If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   Obama's lack on involvement in the Benghazi scandal makes it even more of a scandal. Or something   (foxnews.com) divider line 387
    More: Followup, President Obama, Benghazi, Martin Dempsey, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, M.I.A., dereliction of duty, scandals, interest rates  
•       •       •

1026 clicks; posted to Politics » on 11 Feb 2013 at 3:20 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



387 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-12 04:33:36 PM

NateGrey: halfof33: Uh, you mean where I pointed out a dozen times that the CIA didn't alter the lies about the non-existent protest?

"The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations." Link


There was NEVER any evidence to support that, and it was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, the FBI's evidence, and the DoD's position. I said that already silly.
 
2013-02-12 05:08:43 PM

halfof33: t was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, . . . and the DoD's position.


I haven't been following as closely lately as I did initially, but did you ever manage to come up with any actual proof of this?
 
2013-02-12 05:26:16 PM

halfof33: Man, I get that you are a partisan troll, sport, but an incompetent partisan troll?


OH WOW THE IRONY LOLOLOL.
 
2013-02-12 05:28:14 PM

incendi: halfof33: t was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, . . . and the DoD's position.

I haven't been following as closely lately as I did initially, but did you ever manage to come up with any actual proof of this?


1. Do you HONESTLY believe this guy has the integrity to properly cite his sources?

2. Why are you engaging trolls? Leave him to his own twisted reality. You don't want to go down that road.
 
2013-02-12 05:33:19 PM

incendi: halfof33: t was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, . . . and the DoD's position.

I haven't been following as closely lately as I did initially, but did you ever manage to come up with any actual proof of this?


Did you ever ask?

It is all in the Fact Check timeline.

But lets be honest, you don't really care do you?  If you do just google this:  Factcheck.org benghazi and it is all right there.
 
2013-02-12 05:43:16 PM
It was the thread that never ends,
the derp goes on and on my friends
halfof33 started burping it, not knowing what it was
and he'll continue durping it forever just because
(go to start)
 
2013-02-12 06:22:21 PM

halfof33: incendi: halfof33: t was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, . . . and the DoD's position.

I haven't been following as closely lately as I did initially, but did you ever manage to come up with any actual proof of this?

Did you ever ask?

It is all in the Fact Check timeline.

But lets be honest, you don't really care do you?  If you do just google this:  Factcheck.org benghazi and it is all right there.



Keep going; I'm sure you'll get to him some how and we'll all come to our senses and bow to the greatness that is you! I know this because Mr. Rogers says we're ALL special in our own *special* way.

/So brave.
 
2013-02-12 08:04:15 PM

Eshman: 2. Why are you engaging trolls? Leave him to his own twisted reality. You don't want to go down that road.


It's a hobby.

halfof33: But lets be honest, you don't really care do you?  If you do just google this:  Factcheck.org benghazi and it is all right there.


So, no, you haven't found any proof. And yes, I've read the factcheck timeline. It still doesn't support you. Maybe one of these days they'll declassify what you need to prove your thesis one way or the other.
 
2013-02-12 08:12:55 PM

cranked: It was the thread that never ends,
the derp goes on and on my friends
halfof33 started burping it, not knowing what it was
and he'll continue durping it forever just because
(go to start)


nice

Eshman: Keep going; I'm sure you'll get to him some how and we'll all come to our senses and bow to the greatness that is you! I know this because Mr. Rogers says we're ALL special in our own *special* way.

/So brave.


If you get him  really riled up, his delusions of grandeur become even more apparent...
 
2013-02-12 08:20:56 PM

incendi: And yes, I've read the factcheck timeline. It still doesn't support you. Maybe one of these days they'll declassify what you need to prove your thesis one way or the other.




Fact Check!

My claim: Administration's claim that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest outside the Consulate was inconsistent with state department' intelligence
Derpy: Derp!
Me: my source is Fact Check.
Derpy: I checked fact check, DERP!
Me: Direct Quote from FactCheck:

Oct. 9: At a background briefing, senior state department officials reveal there were no protests prior to the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi - contrary to what administration officials have been saying for weeks. A senior department official says "everything is calm at 8:30 p.m." (Libya time) when Stevens was outside the building to bid a visitor goodbye. The ambassador retired to his bedroom for the evening at 9 p.m. The calm was shattered by 9:40 p.m. when "loud noises" and "gunfire and an explosion" are heard. (The background briefing provided on Sept. 12 also said the attack began at about 10 p.m., or about 4 p.m. EDT, but it did not provide information about what happened prior to the attack.)

A senior official says it was "not our conclusion" that the Benghazi attack started as a spontaneous protest to the anti-Muslim video. He also said "there was no actionable intelligence of any planned or imminent attack."

Thread?: Farking OVER.

Class dismissed. Don't go away mad. partisan trolls, just go away.
 
2013-02-12 08:28:10 PM

halfof33: My claim: Administration's claim that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest outside the Consulate was inconsistent with state department' intelligence


So you're no longer claiming that anyone in the government lied?
 
2013-02-12 08:31:29 PM

halfof33: incendi: And yes, I've read the factcheck timeline. It still doesn't support you. Maybe one of these days they'll declassify what you need to prove your thesis one way or the other.

Fact Check!

My claim: Administration's claim that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest outside the Consulate was inconsistent with state department' intelligence
Derpy: Derp!
Me: my source is Fact Check.
Derpy: I checked fact check, DERP!
Me: Direct Quote from FactCheck:

Oct. 9: At a background briefing, senior state department officials reveal there were no protests prior to the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi - contrary to what administration officials have been saying for weeks. A senior department official says "everything is calm at 8:30 p.m." (Libya time) when Stevens was outside the building to bid a visitor goodbye. The ambassador retired to his bedroom for the evening at 9 p.m. The calm was shattered by 9:40 p.m. when "loud noises" and "gunfire and an explosion" are heard. (The background briefing provided on Sept. 12 also said the attack began at about 10 p.m., or about 4 p.m. EDT, but it did not provide information about what happened prior to the attack.)

A senior official says it was "not our conclusion" that the Benghazi attack started as a spontaneous protest to the anti-Muslim video. He also said "there was no actionable intelligence of any planned or imminent attack."

Thread?: Farking OVER.

Class dismissed. Don't go away mad. partisan trolls, just go away.


So there's no scandal. No one gives a shiat, and your giant tirade added absolutely nothing of substance to this shiatstorm of a thread. Well done. Pat yourself on the back.
 
2013-02-12 08:34:20 PM

Eshman: So there's no scandal. No one gives a shiat, and your giant tirade added absolutely nothing of substance to this shiatstorm of a thread. Well done. Pat yourself on the back.


It's the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle as applied to goalposts: the very act of determining where they are moves them.
 
2013-02-12 08:38:41 PM

incendi: It's the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle as applied to goalposts: the very act of determining where they are moves them.


and of course, I've conflated the uncertainty principle with the observer effect, but unlike certain persons in these parts, I can admit when I'm wrong.
 
2013-02-12 09:19:01 PM

incendi: and of course, I've conflated the uncertainty principle with the observer effect, but unlike certain persons in these parts, I can admit when I'm wrong.


incendi: So you're no longer claiming that anyone in the government lied?




The children still here? Wow. I do enjoy how you completely changed the subject when i schooled you about the State Department, and still managed to shiat the bed. Uh champ, the reason I cited the State Department in the first place was to show that the Administration lied!

Bwhahaha! Oh mercy.

Partisan derps gonna derp!
 
2013-02-12 09:27:32 PM
So is your claim

halfof33: My claim: Administration's claim that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest outside the Consulate was inconsistent with state department' intelligence


or is it

halfof33: the Administration lied!


because these are not the same thing.
 
2013-02-12 09:35:30 PM

incendi: So is your claim

halfof33: My claim: Administration's claim that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest outside the Consulate was inconsistent with state department' intelligence

or is it

halfof33: the Administration lied!

because these are not the same thing.


Incendi! I like you. Time for basic logic! Their story can both be inconsistent with the state departments story AND a lie! Just like you are dumb, and completely full of shiat.

Damn it is like shooting fish in a god damn barrel in here.
 
2013-02-12 09:49:46 PM

halfof33: Time for basic logic! Their story can both be inconsistent with the state departments story AND a lie!


They certainly can be! However, you've provided no evidence that they ACTUALLY are! Just like you are unpleasant on the internet and unpleasant in person. It could be true, but I haven't met you, so I don't have proof of the latter no matter how much evidence you provide of the former.
 
2013-02-12 10:53:47 PM

incendi: halfof33: Time for basic logic! Their story can both be inconsistent with the state departments story AND a lie!

They certainly can be! However, you've provided no evidence that they ACTUALLY are! Just like you are unpleasant on the internet and unpleasant in person. It could be true, but I haven't met you, so I don't have proof of the latter no matter how much evidence you provide of the former.




Yes I did! Remember, when I quoted from Fact Check, and then you deflected it by demonstrating that you don't understand that something can be both inconsistent and a lie and then I showed how you didn't know what you were talking about and then you deflected THAT by claiming that I didn't provide evidence, and then I pointed out that I quoted Fact Check.....

and so on and so on... I honestly CANNOT imagine why you keep coming back for this beating.

Whatever bro, it is your funeral.
 
2013-02-13 01:21:43 AM
www.bitlogic.com
 
2013-02-13 06:52:43 AM

halfof33: and so on and so on... I honestly CANNOT imagine why you keep coming back for this beating.


Because your particular brand of insanity is  fascinating. Especially the bit where merely refusing to ever acknowledge that your arguments don't hold water becomes a "beating" or "shooting fish in a barrel".

That, and your compulsion to have the last word. Is there some prize at the end of each thread I've been missing out on?
 
2013-02-13 08:32:37 AM

halfof33: NateGrey: halfof33: Uh, you mean where I pointed out a dozen times that the CIA didn't alter the lies about the non-existent protest?

"The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations." Link

There was NEVER any evidence to support that, and it was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, the FBI's evidence, and the DoD's position. I said that already silly.


Soooooo Benghazi is a scandal?
 
2013-02-13 08:44:10 AM

incendi: Especially the bit where merely refusing to ever acknowledge that your arguments don't hold water becomes a "beating" or "shooting fish in a barrel".




Yes, I've been very impressed with the intricacies of the various ways you mutts call make personal attacks and deflect, as I grind through the partisan hoard like a freaking wood chipper.
 
2013-02-13 08:48:31 AM

halfof33: Yes, I've been very impressed with the intricacies of the various ways you mutts call make personal attacks and deflect, as I grind through the partisan hoard like a freaking wood chipper.


And here we are, full circle, back to you making up your own reality. It's adorable.
 
2013-02-13 10:17:46 AM

incendi: halfof33: Yes, I've been very impressed with the intricacies of the various ways you mutts call make personal attacks and deflect, as I grind through the partisan hoard like a freaking wood chipper.

And here we are, full circle, back to you making up your own reality. It's adorable.


You know which is my most favorite post in this whole thread?  It was the one after I quoted Fact Check and refuted your entire history of nonsense.  It is this one:

incendi: So is your claim

halfof33: My claim: Administration's claim that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest outside the Consulate was inconsistent with state department' intelligence

or is it

halfof33: the Administration lied!

because these are not the same thing.


Damn, there is just so much WRONG with it! First it hand waves away the quote from the State Department, then it moves the goal posts, and on top of it all, what makes it REALLY SPECIAL?  It demonstrates a gross lack of basic logic, I mean:  "Those aren't the SAME." Really, of course they are fully consistent and  do not contradict one another even a tiny bit, even the tiny bit that a persistent partisan troll would understand if it had ever heard the phrase "false dichotomy."

But of course it hadn't heard the phrase "false dichotomy."  In fact showed that it can't understand the CONCEPT.  And that is why I give it the Award of the Most "Special" Post in the thread.

Drops Mic, Walks Off the Court, the rest of the thread called on account of farking slaughter.
 
2013-02-13 10:45:26 AM

halfof33: Damn, there is just so much WRONG with it! First it hand waves away the quote from the State Department, then it moves the goal posts, and on top of it all, what makes it REALLY SPECIAL?  It demonstrates a gross lack of basic logic, I mean:  "Those aren't the SAME." Really, of course they are fully consistent and  do not contradict one another even a tiny bit, even the tiny bit that a persistent partisan troll would understand if it had ever heard the phrase "false dichotomy."

But of course it hadn't heard the phrase "false dichotomy."  In fact showed that it can't understand the CONCEPT.  And that is why I give it the Award of the Most "Special" Post in the thread.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (gasp) HAHAhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Here, lemme help you out.
 
2013-02-13 10:51:07 AM
Jesus Christ, he googled it, and posted a link to wikipedia, having learned nothing.

Jesus.....
 
2013-02-13 10:52:45 AM

halfof33: Jesus Christ, he googled it, and posted a link to wikipedia, having learned nothing.

Jesus.....


Hahaha, you really don't understand, do you? Pathetic.

Also, you keep walking back on the court and picking up that mic... can't help yourself , can you?
 
2013-02-13 11:56:05 AM

halfof33: Yes, I've been very impressed with the intricacies of the various ways you mutts call make personal attacks and deflect, as I grind through the partisan hoard like a freaking wood chipper.


Your winning. Like Charlie Sheen.
 
2013-02-13 12:00:01 PM

NateGrey: Your winning. Like Charlie Sheen.


My winning what, genius?
 
2013-02-13 12:11:33 PM

halfof33: NateGrey: Your winning. Like Charlie Sheen.

My winning what, genius?


I'm tempted to start a fight over the grammar, but that really would just be trolling.

Seriously, though, why don't you just walk away? I mean, you've already declared victory half a dozen times. Does it really bother you so much that a couple of assholes on the internet think you're an entertaining moron?
 
2013-02-13 06:05:59 PM

halfof33: Jesus Christ, he googled it, and posted a link to wikipedia, having learned nothing.

Jesus.....


"I don't know how wikipedia works."

DRINK
 
2013-02-13 09:09:21 PM
Oh man, it appears that Wikipedia works by cutting and pasting from my post, putting it into google, then linking to the Wikipedia page for what I posted, and adding nothing to indicate that you understand the concept!

Well, let me rebut!

Www.wikipedia.com

Boom!

/lulz, what a pack of idiots.
 
2013-02-14 05:39:37 AM

halfof33: Oh man, it appears that Wikipedia works by cutting and pasting from my post, putting it into google, then linking to the Wikipedia page for what I posted, and adding nothing to indicate that you understand the concept!

Well, let me rebut!

Www.wikipedia.com

Boom!

/lulz, what a pack of idiots.


You owe us therapy fees.
 
2013-02-14 10:28:52 AM

thamike: You owe us therapy fees.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (gasp) HAHAhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

here lemme help you out

amidoinitright?
 
2013-02-14 10:47:29 AM

halfof33: thamike: You owe us therapy fees.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (gasp) HAHAhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

here lemme help you out

amidoinitright?


There is another Benghazi thread, can you show up so we can all ridicule and laugh.

You are the derper Benghazi threads deserve.
 
2013-02-14 01:41:46 PM

halfof33: Kroft: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya attack.
Obama: Right


halfof33: You said he knew it was a terrorist attack, and I posted proof that he said the opposite.


See that right there, folks? You know what that is? That's halfof33's clown shoes

www.orangejuiceblog.com

I see that most people just ridicule him, but those trying to get a straight answer from him? You might as well try to get bozo to just let you have a single bite of that yummy cream pie
 
Displayed 37 of 387 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report