another cultural observer: ABQGOD: Homosexuality exists in 1500 species, homophobia in only one.

Maybe, but animals are pretty racist.

Greyhounds are . . .

/Really, I'm the first?

JohnAnnArbor: I remember several years back that Martina Navratilova got all upset about agricultural research.  Really.  There was a project to figure out how to minimize the occurrence of rams mounting other rams instead of sheep, simply for reasons of productivity.  She was all enraged, saying how DARE you even consider such heresy.  They were all like, we're studying SHEEP.  Get a grip.

That study sounds pretty ewesful, actually

He did seem to be licking his balls a little longer than the other dogs . . .

I hope the new owner names him "Bear".

Don't be be gay, Sparky!

/roll over
//play dead
///don't be gay

This is why inbreeding is illegal.....and no I'm not talking about the dog.

Cythraul: GAT_00: Cythraul: FirstNationalBastard: Well, they can't put gay humans to death like they want to, so they have to take it out on the animals.

Yeah, I hate to be all hyperbolic, but anyone who can do this to an animal for suspected homosexual activity makes me wonder about their attitude towards human homosexuals.

Or, since the dog got adopted within two days - tinfoil on - the dog's nothing of the sort, but it was an owner that couldn't afford to take care of it anymore, but wanted to make sure the dog didn't have to die.  So he turned him into a cause celebere.

Do you think the owner is that smart?

Well, I thought it up, so it's more than possible.

Gay still means "happy", folks.

snowjack: mooseyfate: Terrydatroll: mooseyfate: Terrydatroll: vicioushobbit: Terrydatroll: ausfahrk: I hope the new owner names him "Bear".

What foolish statement? I merely stated my opinion which reflects the opinion of most non-pitbull fantics. They are a breed that should not exist in a modern society.

Silly troll can't even respond to the right person.  I'm not a pit bull fanatic.  I've merely met several of them.  I've been bitten bloody by more errant chihuahuas than barked at loudly by pitt bulls.  Guess which group of dogs had responsible owners?

I agreel. Little dogs are more vicious and nip and snap. Big dogs are usually calmer but when they do bite it is more damaging. When pitbulls attack it is met by horrible disfigurment and/or death because that is what they were bred for. Rottweilers have taken the top spot in recent years for mangling attacks because of the proliferation of the breed and the asshats who usually own them, but they don't usually turn on their owners and owners family. Pitbulls were bred for one reason and being pets wasn't one of them.

Not even 200 years ago, Black people in this country were being bred like animals for one reason. Something tells me your opinion of them is quite similar to your opinion of Pit Bulls. You've probably never considered that we, as humans, are such terrible sacks of shiat, we can't even be trusted to raise a dog, let alone treat a fellow human like a farking HUMAN.

?

I know, posting a response to someone with "troll" in their name is a confusing thing to do, but I did it anyway.

If you're gonna make his post dodge the ignore filter I had on him, at least add something interesting afterward, OK?

You can't put enough seasoning on a piece of shiat to make it edible.

zabadu: My dog gives himself blow jobs and does not hump anything.  What does that make him?
<img src="http://imageshack.us/a/img826/2329/75454919.jpg" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/><br/>

My hero.

zabadu: My dog gives himself blow jobs and does not hump anything.  What does that make him?
<img src="http://imageshack.us/a/img826/2329/75454919.jpg" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/><br/>

Probably pretty happy I would guess.

another cultural observer: ABQGOD: Homosexuality exists in 1500 species, homophobia in only one.

Maybe, but animals are pretty racist.

They only breed with others from their own kind. Sounds pretty racist to me.

ABQGOD: Homosexuality exists in 1500 species, homophobia in only one.

cows?



or would that be chickens?

ABQGOD: Homosexuality exists in 1500 species, homophobia in only one.

You have no idea why animals kill each other. Until you can read animal minds like Dr. Doo-Little, I'd toss this little "factoid" aside.

/It sounded pretty, though

This owner is stupid.  Animals have no souls, they can be as gay as they want.
There's no tiny hell for gay dog sodomites.

OMG! Keep the PitBulls away from humanzzzzz!!!

Elegy: /never call a black man from the south a "punk"

The prefer to be addressed as "boy".

lunkhed: Anybody who owns a Pit or American Bull is going to be too stupid to understand much about animal behaviour.

Yeah, I've known a few owners of such things, all were stupider than the animals.

You're right, the plural of anecdote is data.

lunkhed: Anybody who owns a Pit or American Bull is going to be too stupid to understand much about animal behaviour.

Yeah, I've known a few owners of such things, all were stupider than the animals.

The AR-15 of the Dog world?

Sensationalized incidents of horrible violence, despite smaller varieties actually doing more damage...Defended to the death by owners while others shake their heads, and ask "Is there a good reason you NEED one of these?"

abfalter: My FEMALE dog "mounts" her brother sometimes basically to say in doggie language "You are my biatch now!"

What's great is when you have two female dogs, and you yell at one of them for something they did, and the other comes running over and humps the crap out of them for good measure.  You know, just to help, Daddy.

When I was a kid, me and some friends saw a raccoon humping another raccoon. We thought it was funny, and then they switched! Minds were blown. To this day, I still assume all raccoons are gay.

Interesting that the paper that spewed bile and outrageous homophobia over the death of a gay pop star should defend a "gay" dog by referring to Bruce Bagemihl's excellent (and sometimes hilarious) book, "Biological Exuberance". I can only conclude that they are massive hypocritical twats. Which is what I thought anyway about the Daily Fail.

kbronsito: [ecx.images-amazon.com image 300x300]
why not send the little guy here?

"He's doing something to his ass.  He's not kicking his ass, but definitely doing something to his ass"

That dog was dependent upon its Owner.  He loved his Owner, he obeyed his Owner, he had loyalty for his Owner, and his Owner provided for him.  That dog chose to be gay, which is an abomination in his Owner's eyes, and for that he was punished by his Owner as his Owner saw fit.

/until someone else adopts him.
//am i doing it right?

Cythraul: Terrydatroll: Putting the dog down because it is gay is the epitome of ignorant. Putting it down because it is a Pit Bull is the smart thing to do. Still, being a Pit Bull being put down for any reason is acceptable.

Well, technically that's not why the animal shelter is putting it down, that's just why the owner gave him up.

I agree 100%. The guy merely abandoned him. The whole "humping another male dog" was probably just an excuse and he was tired of caring for the animal so he took him to the shelter. I would have taken it behind the house and shot it in the  head if it were me, but then I have balls.

I love my dead gay dog!!!

That guy's next dog will be caught humping his girlfriend.

Putting the dog down because it is gay is the epitome of ignorant. Putting it down because it is a Pit Bull is the smart thing to do. Still, being a Pit Bull being put down for any reason is acceptable.