle of rebirth.

Uh, not quite.

The cycle of death and rebirth is not provable to physics. However that the nature of dukkha (commonly suffering but actually a profound dissatisfaction of which physical and mental suffering are but a facet) is such that everything that exists at this level of enlightenment is flawed is simple observation.


Sorry but if it isn't provabelt o physics, it isn't scientific.

If it require enlightenment it isn't sceintific.

doglover: There's simply nothing but oh so fleeting instances of true satisfaction. Even your highest highs can be pierced by the littlest things and soon fade to memory which clutch in vain like a photograph of a beautiful woman who has passed away never to return trying to ekk out a little more to ease your disquiet and it never quite works well enough. If you will contest this point, the burden of proof is simple. All you have to do is find true, lasting happiness in this life. The kind that celebrates the present fully as it is and is never tarnished by longing for what is not nor longing for what was. A trifling thing, that happiness. I'm sure you've found such a thing already, right?


When I was in middle school I was catholic.  I was dating a baptist girl and I went to one of her youth group meetings.  We had a pretty good talk abotu communion, what I thought it meant, what it symbolized, how I felt, etc.  He brought up a remarkably similiar argument about how true happiness can only be found by having a personal relation ship with Christ, and unless I felt like I did when in church or getting communion I didn't have that relationship.


doglover: But for those of us who are not as wise as you, there is the Buddha's teachings. The Middle Way, also known as the 8-Fold Path. The "greater vehicle" upon which we shall all be transported to a state of Nirvana eventually. Perhaps there are no Bodhisattva guiding us and perhaps one life is all we get. However the meditations handed down and the truths in the many sutras the Buddha left us seem to work enough. That is why it is called The Middle Way, because it works.

It is not, however, called The Only Way, because it is not. That's why Buddhism spread so fast across Asia. It was compatible with every local belief. Even science cannot find fault with it upon close investigation because while each school has their own dogma, the Buddha was FAMOUS as a teacher who talked at the level of the listener, so he made many contradictory seeming statements about the nature of enlightenment depending on if he was addressing farmers who'd never seen a prince before or his closest disciples. Many, many, many more monks have since added their own insights to the practice in a similar fashion, following the Buddha's example of talking at a level the audience can understand. So ultimately the proof of the teaching is in the enlightenment of those who practice it diligently, not the dogma of the particular school.


"Seem to work" isn't sceintific.

Adding their own insights to something that can never be proven isn't scientific.

The enlightenment can't be proven, it isn't scientific.

I have met many peopel who have very content lives and are at peace beacuse they have fully committed themselves to Jesus (not the gay are bad types, but theose that work for others, lover their neighnor,etc).  That "seems to work" for them.  Many people through the course of christian history have added their insight to their religion.  Would you describe that as "sceintific"?

doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found


That sounds real scientific.
 
2013-02-12 08:50:47 AM

liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.


andrewnewberg.com

Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.
 
2013-02-12 09:02:32 AM

Bad_Seed: studies involving shoving monks


filmjournal.net
Every monk who is a monk, punch a monk who isn't a monk!
 
2013-02-12 09:10:42 AM

Bad_Seed: liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.

[andrewnewberg.com image 380x307]

Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.


The next few years will involve shoving scanners into monks


/sorry monks
//Breathe it out
 
2013-02-12 09:15:44 AM

Rufus Lee King: Being Jewish, I usually meditate upon metaphonical Cohens.


*snert*

/ugh I got yogurt on my monitor
 
2013-02-12 09:18:35 AM
Now excuse me while I yang my yin.
 
2013-02-12 09:19:51 AM

liam76: If it require enlightenment it isn't sceintific.


And you see, this is the level of discourse you're bringing to me telling you about Buddhism. I'm just explaining things to you as they are going to be presented. I'm just like an R2 unit showing a holographic projection of the battle plan, and already you've blundered magnificently, typos aside, and all but run up the white flag. The the science =(read: is limited to) physics fallacy here is frankly just astounding. Have you never heard of any other branches?

And Buddhist philosophy? That's no moon. If you wanna come against something like that, you have got to come correct and quite frankly even then you're probably going to be sent away realizing you've been mostly Buddhist all along. There's no ventilation shafts.

I won't even address your other nit-picking because it's all predicated on this fallacy that you've got going in your head. I suggest you cool yourself and school yourself with the following Link  to familiarize yourself with the various branches of science.
 
2013-02-12 09:33:24 AM

doglover: liam76: If it require enlightenment it isn't sceintific.

And you see, this is the level of discourse you're bringing to me telling you about Buddhism. I'm just explaining things to you as they are going to be presented. I'm just like an R2 unit showing a holographic projection of the battle plan, and already you've blundered magnificently, typos aside, and all but run up the white flag. The the science =(read: is limited to) physics fallacy here is frankly just astounding. Have you never heard of any other branches?

And Buddhist philosophy? That's no moon. If you wanna come against something like that, you have got to come correct and quite frankly even then you're probably going to be sent away realizing you've been mostly Buddhist all along. There's no ventilation shafts.

I won't even address your other nit-picking because it's all predicated on this fallacy that you've got going in your head. I suggest you cool yourself and school yourself with the following Link  to familiarize yourself with the various branches of science.


You do realize you brought up physics, not me, right? I didn't want to get off topic by pointing out your mistake. But I see by you harping on that, spelling, and not addressing my points you have no actual response.
 
2013-02-12 09:40:07 AM

Bad_Seed: liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.



Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.


Neat, not unfamiliar to me, and completely irrelevant.

I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.
 
2013-02-12 09:41:56 AM
Pretty sure I read this years ago in CANDY...
 
2013-02-12 09:45:12 AM
When you put enlightenment into words you take it away from its actual meaning.
 
2013-02-12 09:48:49 AM

liam76: Bad_Seed: liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.



Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.

Neat, not unfamiliar to me, and completely irrelevant.

I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.


I am on my phone or I would try and find it myself but I seem to remember a study showing similarities between catholic and Buddhist monks brain scans while praying/meditating.
 
2013-02-12 09:51:36 AM

liam76: Bad_Seed: liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.

Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.

Neat, not unfamiliar to me, and completely irrelevant.

I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.


I don't see why not, if, at the moment that you 'grasped' them, you have necessarily entered into a state of consciousness that's different from the one we call normal.

For the record, I'm not a big fan of the "Buddhism is scientific" claim. Not because I think it's wrong, but because it usually ends up with people getting sidetracked with discussing a definition of "science".
 
2013-02-12 09:53:19 AM

Bad_Seed: because it usually ends up with people getting sidetracked with discussing a definition of "science".


And as we all know, defining things people may be confused about is bad...  I guess.
 
2013-02-12 09:56:06 AM

liam76: I am on my phone or I would try and find it myself but I seem to remember a study showing similarities between catholic and Buddhist monks brain scans while praying/meditating.


No doubt. There are forms of Christian prayer that are essentially types of meditation. They don't usually teach it to lay people though. (Though, in lots of Buddhist countries lay people don't really meditate either).
 
2013-02-12 09:57:06 AM

liam76: Bad_Seed: liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.

Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.

Neat, not unfamiliar to me, and completely irrelevant.

I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.


Why should enlightenment be scientific?

Everybody has their own path to enlightenment.
 
2013-02-12 10:01:44 AM

liam76: Bad_Seed: liam76: doglover: Wow, that's a novel. tl;dr Buddhism deals with complex ideas that cannot even be grasped fully in a normal conscious state and so in the beginning you must speak at the level of your audience, but practices are optimized and do change as better ones are found

That sounds real scientific.

Scientific enough for you? In the last few years there have been tons of studies involving shoving monks into brain scanners.

Neat, not unfamiliar to me, and completely irrelevant.

I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.


No, you're attempting to argue for the sake of argument.

Buddhism is a religion, not a physical science.

However, unlike other religions, Buddhism is alterable based on new input. It can be said that it follows the scientific method of observation, hypothesis, expirimentation, conclusion already as that's just formalized trial and error. Being a religion not a natural science, it has no overlap with physics or chemistry or any of those. However it intergrates seamlessly with psychology, sociology and things of that nature where areas of influence overlap. When a Buddhist idea is proven wrong by science or philisophy, Buddhist teachings change. It's happened before. It will hsppen again.

As for your asertion that an idea which is difficult to hold in your normal state of mind is without merit, see the heart sutra. It's a very simple idea you cannot hold fully in your mind outside of deep meditation at first. Try as you might, the waking mind just doesn't let you fully experience simultaneous emptiness and form as a single state of being.
 
2013-02-12 10:06:15 AM

doglover: However, unlike other religions, Buddhism is alterable based on new input. It can be said that it follows the scientific method of observation, hypothesis, expirimentation, conclusion already as that's just formalized trial and error. Being a religion not a natural science, it has no overlap with physics or chemistry or any of those. However it intergrates seamlessly with psychology, sociology and things of that nature where areas of influence overlap. When a Buddhist idea is proven wrong by science or philisophy, Buddhist teachings change. It's happened before. It will hsppen again.


While it is novel- and perhaps refreshing- to see religions that do not hold themselves to immutable dogma in the face of reason, failure to do so alone does not make an institution empirical in nature.
 
2013-02-12 10:47:43 AM

dready zim: Why should enlightenment be scientific?


I never said it should.

I am pointing out doglover is wrong to call Buddhism scientific.

doglover: No, you're attempting to argue for the sake of argument.


Fromt he guy who brought up physiscs and then bashed me for responding about physics, that is rich.


doglover: Buddhism is a religion, not a physical science.

However, unlike other religions, Buddhism is alterable based on new input. It can be said that it follows the scientific method of observation, hypothesis, expirimentation, conclusion already as that's just formalized trial and error.



What "expirament" can prove you have broken the cycle of re-birth, or reached enlightenment?  Hwo do you observe fi someone has done that?

Yes some forms of buddhism have changed with new ideas, but so has every religion.


doglover: When a Buddhist idea is proven wrong by science or philisophy, Buddhist teachings change. It's happened before. It will hsppen again.


Care to point out an example?

doglover: As for your asertion that an idea which is difficult to hold in your normal state of mind is without merit


Where did I say "without merit"?

Bad_Seed: I don't see why not, if, at the moment that you 'grasped' them, you have necessarily entered into a state of consciousness that's different from the one we call normal.


If something can only be grasped in an altered state of mind it isn't compatable with the scientific method.
 
2013-02-12 10:49:38 AM

liam76: If something can only be grasped in an altered state of mind it isn't compatable with the scientific method.


upload.wikimedia.org
/has a sad.
 
2013-02-12 12:03:06 PM

liam76: Bad_Seed: I don't see why not, if, at the moment that you 'grasped' them, you have necessarily entered into a state of consciousness that's different from the one we call normal.

If something can only be grasped in an altered state of mind it isn't compatable with the scientific method.


Yes!  Thank you Sir Iiam76,
If the people involved in this article had followed the scientific method of asking basic questions they would have come to the conclusion of "Hey, this Japanese perv is groping his subjects!" instead of sweeping this under the rug for decades.  There was a very telling quote:

FTY: "Because of their long history with Zen practice, people in Japan have some skepticism about priests," Ms. Schireson said. But in the United States many proponents have a "devotion to the guru or the teacher in a way that could repress our common sense and emotional intelligence."

The scientific method is what works!  Skepticism works!  Blind devotion that can only be grasped by the enlightened leads to abuse by the have's over the have-not's (in this perverse case, enlightenment being the 'have').
 
2013-02-12 12:32:29 PM

SkunkWerks: Brainsick: Notabunny: fta a "career of misconduct,"

See, mom? I wasn't a smartass delinquent. I just started on my career path in grade school.

Couldn't commit to a career of evil?

[burnsburdick11.wikis.birmingham.k12.mi.us image 155x151]

Something wrong with Astronomy?


Yeah, something wrong?  At least it's not Subhuman.
 
2013-02-12 12:55:18 PM

liam76: BarkingUnicorn: While Buddhism is a religion, it is practiced scientifically

If it was practiced scientificially they would only teach or advocate things they know will help you escape from the cycle of rebirth.  Since the cycle itself is impossible to prove, and escaping it is impossibl;e to prove you can't say it is practiced scientificially.


Buddhism's goal is to end suffering.  It teaches what has been proven to do that.  Is it possible to prove that cancer can be eliminated?  If not, then cancer research is unscientific by your reasoning.


BarkingUnicorn: Buddhism is not concerned with the existence of God, or the origin of the universe. It is concerned with the cessation of suffering

Buddhism has a pretty in depth cosmology.  Not sure hwo you can say theya ren't concerend with the originof the universe. Depending on the flavor there are gods.


Many scientists tell their children about Santa Claus, but he is not science's concern.  He is a tool for teaching certain moral values.
 
2013-02-12 12:57:58 PM

dready zim: liam76: hwo you

liam76: theya ren't concerend

liam76: originof

I`ve started typing in this way lately. I`m worried I might have early symptoms of parkinsons.


Or a clogged keyboard.
 
2013-02-12 01:21:57 PM

liam76: I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.


But that is not what Buddhism teaches.  Enlightenment can come under any circumstances, not just while one is meditating.  One of the Buddha's disciples "got it" when the Buddha simply held up a flower without saying a word.

Some people smoke and drink but live to be a vigorous 100+.  Most people find that certain regimens are necessary to maintain health. Science teaches people to play the odds, and so does Buddhism.
 
2013-02-12 01:25:55 PM

BarkingUnicorn: liam76: BarkingUnicorn: While Buddhism is a religion, it is practiced scientifically

If it was practiced scientificially they would only teach or advocate things they know will help you escape from the cycle of rebirth. Since the cycle itself is impossible to prove, and escaping it is impossibl;e to prove you can't say it is practiced scientificially.

Buddhism's goal is to end suffering. It teaches what has been proven to do that. Is it possible to prove that cancer can be eliminated? If not, then cancer research is unscientific by your reasoning.


Buddhism has been "proven" to end suffering as much as any religion has.

Yes it is possible to prove that cancer has been eliminated, not so with "ending suffering".


BarkingUnicorn: BarkingUnicorn: Buddhism is not concerned with the existence of God, or the origin of the universe. It is concerned with the cessation of suffering

Buddhism has a pretty in depth cosmology. Not sure hwo you can say theya ren't concerend with the originof the universe. Depending on the flavor there are gods.

Many scientists tell their children about Santa Claus, but he is not science's concern. He is a tool for teaching certain moral values


A scientist is a person, he has concerns outside of science.  Not really coomprable to the teachings of a faith.

The fact is has teachings for the origin of the universe.  If it wasn't concerend with them it wouldn't be teaching them.
 
2013-02-12 01:28:29 PM

BarkingUnicorn: liam76: I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.

But that is not what Buddhism teaches.


Take that up with the guy that said it.


BarkingUnicorn: Enlightenment can come under any circumstances, not just while one is meditating. One of the Buddha's disciples "got it" when the Buddha simply held up a flower without saying a word.


My point in thw whoel thing is that the stage of "enlightenment" isn't compatable with the scientific method as it can't be proven.
 
2013-02-12 01:39:40 PM
th06.deviantart.net
gis for "monk tittys"  Looks like Camron Diaz has gotten some work done.
 
2013-02-12 02:06:24 PM

liam76: BarkingUnicorn: liam76: BarkingUnicorn: While Buddhism is a religion, it is practiced scientifically

If it was practiced scientificially they would only teach or advocate things they know will help you escape from the cycle of rebirth. Since the cycle itself is impossible to prove, and escaping it is impossibl;e to prove you can't say it is practiced scientificially.

Buddhism's goal is to end suffering. It teaches what has been proven to do that. Is it possible to prove that cancer can be eliminated? If not, then cancer research is unscientific by your reasoning.

Buddhism has been "proven" to end suffering as much as any religion has.

Yes it is possible to prove that cancer has been eliminated, not so with "ending suffering".


BarkingUnicorn: BarkingUnicorn: Buddhism is not concerned with the existence of God, or the origin of the universe. It is concerned with the cessation of suffering

Buddhism has a pretty in depth cosmology. Not sure hwo you can say theya ren't concerend with the originof the universe. Depending on the flavor there are gods.

Many scientists tell their children about Santa Claus, but he is not science's concern. He is a tool for teaching certain moral values

A scientist is a person, he has concerns outside of science.  Not really coomprable to the teachings of a faith.

The fact is has teachings for the origin of the universe.  If it wasn't concerend with them it wouldn't be teaching them.


One can prove that cancer or suffering has been eliminated in specific individuals.  But you cannot prove that no one (including the "cured') will ever again suffer  or come down with cancer.  Yet science pursues the elimination of all cancer forever, and Buddhism does likewise for suffering.  They do it in the same way:  with faith and scientific method.

Cosmology is not a defining characteristic of Buddhism any more than Santa Claus is  a defining characteristic of science.  One can practice Buddhism without cosmology, and many do; particularly, Zen practitioners.
 
2013-02-12 02:23:26 PM

BarkingUnicorn: One can prove that cancer or suffering has been eliminated in specific individuals. But you cannot prove that no one (including the "cured') will ever again suffer or come down with cancer. Yet science pursues the elimination of all cancer forever, and Buddhism does likewise for suffering.



Nope.

YOu can't prove that suffering has been eliminated in an individual.

BarkingUnicorn: They do it in the same way: with faith and scientific method.


Buddhism does it with fait.

Faithe that the person has escaped the cycle of re-birth.  Faioth that the path they are on will end their suffereing, faith that their teacher has reached enlightenment, etc.

BarkingUnicorn: Cosmology is not a defining characteristic of Buddhism any more than Santa Claus is a defining characteristic of science. One can practice Buddhism without cosmology, and many do; particularly, Zen practitioners


There is absolutely no science that supports Santa.  You can't say that about Buddhism and cosmology.

Your argement here is bordering on troll level of stupid.
 
2013-02-12 02:32:18 PM

liam76: My point in thw whoel thing is that the stage of "enlightenment" isn't compatable with the scientific method as it can't be proven.


Enlightenment is not the end of suffering;  it is the understanding that produces the effect of suffering's ending.  The mechanism of action of many drugs is not proven, yet  their effects are. Is the method by which such drugs are  developed unscientific?

If you insist that the mechanism of a drug's action can be proven but simply hasn't been yet, then you are making a statement of faith.

 
2013-02-12 02:41:48 PM

BarkingUnicorn: liam76: My point in thw whoel thing is that the stage of "enlightenment" isn't compatable with the scientific method as it can't be proven.

Enlightenment is not the end of suffering; it is the understanding that produces the effect of suffering's ending. The mechanism of action of many drugs is not proven, yet their effects are. Is the method by which such drugs are developed unscientific?


First off you have been conflating "enlightenment" and "end of suffering."

That has nothing to do with my point.

Neither one (enlightenment, or end fo suffering) can be proven.

The effects of the drug can be proven. The effects of enlightenment can't.


BarkingUnicorn: If you insist that the mechanism of a drug's action can be proven but simply hasn't been yet, then you are making a statement of faith


I am not making that statement. The effects of drugs have real measurable results. Not so with enlightenment, end of suffering or whatever you want to move the goal posts to.
 
2013-02-12 02:47:12 PM

liam76: YOu can't prove that suffering has been eliminated in an individual.


One can observe changes in neurochemistry or electrical brain activity, but one cannot prove their effects on schizophrenia.  So all related  research and practice is unscientific.

Are you a Scientologist?
 
2013-02-12 02:53:12 PM

BarkingUnicorn: liam76: YOu can't prove that suffering has been eliminated in an individual.

One can observe changes in neurochemistry or electrical brain activity, but one cannot prove their effects on schizophrenia. So all related research and practice is unscientific.


That might be a valid point if schizophrenia=suffering. It doesn't.

Can you point to any "related research" that shows suffering is lessend with Buddhism?

How about any research that shows they have stopped the cycle of re-birth?


/this is like arguing with christians like Kirk Cameron that think they are using science to prove evolution doesn't exist...
 
2013-02-12 03:24:14 PM
Jesus fark, there are Buddhist fundies in this thread.
 
2013-02-12 03:28:18 PM

omnibus_necanda_sunt: Jesus fark, there are Buddhist fundies in this thread.


I think you mean scientists...
 
2013-02-12 03:57:45 PM

liam76: omnibus_necanda_sunt: Jesus fark, there are Buddhist fundies in this thread.

I think you mean scientists...


Yes, scientific fundamentalists. "Science is all of this, and all else is not science."
 
2013-02-12 04:21:11 PM

doglover: Try as you might, the waking mind just doesn't let you fully experience simultaneous emptiness and form as a single state of being.


Bullshiat! Anyone who has played this game far enough to obtain both "tea" and "no tea" has experienced that!

www.douglasadams.com
 
2013-02-12 04:47:45 PM

BarkingUnicorn: liam76: omnibus_necanda_sunt: Jesus fark, there are Buddhist fundies in this thread.

I think you mean scientists...

Yes, scientific fundamentalists. "Science is all of this, and all else is not science."


Studying how to break the cycle of rebirth and how to reach "Enlightenment" has nothing to do with science.
 
2013-02-12 05:44:22 PM

liam76: BarkingUnicorn: liam76: omnibus_necanda_sunt: Jesus fark, there are Buddhist fundies in this thread.

I think you mean scientists...

Yes, scientific fundamentalists. "Science is all of this, and all else is not science."

Studying how to break the cycle of rebirth and how to reach "Enlightenment" has nothing to do with science.


You're right; I should have said, "all else is not scientific."

"Of, or relating to, or using the methods or principles of science."

Science and Buddhism share many methods and principles, not the least of which are  open-mindedness and collaboration.
 
2013-02-12 05:59:46 PM

BarkingUnicorn: Science and Buddhism share many methods and principles, not the least of which are open-mindedness and collaboration


They may share open mindedness and collaboration (I would argue that that statement can't be applied to Buddhism as a whole seeing as how different sects have very different ideas on how to gain enlightenment), but that doesn't mean they share the central principles and methods.

You can't prove enlightenment.  You can't prove someone has broken the cycle of rebirth (or that there even is one).  Without proof of those claiming "scientific method" for reaching them is meaningless.
 
2013-02-13 06:32:47 AM

BarkingUnicorn: Science and Buddhism share many methods and principles


Apples and oranges share many traits, yet apples are still apples, and oranges are still oranges.
 
2013-02-13 12:16:26 PM

BarkingUnicorn: liam76: I am not arguing that the brain isn't going to experience different thing while meditating, sleeping, on drugs etc.

I am pointing out that if you can only 'grasp' things in that state it isn't scientific.

But that is not what Buddhism teaches. Enlightenment can come under any circumstances, not just while one is meditating. One of the Buddha's disciples "got it" when the Buddha simply held up a flower without saying a word.


Enlightenment is a funny word to use, because you don't really get what it means unless you know you've had a brief moment of it.  All people have and do from time to time.  I think the simplest way to describe is to say that it's like that light bulb going off in your head when you come to realize something then understand how that knowledge gives you deeper understanding of both prior and future events.  Funnily enough, I got it a lot when I first started learning about physics and pretty much every other core science.

Don't divorce science and spirit.  Science observes, tests, records, then observes, tests, and records again until concrete facts can be established.  The human spirit is the driving force leading us to the questions we ask that eventually lead to science and cataloging.

This all reminds me of a zen proverb.  Grope boobies, find enlightenment, grope more boobies.  Or something like that.
 
Displayed 123 of 123 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report