If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   Obama's lack on involvement in the Benghazi scandal makes it even more of a scandal. Or something   (foxnews.com) divider line 387
    More: Followup, President Obama, Benghazi, Martin Dempsey, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, M.I.A., dereliction of duty, scandals, interest rates  
•       •       •

1026 clicks; posted to Politics » on 11 Feb 2013 at 3:20 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



387 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-02-12 01:34:23 AM

Zeppelininthesky: Biological Ali: Seriously, why even have "posting rules" if a troll as obvious as halfof33 isn't going to get a timeout? Beyond a certain point you might as well just give up the whole pretense altogether.

I put him on ignore. I don't mind arguing with folks, but he is just obnoxious.


The ignore filters work inconsistently at best, especially with trolls who show up in every single thread on a given topic and go on to post seemingly hundreds of times. Lots of people will end up replying to them, and enough of it trickles through that it defeats the purpose of ignore.
 
2013-02-12 01:38:20 AM

Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: What in the holy blue f*ck is the GOAL here? What do you WANT? Tell me what you need us to tell you? What will make you happy?


They want a big show and impeachment.  They're still looking for revenge for Watergate.  They want to drive a Democratic president from office, but they fell short with Clinton.  So now it's Obama's turn.
 
2013-02-12 01:39:19 AM

DeaH: StopLurkListen: clambam: Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: What in the holy blue f*ck is the GOAL here? What do you WANT? Tell me what you need us to tell you? What will make you happy?

They want Obama to resign. Then they want Biden to resign. That would make Boehner president and the country could start to heal.

After the VP, the President Pro-tem of the Senate succeeds - currently Senator Pat Leahy.

Nope. the House is first. Then the Senate Pro-tem. That is one of the reason Nancy Pelosi was supposed to fly on Air Force Two when she was speaker. Boehner flies commercial, and I bet the Secret Service isn't very happy about that.


but does Boner fly coach?
 
2013-02-12 01:39:54 AM

Biological Ali: Zeppelininthesky: Biological Ali: Seriously, why even have "posting rules" if a troll as obvious as halfof33 isn't going to get a timeout? Beyond a certain point you might as well just give up the whole pretense altogether.

I put him on ignore. I don't mind arguing with folks, but he is just obnoxious.

The ignore filters work inconsistently at best, especially with trolls who show up in every single thread on a given topic and go on to post seemingly hundreds of times. Lots of people will end up replying to them, and enough of it trickles through that it defeats the purpose of ignore.


Yeah, but at least if he tries to talk directly to me, I will miss it. Win/win for me
 
2013-02-12 01:48:05 AM
To summarize: anything Obama said (or didn't say) is a lie. Anything Obama did (or didn't do) was wrong.
 
2013-02-12 02:42:30 AM

jjorsett: Anyone remember the multi-week biatchfit that the callous and uncaring President George W. Bush got when he didn't land Air Force One smack in the middle of Katrina-submerged New Orleans and instead flew over it and just looked out the window? If that criticism was valid, so it this. Welcome to the club, hypocrites.


Benghazi happened in September. The only valid part of the criticism was that the White House statement was possibly mischaracterized.

It is now five months after the fact. It never became a scandal. Obama was re-elected. Benghazi is no longer politically relevant. Find a new chicken to fark.
 
2013-02-12 09:12:24 AM

thiefofdreams: Cutting a quote like that is bad and makes your point look bad. Hell all Carney was saying in the second quote was, we don't know if this is in reaction to a film or not. It is not an admission by any stretch.




This is why I participate in these threads, to correct the glaring obvious mistakes that contaminate these threads.

Did you see the utterly wrong claim to which I was responding? That the claim that the attack arose out of a protest was Susan Rice's speculation. I pulled one out of a dozen examples to demonstrate that was false, all of which are listed in the non-partisan web site Fact Check FROM WHERE I GRABBED THAT QUOTE, or I certainly could have posted the admission from the administration that the claim that the attack arose out of the protest was incorrect.

These fact are NOT DISPUTED. And therefore, your entire post is simply another example of the failures of people like you to see the forest for the trees. They admitted that their claim that the attack arose out of a protest was incorrect, and therefore your post is another in a long line of gross misrepresentations.

Do your homework next time, champ, I'm sick of educating you.
 
2013-02-12 09:36:47 AM

halfof33: This is why I participate in these threads


To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.
 
2013-02-12 09:57:05 AM
POTUS should resign. His handling of this affair is despicable, and an embarrasment to our country.

And anyone who even thinks about voting for Hillary in 2016 is completely out of their mind.
 
2013-02-12 10:35:55 AM

Pick: POTUS should resign. His handling of this affair is despicable, and an embarrasment to our country.

And anyone who even thinks about voting for Hillary in 2016 is completely out of their mind.


Derp thoughts with a Fark Con.
 
2013-02-12 10:38:38 AM

halfof33: This is why I participate in these threads, to correct the glaring obvious mistakes that contaminate these threads.


Congratulations - I now have you farkied in orange and labeled "Irony personified"
 
2013-02-12 10:42:34 AM

NateGrey: To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.




Nate Grey's reality: 1. The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice

2. 53 Americans died as the result of attacks on American diplomatic facilities during the Bush administration

3. Non-partisan organization "Fact Check dot org" is "Republican."

Facts are non-partisan, Nate, too bad you are so partisan you'll never understand that.

Welcome to reality Sport.
 
2013-02-12 11:10:34 AM

halfof33: NateGrey: To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.

Nate Grey's reality: 1. The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice

2. 53 Americans died as the result of attacks on American diplomatic facilities during the Bush administration

3. Non-partisan organization "Fact Check dot org" is "Republican."

Facts are non-partisan, Nate, too bad you are so partisan you'll never understand that.

Welcome to reality Sport.


There you go again....
 
2013-02-12 11:14:12 AM

halfof33: NateGrey: To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.

Nate Grey's reality: 1. The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice
2. 53 Americans died as the result of attacks on American diplomatic facilities during the Bush administration
3. Non-partisan organization "Fact Check dot org" is "Republican."
Facts are non-partisan, Nate, too bad you are so partisan you'll never understand that.
Welcome to reality Sport.


Actually Nate Grey's reality: 1. Doesn't Care 2. Laughs At Republicans

You guys set the bar so low as long as we don't invade countries for a decade these little fake scandals don't matter. Thanks Republicans!
 
2013-02-12 11:18:57 AM

incendi: halfof33: NateGrey: To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.

Nate Grey's reality: 1. The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice

2. 53 Americans died as the result of attacks on American diplomatic facilities during the Bush administration

3. Non-partisan organization "Fact Check dot org" is "Republican."

Facts are non-partisan, Nate, too bad you are so partisan you'll never understand that.

Welcome to reality Sport.

There you go again....




I know, I KNOW. The facts.

Can you BELIEVE that guy tried to claim that it was only Susan Rice's speculation. Hoo Doggie, that must have pissed you off.

And how about that dork trying to claim 53 Americans were killed? DAMN! That is some bull shiat.

/Lots of solid substantive posts from the slurpers in this thread: "Derp, 16.5 is a meanie." Welcome to flavor country, kids.
 
2013-02-12 11:21:51 AM

NateGrey: Actually Nate Grey's reality: 1. Doesn't Care 2. Wallows in Ignorance.


Fixed that for you, sport shirt. Nate doesn't care you see, but here he is trolling the farking thread. Go back to lurking.

Thanks for posting.
 
2013-02-12 11:23:45 AM

incendi: halfof33: NateGrey: To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.

Nate Grey's reality: 1. The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice

2. 53 Americans died as the result of attacks on American diplomatic facilities during the Bush administration

3. Non-partisan organization "Fact Check dot org" is "Republican."

Facts are non-partisan, Nate, too bad you are so partisan you'll never understand that.

Welcome to reality Sport.

There you go again....


I do like how he considers other human beings ablative.  Apparently, Obama's sin here is he didn't ensure enough human shields.
 
2013-02-12 11:28:17 AM

halfof33: Welcome to flavor country, kids.


I just think it's amusing that you respond to an assertion that you ignore reality and substitute your own by assigning positions to someone that they haven't asserted (in this thread, at least).

So, either you're doing precisely what you were accused of, or you've got a dossier on NateGrey's current positions regarding various aspects of your scandal. I'm not sure which casts you in a more pathetic light.
 
2013-02-12 11:33:17 AM

halfof33: Lots of solid substantive posts from the slurpers in this thread: "Derp, 16.5 is a meanie."


lol meanie? I am pretty sure no one takes you that seriously, think its more amusing. You arent posting anything you havent before. Cut off quotes, faulty citations. Plenty of Fark Cons have done it, even in this thread. There have been multiple hearings and nothing has come of it.
 
2013-02-12 11:37:15 AM

incendi: So, either you're doing precisely what you were accused of, or you've got a dossier on NateGrey's current positions regarding various aspects of your scandal. I'm not sure which casts you in a more pathetic light.




Oh wait, I'm the bad guy? Lets take a look at Nate's present position shall, we friendo?

"Actually Nate Grey's reality: 1. Doesn't Care 2. Laughs At Republicans." Wow, that is a substantive position that is worthy of respect, thank god you spent what ever shred of credibility on that position!

Oh wait, he is an admitted troll, and you "pathetically" attacked me again.

Say sport: lets talk reality. Was that troll correct when he posted a graphic claiming that 53 Americans were killed in attacks on Embassies or Consulates during the Bush Administration?

Yes or No. Save your butthurt 16.5 is a meanie bullshiat.

Yes or No?

C'mon, you can address facts in ONE post can't you?
 
2013-02-12 11:38:17 AM

NateGrey: halfof33: Lots of solid substantive posts from the slurpers in this thread: "Derp, 16.5 is a meanie."

lol meanie? I am pretty sure no one takes you that seriously, think its more amusing. You arent posting anything you havent before. Cut off quotes, faulty citations. Plenty of Fark Cons have done it, even in this thread. There have been multiple hearings and nothing has come of it.




Actually Nate Grey's reality: 1. Doesn't Care 2. Laughs At Republicans

Thanks for posting.
 
2013-02-12 11:43:45 AM

halfof33: Say sport: lets talk reality. Was that troll correct when he posted a graphic claiming that 53 Americans were killed in attacks on Embassies or Consulates during the Bush Administration?


Where is this post that you're so fixated on?
 
2013-02-12 11:45:16 AM

halfof33: NateGrey: halfof33: Lots of solid substantive posts from the slurpers in this thread: "Derp, 16.5 is a meanie."

lol meanie? I am pretty sure no one takes you that seriously, think its more amusing. You arent posting anything you havent before. Cut off quotes, faulty citations. Plenty of Fark Cons have done it, even in this thread. There have been multiple hearings and nothing has come of it.

Actually Nate Grey's reality: 1. Doesn't Care 2. Laughs At Republicans

Thanks for posting.


You proved for months you arent up for a serious discussion. I have posted to you and others multiple articles and citations, now I can laugh. Your brain is stuck on that day and any new facts are still in your queue for processing. I responded to you a month ago with this article, here you go again, catch up:

Report: Benghazi 'Talking Points' Watered Down By CIA


Proceed Republican.
 
2013-02-12 11:49:03 AM

incendi: halfof33: Say sport: lets talk reality. Was that troll correct when he posted a graphic claiming that 53 Americans were killed in attacks on Embassies or Consulates during the Bush Administration?

Where is this post that you're so fixated on?



AdolfOliverPanties [TotalFark] 2013-02-11 07:34:06 PM

/damn, this new posting system truly farks with the formatting of posts.
 
2013-02-12 12:03:22 PM

halfof33: AdolfOliverPanties [TotalFark] 2013-02-11 07:34:06 PM

/damn, this new posting system truly farks with the formatting of posts.


Ah, so nothing, actually, to do with NateGrey's "reality". You should probably take up the issue of the factual errors with somebody who actually had anything to do with that image being posted. Here, I'll even do it for you: Tisk tisk, AOP. Your image was factually incorrect in a manner which really has minimal bearing on its larger point.

Anyway, my point was that amidst all your righteous indignation, you responded to what amounts to an accusation of making shiat up by doing something that looks an awful lot like making shiat up... and I find that amusing.
 
2013-02-12 12:08:39 PM

NateGrey: I responded to you a month ago with this article, here you go again, catch up:

Report: Benghazi 'Talking Points' Watered Down By CIA

Proceed Republican.


"Proceed Republican." ... face palm.

I've explained this a dozen times, the CIA did not "water down" that part of the story that claimed the attack spontaneously arose from a non-existent protest.  There was NEVER any evidence to support that, and it was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, the FBI's evidence, and the DoD's position. The video "cover" story is not even mentioned in that NPR article you cited.

So that story does not at all contradict what I said.  Although it does contradict quatchi's posts, which i have pointed out repeatedly.  But he's on your side, Party before progress huh sport?
 
2013-02-12 12:14:47 PM

incendi: Ah, so nothing, actually, to do with NateGrey's "reality".


I point out that image was wrong.
Troll Nate comes in and claims that i am dealing with my own reality.
I point out that what I had been doing is correcting errors like that false graphic
You come in and white knight him
I point you to the picture
You agree it was wrong and
I'm still the bad guy.

Check
 
2013-02-12 12:48:57 PM

halfof33: You agree it was wrong and
I'm still the bad guy.


I never had any particular interest in the picture, other than you made it into someone else's position with no particular evidence that they believe it. I didn't even call you a bad guy (this time), just noted that you respond to an assertion that you make shiat up by making shiat up. It's funny. You might have even had a point about his accusation in that very particular circumstance if you hadn't then gone completely off reservation with your "NateGrey's reality", which ultimately only served to prove his point instead.
 
2013-02-12 01:03:47 PM

incendi: You might have even had a point about his accusation in that very particular circumstance if you hadn't then gone completely off reservation with your "NateGrey's reality", which ultimately only served to prove his point instead.


FACE PALM.  Hey white knight, thanks for getting involved!!  Lets, once again, go to the tape.

halfof33: This is why I participate in these threads, to correct the glaring obvious mistakes that contaminate these threads.


NateGrey: halfof33: This is why I participate in these threads

To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.


halfof33: NateGrey: To ignore reality and substitute your own? We know, you are a Republican.

Nate Grey's reality: 1. The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice

2. 53 Americans died as the result of attacks on American diplomatic facilities during the Bush administration

3. Non-partisan organization "Fact Check dot org" is "Republican."

Facts are non-partisan, Nate, too bad you are so partisan you'll never understand that.

Welcome to reality Sport.


Summary:

me: I correct the glaring obvious mistakes that contaminate these threads
Troll: you make up your own reality
me: give several examples of actual Facts i posted in this thread, that are not consistent with Troll's version of "reality"
Troll: admits he doesn't care, is a just a partisan knucklehead
White Knight:  DERP!

Thanks for thread shiatting white knight, he probably won't sleep with you but you can jerk each off.
 
2013-02-12 01:12:44 PM

halfof33: Summary:


It's cool, you can keep believing your version if you like.
 
2013-02-12 01:15:10 PM
www.bitlogic.com
 
2013-02-12 01:16:02 PM

incendi: halfof33: Summary:

It's cool, you can keep believing your version if you like.


My version?  you mean the posts I quoted in a discussion in which you were not farking involved, champ? Yeah, I'm going to go with that version, and why don't you mind your own farking business?  kthx

/Oh White knight, he loves you so.
 
2013-02-12 01:25:08 PM
halfof33:

You attributed all those points to me, which I didnt say, and which are wrong. Yet somehow you are correct? Definitely a Republican.
 
2013-02-12 01:43:30 PM

NateGrey: halfof33:

You attributed all those points to me, which I didnt say, and which are wrong. Yet somehow you are correct? Definitely a Republican.


You said that I was making up my own reality, troll, so that naturally means that the things I had posted in this thread were not your reality, so in your partisan world 53 Americans died at Consulates during the Bush administration (even though in my reality and in fact that is false), and The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice.  Which is absolutely farking ludicrous.

Man, I get that you are a partisan troll, sport, but an incompetent partisan troll?  Wow, I'm guessing you are a Democrat, huh?

lolz.
 
2013-02-12 01:51:52 PM
Yes, there were attacks on embassies and/or consulates during Bush's term, but...! Not all of the people killed were American! So it doesn't count.
 
2013-02-12 02:01:38 PM

halfof33: NateGrey: halfof33:

You attributed all those points to me, which I didnt say, and which are wrong. Yet somehow you are correct? Definitely a Republican.

You said that I was making up my own reality, troll, so that naturally means that the things I had posted in this thread were not your reality, so in your partisan world 53 Americans died at Consulates during the Bush administration (even though in my reality and in fact that is false), and The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice.  Which is absolutely farking ludicrous.

Man, I get that you are a partisan troll, sport, but an incompetent partisan troll?  Wow, I'm guessing you are a Democrat, huh?

lolz.


Aw, you sound so frustrated. Like the crazy person on the side of the road with his cardboard sign talking about conspiracies. Maybe one day Benghazi will be a scandal. If you knew the facts this wouldnt be so confusing for you. Whats that thing where you attribute all these points to someone and tear it down? lol
 
2013-02-12 02:07:08 PM
friendo, sport, champ, bro, big guy, brah, buuuuuudEE, sport shirt...
 
2013-02-12 02:09:58 PM

propasaurus: Yes, there were attacks on embassies and/or consulates during Bush's term, but...! Not all of the people killed were American! So it doesn't count.


Well lets break that down: the trolling graphic specifically stated they were Americans, didn't it. Yes it did, and it says right on the bottom "Yes, they are that insane." Hmmm, so they lied and are using it to make their stupid point

But perhaps you have a point, perhaps what they meant to say in their stupid farking fake graphic was 53 people were killed. Perhaps.  Except for the fact that they are missing something pretty farking significant fact:

the African Embassy Bombings in 1998 where 223 People Died and OVER 4000 People were injured.  Oh but that wasn't while a Republican president was President, so those people don't count.

But go ahead and keep justifying that piece of farking partisan trolling shiat.

Thanks.
 
2013-02-12 02:11:40 PM
fark you
 
2013-02-12 02:12:37 PM

NateGrey: halfof33: NateGrey: halfof33:

You attributed all those points to me, which I didnt say, and which are wrong. Yet somehow you are correct? Definitely a Republican.

You said that I was making up my own reality, troll, so that naturally means that the things I had posted in this thread were not your reality, so in your partisan world 53 Americans died at Consulates during the Bush administration (even though in my reality and in fact that is false), and The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice.  Which is absolutely farking ludicrous.

Man, I get that you are a partisan troll, sport, but an incompetent partisan troll?  Wow, I'm guessing you are a Democrat, huh?

lolz.

Aw, you sound so frustrated. Like the crazy person on the side of the road with his cardboard sign talking about conspiracies. Maybe one day Benghazi will be a scandal. If you knew the facts this wouldnt be so confusing for you. Whats that thing where you attribute all these points to someone and tear it down? lol


Oopps!  Say trolly, I can attribute them to you because you farked up and said that my points "were wrong."  So saddle up sally, and take a ride to farking flavor country.
 
2013-02-12 02:15:59 PM

propasaurus: fark you


Awww, and you thought you were being so clever!
 
2013-02-12 02:20:42 PM

halfof33: propasaurus: fark you

Awww, and you thought you were being so clever!


Near as I can tell THIS is the first and only time I've responded to you.
 
2013-02-12 02:21:24 PM
sally
 
2013-02-12 02:23:00 PM

halfof33: NateGrey: halfof33: NateGrey: halfof33:

You attributed all those points to me, which I didnt say, and which are wrong. Yet somehow you are correct? Definitely a Republican.

You said that I was making up my own reality, troll, so that naturally means that the things I had posted in this thread were not your reality, so in your partisan world 53 Americans died at Consulates during the Bush administration (even though in my reality and in fact that is false), and The administration did not say that the attack was spawned by the anti-video protests going on in the region that was speculation by Susan Rice.  Which is absolutely farking ludicrous.

Man, I get that you are a partisan troll, sport, but an incompetent partisan troll?  Wow, I'm guessing you are a Democrat, huh?

lolz.

Aw, you sound so frustrated. Like the crazy person on the side of the road with his cardboard sign talking about conspiracies. Maybe one day Benghazi will be a scandal. If you knew the facts this wouldnt be so confusing for you. Whats that thing where you attribute all these points to someone and tear it down? lol

Oopps!  Say trolly, I can attribute them to you because you farked up and said that my points "were wrong."  So saddle up sally, and take a ride to farking flavor country.


lol I farked up? Your points are wrong and idiotic. The entertainment value though is great. You usually get owned within one or two posts of your lies and half quotes. MrTraveler1 tore you a new one with your CIA lies and you put him on ignore. Why anyone tries to have a conversation with a liar is their business. The CIA timeline is out there and you continue from square one. Since you are so slow, I prefer to make fun of you through pictures. I hope you put me on ignore so I can make fun of you without responding to you.

"Hey did you know Barry was MIA the whole night??? Where was he!! Brennan told everyone to stand down! Hook em!!! DERP \m/"
 
2013-02-12 02:25:16 PM

halfof33: the African Embassy Bombings in 1998 where 223 People Died and OVER 4000 People were injured.  Oh but that wasn't while a Republican president was President, so those people don't count.


And yet, we're hearing a lot more whining about Obama than we did about Clinton over the attacks on our embassies.
 
2013-02-12 02:35:00 PM

NateGrey: MrTraveler1 tore you a new one with your CIA lies and you put him on ignore.


Uh, you mean where I pointed out a dozen times that the CIA didn't alter the lies about the non-existent protest? LETS GO TO THE TAPE!

halfof33: I've explained this a dozen times, the CIA did not "water down" that part of the story that claimed the attack spontaneously arose from a non-existent protest. There was NEVER any evidence to support that, and it was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, the FBI's evidence, and the DoD's position. The video "cover" story is not even mentioned in that NPR article you cited.

So that story does not at all contradict what I said. Although it does contradict quatchi's posts, which i have pointed out repeatedly. But he's on your side, Party before progress huh sport?


Oh man, I already responded to YOU on this and you ignored it.  This thread is turning into a blood bath for partisan trolls like you.

Oh yeah baby!
 
2013-02-12 02:52:31 PM

halfof33: This thread is turning into a blood bath for partisan trolls like you


Heh, this is why you get accused of making up your own reality.
 
2013-02-12 03:45:42 PM

halfof33: NateGrey: MrTraveler1 tore you a new one with your CIA lies and you put him on ignore.

Uh, you mean where I pointed out a dozen times that the CIA didn't alter the lies about the non-existent protest? LETS GO TO THE TAPE!

halfof33: I've explained this a dozen times, the CIA did not "water down" that part of the story that claimed the attack spontaneously arose from a non-existent protest. There was NEVER any evidence to support that, and it was DIRECTLY inconsistent with the State Department's position, the FBI's evidence, and the DoD's position. The video "cover" story is not even mentioned in that NPR article you cited.

So that story does not at all contradict what I said. Although it does contradict quatchi's posts, which i have pointed out repeatedly. But he's on your side, Party before progress huh sport?

Oh man, I already responded to YOU on this and you ignored it.  This thread is turning into a blood bath for partisan trolls like you.

Oh yeah baby!


Wait, so Benghazi is a scandal? lol
 
2013-02-12 03:55:31 PM

NateGrey: Report: Benghazi 'Talking Points' Watered Down By CIA

Proceed Republican.


Somebody post this, because this troll apparently has me (and everyone else who makes reference to it) on ignore:

"The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations."
 Rather than attempting to engage or argue with this troll, anybody tempted to respond should just post this link, and nothing more. It seems to be the one thing that he can't even formulate a troll response to.
 
2013-02-12 04:29:37 PM

halfof33: Uh, you mean where I pointed out a dozen times that the CIA didn't alter the lies about the non-existent protest?


"The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations." Link
 
Displayed 50 of 387 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report