ZAZ: I GISed the original (not at work). Good painting. Art must have been in a realistic phase instead of an impressionistic phase.
Coco LaFemme: I've seen the original painting, and I never understood why some people now have a problem with it. I could understand at the time, the graphic and blunt nature of the work shocking the more delicate sensibilities of the age, but today? That's less ribald than you'd see in Hustler, Penthouse, or any porn movie currently available.
kimwim: And yet no one has posted it here. Fark I am disappoint.
Gothicindustrial: Somebody's popping tags...
rickane58: I disagree with TFA. Dream of the Fisherman's Wife is clearly the naughtiest work.
Paris1127: rickane58: I disagree with TFA. Dream of the Fisherman's Wife is clearly the naughtiest work.Disagrees (consider it NSFW, just to be safe)/caused a double take when I was at the Louvre
FlashHarry: rickane58: I disagree with TFA. Dream of the Fisherman's Wife is clearly the naughtiest work.so japanese tentacle porn is 200 years old? who knew?
Devolving_Spud: What Courbet's L'Origine du Monde may look like.
Munchkin City Coroner: Devolving_Spud: What Courbet's L'Origine du Monde may look like.[i218.photobucket.com image 473x414]No, no, no, Spud. This one is supposed to go first and when someone asks for the original, then we post yours.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Aug 22 2017 21:01:30
Runtime: 0.404 sec (404 ms)