If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Barack Obama to Bashar al-Assad: Using chemical warfare on your civilians is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE...unless we do it first   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 174
    More: Scary, chemical weapons, Bashar al-Assad  
•       •       •

4254 clicks; posted to Politics » on 29 Jan 2013 at 11:25 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



174 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-30 01:38:39 AM

KarmicDisaster: LordJiro: KarmicDisaster: Daily Fail.  Nope.

Daily Fail citing Infowars, no less.

Infowars had some crazy claim that was featured on Fark about 6 months ago, but I can't remember exactly what it was. We were going to attack Iran the next week or something.


It would have happened, but brave InfoWars made it public, so Washington had to drop the plan.

/that's what infowars supporters believe
 
2013-01-30 01:39:40 AM
I Feel Like I'm Fixin To Die ...
For it's 1...2...3 what are we fightin' for...
We supported Iraq when they attacked Iran to cut off Iran's oil
We spanked Iraq when they attacked Kuwait for angle drilling under Iraq to steal Iraq's oil.
We attack Afghanistan for not kicking al Qaeda out, even though 16 of the 19, September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, then spend 12 years trying to kick al Qaeda out...unsuccessfully only 3257 American soldiers died because they hated our freedoms
We then invade Iraq with "ginned up" intelligence killing over 120,000 civilians(according to our own documents released by WikiLeaks) and allowing 4488 American soldiers to die.
We are using drone aircraft to kill foreigners AND American citizens with 5 civilians dying for every 1 "suspected terrorist" killed.
t3.gstatic.com
Remember the Maine
Gulf of Tonkin
Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
WMDs in Iraq
Read about "Operation Northwoods" if you don't believe America is capable of committing a False Flag attack
 
2013-01-30 01:43:19 AM

mediablitz: KarmicDisaster: LordJiro: KarmicDisaster: Daily Fail.  Nope.

Daily Fail citing Infowars, no less.

Infowars had some crazy claim that was featured on Fark about 6 months ago, but I can't remember exactly what it was. We were going to attack Iran the next week or something.

It would have happened, but brave InfoWars made it public, so Washington had to drop the plan.

/that's what infowars supporters believe


In fact, they flew the hardcopy of the plan out of Qatar using a black helicopter.
 
2013-01-30 01:46:44 AM

Satyagraha: I Feel Like I'm Fixin To Die ...
For it's 1...2...3 what are we fightin' for...
We supported Iraq when they attacked Iran to cut off Iran's oil
We spanked Iraq when they attacked Kuwait for angle drilling under Iraq to steal Iraq's oil.
We attack Afghanistan for not kicking al Qaeda out, even though 16 of the 19, September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, then spend 12 years trying to kick al Qaeda out...unsuccessfully only 3257 American soldiers died because they hated our freedoms
We then invade Iraq with "ginned up" intelligence killing over 120,000 civilians(according to our own documents released by WikiLeaks) and allowing 4488 American soldiers to die.
We are using drone aircraft to kill foreigners AND American citizens with 5 civilians dying for every 1 "suspected terrorist" killed.
[t3.gstatic.com image 182x276]
Remember the Maine
Gulf of Tonkin
Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
WMDs in Iraq
Read about "Operation Northwoods" if you don't believe America is capable of committing a False Flag attack


www.tinfoilonmyhead.com

The one person who proposed Operation Northwoods was run out of his position because the suggestion was viewed as completely abhorrent. Your paranoid, delusional argument is invalid.
 
2013-01-30 01:50:03 AM

zerkalo: If somebody doesn't lose their job at Daily Mail over this journalism is truly dead.


You're making the assumption that the Daily Mail actually cares about journalism.
 
2013-01-30 01:50:50 AM

ongbok: The same goes for any language. You can be fluent in Spanish, but trust me, if you go to a Spanish speaking country they will know you are not a native Spanish speaker.


Assuming all Spanish-speaking countries are equal = silliness.
 
2013-01-30 01:52:07 AM

BronyMedic: Satyagraha: I Feel Like I'm Fixin To Die ...
For it's 1...2...3 what are we fightin' for...
We supported Iraq when they attacked Iran to cut off Iran's oil
We spanked Iraq when they attacked Kuwait for angle drilling under Iraq to steal Iraq's oil.
We attack Afghanistan for not kicking al Qaeda out, even though 16 of the 19, September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, then spend 12 years trying to kick al Qaeda out...unsuccessfully only 3257 American soldiers died because they hated our freedoms
We then invade Iraq with "ginned up" intelligence killing over 120,000 civilians(according to our own documents released by WikiLeaks) and allowing 4488 American soldiers to die.
We are using drone aircraft to kill foreigners AND American citizens with 5 civilians dying for every 1 "suspected terrorist" killed.
[t3.gstatic.com image 182x276]
Remember the Maine
Gulf of Tonkin
Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
WMDs in Iraq
Read about "Operation Northwoods" if you don't believe America is capable of committing a False Flag attack

[www.tinfoilonmyhead.com image 215x182]

The one person who proposed Operation Northwoods was run out of his position because the suggestion was viewed as completely abhorrent. Your paranoid, delusional argument is invalid.


I love how these paranoid crazies point to "Operation Northwoods" It has been debunked so many times, you think they would actually pay attention to that.
 
2013-01-30 01:52:27 AM
I don't usually complain about what gets greened, because there are so many really lame green lights, but THIS sets a new standard for craptastic green lights.

Subby even buys into this stupidity, making it double-craptastic.

Just the tiniest bit of standards would be nice for this site.
 
2013-01-30 02:02:40 AM

Zeppelininthesky: BronyMedic: Satyagraha: I Feel Like I'm Fixin To Die ...
For it's 1...2...3 what are we fightin' for...
We supported Iraq when they attacked Iran to cut off Iran's oil
We spanked Iraq when they attacked Kuwait for angle drilling under Iraq to steal Iraq's oil.
We attack Afghanistan for not kicking al Qaeda out, even though 16 of the 19, September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, then spend 12 years trying to kick al Qaeda out...unsuccessfully only 3257 American soldiers died because they hated our freedoms
We then invade Iraq with "ginned up" intelligence killing over 120,000 civilians(according to our own documents released by WikiLeaks) and allowing 4488 American soldiers to die.
We are using drone aircraft to kill foreigners AND American citizens with 5 civilians dying for every 1 "suspected terrorist" killed.
[t3.gstatic.com image 182x276]
Remember the Maine
Gulf of Tonkin
Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
WMDs in Iraq
Read about "Operation Northwoods" if you don't believe America is capable of committing a False Flag attack

[www.tinfoilonmyhead.com image 215x182]

The one person who proposed Operation Northwoods was run out of his position because the suggestion was viewed as completely abhorrent. Your paranoid, delusional argument is invalid.

I love how these paranoid crazies point to "Operation Northwoods" It has been debunked so many times, you think they would actually pay attention to that.


You might want to click on Satyagraha's name, and read his profile. He's not a poe or troll. I think he's a real, live, Alex Jones drone.
 
2013-01-30 02:07:21 AM
First he fires all his military leaders who won't fire upon Americans, and now this? THIS MAN IS A MONSTER!
 
2013-01-30 02:09:10 AM

BronyMedic: The one person who proposed Operation Northwoods was run out of his position because the suggestion was viewed as completely abhorrent. Your paranoid, delusional argument is invalid.

Run out of his position...in Dallas...I get it
The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.[3] One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".

Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

I see, the fact that the entire Joint Chiefs drew up and unanimously approved a plan for a false flag attack (even as far as attacking US cities) to start a war...yup, that's delusional all right
 
2013-01-30 02:12:19 AM
The Government has already used drones to spray all of downtown Portland with LSD.

/it's the only explanation.
 
2013-01-30 02:18:45 AM

Satyagraha: BronyMedic: The one person who proposed Operation Northwoods was run out of his position because the suggestion was viewed as completely abhorrent. Your paranoid, delusional argument is invalid.
Run out of his position...in Dallas...I get it
The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.[3] One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".

Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff,but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

I see, the fact that the entire Joint Chiefs drew up and unanimously approved a plan for a false flag attack (even as far as attacking US cities) to start a war...yup, that's delusional all right


It was totally rejected and could never be implemented anyway. Plus the person who proposed it was fired.

The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence communities (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) had already prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hardline anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy had fired CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam. Kennedy had also stripped the CIA of responsibility for paramilitary operations like the Bay of Pigs and turned them over to the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which, as Commander in Chief, Kennedy could more directly control. Personally, Kennedy expressed outrage to many of his associates about the CIA's growing influence on civilians and government inside America[citation needed], and his attempt to curtail the CIA's extensive Cold War and paramilitary operations was a direct expression of this concern.
Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and it would now be the Joint Chiefs' turn to incur his displeasure. A JCS/Pentagon document (Ed Lansdale memo) dated 16 March 1962 titled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962 reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for U.S. intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on U.S. aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba."[21] The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, but was not implemented.
(Some fifty years later when asked about the plot by journalist David Talbot, Robert McNamara drew a blank. "I have absolutely zero recollection of it. But I sure as hell would have rejected it," McNamara said, adding, "I really can't believe that anyone was proposing such provocative acts in Miami. How stupid!" [22])
Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the Cuban Missile Crisis.
On 3 August 2001, the National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.[23]
 
2013-01-30 02:21:16 AM
This is farking retarded Flacco-approved stupid, considering our total non-involvement for the past, oh, 21 months of the revolt.
 
2013-01-30 02:30:29 AM
This is Alex Jones, the man in charge of InfoWars:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M

Worth a laugh, but keep in mind this maniac has a lot of followers.
 
2013-01-30 02:31:10 AM

Wayne 985: This is Alex Jones, the man in charge of InfoWars:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M

Worth a laugh, but keep in mind this maniac has a lot of followers.


Even better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M
 
2013-01-30 02:31:55 AM

Wayne 985: Wayne 985: This is Alex Jones, the man in charge of InfoWars:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M

Worth a laugh, but keep in mind this maniac has a lot of followers.

Even better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xog5FoODC4s

Yes, I'm inept.
 
2013-01-30 02:33:53 AM

Wayne 985: Wayne 985: This is Alex Jones, the man in charge of InfoWars:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M

Worth a laugh, but keep in mind this maniac has a lot of followers.

Even better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR2UXmTGK4M


This one's better Link
 
2013-01-30 02:50:58 AM
Reading this book right now, so I'm getting a kick from these comments.

www.american-buddha.com
 
2013-01-30 02:55:05 AM
So the Daily Mail said that InfoWars said that these contractors said that the Qataris said that Michelle Obama's hairdresser said that her friend Suzie's cousin who works at the Pentagon heard that her boss approved a chemical attack on Syria! I know, totally messed up, right?!
 
2013-01-30 02:56:23 AM
They're using Infowars as a source and this didn't get a Satire tag?
 
2013-01-30 03:30:28 AM

Gyrfalcon:
Imagine that you live next door to a man you know is abusing his family. You can hear through the walls every night as he beats his wife, whips his children, kicks the dog, yells, screams, until he drops into bed in a drunken stupor. You've seen the wife and kids stagger out of the house every day covered in bruises and bloody welts and god knows how many dogs you've buried. Now: Do you have the moral authority to kick down his door some night and murder him in his bed because of his awful acts? No.


But to do nothing while assault is knowingly being carried out and to do nothing is morally reprehensible. No one is asking for his murder, they are asking to intervene to stop the violence. If he gets killed because he doesn't cooperate and stand down, then that's his choice.

Wars and genocide are lesions in what not to allow happen if it's within your power to intercede. To sit idly by hand-wringing and tut-tutting is cowardice and questions your own moral superiority.
 
2013-01-30 03:36:51 AM

NewportBarGuy: Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: How many lives can be taken with conventional weapons before the world community steps in

Many, many, many, many, many... As long as it is their own people. We really don't give a sh*t. This is what I've learned.


As long as we can TELL ourselves it's their own people.  Half the time, they're just occupied people about whom we care little.
 
2013-01-30 03:42:45 AM

Satyagraha: Read about "Operation Northwoods" if you don't believe America is capable of committing a False Flag attack


The fact that it didn't happen kinds puts a damper on that assertion.  All you can say is that America is capable of CONSIDERING THEN REJECTING a false flag attack.

Kennedy: [about the Operation Northwoods] For a time, I was tempted by the offer.
Advisor: How long a time?
Kennedy: 0.68 seconds. For a President, that is nearly an eternity.
 
2013-01-30 04:20:49 AM

Lionel Mandrake: Fail in Human Form: Allow me to sum up Alex Jones' position on Syria. The NWO is desperate and is losing the fight for our firearms. We must be disarmed before they can start rounding us up in FEMA camps, destroy the dollar, impose Chinese style working conditions on us, and then exterminate 99% of the population with a bio weapon so the new "royalty" can use its robot army to run the Earth with the select few humans remaining. Since the government runs Al Qaida, they're going to be directed by the president (who is a puppet of the NWO) to gain access to chemical weapons and use them against Syrian people as a pretext for starting WWIII. Then ensuing destruction, and desperate population, will allow the NWO to further their agenda before "enough people wake up" and realize their plans (which I won't type out because there's wayyy to many to list).

/I did not make any of that up, that's exactly what he's saying everyday on his show

I gotta start tuning into this guy.  He sounds hilarious.


About a month ago, while whiling away the time waiting for my son's wrestling practice to end, I hit the tuner on the car radio to see what was worth listening to - when I discovered the joy that is the Alex Jones show. (BTW, it seems to alternate on my local station with any number of other "liberty" types. Some who seem to be more grounded in reality than others, but all of whom seemed to be convinced that there is some over-riding grand conspiracy of some sort being unleashed or managed by the "powers that be" to rule over us.) What was written and quoted above is a damned near verbatim account of what Alex Jones typically says.

But I will say, listening to Jones and his counterparts on the local "liberty" station has been very entertaining for the most part. I did not realize, until listening, that I was just one of the "sheeple" who was being controlled and manipulated by having had all of my vaccinations. By the "chemtrail" large scale population (mind control) agents being unleashed by the US Air Force on a daily basis. That the "government owned" media was being used to brainwash us ignorant masses into playing along with the conspiracy. And ultimately, I (and you) are being lead like innocent lambs to slaughter because we just didn't know the "truth." But, all the while we are blissfully unaware of the situation it is "brave souls" like Alex Jones who risk their lives, liberty and property by informing us of all of these things the NWO Govt is doing to us at such great personal sacrifice.

During the advertisements, dominated by MLM vitamin/mineral scams, emergency supply providers, like freeze dried meals and water decontamination units, along with "liberty" garden supplies to grow your own food for the upcoming Zombie apocalypse, I was completely surprised that no one was selling special "sunglasses" which would allow you to see things as they really are and help us identify the aliens among us who are really controlling things.

I really didn't know much about Jones until then, But it caused me to go back and read/listen to some of his earlier predictions and claims - what a hoot! To think that anyone with a functioning IQ above that of a glass of water could listen to this guy and think he had any credibility is simply astounding.
 
2013-01-30 04:45:28 AM
Ah, yes. Because Republicans would be so very very concerned about killing people who aren't them, because they totally are not selfish, idiot farkwads.
 
2013-01-30 05:05:48 AM

ongbok: FTFA:

It reads: 'Phil... We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.

Would a native English speaker even phrase this sentence like this? This really sounds like a non-native English speaker wrote this.


As a Native English speaker of 46+ years, I see nothing anomalous or unusual about this phraseology..

/I felt my username required I respond..
 
2013-01-30 05:20:58 AM

fusillade762: The Daily Mail sourcing Infowars? That's dividing the derp by zero.


Seriously? Has Fox News even done that?
 
2013-01-30 05:42:28 AM

Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: No, but that's not really the point of my question. This situation is more analogous to a shelter that routinely abuses their animals, and while we're more than willing to write a pointed op-ed column about it every so often, we scoff at the idea of adopting any of the animals still living inside because it would inconvenience us.


Great analogy.  Don't mind my slow clapping.
 
2013-01-30 05:44:19 AM

fusillade762: Reading this book right now, so I'm getting a kick from these comments.

[www.american-buddha.com image 558x866]


Jon Ronson?

upload.wikimedia.org

Please pick up the white courtesy phone.
 
2013-01-30 06:14:52 AM

fusillade762: The Daily Mail sourcing Infowars? That's dividing the derp by zero.


Came to say this. Who would have thought there way a way to make the Daily Fail even less trustworthy.
 
2013-01-30 06:15:58 AM
Any reasonable person stopped at: "According to infowars.com..." (the smart ones didn't even click the Daily Fail link).


"When we are alarmed with imaginary dangers in respect of the public, till the cry grows quite stale and threadbare, how can it be expected we should know when to guard ourselves against real ones?"

~Samuel Croxall  1722
 
2013-01-30 06:47:52 AM
Infowars claims that hackers claim that Britam claims that Qataris claim that the scheme is Washington-approved.

I think we're truely ready to impeach now.
 
2013-01-30 07:08:58 AM

The Repeated Meme: Wasn't there some SS officer at Nuremburg who got off because he proved Allied forces carried out the same actions he was accused of? A war crime can be defined as "something we didn't do."

/getting bored of the Middle East
//looking forward to the Scramble for Africa reboot


No. "Tu quoque" did not fly at Nuremberg. Lawyers who tried it soon found that out.

You might be thinking of a different trial. There were no SS officers at Nuremberg unless you count Speer, who had been a kind of honorary SS officer since the early 30s. Something to do with a motoring club, as I recall.
 
2013-01-30 07:18:16 AM

lawboy87: I was completely surprised that no one was selling special "sunglasses" which would allow you to see things as they really are and help us identify the aliens among us who are really controlling things.


Fark need, I want those lol

/CONSUME
 
2013-01-30 07:36:36 AM

vygramul: Satyagraha: Read about "Operation Northwoods" if you don't believe America is capable of committing a False Flag attack

The fact that it didn't happen kinds puts a damper on that assertion.  All you can say is that America is capable of CONSIDERING THEN REJECTING a false flag attack.

Kennedy: [about the Operation Northwoods] For a time, I was tempted by the offer.
Advisor: How long a time?
Kennedy: 0.68 seconds. For a President, that is nearly an eternity.


+2 (I added an extra point for making a Next Gen movie reference.)
 
2013-01-30 07:36:59 AM
Well... we did give Saddam bio/chem weapons, and then we replenished his supplies after he gassed the Kurds, so it wouldn't be out of character.
 
2013-01-30 07:41:58 AM

fusillade762: The Daily Mail sourcing Infowars? That's dividing the derp by zero.


I've noticed that Drudge has been linking to Infowars a lot. But, in almost every case, a quick Google search can find verification of whatever the story is from multiple, legitimate sources. I've come to the conclusion that the powers-that-be use Infowars to sway people into believing that something that happened didn't happen. And it works. People refuse to believe a lot of things that can be easily verified, just because their first knowledge of it came from Infowars. No wonder the politicians treat us like idiots; for the most part, we are.
 
2013-01-30 07:46:16 AM
sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net
 
2013-01-30 07:50:12 AM
i221.photobucket.com

Dsarti unavailable for comment
 
2013-01-30 07:51:30 AM

DrPainMD: fusillade762: The Daily Mail sourcing Infowars? That's dividing the derp by zero.

I've noticed that Drudge has been linking to Infowars a lot. But, in almost every case, a quick Google search can find verification of whatever the story is from multiple, legitimate sources. I've come to the conclusion that the powers-that-be use Infowars to sway people into believing that something that happened didn't happen. And it works. People refuse to believe a lot of things that can be easily verified, just because their first knowledge of it came from Infowars. No wonder the politicians treat us like idiots; for the most part, we are.


So, your conspiracy theory is the that the government is using conspiracy theorists to make us think legitimate stories are conspiracy theories.

i.qkme.me
 
2013-01-30 07:52:17 AM
i208.photobucket.com

I think this deserves a congressional investigation -Rand Paul
 
2013-01-30 07:54:01 AM

NobleHam: So the Daily Mail said that InfoWars said that these contractors said that the Qataris said that Michelle Obama's hairdresser said that her friend Suzie's cousin who works at the Pentagon heard that her boss approved a chemical attack on Syria! I know, totally messed up, right?!


I guess it's pretty serious.
 
2013-01-30 08:06:39 AM
You know, there's plenty of things this administration has done so catastrophically wrong that you really shouldn't need to make wildly unsubstantiated accusations that make no sense.

If we wanted an excuse to get involved in Syria do you really think we'd do something as silly as frame Assad with chemical weapons?
 
2013-01-30 08:09:21 AM
You mean like Ronald Reagan selling chemical weapons to Iraq, with Donald Rumsfeld brokering the sale so Saddam could gas the Kurds?
 
2013-01-30 08:21:34 AM
FTFA: It reads: 'Phil... We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.

While as solid as this source is, I am awaiting confirmation from my sister's friend's cousin's brother's barber's dog's veterinarian before I accept it as fact.
 
2013-01-30 08:32:54 AM

Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: doyner: No. If you already have the moral authority to act you don't need to compromise your position to do so.

That in itself is already a weird situation. If the rest of the world has the moral authority to act, why haven't they? Is a man less dead because he's killed with a bullet instead a nerve agent? How many lives can be taken with conventional weapons before the world community steps in, compared to how many can be taken with chemical weapons? Children are being tortured to death on a regular basis. Moral authority took a smoke break a few months ago.


Thing is, messing with a country's civil war can be a bit problematic. There's been a lot of times when that's gone to hell. Especially if the populous views the new regime as a puppet/creation of the foreign powers that intervened.
 
2013-01-30 08:35:57 AM

NewportBarGuy: Sgt Otter: So that's why they nick-named him "Boom-Boom!"

[i49.tinypic.com image 200x266]

"Please excuse U.S. forces from this free-for-all. Sincerely, Epstein's Mother."


What makes me sad is that both of those gentlemen are no longer with us. Sigh.

/good times, good times
 
2013-01-30 08:52:09 AM

randomjsa: You know, there's plenty of things this administration has done so catastrophically wrong that you really shouldn't need to make wildly unsubstantiated accusations that make no sense.

If we wanted an excuse to get involved in Syria do you really think we'd do something as silly as frame Assad with chemical weapons?


Plenty of things? Like?
 
2013-01-30 08:59:35 AM
The refusal to believe the United States would conduct a false flag operation is INSANE.
 
Displayed 50 of 174 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report