born_yesterday: Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: What in the holy blue f*ck is the GOAL here? What do you WANT? Tell me what you need us to tell you? What will make you happy?I don't even think they know anymore.
birchman: I want you to say, in exact, specific words, what you are looking for.He'll know when he finds it.
halfof33: Headso: The good part about Benghazi is if you hear someone talking about it like it's a conspiracy you know they are a farking moran of the highest order and you can ignore everything they say.Damn straight! It ain't no conspiracy, we know all the facts, all we need now is the why.Why did they lie?Solid post headso.
halfof33: Kroft: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya attack.Obama: Right
halfof33: You said he knew it was a terrorist attack, and I posted proof that he said the opposite.
LordJiro: And when he says anything REALLY blatantly idiotic, he gets his post removed when someone points it out. He's a troll, nothing more. He doesn't believe a word he types, Maybe he's a mod, or a friend of one who does it for kicks. Maybe he's one of the RNC's paid shiat-flingers. All I know for sure is that his dishonest bullshiat isn't even worth looking at.
justtray: Still lying, still deflecting, still not answering the question.Still a liar.
quatchi: "Iraq has WMD and are gonna use them so we hafta go to war"and..."Enhanced interrogation isn't torture"
NEXT! You partisan slurpers are pathetic. It matters because the government lied, because their intelligence was incompetent or dishonest. I get that none of this makes any difference to you apologists.
Looking forward to more hand waving from the sheep.
Biological Ali: SkinnyHead: udhq: It's telling that the order to defend the consulate by any means necessary="whatever".Saying "do whatever you need to do" is the same as saying "whatever." What is that supposed to mean?Stop trolling. Do something productive and meaningful with your time.
halfof33: Now had the mutts who made that added the African Embassy attacks in 1998,
Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: What in the holy blue f*ck is the GOAL here? What do you WANT? Tell me what you need us to tell you? What will make you happy?
Rwa2play: randomjsa: Being completely disengaged while a disaster was happening then being so concerned about it that you run off to a fund raiser the next day... Then lie about it for two weeks after the fact...Yeah no reason to ask questions here.3/10. C'mon man, troll a little harder wouldya?
halfof33: Karac: 1998? I don't see no stinking 1998 in that graphic. Which can only mean one thing:EXACTLY! As I said, it is missing! Of course, I didn't create that lie. Thanks for having my back big guy!
halfof33: EXACTLY! As I said, I lie. Thanks
Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: halfof33: lilbjorn: Because it's UTTERLY FARKING STUPID to go around broadcasting details of how the State Department, CIA, and military respond to terrorist situations.I think you meant: didn't respond.And what is particularly interesting is the key lie (that the attack spontaneously arose out of an anti-video protest) had nothing to do with "responding to terrorist situations." But Obama was busy, so any old lie in a crisis, a re-election crisis.\m/I want you to say, in exact, specific words, what you are looking for.
halfof33: hugram: Here you go 16.5...[ct.politicomments.com image 480x496]Awesome! I love it when liars post that lie.Now had the mutts who made that added the African Embassy attacks in 1998, and the several attacks During the Obama ADMINISTRATION, it might be effective.Instead it serves to highlight that IN THIS CASE, the bozos at the Administration lied through their teeth about it.That is why Benghazi is different and that is why I LOVE IT when morans post that bullshiat graphic.Thanks BRO!
halfof33: Why did they lie?
Antimatter: His job is to say yes or no, when a plan is laid before him. That's it. Everything else is left to people who plan stuff like this for a living.
dookdookdook: FTA:According to Panetta, President Obama checked in with his military team early on during the attack, then checked out for the rest of the night.In the interest of presenting the liberal (i.e. true) side of this:(tldr, "You didn't build that" all over again)http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/02/07/conservative-media-selectivel y -crop-panettas-co/192580Conservative media are pushing selectively cropped footage of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey as evidence that President Obama was "AWOL" the night of the Benghazi attack. In reality, Panetta and Dempsey emphasized that Obama's involvement was appropriate and that the White House was kept "well-informed" throughout the night....Both The Weekly Standard and Fox News' video cuts off just as Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who was also testifying, corrected Ayotte as to the White House's focus the night of the Benghazi attack. Gen. Dempsey attested to the fact that although Obama did not personally follow up with him, Obama's staff was engaged "pretty constantly through the period, which is the way it would normally work."...Panetta also testified to the fact that Obama was in contact with military officials and was "well-informed" during the attack on our consulate, another part of the testimony that was ignored by conservative media. Special Report aired a portion of Sen. Lindsey Graham's questioning, but cut off Panetta's defense of Obama.
SkinnyHead: So when that 3AM phone call came in, nobody answered. Well that comes as no surprise.
randomjsa: Being completely disengaged while a disaster was happening then being so concerned about it that you run off to a fund raiser the next day... Then lie about it for two weeks after the fact...Yeah no reason to ask questions here.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Apr 29 2017 06:55:48
Runtime: 0.570 sec (570 ms)