If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Jim Carrey talking out of his ass again   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 15
    More: Interesting, Jim Carrey, assault rifles, Bob Costas, liberal elite  
•       •       •

11358 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 07 Feb 2013 at 1:38 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-02-07 12:37:37 PM
3 votes:
Jim Carrey is from Canada.

Maybe if Canada had a 2nd amendment, they wouldn't have lost the war of 1812.
2013-02-07 01:51:36 PM
2 votes:
coedmagazine.files.wordpress.com
2013-02-07 11:46:21 AM
2 votes:
Maybe he had too many vaccine shots?
2013-02-07 05:23:51 PM
1 votes:

Cup_O_Jo: Anyone who agrees with what he said has no concept of what the 2nd is. It is to protect us from GOVERNMENT. THE END.


Why do I hear banjos playing dixie when I read your post?
2013-02-07 03:45:31 PM
1 votes:

oldfarthenry: vernonFL: Jim Carrey is from Canada.

Maybe if Canada had a 2nd amendment, they wouldn't have lost the war of 1812.


Explain to me, Cletus how this is winning?
[i1151.photobucket.com image 583x240]


symonsez.files.wordpress.com

Guess we lost this war too, huh?
2013-02-07 03:29:57 PM
1 votes:

DirkValentine: Dimensio: DirkValentine: dittybopper: Mangoose: xanadian: They probably ran out to buy AR15s not because they were thinking, hey, I wanna be on national TV, too!   But because they rightly predicted the potential backlash:  people wanting to (and may or may not be successful) ban "assault weapons."

I'm willing to stand by my statement. If your reaction to Newton was "Oh shiat, better get a gun!", you = soul-less cock-demon*.

Actually, it's rational economic behavior, if you expect some sort of a ban.  Here is why:

First, if you assume that any sort of a ban will have a "grandfather clause", exempting weapons that were owned at the time the ban was enacted, that will only make those guns with those certain cosmetic features more valuable after the ban:  The cost of "pre-ban" assault weapons rose steadily after the start of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, and dropped after the ban sunset.

Second, if you assume that the ban will also include some sort of mandatory turn-in, the government would be required to compensate you for your guns.  If you produce a receipt saying you purchased that gun for $1,200 a few months ago, the government would be constitutionally required to cut you a check for that amount.

Really, there is no way for you to lose from an economic standpoint:  You either make a profit in the future, or, at the very worst, you break even.

That's why it's economically rational to purchase guns in the face of a possible ban.

You are truly on the the finest gun apologists around.  You will come to their defense and never back down. You are always right.

Thanks for being so ideologically consistent, and a complete insensitive jerk to boot.

Your observation is apt; only a "jerk" would present a rational and fact-based explanation.

No, it's the fact that all he ever posts in gun threads is pedantic arguments that don't even remotely address the fact that there is a major problem with gun violence in this country.

You want a fact to deal with :

We are 1 ...


I understand now. dittybopper is a "jerk" for providing a direct, relevant reply to a post, rather than changing the subject to address a topic not directly relevant to the post to which he was responding.
2013-02-07 02:42:10 PM
1 votes:
It seems like a disproportionate number of 2nd amendment supporters have a problem with people exercising their 1st amendment rights.
2013-02-07 02:34:58 PM
1 votes:
Sssssssmokin'!!!

Barrels
2013-02-07 02:13:25 PM
1 votes:
Don't worry, guns.  Someone will be here to rescue you from the bad nasty man that talks out of his ass for laughs.
2013-02-07 01:51:52 PM
1 votes:
i240.photobucket.com
2013-02-07 01:41:28 PM
1 votes:

Because People in power are Stupid: People should go out and buy more guns to prevent mass killings like the one in Sandy Hook?


Guns don't kill people, violent video games kill people.
2013-02-07 01:27:45 PM
1 votes:
Women having sex for pleasure angers right
2013-02-07 01:25:49 PM
1 votes:
Jim Carrey 'Assault Rifle' Tweet Everything Angers Right

That's more like it.
2013-02-07 11:59:16 AM
1 votes:

Mangoose: I agree. If Newton made you want to run out and buy a gun, you're a soul-less cock-demon. There are plenty of good reasons to buy a gun, that is not one of them.


They probably ran out to buy AR15s not because they were thinking, hey, I wanna be on national TV, too!   But because they rightly predicted the potential backlash:  people wanting to (and may or may not be successful) ban "assault weapons."

I think those that ran out to buy assault rifles aren't necessarily soulless shiatbags, but people who help keep The Reynolds Wrap company in business.

I have people on my FB feed who are so worried "nObama" is gonna personally bust down their doors and take their guns WHILE raping their dog and drinking all their beer.  It's ridiculous.  I ask them, "OK, what do YOU suggest we do to keep guns out of the hands of the irresponsible and/or criminally insane?"
2013-02-07 11:51:44 AM
1 votes:
img46.imageshack.us

The Border Patrol responds.
 
Displayed 15 of 15 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report